💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[BALLZ-BROKEN MkII]

Goddammit please STOP DOING THIS. Not just you, EVERYONE. There is no FUCKING H IN "CUCKOLD." WHY DO YOU PEOPLE DO THIS?

Sorry to single you out tons of people are doing this I just hit my meltdown point.

In Nick's case, wouldn't it be "quckold"?

 

[LiquidKid]

Not worse for rackets than reported.

Kiwi farmers did GOID WORK. I think it was token who called the motion in limine thing that NICK LIED about for HOT WIFE=Ape, OUR Wife=kayla. Sorry, kayla cannot have BOTH wife titles when there are sister wives now.

Anyways, KIWI FARM REPORTERS were spot on, and much more accurate that Junkie. ALWAYS attend these things in person, you can see how judge reacts, jury reacts, the nervous stutter was caught by farmers AND the fact kayla looked worn out.

Always Attend hearings if you can.
You all were excellent in character, the smile, the turn and wave. CARRY ON.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE!

I don’t disagree that they did well for us, but the fact is, there was never an order to prevent April’s testimony, nor was it deemed that her rights were violated.
The judge went out of his way not to make a ruling on it and the prosecutor claimed April’s comments were hearsay and that was why they weren’t using it. I feel like the kiwi reporters shouldn’t have missed such a major part of the hearing, which lead to pages and pages of speculation as a result.
I’m grateful for their service and I agree that people always should be in person, but at the same time I think they dropped the ball there.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I don’t disagree that they did well for us, but the fact is, there was never an order to prevent April’s testimony, nor was it deemed that her rights were violated.
The judge went out of his way not to make a ruling on it and the prosecutor claimed April’s comments were hearsay and that was why they weren’t using it. I feel like the kiwi reporters shouldn’t have missed such a major part of the hearing, which lead to pages and pages of speculation as a result.
I’m grateful for their service and I agree that people always should be in person, but at the same time I think they dropped the ball there.

Nobody said there was an order that she could not testify, only that the prosecutor said they would call her as a witness if the bodycam footage is brought in as evidence.

I do not believe anyone thought the judge had ruled on this at all. It was very clear the admissibility of April's bodycam footage and her testimony could be challenged, but that the omnibus was the wrong hearing for that.

If a violation of her rights had indeed taken place then you could bet her lawyer would have brought that up in her motion to dismiss. But contrary to Nick, April has an actual lawyer who is not just an sockpuppet for Nick to file his schizoid rants and delusional legal arguments. Might indeed still bring that up at a later point, but then we would 100% get to see her bodycam footage as evidence in her own case.

 

[RotPockets]

In Nick's case, wouldn't it be "quckold"?

CuQold?

 

[bitch eating beans]

Hello everyone. I've been lurking for a long time- I'm a therapist and I know Nick's type very well. He's an average-intelligence narcissist who Dunning-Krugers his way through life. He thinks he's an expert rhetorician while playing middle-school-level word games. Definitely was not told "no" enough, which led to him believing he' s always right and therefore people should respect him. He respects no one, not even Dax (aka Juju the Sodomy Cow.) That's just jealousy- he wants Dax's life, even getting dressed up as a cow and getting pegged. He's entitled to people's time and attention (and superchat $$) because he's the Smart and Cool Guy. The ladies in his life are for show, as are his children. "See how cool I am? I've got bitches on my dick but I'm also a caring parent and a successful lawyer! I do cool shit like drugs and weird sex stuff, of course everyone else thinks I'm awesome!"

One thing I found interesting was his claim of having ODD. In my experience. ODD is a symptom of a greater problem, not necessarily a standalone disorder. There is usually some psychological trauma or other mental health issue below the surface causing the oppositional behavior and once that's addressed the ODD becomes less of a problem. BUT. He does not have ODD. Obviously because it's a disorder of childhood, but also because if anything he's a Conduct Disorder kid. Conduct disorder is the precursor to antisocial personality disorder in adults- it involves things like risky behaviors (drugs, sex,) cruelty to animals, and general disregard for others. He'd like people to believe he's a cool Oppositional and Defiant guy, a loner, a rebel, no one can tell him what to do, etc. but he's really a narcissist with antisocial features.

Spoiler: therapy nonsense

Not to give away my secrets, but the best way to deal with this type of person is to get them to believe things are their idea. It's easier with kids but it can be done with adults who are very into being The Smartest Guy in the Room- tell them about 80% of a course of treatment with one glaringly obvious bit missing. Being so so so smart, they usually jump at the chance to fill in the missing 20%, and then you can be like "wow! I never thought of it that way!" and they've invented therapy! It was all their idea. I'm an idiot for not thinking of it and they totally got one over on me. This might be a little unorthodox but personality disorders are very tough to treat. I've used this technique in my personal life too (slight PL but child of narcissists.)

Anyway, I heard this song and it reminded me of the qover (that is the cringiest name/concept ever btw)

 

[USAroXX]

I believe the issue is not one of explicit permission.

Unless she actually told him not to share the photos (presumably she didn't) the issue is whether he reasonably should have known she did not consent.

If she's a huge slut that fucks random strangers and has already posted nude photos online, why would he reasonably expect that this time is different?

And..
Kayla's archived response to her nekid behind bottle pix..."I am proud of my body" or "I think I have a beautiful body" and "I am proud to show it off"

Aaron did speak, in one of his STS streams about Kayla and Nick as having a reputation as swingers

 

[LiquidKid]

Nobody said there was an order that she could not testify, only that the prosecutor said they would call her as a witness if the bodycam footage is brought in as evidence.

I do not believe anyone thought the judge had ruled on this at all. It was very clear the admissibility of April's bodycam footage and her testimony could be challenged, but that the omnibus was the wrong hearing for that.

If a violation of her rights had indeed taken place then you could bet her lawyer would have brought that up in her motion to dismiss. But contrary to Nick, April has an actual lawyer who is not just an sockpuppet for Nick to file his schizoid rants and delusional legal arguments. Might indeed still bring that up at a later point, but then we would 100% get to see her bodycam footage as evidence in her own case.

Were you not reading the site during the omnibus? Go back at look at the posts in the omnibus thread on the day of, as well as all the discussion around it in the lawsuit thread and this thread.
The official understanding that everyone was working with was “the prosecution wasn’t allowed to use April’s testimony in the body cam” and most discussion related to it was about why this could be the case and how the prosecution could potentially still use it. Absolutely nobody offered the idea that there was never a ruling or that this was in accurate because it was just assumed to be correct. Made further by Nick’s stream afterward.

This all happened before April’s motion to dismiss.

Post in thread 'The August 21st Omnibus Hearing for Nick Rekieta'

“Can not use April's testimonies unless she testifies”

To give credit where it’s due, Talk Talk Talk was the closest to accurate on this
Post in thread 'The August 21st Omnibus Hearing for Nick Rekieta'

“When he got to the argument about Fleshlight’s statements, the judge interrupted to ask whether that would be better addressed as a motion in limine before trial. Frank hemmed and hawed about wanting to raise the issue early. There was a little back and forth about whether the footage could be used at trial. Judge was noncommittal. Again, that will all be in the transcript.”

Though this did little to stop speculation about “how April’s right were violated” and “where her it was legal or not.”

 

[Father Balldo]

I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE "MYSTERIOUS BROWN SUBSTANCE" WAS!!!!!

Never forget.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

What coudl really help us determine if April's rights were violated is the bodycam

 

[PinKopyKat]

Snitch Rekieta

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I think it’s more of a fact that Kayla was the first woman who would actually get with Nick, whereas April is the first “trophy” he got after he felt like he was a mega celebrity and could get anyone.

Imagine your “trophy” being a busted slut who’s almost as bald as you are, whose snatch is so infected that she can’t even wash with normal shower gel, covered in trashy tattoos and missing half her eyebrows.

Like I said, Nick deserves her.

I do not believe anyone thought the judge had ruled on this at all.

I wish that were true, but the fact is people were running with Nick’s account without questioning it. When I asked for those who’d been present to clarify whether things had actually played out the way Nick claimed, instead I got people who weren’t there replying with guessing games as to what they thought might have happened. This is all visible if you go back in the thread to the day it happened. It was extremely regrettable.

I don’t blame those present for not nailing down all the procedural details. There was a lot to take in and the hearing ended pretty quickly.

 

[laundryroom]

jesus he's so drunk & high here. Compare before hedonism and after. It's amazing how fast his health declined. No wonder his friends and family reported him; they must have tried to talk to him many times and only resorted to reporting him to give him a kick up the behind so he'd be forced to confront it

I hate the majority of millennials. Most of us are stunted teenagers who never had to man up like our grandfathers. Not all but a large majority. Being married and having kids means nothing if you've had to act like a man before.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

This all happened before April’s motion to dismiss.

“Can not use April's testimonies unless she testifies”

And that is perfectly accurate. Anything April said about the case against Nick and Kayla during the execution of the warrant cannot be used unless she is called as a witness because the defendant has a right to confront and challenge what April says or has said in the past.
The thing is that IF April is called as a witness, she can plead the 5th, but then the bodycam footage can be played and she can be asked about the things she said there.

The admissibility of that footage and what April said is in question and will be argued about in detail and I would expect her lawyer to be present should she testify to advise her.
All the above is 6th amendment material and was discussed as such by multiple lawyers and widely expected.

The other point here is that Nick accuses the police of violating her 5th amendment right, but if such a violation really happened would have to be shown via bodycam footage. If they did, as the report says, read April her rights and stopped directly asking her questions after she requested to speak to a lawyer, but then volunteered information, then there is nothing Nick can do about that.

And he cannot challenge this part anyway, because its not his rights. If the information given by April is not self-incriminatory then she might not even be able to plead the 5th anyway. This would be for motion in limine to argue.

[EDIT] I understand that a few people might have gotten this wrong, but I think the majority here understood the explanations given.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

While Nick may have lost any moral authority, his good name, most of his fans, his legal credibility and much more… He still has money. Millions likely.

So in a sense he will never really hit bottom, unless he somehow gets disinherited.

Spot on!

Anybody remember ken's counseling couch? I wonder what will he say to nick now that all this happened.

He was allegedly in talks to do live therapy streams with Nick. Unfortunately it never happened.

wait is he STILL trying to deny the swinging and that he's banging April?

If I was April I'd wonder why this guy, whose balls I hold firmly in my hands and can crush like play-dough between my fingers at any second for any reason or no reason at all, is still trying to keep this downlow.

It looks to me that he's just trying to string her along just long enough to:
1) Get her to act in his interests in her criminal matters rather than her own,
2) Keep her quiet for as long as possible,
3) Keep her from consenting to the body cam footage being released until he can find some permanent solution to it.

The moment that he's gotten everything he needs from her, she will be discarded. Then April can go online and say that XYZ happened and Nick will just laugh it off and do very smug toast to the camera, because she'd have lost all her leverage over him by then. She will just be a "jilted ex-friend" whose words "can't be trusted", and the criminal cases will be resolved so her testimony doesn't matter.

He still denies going to Hedonism II, so use that as a data point to triangulate the likelihood of Nick admitting anything.

One of the clergy that's involved with Nick's kids' education was one of the people who reported Nick to CPS

It was the head of the children's ministry at the church. They provide babysitting and instruction for children during services.

So I'm guessing that Rekieta didn't fly out of a US airport with a suitcase full of MDMA. I'm equally certain that him and Kayla wouldn't be venturing outside of the safe wypipo compound that Hedonism II provides to go wandering around the Jamaican bars and nightclubs to buy his molly.

So I'd presume this means he had to have bought his MDMA on site at Hedonism II.

They're going to be running a tight ship there at Hedonism II. They won't be allowing random Jamaican drug dealers to wander on site and start serving up the well-to-do American hedonists. That would be madness. So you'd have to presume that somebody has got the drug dealing franchise -- or the owners control sales themselves?

Swingers be generating some serious money in those $1,000 a night hotel rooms, so there's a pretty solid chance that the local cops/politicians are being taken care of financially. Nevertheless, I would have thought that the DEA would be hugely unhappy about an open drug market servicing primarily American customers from an island on the US doorstep. I wonder what it would take for them to intervene?

You'd probably need a middle aged, middle class American white woman to drop dead from an overdose of cocaine and black cock before anybody's going to act, but if I was the DEA agent based on that island, I'd be looking into their activities very closely.

Nick is on the record talking about the Jamaican drug dealer on the beach coming up and offering them their choice of poison.

Dude, there could be a video of him fucking April, and he'd still deny it. Some of these same people he's fighting with right now posted clips about Nick actually said in relation to Jesus and he keeps insisting they're wrong and he's right.

I don't see why anybody bothers arguing with him. It seems like it would drive anybody insane.

I guess it's good fodder for the thread though.

It just highlights his hypocrisy in undeniable ways... It is really something to have these tweets immortalsed in the same picture.

And here's another. And of course the #1 way to keep them coming around is not to have food out for them.

Nick was leaving food out for their roaming cats and that is what likely attracted them in the first place.

 

[mailfrawd]

They need to put a picture of Kayla's tits into the record so we can confirm the tattoo.

No they don’t.

 

[Jungle Strike]

I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE "MYSTERIOUS BROWN SUBSTANCE" WAS!!!!!

Never forget.

While they got caught before they could make the final product, they had the basic ingredient of Jenkem.

 

[Fapcop]

I can see how Nick would be infatuated with April though - apart from the classic mid-life trading up to a newer model, April seems 180 degrees different from Kayla personality-wise.
Kayla is an anxious shut-in stay at home mom with no ambition or drive. Whether that’s a result of living with Nick for 20 years or she was always like that, who knows.
April has “no fucks given” coolness, is impetuous and a risk taker, and zero responsibilities. She wants to do things like go to dumb tattoo conventions and gallery openings and be shown off, which aligns with what Nick wants, and Kayla is easily influenced so she then wants to do the fun things too.

Plus she’s younger. Nick can live out his “Golly gee, I’m a cool young stud in his 20ies with zero responsibilities!” Fantasies through her.

Kayla is baggage. Miscarriages and five kids. Nick “wasting” the best years on boring prude shit like being a father and responsible income earner.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

This is why I have a boiling disdain for Rekieta
The guy had a life that the average man can only dream of these days
A wife, kids, house, and a comfortable job
What does he do with that? Throw it all away for drugs and a shitty polycule with a trashy cheapass coke whore

Why would you even want that lifestyle? It isnt even like the movies where he is doing blow off the ass of a supermodel before an orgy with the cheerleaders of an NFL sportsteam

Esau trading his legacy for a meal bullshit

Esau was tricked after a long day of hunting, he also got extremely pissed to the point of forcing Jacob to run away and toil under someone who tricks him into working for 14 years, and even then embraced Jacob when he came home like he ran out in front of his guards. Jacob’s story ends with him giving his blessing to Joseph’s sons equally. (There’s a lot of rabbinical shitposting about Esau with Amalek, but honestly I do like how the reconciliation is and Jacob’s death can be read as hoping to end the brother against brother fighting).

Nick’s like one of the retarded sons of a few prophets who basically get slaughtered due to being a total disgrace to their lineage.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Yes, a lot of reasonableness. But a person sharing a nude pic with a lover or polycule/private group in itself does not operate as consent to that person or those people further disseminating the picture. The presumption is that things shared privately are intended to be private. It's a high hill to claim, absent a clear statement otherwise, to suggest he shouldn't reasonably have known she didn't consent to him sending it around, and also that it wasn't reasonable for him to believe she had a reasonable expectation of privacy about private pictures made or shared privately.

Statute:

As the statute you cite states, no such "presumption" exists for either of those two elements. Instead, it is a necessary element which must be proven that Aaron knew or should have known that there was an expectation of privacy. Same for the other element.

The parameters of the swinging relationship between the Rekietas and Imholtes will need to be defined in some detail in order to prove those two elements.

It also means that Aaron could potentially claim that Nick and Kayla's long-standing public reputation as exhibitionist nudist swingers is relevant. Remember, Aaron has already said he knew about their "reputation" before the wife swapping ever happened.

A polycule or swinging group, as ick as it is, is still an intimate relationship. It's never been suggested, even by Aaron, that the ethos of the thing was a total free-for-all, spread my personal bits around to anyone and everyone. Maybe that will come out, but none of them have acted in any way to suggest that. Very much the opposite.

Maybe! The parameters of the relationship have to be established.

Again, my point isn't whether Aaron is guilty or not under the statute.

My point is, in order to find Aaron guilty, all sorts of lurid claims of the sort Nick and Kayla Rekieta denied for years will have to be shown to be real, potentially via their own testimony to the contrary of what they insisted forever.

It's not what a random "reasonable person" would believe. It's about this person and that person.

I was jumping to the negligence part ("reasonably should have known") because obviously everyone involved in this sordid drama is a stupid, drug-addled, insane asshole; trying to understand their thought process is a waste of time.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Hold on to this image and archive of it
I can't wait for this to age.
View attachment 6370354

Nick was passing nudes of Kayla around their depraved poly group. Nick’s an exhibitionist. There is likely video of Nick giving or receiving dick on somebody’s phone.