YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Atun-Shei reportedly broke down crying when Trump had a black man say negro during the benediction
Mr. Beat started “beating” himself up after seeing a Trump musical remix.

Cynical Historian met with his dad to go pawn off his degrees at a little-known Pawn Shop they frequent.

TIK started screaming up at the sky, rambling about the “demiurge”.

WhatIfAltHist just bought a new $1 microphone from Temu to randomly swap with his half-broken Walmart microphone to record a 2 hour video about how he predicted all this and that he’s accepting disciples.


/sneed
 
Possible future Troon-out:
There is a really high chance this guy is gonna troon out, his online persona is a woman, his discord server is openly pro-gay, and his DeviantArt (which I found through whatsmyname.app) which has his correct birthday lists his pronouns as They/Them.
Dear fucking god I hope not. He'll end up looking like an AI Meg Griffin. Poor Meg doesn't deserve this.

This article goes info deep into why he is a retard.
https://grahamhancock.com/skinnerhl2/ (Archive)
While I have no doubt that Milo has, is and will be a retard, I think this a poor example to give.
Milo's popular videos on Hancock shift this source to being a hostile one.
Since Hancock is a retard himself - seemingly attacking anyone who publicly disagrees with his theory - I wouldn't trust anything written by him or his butt buddies.
To add to that, the author of that article:
1737472264264.png

Yikes.

I'd add this video as an example of how retarded he can be:

This guy's nitpicking, sure. But if Milo can't get the basic facts/procedures right - why is he touching history or archaeology?

But, a really good infodump! Yet another example of why op-sec is important.
 
This guy's nitpicking, sure. But if Milo can't get the basic facts/procedures right - why is he touching history or archaeology?
It's the internet past time of making fun of people who deviate from orthodox positions. He gets a lot of views and a big ego over it. It's extremely low hanging fruit because you never have to actually engage with what they say, just point your thumb and go "get a load of this guy".
 
It's the internet past time of making fun of people who deviate from orthodox positions. He gets a lot of views and a big ego over it. It's extremely low hanging fruit because you never have to actually engage with what they say, just point your thumb and go "get a load of this guy".

True, I think it must be an result of Milo's transition from focusing on pure alt-history theories to what he's doing now. It just doesn't translate well and he ends up looking like a retard.

It reminds me of the atheist vs Christian debates YouTube used to have back around 2008-10. Everyone got a superiority complex and then some new Christian channel would come along, stir the pot, and all the atheists would circle the wagons and start huffing each others farts.
 
Not sure if it "counts" for this thread, but I've been listening to a lot of history lectures recently and Dr. Roy Casagranda is probably the most insufferable lecturer I've come across. I usually don't mind if someone is somewhat to the left, but this guy is the definition of a "flaming liberal." He constantly interrupts the flow of his talks to go on a tangent about racism or someshit. I've tried getting through two of his talks on the origins of WWII and had to turn it off each time.
 
Not sure if it "counts" for this thread, but I've been listening to a lot of history lectures recently and Dr. Roy Casagranda is probably the most insufferable lecturer I've come across. I usually don't mind if someone is somewhat to the left, but this guy is the definition of a "flaming liberal." He constantly interrupts the flow of his talks to go on a tangent about racism or someshit. I've tried getting through two of his talks on the origins of WWII and had to turn it off each time.
And you keep listening to him?
 
This is the only infrastructure Youtuber who doesn’t feel like he’s ramming biased politics down my throat. And when I say that he is clearly conservative leaning (he knocks Tim Walz in this video) but it’s not like you’re listening to some DailyWire shit.
Really comfy channel, just talks about American cities. Doesn’t make flamebait content. Really enjoy his work.
 
This is the only infrastructure Youtuber who doesn’t feel like he’s ramming biased politics down my throat. And when I say that he is clearly conservative leaning (he knocks Tim Walz in this video) but it’s not like you’re listening to some DailyWire shit.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=39E8ijgylsEReally comfy channel, just talks about American cities. Doesn’t make flamebait content. Really enjoy his work.
The comments are really entertaining, Some of them bring up interesting points and then they suddenly turn into a stereotypical bughiver or "Diversity is our strength" post with some people saying bye and unsubbing in-between
I'll definitely have to watch this later when I'm more energized, though what mainly convinces me to watch is his channels name which is a play on the idea of a persons third place.
 
Possible future Troon-out:
There is a really high chance this guy is gonna troon out, his online persona is a woman, his discord server is openly pro-gay, and his DeviantArt (which I found through whatsmyname.app) which has his correct birthday lists his pronouns as They/Them.
This is a really good starting point for a potential thread.
He's not quite there yet but he's been recently posting political sperging completely unrelated to archaeology.
Saying shit like "If you ever wondered what you would do in Nazi Germany, its exactly what you're doing right now."

So I'd predict that within the year he'll be in some sort of massive drama.
 
The people most obsessed with the idea of how virtuous they would have been in Nazi Germany would have been the ones the most emotionally invested in following the party line.
Especially assuming that all morally righteous people would immediately form a Rebel Alliance to take down Lord Voldemort and his Handmaid's Tale Order. They wank so hard believing that only good people resist evil and not that 99% of the population would duck their heads and try and make it through whatever regime is in charge. I'm sure a majority of Russian peasants weren't diehard Communists, just as I am sure a majority of Germans weren't diehard Nazis.

Boiling down this sort of scenario to good and bad destroys all nuance to human psychology and authoritarian regimes. Going ahead and saying anyone pointing out these nuances is a closet Nazi/Whatever is just fucking retarded. The biggest consequence of WW2 in the long run has to be the foundation of this good/bad dichotomy that allows no actual discourse.
 
Back
Top Bottom