I genuinely think if it came to an actual war, china would win if it became a war of attrition. The US population I am convinced doesn’t have the stomach for the type of war that we have seen in Ukraine, and the US equipment while advanced, costs way too goddamn much to be used in a prolonged engagement. China at least has the ability to send endless meat to the grinder
the danger of a little correct knowledge/information leading to a conclusion that in theory or on paper could be seen as "logical"
is the US population very sad and cringe and gay right now for the most part? Yes
But your missing ALL the forest for an admittedly big, single tree, that being the idea that American population is to "weak" to fight a war so far from us.
So lets address your 2 points 1 at a time shall we? This will be a slightly fun by highly useful look into how history can help inform how certain geopolitical events will unfold.
1. your first point being Americans are gay and decadent with no stomach for war, they are to bastardized, niggerized and owned lock stock and barrel by the jews to have any ability to wish to fight a long term war let alone arm and supply such a fighting force so far from their own shores.
You might be thinking "hmm that sounds like your mis representing his point a little" Yes cunning reader I am, the above statement is a very slightly and I do mean that genuinely, paraphrased quote from Hitler to his own high council during a daily Fuher meeting in 1940 in regards to americas chances of joining the war (Source is Rise and Fall Of the Third Reich, I can find the exact area he says it if pressed but know its there)
Your idea is a slightly more tame version of that and when you put the 2 next to eachother with the history we know followed its just kinda funny to think 80 years removed from the fall of his Reich that the Great grandsons of the men who toppled his little tin foil empire of 1,000 years in just under half a decade would be using nearly his same talking points to declare how their own nation was of such little character that they could not rise to fight tyranny again should it wish to growl and moan like its not to anciently slain kin. it would certainly seem to be very cruel irony indeed.
In case you skipped history class, a little less than 4 years after he would utter those words over a million of those decedent and bastard americans and their allies had shown up at his beach, thousands of miles from their own shore, build 2 floating harbors
we built fucking FLOATING HARBORS and unloaded 3 army groups worth of whoop ass onto dug in ENTRENCHED troops in concrete pillboxes with machine guns, artillery and mortars all scoped and sighted right on their position. I also want to tell anyone who dosent already know this.
SAVING PRIVATE RYAN FUCKED UP THE CLIFF SCALE
This is what OMAHA would have looked like, more or less, those cliffs were SHEER, there was no "scaling them" that was possible at some other beaches but not OMAHA, the boys there just more or less dug in at the center until the cliffs were flanked from much further than most realize, with some areas needing to be connected up from other beaches elements.
if you remeber my other post about dunkirk you will remember the British lost 68,000 men to hold the line long enough to evacuate their men, so how many did we lose on this, "day of days"? On this Cultural juggernaut of an event what all Americans think of as our greatest "sacrifice"?
Source
Maybe, MAYBE 12,000
thats not even a full division of troops, not to minimize ANY mans death but if 68,000 lost troops is and afterthought when 350,000 are evacuated, 12,000 to land over a million must be seen as nothing short of one of the most flawless and exceptional military plans even executed.
So my assertion is we could do it again