💼 Careercow Alyssa Mercante / beerandfeminism / kombitchaTEArex / High Heeled Gamer / hayy GIRL hayy / uhLyssa15 - From failed sex worker to failed clickbait journalist. A far-left racist narcissistic abusive smug feminazi. Stalks her targets and their families, DEI & SBI activist, alcoholic junkie, threatens gamers & YouTubers to public fights and then lawsuits.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Mercante v. Tarzia 1:24-cv-08471 — District Court, E.D. New York

  • Docket No.
    1:24-cv-08471
  • Court
    District Court, E.D. New York
  • Filed
    Dec 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    320 Assault Libel & Slander
  • Cause
    28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
  • Jurisdiction
    Diversity
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    May 12, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Jeff Tarzia, Alyssa Mercante

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 178)

# Date Description Filing
93 May 12, 2026 Letter re: Sealing Status of Various Documents, per the Court's Request by Alyssa Mercante (Attachments: (1) Exhibit Attachment: Redacted Version of ECF No. 91.) (Green, Remy)
May 11, 2026  
May 11, 2026 MINUTE ENTRY AND ORDER: A telephonic motion hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Eshkenazi on 5/11/2026. Appearances by Remy Green for Plaintiff, and Ronald Coleman for Defendant. The parties discussed Defendant's objections to Plaintiff's Rule 37 fees. As discussed on the record, Defendant will make an offer on the fees by close of business on 5/12/2026. Plaintiff will respond to Defendant's offer by close of business on 5/13/2026. The parties are directed to file a joint status letter on 5/15/2026, indicating whether judicial intervention, including a settlement conference, is necessary. Defense counsel also stated his intent to cover the costs of Plaintiff's counsel resulting from the unredacted filing of ECF 88. The parties' 5/15/2026 status letter shall include any update on the payment of those costs.
May 11, 2026 MINUTE ENTRY AND ORDER: A telephonic motion hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Eshkenazi on 5/11/2026. Appearances by Remy Green for Plaintiff, and Ronald Coleman for Defendant. The parties discussed Defendant's objections to Plaintiff's Rule 37 fees. As discussed on the record, Defendant will make an offer on the fees by close of business on 5/12/2026. Plaintiff will respond to Defendant's offer by close of business on 5/13/2026. The parties are directed to file a joint status letter on 5/15/2026, indicating whether judicial intervention, including a settlement conference, is necessary. Defense counsel also stated his intent to cover the costs of Plaintiff's counsel resulting from the unredacted filing of ECF 88. The parties' 5/15/2026 status letter shall include any update on the payment of those costs.For the reasons discussed on the record, the parties are also directed to file a joint status letter on 5/13/2026, updating the Court as to whether any docket entries should be unsealed.The Court also discussed Plaintiff's 89 Motion for an Order to Show Cause. The Court declines to issue an Order to Show Cause at this time in light of the Courts on the record warning to Defendant's counsel of his obligations to (1) exercise due diligence when citing case law, (2) exercise due diligence when filing sensitive information on the docket, and (3) refrain from filing any documents on the docket designated as "confidential" regardless of counsel's disagreement with the designation. As discussed on the record, defense counsel is directed to follow all procedures set forth in the Protective Order (ECF 34) for challenging any confidentiality designations. Failure to meet these obligations in the future may result in sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for an Order to Show Cause 89 is denied. (MED)
92 May 10, 2026 REDACTION and Notice of Errata by Jeff Tarzia (Attachments: (1) Errata - Fully redacted Exhibit F) (Coleman, Ronald)
and since the Journalists at Kotaku were overwhelmingly Jewish and LGBT, also a hate crime
Where's that clip from the Vice fluff interview or whatever where the dude's like "I'm trans, I'm Antifa, and I'm Jewish. And those things are related"?

Edit: found it, 4:20 if it doesn't queue:

The defendant neither lives there, committed the alleged tort there, nor "intentionally reached" into the jurisdiction by tweeting a hashtag. There is a interesting case from another circuit, Johnson v. Griffin, that involves the defendant (world famous Kathy Griffin) interfering with the plaintiff's job with direct communications to the business. But the 2nd circuit hasn't adopted any similar doctrine as far as I can tell, and the facts here are essentially nothing beyond a hashtag
I don't disagree that is how it should/used to be. But didn't that get blown out of the water with Douglass Mackey / Ricky Vaughan, where they got to try him in the most leftwing NY district by claiming his tweets might've passed through some internet cable there at some point?
 
Last edited:
The issue with the "sucks dicks for money "thing is that isn't even why she is claiming G/O media stopped liking her or something and made her quit? That is due to an' elaborate harassment campaign ' once again im no lawyer but Im pretty sure defamation to fly you need financial damages or atleast some proof she has suffered socially (not mean anonymous tweets directed at you) where the crux of the lawsuit is SmashJT summoned a army of chuds to tell Alyssa they would never ever rape her.
 
Last edited:
The final battle of gamer gate will be fought by kike lawyers with knives in the streets. I cant wait to tell my great grandchildren about this great power struggle.
 
Lol what is this bullshit that this retard is spewing? Still crying about GG 10 years after the fact. Maybe if they keep crying about it people will care. Who am I fucking kidding? The longer they can use what is now an irrelevant event as a catalyst for their insanity the longer they can cling to relevancy.
 
The issue with the "sucks dicks for money "thing is that isn't even why she is claiming G/O media stopped liking her or something and made her quit? That is due to an' elaborate harassment campaign ' once again im no lawyer but Im pretty sure defamation to fly you need financial damages where the crux of the lawsuit is SmashJT summoned a army of chuds to tell Alyssa they would never ever rape her.
Not necessarily. Accusing a woman of being a Prostitute is akin to accusing anyone of being a Pedophile. It is per se defamation. This statement would in fact be a problem for SmashJT, with or without material damages to mercante, but for the niggling detail that she did in fact publicly claim to be a Cam Whore, which is considered by many in "The Public" to be a form of prostitution. In which case the accusation of prostitution is defeated by the absolute defense of the truth.

That is really her only in here, and if the court decides to entertain this case, it will be solely on the legal status of Cam Whores. Are they in fact sex workers, and thus can be called prostitutes in public? While I don't think there is much case law on Cam Shows specifically, there is plenty on strip clubs and pronographic video. Which all firmly holds that yes, cam shows are sex work and thus a form of legal prostitution regulated by the States.

How the State of New York chooses to interpret this, and the Eastern District of New York itself in its precedents will be critical. And this is outside my knowledge. But I would expect her claim that being a cam model is not the same thing as being a Prostitute will face an uphill climb.
 
Last edited:
hasanlawsuit.jpg

:story:
 
Not necessarily. Accusing a woman of being a Prostitute is akin to accusing anyone of being a Pedophile. It is per se defamation. This statement would in fact be a problem for SmashJT, with or without material damages to mercante, but for the niggling detail that she did in fact publicly claim to be a Cam Whore, which is considered by many in "The Public" to be a form of prostitution. In which case the accusation of prostitution is defeated by the absolute defense of the truth.
Imagine if this all comes down to her having to lie and pretend she did her camwhoring solo, at the very last moment Ron Coleman presents a video on a flash drive to the court of Alyssa sucking dicks to the sound of coin effects.
 
I'm not even an attorney, and I've already spotted a few glaring errors of reasoning. (Underlining added)
Lane Haygood said:
Paragraph 20: "On or about September 8, 2024, Tarzia was given an opportunity to recant his lies and reduce the vitriol in the discourse. Tarzia took this opportunity to double-down on his conduct, finding new ways to become even worse in tone, content, and directedness of his attacks and calls for harassment (footnote 11)". However, the citation in the footnote is "Jeff Tarzia (@SmashJT), TWITTER, https://x.com/SmashJT/status/1811621628968853559 (Jul 11, 2024)'"
In other words, they're trying to argue that SmashJT "doubled down" nearly two months before receiving his "opportunity to recant"?

Lane Haygood said:
Paragraphs 172, 175, and 176:
172. Tarzia has also commented on Mercante’s raising money for the “Trans Lifeline” charity, claiming that the charity itself is a scam and an “iceberg of hidden criminal activity.”
...
175. No one associated with Trans Lifeline has been charged with a crime, although two former directors did agree to repay, independent of a lawsuit, funds that were diverted from the charity’s main mission. Such repayments were disclosed in the 2017 financial filings.
176. Such flippant and reckless disregard for the truth demonstrates that, at the time Tarzia made the defamatory statements about Mercante highlighted above, he knew they were false.'
Even granting arguendo (since we're breaking out the five-dollar jargon in here) that the statements that Trans Lifeline is 'a scam and an “iceberg of hidden criminal activity"' are false, 1) these statements were made about the charity itself, not Alyssa, and 2) the mere fact that they are false does not prove one way or the other whether SmashJT knew they were false. He could have simply been stating things that he genuinely, if mistakenly, believed were true.

Something tells me an actual attorney will have no trouble ripping this to shreds.

edit: formatting
 
Last edited:
Frontpage material :story:
Rewatching this I'm just now realizing how Alyssa says SHE'S been working on the lawsuit and how the passages that simply sound like a know-it-all undergrad were probably written by her.

Reminds me that I've been wanting to nitpick her shitty thesis.

thread tax:
lawsuitspritz.jpg
lawsuitspritz02.jpg
 
Imagine if this all comes down to her having to lie and pretend she did her camwhoring solo, at the very last moment Ron Coleman presents a video on a flash drive to the court of Alyssa sucking dicks to the sound of coin effects.
I'm here for a Federal Court having to determine that yes, all those whores on Onlyfans are LEGALLY whores and everyone can call them Prostitutes for the rest of their lives.
 
I remember the Gamergate years here. I don't recall Mercante at all from that period and everyone involved with the Gamergate was talked about here. This is stolen valor from the real BPD whores of Gamergate like Leigh Alexander, Zoe Quinn, and of course Gamergate's biggest victim Brianna Wu.
Tell me stories of the retard war grandpa.
 
Simply put, Alyssa simply manages to simply pick the worst lawyers ever, to put it simply.
Screenshot 2024-12-11 201252.png
 
Rewatching this I'm just now realizing how Alyssa says SHE'S been working on the lawsuit and how the passages that simply sound like a know-it-all undergrad were probably written by her.

Reminds me that I've been wanting to nitpick her shitty thesis.

thread tax:
View attachment 6742154
View attachment 6742155
Non sequitur but she looks like the kind of person who watches the king of Staten Island more than once
 
Alyssa wants people to be afraid that if they call her a dumb whore on Twitter they might get sued as well.
Well, that's gonna backfire spectacularly when she finds out two can play that game. Or when she says something slanderous about another person that DOES have money and a good lawyer. She's just setting herself up to be fucked with in the future, just like the Ragepig.
"Everything is fair game".
 
Last edited:
Rewatching this I'm just now realizing how Alyssa says SHE'S been working on the lawsuit and how the passages that simply sound like a know-it-all undergrad were probably written by her.

Reminds me that I've been wanting to nitpick her shitty thesis.

thread tax:
View attachment 6742154
View attachment 6742155
Why is she happy? She started a fucking shit storm. Her entire life will be subject to the scrutiny of a Federal Court. The next 1 to 5 years of her life are going to be consumed by litigation that she very well may lose to ruinous financial costs. My god is she dumb. She's dumber then Russel Greer. At least Russel Greer is wasting years of his life at no financial cost to himself. Mercante can't very well claim pauper status. She doesn't even have the Pro Se tard shield. Why is she smiling? Starting a lawsuit should be a somber moment. Its not a victory. Its a defeat. A last a resort. Its subjecting yourself to endless stress and misery.
 
Gjoni never actually accused Zoe Quinn of sleeping with Nathan Grayson for a review in the Zoe Post and actually said later that the timeline didn't make any sense for that to be true. Nice to see that no one on Mercante's side actually bothered to read the damn thing.
To elaborate, Nathan was the author of the largest puff piece to be written about Zoe Quinn, hyping up Depression Quest and her "gamedev skills" seemingly out of nowhere when much better games are listed within the same article. It begged the question: why would he write about her at all? It later came out that he also paid her $600. It seems pretty obvious she buttered him up & slept with him to get articles written about her, he accidentally knocked her up, and paid for the abortion.

Nathan Grayson's part of Gamergate leans more heavily on the Gamejournopros mailing list side, rather than The Zoe Post™ itself.
 
Back
Top Bottom