💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
I believe the perjury claim refers to this.
The perjury claim was in reference to her being prevented access to the master bedroom.

It appears Nick insists that telling someone "You do not need to come in here" in relation to the master bedroom and shutting the door in their face does not constitute denial of entry to the master bedroom.

door.png

This is how Rekieta characterized it:
1719002032450.png

When Nick first discussed this in June it was already super obvious what had happened:
Nick had done or said things which were as denials of entry to the master bedroom/bathroom area without explicitly saying that he was denying access. He is way less clever than he gives himself credit for.

I had predicted that he insisted on another time to do the walkthrough. Also appears to be correct, as according to the transcript they wanted to hurry up and leave to post bond, but they also insisted on counsel being present at any future meetings.
The sleight of hand from "not allowed" to "prevented" is a classic Rekieta trick. If I had to guess, I would say he insisted on another time "to do a walk through of the whole house" which was taken as a refusal to enter the master bedroom. That's if he's not straight up lying, which is always a likely possibility.

We also have a hint of why Rekieta may not have wanted her in the bedroom which is that Nick tested positive for alcohol after this all went down. If there were bottles strewn throughout the bedroom, that probably would have been frowned upon.

That said, shutting the door and saying "You do not need to come in here" is more explicit than I thought it would be.

But it's still not an explicit "I am not allowing you to come in here", in Rekieta logic it is not a denial of access at all and it's PERJURY!

Bottom line: this kind of brinkmanship doesn't work in these types of cases. All that it means is that the usual benefit of the doubt which would be allowed to parents is lost. You can see it in the case plan. Probably because of the brinkmanship with the hair follicle test release, the case plans which were posted made clear that failures to abide by testing would simply be treated as a positive test.
 
Sir Rekieta would like to point out that I 'fled the country for unknown reasons', and that the Kiwi Farms is a bunch of 'loli avatars',
Bold move to make bad faith insinuations considering his and Kayla's charges. Just saying I don't think any posters here stand accused of "knowingly permitting physical or sexual abuse of a child".
 
I hope for all of our sakes that he does not take a plea deal.
It would be much funnier if he continues trying to fight everything.
 
I don't know why the midwit thinks he can control the narrative on the Internet. Even major world governments can't do that effectively, yet somehow Nick thinks he's better than that. He's especially dumb to try directly lying to Null, who has access to a practicing lawyer and a reputation for publicly shaming retards online.

Also, I should be thankful I can't understand his drug-ravaged brain, but I don't get what he's actually going for with his public image. Balldo wants to pretend to be wholesome, that he didn't do drugs or swing. But at the same time he admits to going to "crazy parties", using sex toys, being a drunkard, streams half-naked, and takes his wife and side-whore out to a tattoo festival dressed like skanks.

Even if I didn't known he was cucked by Aaron and caught with a bunch of coke, I still wouldn't look at him and think heckin' wholesome Christian family man. Especially after all the blasphemy streaming.
 
If he doesn't take a plea, even more of these humiliating details will surface, whether he wins at trial or not. And this ongoing saga of humiliation will continue for as long as any new occurrences emerge, regardless how minuscule. For not just him but Kayla, April and his entire family. And he will drain his and his family's wealth on this case, Kayla's case, April's case & his retarded lawsuit defense. If he pleas, all he has to do is admit to something that everyone already knows anyway, and he'll incur almost no significant consequences.

I tend to think his most retarded choices correlate with time he spends online. If he can go at least 2 consecutive months without even looking at anything online, he might be convinced by his family and lawyer to plea. I just don't think he can keep away. This is probably one of the most aggressive cases of terminal addiction to self indulgence seen in some time.
 
This guy is loaded with a trust fund and has his grandparents, his GRANDPARENTS, clean his house. By all means I’m not rich but I still have a professional service come out and do work on the carpet at least once a year. I’d be loathe to call my parents, much less my fucking grandparents whom I dearly love and want nothing more for them to enjoy their lives to come by and clean my shit.

Holy fuck.
Be fair to Nicky, can you imagine just how hard it is to find a cleaning lady to take up the task of making your Crack&Coom hovel presentable when she has to deal with the following?:

-Rumors that the owner of the house has two side pieces and owns an extensive collection of sex toys and BDSM paraphernalia.
-Rumors that every surface is tainted with illicit substances which may get you thrown in the slammer if even trace amounts are found on you.
-The owner of the house refusing to tell you what he would like cleaned up because on top of being his cleaning lady you are supposed to be a mentalist and read his mind. But only the part of his mind that he wants.
-No bleach or other cleaning supplies in the house, that could be dangerous to the kids that are no longer there.
-A room filled with dog poop you can always hear soft sobbing from.
-A room with a mountain of Star Trek merchandise and Legos where, inexplicably, a soft demented wail perpetually permeates the soundscape and a pair of bulging eyes, pupils dilated like twin blackholes, watch your every move.
-A room which is comprised of eight arrow-shaped corridors splitting from the center. Two corridors, they hold a collection of pornographic DVDs categorized by date, theme, length and "spicyness". Two corridors, their walls damaged beyond repair, they have the words 'INCEL PRUDES' carved on every visible surface. Two corridors, they hold nothing but unending packages of pre-boiled eggs. Two corridors, their walls, floors and ceilings wall-papered with nothing but endless, infinite tiles of a picture of a fat, bald man wearing a suit, the man is smugly smirking as his countenance slowly warps into the shape of a pug.
At the center of the room where the corridors converge there is a single pedestal upon which a silicon cage and two rings rest.

You'd have a better and easier time cleaning up R'lyeh than whatever the balldo Nightmare McMansion currently is.
 
Last edited:
If he doesn't take a plea, even more of these humiliating details will surface, whether he wins at trial or not. And this ongoing saga of humiliation will continue for as long as any new occurrences emerge, regardless how minuscule. For not just him but Kayla, April and his entire family. And he will drain his and his family's wealth on this case, Kayla's case, April's case & his retarded lawsuit defense. If he pleas, all he has to do is admit to something that everyone already knows anyway, and he'll incur almost no significant consequences.

I tend to think his most retarded choices correlate with time he spends online. If he can go at least 2 consecutive months without even looking at anything online, he might be convinced by his family and lawyer to plea. I just don't think he can keep away. This is probably one of the most aggressive cases of terminal addiction to self indulgence seen in some time.
Yeah a plea definitely seems like the obvious action.
The famous 5 stages of grief are denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.
I'd say at this point we are still at the bargaining stage.
He is exhausting every option possible.
As trial dates approach the potential consequences of his actions will get larger and more real in his mind, I would think.
And so we will see if that is enough to move him off of the bargaining stage and into depression ("there's no way i can win this") and acceptance - a plea deal.

But some people will go a very long time without accepting their reality. I think it's possible he wont.
He doesn't want to admit he did anything wrong and that's a big ego thing for him (obviously).

@Null perhaps there should be betting or a poll on whether or not he accepts a plea deal.
 
Hear ye, hear ye. It is the 4th day of August in year 2024 since the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. I have been contacted by King Balldo through a series of ropes and pulleys and given a missive.
*snip*

Yeah, it's not creepy and cult-like at all that he's STILL contacting you trying to control the narrative.

All that's missing is him saying he forgives you for "betraying" him and denying his divinity.

:story:
 
You're giving him too much credit. Nick has chosen this route because he is a moron and is going to fight back anyway he can against people using force against him. Whether or not he actually wants his kids in his life, he isn't going to have people in positions of authority determine that he can't see his kids. Especially since there is a forum of people who enjoy laughing at Nick and will mock him if he dares willingly give up custody to pursue his degenerate lifestyle.
The technicalities and clever little semantic word plays that Nick is coming up with are going to look absurd before a jury, none of his defences are even close to being reasonable. Nick is the type of person who thinks that if he finds the correct magic words then he can talk his way out of anything, he can't.
The thing with narcissistic cows like Nick is that they believe they can bend objective reality and people's comprehension of it if they sperg hard enough.
It's like when Ralph believes he's winning as long as he keeps hollering and screaming "5 star days".
Nick is convinced that he can clear the record and lawsplain his way out of this shitshow. If he could find just the right words, then everyone - his judge, the Farms, his detractors would instantly forget the last 2 years. In his mind, if he beats the case, then that would mean that everything leading up to it was proven to be untrue, reality would rearrange itself and all those haters would again see him as a based traddad lawyer he's always been.
So lets conduct a little thought experiment.
Lets imagine, that Nick beats the case, like the search warrant gets thrown out, or something. What happens next? Does Null commit seppuku to wash away his dishonour? Do Warski and PPP do a 12-hour "We Were Wrong, Balldo is cool and hip, and Nick is NOT an addict " stream? No. People would still call Nick a cokehead cuck and a deadbeat dad, who weaseled out of his jail time.
Rekieta can't grasp this simple truth, that's why he keeps going with this shit and seething impotently.
 
She definitely wants him to eat a felony. If Barneswalker negotiates him a deferred adjudication, then he did a great job. An Alford plea is a much more realistic goal, and it would allow Nick to claim "I'm innocent but I had to do this for muh keeds."
I think you have it backward. In a deferred adjudication, he pleads guilty and admits he committed the crime. He eats the felony. The judge then defers the sentencing with the possibility that it's dismissed in a few years. But for the prosecutor, it's a guilty felony conviction.

Importantly, Rekieta admits his guilt in open court.

An Alford plea is that he doesn't admit guilt. It's much rarer. He is much less likely to get an Alford plea after antagonizing the prosecutor and accusing them of crimes. The prosecutor is going to require he admit guilt and be unable to assert innocence in the future and that happens with a deferred adjudication plea.

An alford plea would also allow him to appeal. Deferred adjudication plea removes appeals. Barnes getting an Alford plea would be amazing. Deferred adjudication after guilty plea is much more likely to be offered.
 
The perjury claim was in reference to her being prevented access to the master bedroom.

It appears Nick insists that telling someone "You do not need to come in here" in relation to the master bedroom and shutting the door in their face does not constitute denial of entry to the master bedroom.

door.png
Am I misunderstanding this part, or was Nick wanting to show off his shitty artwork to the CPS worker? A CPS worker is at his house, trying to assess whether the kids can go back home, and this guy is so unserious about what is happening that he wants to show off his art to Sweep? He is actually trying to flaunt his wealth to a CPS worker, this is just unreal. :story:
 
Sir Rekieta would like to point out that I 'fled the country for unknown reasons', and that the Kiwi Farms is a bunch of 'loli avatars', which makes us even less deserving of seeing the divine footage.

We all know how desperate Rekieta was to try and keep this country fleer onside, and how utterly heartbroken he was when the Farms turned against him.

You can't dump somebody after you've already been dumped, Nick.

Ask Aaron Imholte.
 
I laughed at the document part when Rekieta required the poor social worker to stare at his stupid shell casing art, like it was a big "gotcha" moment.
This is how I envisioned Rekieta's House Tour happening::



RekietaHomeTour.png
RekietaHomeTour-2.png
 
Am I misunderstanding this part, or was Nick wanting to show off his shitty artwork to the CPS worker? A CPS worker is at his house, trying to assess whether the kids can go back home, and this guy is so unserious about what is happening that he wants to show off his art to Sweep? He is actually trying to flaunt his wealth to a CPS worker, this is just unreal. :story:
I think he was trying to explain the shell casings as part of an art piece in his bedroom. But it just comes off as him overly explaining and acting totally not on drugs.
 
Am I misunderstanding this part, or was Nick wanting to show off his shitty artwork to the CPS worker? A CPS worker is at his house, trying to assess whether the kids can go back home, and this guy is so unserious about what is happening that he wants to show off his art to Sweep? He is actually trying to flaunt his wealth to a CPS worker, this is just unreal. :story:
Nick was trying to say that the art piece was the explanation for the loose ammunition found in his room, because said ammunition was part of said art piece.
He's really thinking he's winning because he has an explanation for the ammunition, and not the fucking cocaine, which he now is of the opinion he "doesn't believe necessarily was in his house".

The cocaine that was literally in a safe in the room he admitted he sleeps in.
 
“Sorry, Kiwifags teehee

Him accepting a plea deal is not gonna fucking happen. If he can’t pay a fucking parking ticket or his own taxes, then he’s gonna step on a rake with the plea deal.

Well, the bodycam footage becomes public if they go to trial. If in Rekieta's mind he can deny Null and KF the body cam by going to prison, he'll do it. He'll become spitecow seething in prison about how his fight for privacy for all of us was worth it. He's fighting cancel culture for us!
 
Why would anyone want Nick to go to prison? When he violates his probation (which is likely), he'll go to prison automatically, yes?

The odds of him NOT being an alcoholic and drug addict are zero. He probably went out and bought more cocaine the night he was released.
 
  • Sir Rekieta dearly wishes the footage may be made available, however, due to the court order in the CHIPS case, as a result of a request he filed himself, discovery is sealed.
  • Sir Rekieta states that consenting to such a release would make him look irresponsible in the eyes of the court, revealing intimates of his home for the benefit of only an evil doxing website, which the court would not find amusing.
The easy solution to this would be for him to persuade April to consent to the release. Rekieta gets his wish granted, he won't look irresponsible and April has the excuse of the $1K. Held hostage by evil doxing website due to recent unemployment.

He never stress tests his bullshit.
 
I don't know how April stays if the kids return home, legally or practically. Especially if the grandparents move in too. But I'm sure Nick's not too worried about appearing responsible when it comes to evicting his pay-as-you-go girlfriend experience. Won't be surprised if he fights it tooth & nail on the grounds that she's in danger for her life because her estranged husband fucked his wife and etc etc etc.
IMO, he already fought a condition that she not be around. They tried to keep it as just a simple "she can't be there for obvious reasons." Nick then lawyer sperged at them: "April doesn't live there. she has no criminal history, there's no evidence that she does drugs, she's not accused of a crime." So the prosecutor needing to protect kids did a legal *sigh* and charged her with the lowest level drug felony just to shut Nick up and keep the coke whore away from the kids. Now there's a legal reason they can cite for keeping her out of the house and away from kids. Because Nick is retarded and talked her into a felony charge.
 
Back
Top Bottom