Konstantin Romanov
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
With the same preamble as you that I don't believe it's what happened, there was actually a study posted in the MNPublicRecords CHIPS file thread which found test-significant amounts of benzoy did form in samples from subjects who had street cocaine rubbed into their hair under otherwise normal conditions.I can't believe that a cop touching her hair with a cocaine contaminated glove could result in its formation. Was her hair soaked in lye at the time?
It does form, probably not in sufficient quantities in the sample->test timeframe in this instance, also we have no indication but Rekieta's word that this was the standard they used and he has displayed repeated illiteracy on this subject, ALSO he weaseled it up by not specifying what metabolites were "missing" from the test or why it would matter. It doesn't matter for example if they only test 2 of the possible dozen, if those 2 are sufficiently specific to rule out false positives.
https://academic.oup.com/jat/article/43/7/543/5423761
Note that the BE/COC ratio actually climbs (!!!) from below the 0.1 ratio cutoff (negative) at week one to above the 0.1 ratio cutoff (positive) three weeks after cocaine powder was applied to participants hair. Wild.
Edit: Also correct me if I'm wrong @AltisticRight but you don't have any particular knowledge of the MMS test methodology beyond what they post on their website right? Do you have confirmation they use benzoylecgonine as the specificity marker?
Last edited:

