💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.5%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 168 24.2%
  • Total voters
    693
"Kids, this is drugs, and this is your brain on drugs"
*Hhhnnnnnrrks up a mountain of blow
"Woah... so anyway.... anime sucks.... cope and.... sneeeed.... for ten dollars...."
 
Zab McMann said:
If the case is closed, then couldn't someone use FOIA to release it?
Click to expand...
AFAIK that's what Josh tried and was DENIED 'cause Rackets sealed the records. You'd need a permission from one of them who is on video, which is why Josh dangles the $6k crowdfund before April.
 
HodgePodgeRogerDodger said:
Looks like he took a plea deal.

Plea hearing is on 1/24/2025.
Click to expand...
Nick, how is this possible big guy? Didn't you say this was an obvious case of government corruption? Didn't you say you were going to fight, fight, fight it the whole way? Didn't you say you the police and CPS lied about what they found in your house? Didn't you say the testing lab messed up the drug reports? Didn't you tell your "friends" that the police rubbed cocaine in your daughter's hair? Didn't you say you had video evidence that could prove all this? Didn't you say the practicing lawyers who thought you'd need to take a plea deal were retards who didn't know what they were talking about?

Taking a plea deal after saying all that would make you look like the biggest bitch in the world, wouldn't it? It's enough to drive a man to drink
 
Fields Of Rye said:
Because we all know a John, a genuine hopeless fuckup retard who for no good reason and of our own volition we end up carrying on our back uphill like a cross

A John is human salvage. They accidently prey off human kindness. They might be druggies, molested, or just depressed but you never really expect your John to do anything other than John about, but that’s not why you help him is it? He’s the human equivalent of a stray cat.

Well Rikieta walked this John off a wire, and then later, through some miracle John stops being a John, or maybe he still is a John, and Rikieta for whatever reason demanded total John loyalty. This wailing cat in a river grabbed on to the first outstretched hand it found and now years later is expected to still serve his lordship.

And you know how it feels. Whip out your phone. Go to “that” contact and think of how retarded and spiteful you’d have to be to craft a dear John, then imagine doing it to for the world to hear. It’s not just calling the debt on your broke ass friend, it’s sending his ass to collections.
Click to expand...
Or you could be a self aggrandizing faggot wildly embellishing something that happened to own the Karens and John is completely fine; You can ask @Captain Manning directly which is it.
 
Feeling real good about getting that locals stream and gift right now. Now that Rekieta is in the clear and can put all this false allegations behind him
 
John Andrews Stan said:
Is Nick “I NEVER LIE” Rekieta still pretending Rumble picked him up for another lucrative year?
Click to expand...

No. He just stopped talking about it.

Desktop User2 said:
Who is currently Nick´s audience? I´d guess weebs and wine moms so the anti drug PSA, even if we were charitable and think he still has a career streaming, would be completely worthless.
Click to expand...

He insulted the weebs who were some of the first to express concern for him. The remainder who stayed after Vic lost left when he told them to. Even the winemoms have largely vanished. It is only the brainwashed mindless fanatics that remain.

Strix454 said:
There was another stream a long time ago where he explained his views that corporations just give people money without any expectations at all. That once he started working for a corporation (rumble), he didn't have to worry about ratings or views or stats or superchats. They would just pay him money forever and he could do whatever show he wanted. Even a show nobody watched.

He really didn't understand business at all or even really what a job is. He also really thought at the end of his contract that he was some sort of big star that was going to courted by rumble and listened to. The impression I get is that they never even contracted him about a renewal. His failure was so spectacular that he was just an embarrassment to be forgotten. And when the people he could reach didn't listen to his ideas, escalating all the way to the board of directors probably made sense to Nick.

He really did have a chance at substantial success for a moment. But when it came down it, what Nick really wanted were lewds of middle-aged women, an online romance with a skinwalking troon and a bottle up his own ass.
Click to expand...

Can you imagine if Kandiyohi County accepted his PSA deal? How long would it be until they threw him in jail for cancelling his show as he screams, COMPELLED SPEECH! MY FIRST AMMENDMENT!'

He would not suddenly become more consistent. The fact he wanted to 5k g(r)ift the government is hilarious!

Strix454 said:
They obviously thought with Nick they were getting a major legal commentator with a large audience and a channel that generated really high superchat revenue. There is no way to know if Nick could have ever met their expectations for him, but honestly Nick never even tried.
Click to expand...

This was absolutely insane. Nick openly talked about how terrible Rumble was, but that they would still give him money for nothing. It doesn't take a savvy business person to tell that it was not going to last.

Nick really did miss away every advantage he ever got.
 
Himedall All-seeing Waifu said:
Nick really did miss away every advantage he ever got.
Click to expand...
It’s amazing, really. Fucker was on third base and still couldn’t make it home.

But his dick got in the way, the moment he got to be a “cool guy” and started receiving attention from random women he fell the fuck apart.

Good job Nick, now your wife hates you and knows you’d leave if you weren’t stuck with all them kids, and your crack whore needs to suck a new dick to keep a roof over her head.
 
I kinda want Nick to do anti-drug PSAs, especially in his current broken state. I want him to do the kind where he's not the example of a drug user, but coming from a place of authority/celebrity i.e Micheal Jordan. The continued hypocrisy and narcisicim would be funny as fuck.

And as a friendly reminder, he's learned nothing, isn't gonna change and still has not hit bottom.
 
Fortyone said:
ven though Nick probably deserves hard time for starting one of his kid's hard drug addictions so early in life and having a dealer's amount of cocaine, I think him going free is what's best for us.
Click to expand...

Trapping Nick in his own house dead sober with his wife and children for several years is a worse punishment for Nick than a prison term. He doesn't work. He doesn't really leave that house. He has no hobbies or interests. He also doesn't have any money from his trust fund beyond paying for the basics.

For people like Nick, sending them to prison is a waste because you can really make their lives horrific just through strict probation. Also, Prison would fascinate Nick. Because prison is, like Nick, really gay. Its also worth remembering that show from maybe a couple years ago where Nick and Drexel talked about how fascinated they were with prison rape and both wanted to try to do an interview with a prison rapist.

I dont think long-term Nick will be able to stay away from either drinking or April. He is either going to have several miserable years on probation or he is going to fail probation - probably lose the family - and have the full entire weight of the system fall on him.
 
Goku 1000000 O said:
Also, has the state ever done something like that before? Allowing someone to become a social advocate in exchange for not punishing them?
Click to expand...
When I was younger an *actual* famous person appeared at the local juvenile correctional facility to discuss making good choices. I thought they did it out of the bottom of their heart, but others told me it was totally to part of a plea negotiation regarding some sort of charges.

Nick probably showed the judge his half a million subscriber channel and said “see I’m famous. I have a lot of influence” and the judge, not realizing that Rekieta actually doesn’t have that large a base anymore thought this would be a good idea. A lot of judges are not interested in ruining someone’s life for a first offense. This provides a punishment that might encourage others to not participate in his lifestyle while also ensuring Rekieta doesn’t reoffend (in theory).

This all hinges on it what Aaron was told being true tho.
 
demicolon said:
Yeah, commit a felony then post the result here so the farms will also be implicated in this, all to ayyylog someone on the Internet. Did Nick Rekieta came up with this? Sounds like something he'd do with Melton...
Click to expand...
Wouldn't the case files be accessible locally after it is done? I assumed that was the way that user got the files for the child testing positive for cocaine. I thought that Nick only sealed the records in regards to his CPS case and not on his criminal case. I wasn't trying to imply he should commit a crime to get them, if it came out that way I apologize.
 
Last edited:
demicolon said:
Yeah, commit a felony then post the result here so the farms will also be implicated in this, all to ayyylog someone on the Internet. Did Nick Rekieta came up with this? Sounds like something he'd do with Melton...
Click to expand...
Your right. Don’t post it here but post it somewhere else and let us archive it.
 
R00T said:
When I was younger an *actual* famous person appeared at the local juvenile correctional facility to discuss making good choices. I thought they did it out of the bottom of their heart, but others told me it was totally to part of a plea negotiation regarding some sort of charges.

Nick probably showed the judge his half a million subscriber channel and said “see I’m famous. I have a lot of influence” and the judge, not realizing that Rekieta actually doesn’t have that large a base anymore thought this would be a good idea. A lot of judges are not interested in ruining someone’s life for a first offense. This provides a punishment that might encourage others to not participate in his lifestyle while also ensuring Rekieta doesn’t reoffend (in theory).

This all hinges on it what Aaron was told being true tho.
Click to expand...

One issue is that judge might have watched the coke stream. Or discussed it with the other judge... I am not sure it is exactly something that would sell them on the idea of using Nick for any advocacy...
 
Canard said:
I am not sure it is exactly something that would sell them on the idea of using Nick for any advocacy...
Click to expand...
It’s not very effective to make someone say “kids don’t do drugs” who hasn’t done drugs. It’s why D.A.R.E. Programs are ineffective. You typically have a cop come in and threaten the kids and say “drugs will ruin your life.” At least that’s what my school did in the 2010s. It would’ve been more effective if they drug someone in wearing an orange jumpsuit who said they were losing out on the next ten years of their life and jonesed so hard they made their arms bleed from scratching. That’s proper scare tactics.

Alls I’m saying if I was 14 in an at risk youth program and the Balldo walked through the door to talk to me it might effectively scare me straight. Show me clips of a before and after.
 
datura_binge said:
I am not sure I understand why a defendant would be able to deal the records. Especially if they took a plea deal etc. I don't get it.
Click to expand...

More knowledgeable legal experts can correct me, but based on my understanding, I believe that bodycam footage is presumably private information, and the laws outline exceptions to release--not methods for
access. There is also the fact that children are present and other persons who have their own privacy interest.

Short of the matter, it is up to local authorities to determine to release it or not unless one of the exceptions are met. It was nothing Nick explocitly did. He is simply benefitting from privacy laws.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom