💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

I didn't watch very much of Nick's Rittenhouse coverage, but people that did have told me that Barnes was an angry crybaby at several points because he was on Nick's show and not in that courtroom.

It's difficult to say if Barnes would have harmed Kyle (the state's case was weak, and Binger was an absolute faggot), but I am very glad he wasn't on the case. It worked out just fine for Kyle without Barnes.

Barnes was such a sore loser during those streams. I remember at one point it was giving me such bad secondhand embarrassment that I switched to Law and Crime’s coverage for the remainder of the trial.

There were a lot of good things going for Kyle: solid facts, excellent lawyers, a fair judge, an especially incompetent prosecutor. Even so, there were a lot of tense moments and Kyle’s legal team had to be very careful, measured, and intentional. And after seeing Barnes make an absolute ass of himself defending Rekieta, I believe he could have easily fucked up Kyle’s case.

 

[Strix454]

I will readily admit that I am currently furthering the problem I am about to state, but why does this thread keep becoming a Barnes hotspot instead of talking about the Rackets fiasco? Is he actually involved with this case now or is he still just being talked about because of some non-existent hypothetical involvement?

Barnes made extensive legal and constitutional comments on the case defending Nick. Nick's attorney is a fan of Barnes. Barnes is as close as Nick has to a legal opinion defending him in public. Barnes has made a series of extremely controversial statements on the case suggesting that Nick is a victim of local government corruption and a local government intent on silencing him.

That kind of makes him a thing here.

 

[Vibralldo]

Barnes was such a sore loser during those streams. I remember at one point it was giving me such bad secondhand embarrassment that I switched to Law and Crime’s coverage for the remainder of the trial.

There were a lot of good things going for Kyle: solid facts, excellent lawyers, a fair judge, an especially incompetent prosecutor. Even so, there were a lot of tense moments and Kyle’s legal team had to be very careful, measured, and intentional. And after seeing Barnes make an absolute ass of himself defending Rekieta, I believe he could have easily fucked up Kyle’s case.

Nick surrounds himself with lawyers worse than he is

 

[IDF]

What will be Nick Rekieta's Final stream topic before he gets sent to prison?

He will be seething about Karen Farms of course. Maybe John Potter in particular.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Nick surrounds himself with lawyers worse than he is

Narcs like Nick always surround themselves with people who they sense are less intelligent than they are. Guys like him HAVE to feel like the smartest guy in the room at all times. And he definitely would never have been caught dead marrying a woman of substance and intelligence. Nick needs someone dumb enough to control.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Nick needs someone dumb enough to control.

See also: Kayla, Human Fleshlight.

 

[Botchy Galoop]

Narcs like Nick always surround themselves with people who they sense are less intelligent than they are.

That is also why he initially would not feel threatened by allowing what he perceived was a low-value man (Aaron) to rail his wife. That is until Kayla appeared to be sexually satisfied by Aaron.
It would also explain why he supposedly was unable to perform when he was in a situation where he felt intimidated by the men fucking his wife. In that case, those men happened to be black. He felt very...um...small, while in their presence.
What he supposed would make him feel powerful, i.e. giving his wife to his lessers, granting them a boon like a beneficent ruler; in reality made him feel like what he is. an inferior poser, flaccid in both brain and cock.

 

[Captain Manning]

He's alright as long as someone keeps him away from the judge. Personally, I also think he should have tard wrangled Steve "Nick runs an interstate nigger lynching empire" Quest, but aside from that, and that one hearing, his job was pretty decent.

Sure, but if you're gonna suggest that second one, you should probably also point out that Randazza should tard-wrangle Rekieta. A lot of the shit Nick is saying publicly is pretty nuts too. Fair is fair.

Note I said point out. Not expect. There is no way in fuck Randazza will ever make that happen, and I think Randazza knows it.

Barnes made extensive legal and constitutional comments on the case defending Nick. Nick's attorney is a fan of Barnes. Barnes is as close as Nick has to a legal opinion defending him in public. Barnes has made a series of extremely controversial statements on the case suggesting that Nick is a victim of local government corruption and a local government intent on silencing him.

That kind of makes him a thing here.

Plus Null asked for examples of people suggesting a government conspiracy against Nick. That's why he's coming up a lot again now. People find new examples and tag Null. As you say, he's the biggest name doing that.

Let the record also reflect that, should people feel he's being discussed too much in this thread, I have suggested he's entirely thread worthy in his own right. @Musashi's Son could easily do a good OP with what he has already.

Barnes is a fraud and a lolcow. In fact, I would say he's the one in Nick's orbit that is the most thread worthy right now. Coomy and others can't hold a candle to him.

 

[AnOminous]

Barnes was such a sore loser during those streams. I remember at one point it was giving me such bad secondhand embarrassment that I switched to Law and Crime’s coverage for the remainder of the trial.

He wasn't just being a sore loser, he was being wrong, and retard level wrong. He was rejecting the very strategy that Rittenhouse won on, in favor of his own dumbass tard strategy that he was correctly fired for.

He didn't seem to grasp that the point of the case was saving Rittenhouse's life, not puffing up the reputation of a popinjay lawyer.

 

[Drama keen]

I will readily admit that I am currently furthering the problem I am about to state, but why does this thread keep becoming a Barnes hotspot instead of talking about the Rackets fiasco? Is he actually involved with this case now or is he still just being talked about because of some non-existent hypothetical involvement?

There is a reason this thread is approaching 6000 pages. It looks like you missed the bible talk, some weeks ago.

 

[AnOminous]

I will readily admit that I am currently furthering the problem I am about to state, but why does this thread keep becoming a Barnes hotspot instead of talking about the Rackets fiasco? Is he actually involved with this case now or is he still just being talked about because of some non-existent hypothetical involvement?

Barnes is not directly involved in this case, but Cuckieta's lawyer is a close associate of his and it is strongly suspected that Barnes and his legal philosophy are at the core of Cuckieta's defense strategy.

Therefore, he gets some discussion here.

 

[NaggotFigger]

He wasn't just being a sore loser, he was being wrong, and retard level wrong. He was rejecting the very strategy that Rittenhouse won on, in favor of his own dumbass tard strategy that he was correctly fired for.

He didn't seem to grasp that the point of the case was saving Rittenhouse's life, not puffing up the reputation of a popinjay lawyer.

You sum up everyone involved in the Balldoverse very well. Any of them are retarded and are sore losers that does not know how to exactly debunk things correctly, and put the blame on others when they made their own mistakes. They base from their narcissism more than personally caring for others’ lives, and Balldo’s love for crack and retardation to get past by under the excuse that he is a true and honest “lawyer”. Even Barnes is equally or more dumber than Balldo or Juju could get. Barnes and Nick are not lawyers, they are nepo babies together just so that they can win and continue their insanity together in crack.

Barnes is not directly involved in this case, but Cuckieta's lawyer is a close associate of his and it is strongly suspected that Barnes and his legal philosophy are at the core of Cuckieta's defense strategy.

Therefore, he gets some discussion here.

Nepotism much, Nicky? I guess every single lawsuit that Nick involved in always going to have a tinge of nepotism involved in and baseless accusations and claims.

 

[AltisticRight]

Robert Barnes raped my pet goat behind an Arby's in 1979.

 

[NaggotFigger]

Robert Barnes raped my pet goat behind an Arby's in 1979.

Then Barnes is confirmed to be an Analbanian. Goatfuckers are common in Albania and Kosowho.

 

[Crux]

I will readily admit that I am currently furthering the problem I am about to state, but why does this thread keep becoming a Barnes hotspot instead of talking about the Rackets fiasco? Is he actually involved with this case now or is he still just being talked about because of some non-existent hypothetical involvement?

Barnes is not directly involved in this case, but Cuckieta's lawyer is a close associate of his and it is strongly suspected that Barnes and his legal philosophy are at the core of Cuckieta's defense strategy.

Therefore, he gets some discussion here.

Barnes is very flash and bang but I've found over time the actual legal substance of his arguments is oftentimes flimsy or quite pigeonholed. Nicky Rackets the Rail King himself has pushed a lot of legal views in a similar fashion which tie into what most of us have seen as heavy narcissism. If I recall correctly at the beginning of this beautiful swan dive Nick was piggy backing onto one of Barnes' poorly constructed arguments that the search of the Rail King's home was unconstitutional.

While I get that it seems off topic AnOminous is correct that Barnes has at some level influenced the way Nicky Rackets the Rail King has acted and continues to view and pontificate on his legal standings.

 

[Gay Mouth]

Barnes is a gimmick lawyer who prioritizes his legal plays and ideas over his clients' best interest. A good defense attorney will balance his client's wishes with what is reasonable and likely to happen. Your defense attorney should be in your corner and believe in you, without completely losing the plot and burying their head, and your fate, up their ass. Barnes seems to gamble his clients' fate on vanishingly unwinnable crackpot gambits. They rarely work out, but his retarded game theory plays occasionally win him big cases and headlines. You want a lawyer who is focused on getting you your best possible outcome, not gambling your future on black for his benefit.

 

[Fapcop]

Seems that Barnes mostly makes his living from being a talking head on various shows and podcasts.

And then monetizes it whenever someone needs a lawyer and goes: “Oh! That Barnes guy! From that podcast! He sounds like he knows what’s up and will be in my corner!”

And when Null calls, Barnes charges him 5000$ for a quick chat.

He literally doesn’t make a living by being a good lawyer, but by playing one on podcasts.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick surrounds himself with lawyers worse than he is

Ehhh... Debatable, and dependant how you define worse.

While Barnes sucks, he has won a few cases. Nick hasn't. I think Nick is still the very epitome of shitty lawyer. The worst out of all of 'em.

 

[RotPockets]

Why does Nick talk like this?

It’s like someone trying to get punched.
Fucking pathetic cuck should rope.

 

[demicolon]

I do my podcast and host my little forum but I've really bet the farm on Rekieta being guilty of some really terrible stuff.

I wish you'd win a million dollars.
No, wait. One billion dollars.