💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Captain Manning]

There is now a "Be thankful you're not Nick Rekieta" thread in the gobble gobble subforum:

https://embed.kiwifarms.st/threads/at-least-youre-not-nick-rekieta.205797/

 

[Return of the Freaker]

Do you think I April's invited to the family dinner? That would be awkward.

You don't bring tuna to Thanksgiving dinner

 

[Watching Rekieta]

That would be massive over-reach on the part of the court.

2. Scarebro is verifying BBN's rumor about the no-contact with April issue:

It's probably not April specifically. Restricting contact with non-family people accused or convicted of drug felonies is common probation restriction.

Personally, I believe they charged April to control the interaction. They waited to charge until right before kids returned and April was still living next door.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

With the same preamble as you that I don't believe it's what happened, there was actually a study posted in the MNPublicRecords CHIPS file thread which found test-significant amounts of benzoy did form in samples from subjects who had street cocaine rubbed into their hair under otherwise normal conditions.

The studies showed the hair had to be soaked in a solution for a significant period and it rubbed into the hair.

More germane were the studies that showed children of addicts tested positive at very high rates.

 

[repentance]

Nah, Nick and Kayla will have to be on their best behavior and play the most thankful and happy family today for Grandma & Grandpa Trustfund. Nick putting the case to rest and putting on a good dad behavior show is the only way he gets his parents to fuck off to Florida after the holiday season or by NYE.

And it wouldn't surprise me if Celeste and Bob just have a caterer provide a full Thanksgiving spread or take the family out for Thanksgiving lunch.

 

[Captain Manning]

It's probably not April specifically. Restricting contact with non-family people accused or convicted of drug felonies is common probation restriction.

Personally, I believe they charged April to control the interaction. They waited to charge until right before kids returned and April was still living next door.

If you go back through the thread, you will note that people floated that theory months ago, before BBN even was a thing. People were also mocking Nick for having April attend her court hearings, from Nick's streaming room, in full view of the state and everyone.

Then, BBN, who some people here (not me) are convinced is Kinochet, also suggests the state wants her gone, and the idea suddenly doesn't make sense?

That doesn't make sense to me. If it made sense before, why wouldn't it now?

Is BBN's specific info about a proposed plea deal correct? I dunno. They very well could have been given bad info on that point. But the idea the state wants April the fuck out of there is hardly an original idea by BBN. It's been a discussion topic in this thread for a while now. They avoided charging her initially, because they were hoping she would fuck off, but she snuck back in (poorly) to continue engaging in her home wrecking ways.

Plus, as I've said before, the idea that he went through all this shit only to lose his side bitch in the end would be an amusing outcome. He'd be right back where he started, only with a ruined e-career.

 

[Capt. Jean Luc Ritard]

>We
My assessment earlier seems to be correct. If this is Faggotchet running the account he is not running it alone which is why the slight difference in posting styles. Very interesting how this account feels the need to clarify that there is no affiliation with Homochet...

I hope it's not Kinochet, because I hope Kinochet has already killed himself

 

[LovisXVI]

What if we have gone full fightclub..and BBN is Nick Rekeita's alternate personality..the side of him that knows he has become a degenerate loser trying to fight back against the Corner Demon Possessed Crackhead?

Ahead of you on that one:

What if BBN was Nick Rekieta's alternate personality that breaks though occasionally in an attempt to free himself of the alcohol and drug addled state that was killing their shared body? Would explain the insider information and the inability to determine their identity.

 

[repentance]

If you go back through the thread, you will note that people floated that theory months ago, before BBN even was a thing. People were also mocking Nick for having April attend her court hearings, from Nick's streaming room, in full view of the state and everyone.

The suggestion months ago was that CHIPS had a problem with April living with the Rekietas and that April being a visible part of Nick's life wasn't a good look in terms of the CHIPS case. Her presence or absence has only ever been relevant to the criminal proceedings in respect to her own charges and whether or not she would flip on Nick and Kayla.

Whether or not Nick is fucking April is utterly irrelevant to the criminal case against Nick. It's not even relevant to the charges against April, only whether she was living with Nick and Kayla at the time of the search is because if she can be proven to have been living with them at the time of the search then constructive possession comes into play.

I don't know whether it's because we've had a huge influx of newbies this year but people seem unusually willing to accept unsubstantiated statements from dubious sources as fact and run with them as if they are established truth. It's effectively turned this into a chat thread rather than a credible source of information.

 

[not william stenchever]

I want to believe that Nick tried to stop drinking, poured all his sweet whisky out...and then the next day ripped the doors off the underside of the sink trying to get at that sweet whisky stored in the sink trap.

The similarities are eerie.

 

[Chazzed Up]

Happy Thanksgiving everyone, hope you enjoy time with your family. Hopefully you don't have a Thanksgiving like the Rekietas,


Live look at the Rekieta home:
View attachment 6696904View attachment 6696907
This is the best the AI did trying to capture a Rekieta family Thanksgiving feast.

Have Ralph attend as Tiny Tim. But instead of 'God bless us, everyone' it's GOD BLESS THE GOAALLLL

I want to believe that Nick tried to stop drinking, poured all his sweet whisky out...and then the next day ripped the doors off the underside of the sink trying to get at that sweet whisky stored in the sink trap.

And his friend isn't even alive to fix the cabinets, what a tragedy indeed.

 

[Captain Manning]

The suggestion months ago was that CHIPS had a problem with April living with the Rekietas and that April being a visible part of Nick's life wasn't a good look in terms of the CHIPS case. Her presence or absence has only ever been relevant to the criminal proceedings in respect to her own charges and whether or not she would flip on Nick and Kayla.

CPS = The state.
The Prosecution = The state.

They almost certainly talk to one another. They could both have a problem with her living there. And with good reason.

I don't know whether it's because we've had a huge influx of newbies this year but people seem unusually willing to accept unsubstantiated statements from dubious sources as fact and run with them as if they are established truth. It's effectively turned this into a chat thread rather than a credible source of information.

I have had my account since 2017, and have only stated I think April being gone as a plea condition could be true. Not that it's bonafide fact. To their credit, BBN has also said this could be bullshit. I see nobody here accepting it as the gospel. I think you're being unfair. I think most people here express the right amount of skepticism. Anything coming from the KC, for example.

Regardless, something weird happened the other day that spooked Nick out of accepting a plea deal that it looked like he was willing to accept, and forced this back to next month.

 

[Fortyone]

Do you think I April's invited to the family dinner? That would be awkward.

Nick would call his family prudes and throw a passive aggressive hissy fit if she wasn't allowed

 

[MaltVinegarRespecter]

April being gone as a plea condition could be true.

I've seen quite a few plea deals but I have never seen a solitary instance in which living with or without someone else was a condition of it except in domestic violence situations. I think in terms of the prosecution, at least, that the state telling him to get rid of April is highly unlikely.

 

[Oxyjen]

I would not waste my time.. Better spent on MST3K turkyday marathon.... https://www.pastemagazine.com/tv/ms...w-future-season-14-crowdfunding-shout-factory

Space Mutiny is just starting!

 

[Chazzed Up]

I've seen quite a few plea deals but I have never seen a solitary instance in which living with or without someone else was a condition of it except in domestic violence situations. I think in terms of the prosecution, at least, that the state telling him to get rid of April is highly unlikely.

I lost any expectation of anything being done to benefit the children when they returned the kids to his home. Regardless of whether she tested positive for cocaine or not (she did, but let's pretend for a second she didn't), Nick is still obviously abusing substances and has admitted to doing them on Twitter and other places. Despite being caught with a multitude of substances in his house, he has not sought rehab or any help whatsoever despite public evidence (his streams) from days before the arrest showing him incoherent, and months upon months prior to that showing him trashed every single time he went live. He's an addict. And a bunch of young children shouldn't be in his home. So I have no faith in April being removed. And I also don't think Nick would have said it was a good day if he had any meaningful consequences come down on him. He still wouldn't have admitted anything he didn't like happened, but he'd have probably spent a lot more time malding in tweet replies etc.

 

[daffodils]

Back on Twitter, doing his thing.

Archive

 

[WayTooSleepy]

Back on Twitter, doing his thing.

Archive
View attachment 6697476

Neat, he's like of those pull string dolls, you can get him to reply to your tweet at any time by stating just one simple fact.

 

[AnOminous]

Then, BBN, who some people here (not me) are convinced is Kinochet, also suggests the state wants her gone, and the idea suddenly doesn't make sense?

It makes sense, but we really don't know it's true. While it would be unusual to single out a specific person in a deal like this, they can put any conditions they like on a deal. They're not obligated to give a good deal.

If part of the deal is staying away in general from criminals and druggies is a thing, if they know a specific druggie they want kept away from the kids, it makes perfect sense to name them. Even most stupid druggies are not stupid enough to flaunt their whoring around with their coke whore and literally bring their coke whore into court along with their wife.

That's no kind of environment for kids.

So while it would be unusual to name some specific person, it's also extremely unusual for someone to be so much of a retarded nutjob they do what Nick did.

And again we don't know that it actually happened. If some sketchy source made it up or got it wrong, it might even be literally because it was discussed here.

Whether or not Nick is fucking April is utterly irrelevant to the criminal case against Nick.

It doesn't have to be relevant. They could have him put on a gorilla suit and dance around like a fairy.

I've seen quite a few plea deals but I have never seen a solitary instance in which living with or without someone else was a condition of it except in domestic violence situations.

I've seen exactly that, usually directly from CPS, though, with or without domestic abuse, i.e. get rid of the multiple druggie lovers immediately or else. Naming a specific person on paper would be unusual, but they'd probably make it very clear they're not going to resolve the case without certain conditions being met, conditions that are entirely sensible under the circumstances and are basically "don't do EXACTLY WHAT YOU GOT ARRESTED FOR," which is expose your kids to a bunch of sick shit, with the drugs just being the only one they're directly criminally prosecuting.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

The suggestion months ago was that CHIPS had a problem with April living with the Rekietas and that April being a visible part of Nick's life wasn't a good look in terms of the CHIPS case. Her presence or absence has only ever been relevant to the criminal proceedings in respect to her own charges and whether or not she would flip on Nick and Kayla.

Whether or not Nick is fucking April is utterly irrelevant to the criminal case against Nick. It's not even relevant to the charges against April, only whether she was living with Nick and Kayla at the time of the search is because if she can be proven to have been living with them at the time of the search then constructive possession comes into play.

CPS = The state.
The Prosecution = The state.

They almost certainly talk to one another. They could both have a problem with her living there. And with good reason.

I've seen quite a few plea deals but I have never seen a solitary instance in which living with or without someone else was a condition of it except in domestic violence situations. I think in terms of the prosecution, at least, that the state telling him to get rid of April is highly unlikely.

There is also the issue of 'association with known drug offenders' that may be part of the probation agreement. This might be be the issue here if Nick wants to see his side piece. When April was released, this was not an issue, but with her charges being pushed forward, a conviction would make her a prohibited person if Nick takes this deal.

It could also be that they want them separated before their individual trials because they are all co-defendants.

This may be entirely separate from the CPS issue.

I don't know whether it's because we've had a huge influx of newbies this year but people seem unusually willing to accept unsubstantiated statements from dubious sources as fact and run with them as if they are established truth. It's effectively turned this into a chat thread rather than a credible source of information.

I chalk it up to new people learning about Balldo in 2024. After winning LOTY 2023, a lot of people were upset and tuned in. The arrest arc has just fuelled that and put Nick on a path to win again. These people are not as versed in the lore and ghey-oppery and outright lies that encircle Nick. They will learn eventually.