💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    698
Sharpeteer said:
I really don't think he's getting them back.

While I too have repeated the common Libertarian sentiment (and I believe) that the US government is incompetence to the core, and cannot do anything in a timely or fully correct manner, I don't think they would look at all the evidence that's been presented so far, and come to the conclusion that the kids going back to that house is the appropriate decision.

It would take a miracle in the form of legal arguments and weaselly language, in my opinion, to get everything thrown out and have the kids returned to him. I think that's when we'd be able to assume this department is run by actual monkeys.

If there's one thing we can take away from Nick's decline, is that luck is no longer on his side like it is on DSP's side. He's losing this battle, and all control. He's currently flailing around.
Click to expand...
There's also the fact that Nick blatantly, obviously, screamingly does not want his kids back. He's finally getting to live the Dax fantasy of living in Chateau de Balldo with his side piece until August hits. The leaked documents made it pretty clear he's not interested in taking any steps to get his children back. He can package it as "you can't trust the government" and "Aleisha Sweep is lying about me!11!" but only the most tortion'd of balldowashers are buying that.
 
Do you believe in this level of coincidence?

42-answer.jpg
 
Angry Crustacean said:
The government can take his freedom, but they'll never take his narcissistic personality disorder.
Click to expand...
Heading to Borderline Personality Disorder... I think the simple answer to this.... Paul Aken Just don't look That kills the monsters? It worked for the simpsons.. BPD's bigest fear is being ignored and alone...
 
VIDEO REQUEST: I would probably piss my pants with mirth if someone made a supercut of the times Nick has sassily popped a single Dorito or cracker into his mouth. The most memorable is when he was boasting about how Rumble wanted him to come to Miami to “figure out” his contract renewal and he made some dumb comment about “Kiwi fags.”

Honestly I’d love just having that one clip repeated several times in one file. I’m planning a cringe tolerance competition and it would be the final boss.
 
I feel bad for whoever got stuck with the kids.

You're retired. Living a relaxing life and suddenly you got to babysit a bunch of kids indefinitely, including a 9 year old dealing with coke withdrawal.
 
MirnaMinkoff said:
Not clear if the “foster parents” at the hearing were Kayla’s parents, but it seems likely. I think if they weren’t the foster parents they would have been named as witnesses like Nick’s dad.
Click to expand...
As others have stated - Kayla's parents were at one time foster parents to numerous people. They however, do not currently show up in the online licensing lookup for foster parents, which probably means that their license has since expired, which makes sense for an elderly couple.

However - Minnesota CPS does try to place kids with relatives before assigning them to a foster family per this document. Apparently 63% of the time in 2023.

Snippet:

foster.PNG

So, assuming that both sides of the Rekieta family are not complete dirtbag white trash - then I assume that one of them has got the kids currently, and the reference to "licensed foster care parents" in the CHIPS document was a error made in a rush to get it pushed through. It could also be an effort to hide the location of the children from the public.
 
Lets play Devil's Advocate.

Yes, Nick is talking a big game over the Barnes style, pants on head retarded, SovCit "AKSHUALLY the Government doesn't have the right to enforce laws" argument.

... Is he allowed to talk about any other arguments? Like everyone and their mother can talk about the SovCit shit, that's generic. Universal. Attack the warrant, obviously, duh. But everything else he might do in his defense he can't speak publicly about because the prosecutor is watching every single thing he says online like a hawk. Any information he gives up is information the prosecutor doesn't have to find in other ways.

I mean...

Yeah no he's still a piece of shit. 8 year old on cocaine, NIck. And that's YOUR fault. And you don't give a shit, other than it's causing people to make fun of you and making it hard to get cocaine.
 
footballteam said:
As others have stated - Kayla's parents were at one time foster parents to numerous people. They however, do not currently show up in the online licensing lookup for foster parents, which probably means that their license has since expired, which makes sense for an elderly couple.

However - Minnesota CPS does try to place kids with relatives before assigning them to a foster family per this document. Apparently 63% of the time in 2023.

Snippet:

View attachment 6108072

So, assuming that both sides of the Rekieta family are not complete dirtbag white trash - then I assume that one of them has got the kids currently, and the reference to "licensed foster care parents" in the CHIPS document was a error made in a rush to get it pushed through. It could also be an effort to hide the location of the children from the public.
Click to expand...
I’ve done a few posts since and I’m 99% Nick’s parents have the kids and Nick would have let his kids go to rando foster care providers before he would provide Kayla’s family as “relatives” that could provide kinship care.

I think Nick and Kayla have been estranged from her family for quite awhile and he views them as an enemy camp.
 
HTTP Error 404 said:
... Is he allowed to talk about any other arguments?
Click to expand...

What would those other arguments be? Alot of thought has been given to the case by a great many people and I think the general consensus is that getting the warrant thrown out is the only play he could have.

Sure. Maybe he and Barnes have come up with a cunning plan that nobody could ever imagine that is going to give Nick total victory. But they really don't seem like cunning plan kind of people.
 
DuranceVile said:
It has been said before, but I think Nick's on the Lowtax express. There's a lot of similarities with the infidelity, child neglect, obsession with 'vindication.' Just replace the coke with goldbelly pies. Will not be surprised at all if this ends in an hero.

Many such cases with hedonists. See Hunter S. Thompson.
Click to expand...
Lowtax paid a tranny hooker to shit on a glass table while he jerked off underneath on his final months.

I could see Nick upping the ante
 
Captain Manning said:
Nick's got other brooms, but CGoody has been super loyal to a fault. So you gotta wonder about the caliber of people that would be left if he goes. We're talking Robert Barnes and the lizard people levels of insane loyalty.
Click to expand...

One of Nick’s newer and more active jannies, who has a history of begging for a broom and deleting posts, often times reaching beyond the host’s wishes, is Grifty.

Some might remember him because he was Defango’s associate around the time that Defango doxxed the clip channels that clipped Faran whom he was simping for. At the time, Defango and Grifty were Faran’s attack dogs after she and her newly acquired friend Chrissy Mayr caught heat for DMCA striking clip channels after Faran was exposed as having plagiarized her Eliza Bleu documentary. Faran also struck clippers for clipping her drunken coke streams. I recall that Cynthia, who was Faran advocate #1, also associated with Defango and mentioned him warmly in this thread in her jilted state as a recent Rekieta Law Locals reject.

Oh, the circle of life…
 
JustStopDude said:
I feel bad for whoever got stuck with the kids.

You're retired. Living a relaxing life and suddenly you got to babysit a bunch of kids indefinitely, including a 9 year old dealing with coke withdrawal.
Click to expand...
I can't even imagine. I am a father of one kid and I'm in my early 30s, so far from retirement age.... And if suddenly I was caring for 5 kids, it would be extremely difficult even for me. And then to imagine doing that after I finished raising my own kids and was ready to sit back and enjoy retirement. Of course you'd have to do it, because I can't imagine letting my theoretical grandkids be put into the foster care system, which in some cases could be just as bad if not worse than having coked up parents who don't give a fuck, but damn... it's a rough situation.
 
Sharpeteer said:
I really don't think he's getting them back.
Click to expand...
This isn't so cut and try. The Foster Care system is hell, and CPS knows this. Given ANY possible option, CPS' goal is reuniting kids with their parents. All they demand is a case plan. I.e., CPS will be digging through your trash and crawling up your ass to insure you are doing what they want. Which in this case would be no drugs, no guns, random drug testing, and random home inspections to insure its clean.

Parents who are actually serious about "doing better" will reflexively agree to the plan. The Court will also take compliance with CPS demands into consideration in dealing with charges of child endangerment and wat not. The case could even be plead out to a lesser, or convicted with the parole terms being compliance with the Case Plan. Unironically when it comes to CPS complaints and Juvenile court hearings, the opposite advice is in play. It is far better to just admit to things. Even if CPS is exaggerating or outright lying. Unless you can definitely show you didn't do the thing, you will lose. Because the issue before the court is not YOU. Its your kids. Which means certain constitutional provisions like the presumption of innocence are not operative. In a CPS initiated juvenile court proceeding, you are presumed guilty and if you dare to argue otherwise you are both brave and foolish. So you had better bring the receipts.

Something I don't think Rekieta has. Which means they will take the kids away because as much as CPS hates handing kids over to Foster Parents, they won't return them to recalcitrant biological parents. I would imagine at an intellectual level Rekieta knows this. But his brain is still trying to figure out how to beat the Criminal Charges against him, and admitting to the CPS charges will by course be used against him.

So the kids will not be returned, so long as the Criminal Prosecution is in progress. Once that is over, I expect (hope) Rekieta will then come to terms to CPS. Since he has it in his head right now to fight the criminal charges, he can't by necessity comply with CPS demands.
 
mindlessobserver said:
This isn't so cut and try. The Foster Care system is hell, and CPS knows this.
Click to expand...
Yep. I've known people who either grow up entirely or at least spent some time in foster care. The system... is not well regulated (though that does vary by state I suppose). A lot of sexual and other abuse happens in them.... in some cases it could literally be worse than having coked out parents who occasionally forget to feed you.

I've heard stories of a lot of people fostering for the money.... if you can get the state to pay you $800 a month to foster a kid, and you're able to keep them alive for cheaper than that.... well you just made a profit.

The best case I can imagine for Nick's kid is that he doesn't get them back, but they end adopted by a decent family member.
 
NotADrunkLawyer said:
I can't even imagine. I am a father of one kid and I'm in my early 30s, so far from retirement age.... And if suddenly I was caring for 5 kids, it would be extremely difficult even for me. And then to imagine doing that after I finished raising my own kids and was ready to sit back and enjoy retirement. Of course you'd have to do it, because I can't imagine letting my theoretical grandkids be put into the foster care system, which in some cases could be just as bad if not worse than having coked up parents who don't give a fuck, but damn... it's a rough situation.
Click to expand...
Where I live, it's not unusual for a household to have like a grandma and a bunch of grandkids, where the oldest grandkid is the primary income earner. Grandma is the daycare provider/works part time in retail.

And both parents are pill heads.
 
Sharpeteer said:
Back in May, I did not at all think Aaron would be quite the useful asset, so I do feel a tiny bit bad for killing him off. lol. But again, I wrote that script long before all this shit happened. I did not plan on literally everything going to Hell with this clown. But that said I did make at least some changes after the arrest and his cult defense force came to be.
Click to expand...
That can be easily remedied.
star-wars-1.jpg
Somehow... Aaron returned.
 
JustStopDude said:
Where I live, it's not unusual for a household to have like a grandma and a bunch of grandkids, where the oldest grandkid is the primary income earner. Grandma is the daycare provider/works part time in retail.

And both parents are pill heads.
Click to expand...
Let's see, you're either in Florida, Michigan or Ohio would be my best guess based upon the criteria you listed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom