💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.4%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 279 39.6%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 173 24.6%

  • Total voters
    704
I'm 99.99% sure it was the January 31st STES starting at timestamp 19:53 when something in the room got him so excited that he almost did a spittake, set down his beer and made a "hello what's this" face at something, followed with his eyes as though that attention-getter gradually walked toward the end of his desk, and then made a big thing out of aiming, zooming, and tapping his phone camera toward that end of the desk.
Nick's still in denial. From This Little Piggy yesterday.
2025-04-12 - 07_48_35 - 🔴 THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025...png 2025-04-12 - 07_49_27 - 🔴 THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025...png 2025-04-12 - 07_50_03 - 🔴 THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025...png

2025-04-12 - 07_53_34 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png

Pissed about that MLC episode
2025-04-12 - 08_18_48 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png 2025-04-12 - 07_59_38 - 🔴 THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025...png 2025-04-12 - 07_58_29 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png
Coping
2025-04-12 - 08_13_32 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png 2025-04-12 - 08_15_09 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png 2025-04-12 - 08_23_46 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png
2025-04-12 - 08_26_10 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png
$5 superchat desperation
2025-04-12 - 08_09_41 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png 2025-04-12 - 08_10_54 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png 2025-04-12 - 08_09_53 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png
Still angry about the "destroyed body" clip
2025-04-12 - 08_13_09 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png

Aaron drinks... too little?
2025-04-12 - 08_19_06 - THIS LITTLE PIGGY_ A Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion (April 11, 2025) ...png
 
Last edited:
So naturally Nick Rekieta, a very busy man, was somehow in today's nonce chat for four fucking hours, because of course he was:

41125NLOChat.jpg

There's a lot to go through later, some new, some not, but one that stands out plenty is that despite pontificating so many times about what is "not his story to tell," he somehow felt that now is the time to allege before all the world that Aaron "hit" April in addition to the milder DV allegations previously stated in court documents, and that Keanu knows this from April and is deliberately covering it up for Aaron. As Aaron once rightly asked, at what point is this shit actionable?


Late.jpg

^Anyone want to tell him? :story:


EDIT: Had a hunch this'd get ninja'd, bravo!
 
Last edited:
“Well T’Pol, I suppose it would be logical if I took off my shirt so you can try your healing massage!”
"Oh no! Your pon farr has begun?! But it'll be days before our shuttle makes it to the quantum warp theory symposium on Nebulon VII!"
You guys managed to find Kayla's stash of Star Trek smut fanfiction, didn't you? Lol.
 
Lol what photo? Share it Nick and we can tell you if she knew it was taken. Why was she semi naked in his studio? Why was he obviously looking at her? This isn't a photo taken when sleeping situation.

Nick, why did you tell the cops it was shared in a signal chat? Are you saying there are so many naked photos floating around you don't know which one he sent Geno?
 
I love that we get another season of Breaking Balldo. The last season was explosive but the ending was weak. I just want actual palpable consequences this time around. Nick got off WAY too easy last time because our legal system is dog shit.

Nick has holes in his brain but even still he must surely understand nobody believes a fucking word he says anymore, right? Like he's admitted to the shit he spent months lying about now. How embarrassing.
 
One of the things that bothered me about those Tweets is the "bloody bedsheet" story. I am having a difficult time wrapping my head around most women thinking that's cool or sexy. I think that was wholely an invention of Nick's deranged mind because he does (as he now chides Aaron for being allegedly abusive towards women, no less).
Aaron owned Nick by owning his wife so much, she was happier spending time with him than her own husband. Nick tried to come back at that with Well you know what? I fucked YOUR wife so hard she pissed blood, and SHE LOVED IT. Simple as.

April being childlishly stupid and desperate for daddy's love agreed to debase herself like that. Either that or Nick wrote it and maybe asked her if he can post from her account.
 
"If only you knew how ruined this body truly is"
Aaron ruined Kayla's body. He literally smashed her to pieces.
But what I am wondering about is what snack I should enjoy while watching his life burn to the ground.
Sorry, balldofags, but court doesn't always work the way you think it does
*taco crunch* :smug:
First time I completed Bloodmoon, how the fuck is a game from 2003 that good?
It was the First Age, man. We're in the Fourth now and everything suuuucks!
Skelly has stated it wasn't infidelity in a sense most people would associate and suggested it could stretch so far as to being a hobby.
Skelly lies all the time about the most insignificant shit that doesn't matter every time he opens up his Big Fucking Cocksucker 9000 like a gaping maw of Chaos. If Skelly said Kayla didn't cheat on him in any conventional sense people understand, it means she emasculated him so hard and so often he now walks like a cuck and talks like a cuck. Because he's a CUCK.
 
$5 superchat desperation
Nick begging this fat pedophile to read out a $5 superchat is absolutely delicious. He can’t afford anything else. Nick should boot up a stream if he wants to tell his side of the story so badly.
Aaron drinks... too little?
I thought Aaron was totally a massive alcoholic. Did Nick… lie to us?
 
1744442088721.png

1744442212589.png


Nick is once again lying about easily provable facts. In Aaron's arrest warrant, it is clearly defined as an image that was taken from their faggot swinger Signal groupchat.
Lets give Nick a bit of doubt, lets say it was a picture of her naked and asleep.
But it was still posted in their group chat. She must've seen it. Are we seriously expected to believe she wasn't aware of the photo in question? The report fails to state that she immediately demanded its deletion. Aaron didn't keep an offline copy against her will, in the offending livestream, he had to scroll back in the Signal groupchat to re-discover it.

1744443104235.png

1744442597546.png

This is proof this balldonigger can't let it go. The court has given Kayla the justice it believes is fair. Now he's desperately fishing for evidence to worsen his sentence. An average viewer (who isn't a vengeful cuckold) clearly would've seen Aaron was very uncomfortable with the questions being asked on the MLC podcast and even ducked out. But no, Nick NEEDS to get the felony reintroducted.

"Maybe she will" in response to the idea that the judge will see the MLC podcast. But Nick, this is Kayla's case right! - right? How can you know Kayla will submit evidence against Aaron? (hint: its because he will punch his head if she doesn't)
Aaron said Nick's victim impact statement was twice as long as Kayla's. That's because in reality, this has been a self-inflicted crime against his cuckold manhood.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 7209420
View attachment 7209421

Nick is once again lying about easily provable facts. In Aaron's arrest warrant, it is clearly defined as an image that was taken from their faggot swinger Signal groupchat.
Lets give Nick a bit of doubt, lets say it was a picture of her naked and asleep.
But it was still posted in their group chat. She must've seen it. Are we seriously expected to believe she wasn't aware of the photo in question? The report fails to state that she immediately demanded its deletion. Aaron didn't keep an offline copy against her will, in the offending livestream, he had to scroll back in the Signal groupchat to re-discover it.

View attachment 7209434
This is proof this balldonigger can't let it go. The court has given Kayla the justice it believes is fair. Now he's desperately fishing for evidence to worsen his sentence.
Aaron said Nick's victim impact statement was twice as long as Kayla's. That's because in reality, this has been a self-inflicted crime against his cuckold manhood.
What he is trying to say is that because there are so many naked photos of Kayla floating around, he was initially comfused which photo was shared. To his shock evil Aaron wasnt satisfied with the signal photos and decided to catch Kayla in a state of semi undress, while he was working on his show in his studio.

Yes, Nick, that makes Aaron much worse. What a fucking cope. She posed for it and loved it, as she was trying to seduce him on camera.
 
Nick is once again lying about easily provable facts. In Aaron's arrest warrant, it is clearly defined as an image that was taken from their faggot swinger Signal groupchat.
No, it does not say that. Please don't distort the facts. They always only talked about pictures being shared, and conflated it with using Signal. At no point in time was it claimed the picture was from from a Signal group chat, from a Signal chat or even from any chat between all parties. They only brought the Signal Chats in to support the expectation of privacy argument, which is a required element for the initial charge. Nick arranged it so he had 3 people on his side claiming a privacy expectation based on direct agreement of all involved parties.

[EDIT] For clarity, I am not saying this is the truth, I am simply restating Nick's narrative to put it in perspective how he is trying to spin the story.

The logic here being: "We were in a polyamorous relationship, having free marriage swinger sex with each other, and we sexted and talked about those activities on Signal and shared pictures, but we all agreed that all this would be PRIVATE among us four, therefore any picture of my wife's destroyed body is private too". Which I cannot fault Nick for, that logic is actually solid. Of course a nude is private by default imho.

We had this discussion before in this thread. Their statements to the police and this summary of those statements are not clear about where the supposed picture was from, because they did not have that picture and their only source for the info that a picture was shared were Geno and Keanu.
 
Last edited:
No, it does not say that. Please don't distort the facts. They always only talked about pictures being shared, and conflated it with using Signal. At no point in time was it claimed the picture was from from a Signal group chat, from a Signal chat or even from any chat between all parties. They only brought the Signal Chats in to support the expectation of privacy argument, which is a required element for the initial charge. Nick arranged it so he had 3 people on his side claiming a privacy expectation based on direct agreement of all involved parties.

The logic here being: "We were in a polyamorous relationship, having free marriage swinger sex with each other, and we sexted and talked about those activities on Signal and shared pictures, but we all agreed that all this would be PRIVATE among us four, therefore any picture of my wife's destroyed body is private too". Which I cannot fault Nick for, that logic is actually solid. Of course a nude is private by default imho.

We had this discussion before in this thread. Their statements to the police and this summary of those statements are not clear about where the supposed picture was from, because they did not have that picture and their only source for the info that a picture was shared were Geno and Keanu.
I'm assuming this is real. KR sent nude photos via Signal.
1744442212589.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The logic here being: "We were in a polyamorous relationship, having free marriage swinger sex with each other, and we sexted and talked about those activities on Signal and shared pictures, but we all agreed that all this would be PRIVATE among us four, therefore any picture of my wife's destroyed body is private too". Which I cannot fault Nick for, that logic is actually solid. Of course a nude is private by default imho.

I struggle to believe this, TBH. As you say, a nude is private by default. Given that, it seems unlikely that you'd hammer out an explicit agreement prior to sharing them with other polycule members. And if you HAD done that, surely you'd do it on Signal and there'd be a record of said agreement that you'd put before the court.

I think this is another example of Rekieta telling lies to over-egg the pudding.
 
I'm assuming this is real. KR sent nude photos via Signal.
No, it says that "pictures were shared via Signal".
That could be any type of picture, not a nude, and sent by anyone.

You are just reading into that because of the context. But Nick is a vague-talking faggot and they let people fill in the blanks.

I struggle to believe this, TBH. As you say, a nude is private by default. Given that, it seems unlikely that you'd hammer out an explicit agreement prior to sharing them with other polycule members. And if you HAD done that, surely you'd do it on Signal and there'd be a record of said agreement that you'd put before the court.

I think this is another example of Rekieta telling lies to over-egg the pudding.
Sorry, I should have been clearer that I am only restating what their witness statements are, not that what they told Police is the absolute truth.
Nick is simply trying to frame it in a certain manner so that anyone who reads this fills in the blanks the way he wants them to.

Like people read it as: "We had a Signal group chat" and "nudes were shared on Signal". Thereby understanding it as the Qover having a shared nudes on a shared group chat and that Kayla's nude was part of that. (Thereby putting that specific nude under the umbrella of their supposed privacy agreement)

It has been a story from the start that was only ever intended to present Aaron in as bad a light as possible.
Sadly for Nick this entire narrative just died, because Aaron left the video up and dropped the info that he took the picture on stream, which means Kayla walked into his studio naked while he was live on air, completely destroying the idea that "Aaron took the picture without her knowledge".

Everything Nick says or had his witnesses say for the police reports has to be understood as the faggot trying to spin his narrative.
 
I struggle to believe this, TBH. As you say, a nude is private by default. Given that, it seems unlikely that you'd hammer out an explicit agreement prior to sharing them with other polycule members. And if you HAD done that, surely you'd do it on Signal and there'd be a record of said agreement that you'd put before the court.
Well, Nick and Aaron both seem to be in agreement that Nick tried to get Aaron to sign an NDA. Not just for photos, but talking about what went went on in polycule in general. It didn't happen, and Nick has repeatedly indicated he's bitter about it.

That still slays me, BTW. Normally NDAs are used for things like preserving trade secrets.

Imagine your degenerate shit being so embarrassing you have to try and legally bind somebody to never discuss it. It's almost like some part of Nick knew this whole thing was REALLY bad idea.
 
It literally says "K.R sent nude photographs via signal" on line 3...

I get people comfused this with a group chat, but....
Yes, and it never says who they were sent to and this case was about a picture neither Nick, April or Kayla could provide to the police, because it was never sent via Signal. Even if Kayla shared other pictures on Signal, the witness statements never claim this particular picture was shared on there.

You are just filling in the blanks that the picture the case was supposedly about was part of a Signal group chat.

It is intentionally vague.

Not once is it stated clearly that the picture the entire case hinged upon was part of those Signal text messages, when it was sent and by whom.
Which makes sense because it was never part of the Signal chats. Aaron took it, you can even see him zoom in for a better upper body shot in the video.
He was the only person who ever had the picture, and that is the one he sent to Geno. It was never in any Signal chat.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom