Anything Alyssa deleted starting shortly BEFORE she filed her first warning, threatening the lulsuit against SmashJT and our dear Feeder, can be considered a violation.
Because starting at the point she had formed the intention to take legal action, she would have known that all content pertaining to this threat would become relevant. This includes her tweet in which she claims harassment by KF, because she was "doxed", only to be slapped in the replies with a public google link to her address. She claimed to have been doxed and that her address was never public information, only to be proven IMMEDIATLY wrong, which makes it ridiculous for her to still claim the same thing in the lawsuit against SmashJT, even referencing KF.
We can prove, based on archives, that a lot of tweets did exist in the past and were deleted by her around the time or after she threatened the lawsuits for the first time. (And any social media platform WILL provide the requested information, because it is never fully deleted)
The deletions include:
- Claiming her address was never public info, but a reply proved the opposite
- mentions of "sex worker"
- mentions of "sucking dick for material gain"
- mentions of "going back to sex work"
- self-identifying as a former sex-worker
All these things are directly relevant to the core claims she is making, and shape the context of statements made by other people about her as a person.
She deleted them because she KNOWS they look very bad for her and can be used in court to get the lulsuit dismissed, because she cannot claim defamation because someone repeated what she said about herself before.
I would be very surprised if her case survived a motion to dismiss, using all these deletions as evidence that it is a frivolous lawsuit and subject to anti-SLAPP law.
You cannot go after someone for repeating what you said yourself.