💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    699
I Will Be Us said:
@Captain Manning

Playing devil's advocate, Nick may have zero intention of going to trial, but could be intentionally stretching this out as long as possible for the following reasons:

1) It appears he's free of testing from now until probation.
2) He can see how Kayla's plea resolves
3) He gets to see April
4) He gets time to decide who he wants to be with if the divorce arc is incoming
5) He might want to be checking if the Aaron investigation concludes, at which point any charges could be combined into one plea deal.

Not saying these are strong or good reasons; only that they may be factors. Sane and rational people would have wanted this done and behind them as soon as possible. I wouldn't say Nick is either of those things.
Click to expand...

I think the theory of the no contact order plays a big part, but also he wants to see how Kayla's challenge plays it. If there is a miracle and all that bullshit works then he will try to use it in his trial somehow.
 
Himedall All-seeing Waifu said:
Not being a chemist, how does that 2.4 nanogrammes/milligram correlate to the levels of the test as reported by KCHHS, or are they non-transmutable?
Click to expand...
We're pretty sure her test was printed in pg/mg, because the preliminary immunoassay is typically printed in pg/mg or ng/10mg, and the cutoff is 500 when printed in pg/mg. 2.4 nanograms is 2400 picograms, the average level the study found, and the highest found was 14.4 ng/mg. Rekieta's 9 year old tested squarely within that range.
 
Sad we'll never get the full story of the coked up kid. Or how the government let them live back with the parents. If only there was another leak...
 
Not to derail about body cams but I'm confused why a plea would mean we couldn't get the body cam footage. Is body cam footage only available if a case goes to court? I was under the impression all bodycam footage was foia-able and the only hangup would be if you had to wait for an active case to be resolved before it was provided. Is that not the case? I really don't see what a plea would have to do with the footage either way, and I really don't see why a prosecutor would throw anything about footage into a deal either. Wasn't the entire point of body cams for police accountability to public? So if they are unable to be viewed unless they are officially entered in a court proceeding, what's even the point?
 
Please don't be retarded and take this advice.
Maybe someone could lodge a complaint on nicks behalf and demand the body cam footage through that.
 
Konstantin Romanov said:
We're pretty sure her test was printed in pg/mg, because the preliminary immunoassay is typically printed in pg/mg or ng/10mg, and the cutoff is 500 when printed in pg/mg. 2.4 nanograms is 2400 picograms, the average level the study found, and the highest found was 14.4 ng/mg. Rekieta's 9 year old tested squarely within that range.
Click to expand...

Yes, nano is 9 decimal places and pico is 12. So the range discussed is 2400 - 14400 baud picograms, with the Rekieta child scoring 5000.

What’s not clear to me from that abstract, is whether the children tested with high readings had consumed cocaine. The title “drug users’ children” implies they did not. But if the test levels match those of the using adult, surely they are also being intoxicated.
 
Last edited:
Joke is on Nick.

The only Sandwich in this story was himself, sandwiched between his parental responsibilities as a father and his 20 year old male-cheerleader self who wants to party, fuck teenagers (or pornstars who look like they are) and do lots and lots of drugs.
 
Last edited:
Man, Kayla better start pulling up real fucking fast if she wants to get saved. There’s an ample bosomed piss MILF in Costa Rica who has stolen my heart.

Surprisingly, a woman who thinks drinking urine is healthy seems to have it more together than a lawyers wife in Minnesota. Shit, I bet anyone in the urine therapy thread is overall more wholesome and healthy than the Rekietas.
 
Potentially Criminal said:
"no contact with Co-defendants"
Click to expand...
So would this still be happening if Nick had admitted to the coke being his? Didn't they charge April cause they still need to figure out how much of the coke was hers? Otherwise all they'd have on her would be taking coke and with her being a first time offender (iirc) doesn't that mean she would've been slapped with a fine and sent home or did the whole "she's the live-in nanny" comment from Kayla already doom her by tying her to the house and all the shit that went down? Nick dragging in Ape and causing the no contact part of the plea with his gay attempts at 4d chess would be the funniest way he could've felted himself out of being with April.
 
Hungrier Troon said:
So would this still be happening if Nick had admitted to the coke being his? Didn't they charge April cause they still need to figure out how much of the coke was hers? Otherwise all they'd have on her would be taking coke and with her being a first time offender (iirc) doesn't that mean she would've been slapped with a fine and sent home or did the whole "she's the live-in nanny" comment from Kayla already doom her by tying her to the house and all the shit that went down? Nick dragging in Ape and causing the no contact part of the plea with his gay attempts at 4d chess would be the funniest way he could've felted himself out of being with April.
Click to expand...
I may be wrong but iirc everybody involved gets charged for all the coke in this type of situation. The reason (I believe) they waited to charge April is because they thought they could get her to flip on the others and when it became apparent she would not, they decided to charge her. That's just guesswork.
 
Hungrier Troon said:
So would this still be happening if Nick had admitted to the coke being his? Didn't they charge April cause they still need to figure out how much of the coke was hers? Otherwise all they'd have on her would be taking coke and with her being a first time offender (iirc) doesn't that mean she would've been slapped with a fine and sent home or did the whole "she's the live-in nanny" comment from Kayla already doom her by tying her to the house and all the shit that went down? Nick dragging in Ape and causing the no contact part of the plea with his gay attempts at 4d chess would be the funniest way he could've felted himself out of being with April.
Click to expand...
Nick and Kayla are charged because it is their residence and anything inside the residence is presumed to be theirs.
Either of them could have taken responsibility for the cocaine and helped the other one get a better deal, and presumably a healthy relationship would have seen them work together to get the best possible deal for each of them and make sure that they are present as parents in their children's lives.

The fact that none of that really happened here tells you a lot about how healthy that marriage still is.
datura_binge said:
I may be wrong but iirc everybody involved gets charged for all the coke in this type of situation. The reason (I believe) they waited to charge April is because they thought they could get her to flip on the others and when it became apparent she would not, they decided to charge her. That's just guesswork.
Click to expand...
The residents get charged, since Nick told the cops that April was a guest, the charges against her were dropped because the same presumption of ownership does not apply to guests. They then charged her with the 5th degree felony because of her credit card on the coke nightstand.
 
Kino Casino did a great segment on Nick then Melton. yesterday worth watching, Melton made it so you have to confirm your phone number to get into his discord (who would confirm a number to any of these podcast losers) he is scared shitless and alot of shit comes out of that fat fuck.
 
I'm a little autistically hung up on the vehicle driving to/from the Settlement Conference. I know it's a small thing but it seems telling.

April came separately in the truck due to a combination of the following:
  • She is not supposed to have private interaction with Nick and Kayla. CPS has likely warned about this, and it's consistent with Nick's anger about Keanu's public revelation that April is in the second home. (Bizarrely, Nick and April don't care about the problematic appearance of her attending his hearing in the first place.)
  • Kayla does not want to interact with April. The Farmer and "K" both mentioned tension between them.
Kayla driving Nick to the hearing in the Navigator is very odd to me. We know she hates driving and he almost always drives when they're together. Some ideas:
  • Nick's been drinking and/or using since the kids have been returned (and probably before); he can't afford to get a DUI.
  • Kayla dropped the kids at her parents before the hearing and picked Nick up in a rush. We know that Nick was chatting with Melton as soon as 30 min before the hearing.
  • Kayla is not living at home. She picked him up on the way from wherever she was staying (probably with her parents).
  • The Mustang is obnoxious and all three arriving in separate vehicles would look problematic for the gossips.
Question: Outside possibility that Nick's license has been suspended. Wouldn't we know about that through public documents? Or, does he still have outstanding payments on insurance and/or speeding tickets? He can't afford to be pulled over for that.

Merry Christmas, thruple! What a mess.
 
Last edited:
Cousin Eddie said:
To clarify: I'm not saying there is no deal Nick would take. I'm saying I've seen nothing indicating that he planned to accept a deal that had been offered to him. That is, nothing changed.
Click to expand...
I want him to fight it because it would be funnier, but he was going to plead out on Tuesday with the last brain cell he has.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom