- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
I think it's a nice house, Monty should buy it once he wins his lawsuit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, in those cases you bide your time until he crosses the property line. Then you invoke God, Country, and Castle Doctrine, and allow your very vocal associate and confidant Mr. AR-15, Esq. to speak on your behalf.The foot path worries me. What if you run into the Qover having a romp in the woods? And last thing I’d want is my kids even being near the coke head. There’s also the worry of having Rekieta’s drunk ass speeding in his mustang down the road. What if my kids are out playing? What if it’s me out on the street going for a run? What if my wife is driving out for work?
Does she come with the sale?Yep.. Lonely mistress in the second home. Where will she live now?
I recognize that shorter bottle. Looks like a bottle of Blanton's made in good ol' Kentucky. It's usually around $150 to just shy of $200 depending on supply and has become a bit of a meme bourbon because people just buy it for the horse stuck to the top of the bottle. That particularly sweet and caramelly whiskey (in that gay little basket with the other bottles) combined with the wine and some other little indicators around the room could convince me that April has been lurking in this particular bedroom.
Does she come with the sale?
I’m biased because I hate ranch style houses, so maybe that is clouding my perception, but I think this house is ugly. I’ve seen worse, but the decor in the kitchen, the ghetto fence in the back, and just overall feel is is that of an expanded trailer to me. Maybe I’m just an asshole, and I realize plenty of people would be happy to have a house this size, but I hate it.It's a genuine BalldoBunker!
He’s from the mean ghettos of Houston, incel.Balldo cucked himself out of his hometown!
I'm sure there's enough residue on the walls and counters for her to sniff for a good month.she doesn't usually come unless there's a shitload of blow involved
The absurdity is Nick is in no way protected from anything April says based on whether not they Mirandized her. He has no rights to be violated in this situation. It only becomes an issue for charges and testimony used against her.I don't get his part about April being Mirandized. Can't you loose your "Miranda rights" if you respond willingly? If he made the question she should not have responded at all.
There are rules on what a police officer can do after the person has been Mirandized and asserted their right to silence & an attorney. They can't technically "question" you. But they can draw you into a conversation where you start saying things that you should not say, that is fine. There are all kinds of technical legal rules around it and most police officers are going to be very familiar with the rules.
I think if the police had made an actual mistake on this point, Nick's motion would have described that point in great detail. But the motion is incredibly vague. Which means to me that they don't have anything really specific to point to.
It's an odd argument, even if we read Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010) favorable to Nick, that would only suppress April's statements, not the fact there's 26grams of coke in house.Yes, when exercising your right to remain silent it is on you to actually remain silent. It's really weak unless the officer did something extraordinary to dupe her into talking. I think this is part of the broader "look how badly this warrant was executed, they were even doing Miranda violations" strategy to muddy the waters when it seems pretty clear from what we have that the warrant was valid. The only non-retarded point I saw was that they can't just have her blabbing about Rekieta's crimes on tape in evidence without also putting her on the stand and making her testify.
(b) Thompkins waived his right to remain silent when he knowingly and voluntarily made a statement to police. A waiver must be “the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception” and “made with a full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.” Moran v. Burbine, 475 U. S. 412, 421. Such a waiver may be “implied” through a “defendant’s silence, coupled with an understanding of his rights and a course of conduct indicating waiver.” North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U. S. 369, 373. If the State establishes that a Miranda warning was given and that it was understood by the accused, an accused’s uncoerced statement establishes an implied waiver.
Minnesota is a duty to retreat state sadly.Well, in those cases you bide your time until he crosses the property line. Then you invoke God, Country, and Castle Doctrine, and allow your very vocal associate and confidant Mr. AR-15, Esq. to speak on your behalf.
Not really that surprising.Actually a really nice house, i’m honestly kinda surprised.
Stop it. I'm very tempted to buy the home myself and hang a massive banner that says "KIWIFARMS ALWAYS WINS" aimed directly at Nick's house.Seems like a good place for our dear feeder
To be fair you showed a listing in Vallejo which isn’t rural, nor in the middle of nowhere due to it’s proximity to the Bay Area. I will say Vallejo is an absolute shit hole and my defense of it stops there. I think a listing in Redding is closer to Nick’s situation being out in the sticks.A 1 story, 1 bath house (600sqft) is like 80k in Shelby Montana. It's also isolated as fuck, like 6k people total in the county lmao.
450k in CA (973 sqft):
View attachment 6324785
410k in rural CO: (7.5 acres)
View attachment 6324790