- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
Great shit.
View attachment 6741767
Where's that clip from the Vice fluff interview or whatever where the dude's like "I'm trans, I'm Antifa, and I'm Jewish. And those things are related"?and since the Journalists at Kotaku were overwhelmingly Jewish and LGBT, also a hate crime
Edit: found it, 4:20 if it doesn't queue:
I don't disagree that is how it should/used to be. But didn't that get blown out of the water with Douglass Mackey / Ricky Vaughan, where they got to try him in the most leftwing NY district by claiming his tweets might've passed through some internet cable there at some point?The defendant neither lives there, committed the alleged tort there, nor "intentionally reached" into the jurisdiction by tweeting a hashtag. There is a interesting case from another circuit, Johnson v. Griffin, that involves the defendant (world famous Kathy Griffin) interfering with the plaintiff's job with direct communications to the business. But the 2nd circuit hasn't adopted any similar doctrine as far as I can tell, and the facts here are essentially nothing beyond a hashtag
Last edited:
