💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    698
He just finished up the terrible snake tattoo on his one arm. I didn't think it could get worse, but here we are.
Didn't the """artist""" finish it up by making a wonderful snake with pillow shaded scales? I swear it was so bad he would have been better off just getting the actual "no step on snek" joke flag inked.
1726284654107.png
At least this thing would have been FUNNY and WEIRD.
 
Didn't the """artist""" finish it up by making a wonderful snake with pillow shaded scales? I swear it was so bad he would have been better off just getting the actual "no step on snek" joke flag inked.
View attachment 6413471
At least this thing would have been FUNNY and WEIRD.
The tattoo artist, Jayden (@inkbyjay1), constantly posts his tattoos on Instagram as a way of advertising his services. He posts on his Instagram story almost every day. Finished works, works in progress, etc.

Nick’s tattoo is so fucking bad that he hasn’t featured it once. He’s clearly ashamed of it.
 
I think Rekieta had a moment of clarity and saw how close he's standing to the edge of the cliff. Malignant narcissists like Rekieta aren't big on self-awareness but they do have a keen sense of self-preservation.
If he accepts a plea deal, I would be willing to at least entertain this notion.

Until then, no. No way.

Again, if he had an epiphany, it's that generating additional content now is just generating better content for his enemies, and that his enemies are a lot more credible than he is.

I do not believe he thinks he did anything wrong. Not yet, anyways.
 
Last edited:
Do we need reminding?
EDIT:
Hi Ana! If you haven't seen this video . . . you should check this shit out!
Watch as the Balldo man gets angry and tells Sean REPEATEDLY OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN how he and his wife are monogamous.
And this was during the height of the qocaine quck qult.
ATTN: Kandiyohi County Prosecutors, specifically Kristen Pierce

Please watch and use this video in your case against Nicholas Robert Rekieta to help in your quest to establish a repeated pattern of LYING.
I think Rekieta had a moment of clarity and saw how close he's standing to the edge of the cliff. Malignant narcissists like Rekieta aren't big on self-awareness but they do have a keen sense of self-preservation.
I would imagine his "self preservation" and testimony to this video would go something like this... (a tentative future scene from "REKIETA: A Balldo Musical")

Prosecutor Pierce: "So Mr. Rekieta, we agree this is you in the video with Sean, or Potentially Criminal."
Nick (on the stand): "Yes. Well, Sean at this point hadn't opened his Jimmy John's yet, so he wasn't a franchise owner, but yes. That is me and Sean."
Prosecutor Pierce: "Okay, I don't know what Jimmy John's has to do with this, but I'll allow it I guess. So this video from an Elissa Clips . . . dated November 30th, 2023 . . . At minute 17:37 . . . you state you and your wife Kayla are monogamous to Sean. Correct?"
Nick: [ stares with rage at the prosecutor and sits for 30 seconds in silence ] "Could you define monogamous, [ under his breath ] fat nrrrggggrrrrr ferrgerrrrt?"
Prosecutor Pierce: "I'm sorry, what was that last part Mr. Rekieta? Did you mumble fat nig. . . I'm sorry, Mr. Rekieta, did you call me fat, then mumble a racial slur of a black person and then a slur of a gay person at me?"
Nick: "I'm sorry, I thought I asked you to define monogamous, or did they not teach you that at YOUR law school along with a diet or running program? Should I file a motion to get definitions from this point forward seeing this is a miscarriage of justice and a violation of my rights as a pro se attorney?"
Prosecutor Pierce: "Mr. Rekieta, I thought you had an attorney, I'm sorry but none of this makes any . . . Very well, we're just going to keep this all moving. Mr. Rekieta. Monogamous. Back to the definition."
Nick: "Yeah you fat fuck, what's the definition."
Judge: "Mr. Rekieta, language. Also, Mr. Ralph, one more "SUFFAH STEEL TOE" outburst from you, I will have you banned from my courtroom. Ms. Pierce... you may continue."
Prosecutor Pierce: "Monogamous, Mr. Rekieta. Monogamous, meaning no April in your marriage."
Nick:

WHAT IS HIS ANSWER . . .
 
If he accepts a plea deal, I would be willing to at least entertain this notion.

Until then, no. No way.

Again, if he had an epiphany, it's that generating additional content now is just generating better content for his enemies, and that his enemies are a lot more credible than he is.

I do not believe he thinks he did anything wrong. Not yet, anyways.
Give me rainbows for this, but I am sort of hopeful that this period of relative silence is an inpatient drug treatment program. I assume it's not, but I could see CPS requiring something like that if they caught him pissing hot for the drugs we know he's doing.

I doubt he would check himself in, but if mom and dad required it for trust payouts or CPS did for kids (again, likely a gateway to trust payouts), I could see him doing it.
 
Give me rainbows for this, but I am sort of hopeful that this period of relative silence is an inpatient drug treatment program. I assume it's not, but I could see CPS requiring something like that if they caught him pissing hot for the drugs we know he's doing.

My money is him running afoul another cop in traffic, the cop recognizing him, say he's resisting, and beating his legs with a nightstick and calling for back-up so the beatings continue.

But I'd likely get more rainbows than you.
 
Nick’s tattoo is so fucking bad that he hasn’t featured it once. He’s clearly ashamed of it.
Nick’s tattoo is so fucking bad that he hasn’t featured it him once. He’s clearly ashamed of it him.

FTFY


But the tattoo is bad too.

WHAT IS HIS ANSWER . . .

Asked and answered
🤣


I'd bet dollars to donuts that Nick will assert that "monogamous" narrowly means married to one person. As opposed to polygamous. I can almost hear his nasally voice. "What's funny is I only remember getting married once. To Lady Racketts. I think we're still married. I don't know. Weird."
 
Last edited:
He knows nothing about Imholte or Nick aside from what he's read online, and is just making shit up because it's a topic that gets him attention. He may end up being a future lolcow topic in his own right, but can safely be ignored on any Rackets related issues.

Examples of his high quality thoughts can be found here: https://x.com/marijuanahappy
That makes me curious about why Wil Heren clipped him.
 
At 6:14 the Kush guy makes the claim Nick has been swinging for years(6-7 different couples before Aaron) inside the church and only when he brought in an outsider(Aaron) did the church turn on Nick.
I certainly believe the degeneracy started before April and Aaron. A popular theory is that he got into coke at Hedonism II. I think Coomalot let that slip at some point (@Balldo's Gate might remember).

There's also some evidence he was looking to do polyamorous shit before he met April and Aaron too (i.e. Faran, his Locals harem, etc).

But the church claim, in particular, seems far-fetched, IMO.
 
I still heavily lean toward Nick actually gave his 8 year old cocaine in the hopes it would calm her down because she was 'the problem child' .
"Well it makes me feel better, so I'm sure it will be fine."
 
If Kayla wanted out, all she would need is a good lawyer to get a deal for her in return for testifying against Nick as the one who brought drugs into the house.
She can't. MN law prohibits one spouse from testifying against the other except for very limited exceptions which don't apply here.
 
She can't. MN law prohibits one spouse from testifying against the other except for very limited exceptions which don't apply here.
There is one exception which may be applicable:
"This exception does not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one against the other or against a child of either or against a child under the care of either spouse..."
So, if I'm reading this correctly, Kayla could be compelled to testify whether or not it was Nick who gave their kid cocaine.
 
Nick is so delusional he lives in his own universe (copeworld? balldoville?) and Kayla's IQ is so low she qualifies as a houseplant.
Let's not give undue credit to their combined intelligence.
Fair point,
Same retard that was waxing about the medicinal properties of coke?
The poor child.
You are a very charitable person.
Fingers crossed for the kids not being dosed with drugs to shut them up.
She can't. MN law prohibits one spouse from testifying against the other except for very limited exceptions which don't apply here.
I believe there is an exception for crimes against children under their care, or at least that is how I understand the law. So Kayla could testify in one of the three charges that deals with child neglect.

595.02 TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES
(a) "This exception does not apply to [...] or against a child of either or against a child under the care of either spouse"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom