💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    699
well now that KC started we will see and maybe be able to fact check or correlate to dates whatever Aaron says
 
Third World Aristocrat said:
What the fuck? Is Barnes on a narrative that this is all a retaliation against Nicks big advocacy against government corruption?
This is locals levels of retardness.
Click to expand...
If the corrupt government wants to take out Nick for speaking out against them, they should have just let Nick drink and overdose himself to death or just possibly die in a domestic dispute. Taking away his guns and drugs just protects Nick.
 
CoomerTine said:
The DOJ might have been involved? Lmao their audience makes Q Anon seem sane
Click to expand...
Had Nick actually lived up to his potential as this promised RW legal media titan, then and only then, would the DoJ probably want to ruin him. The feds don't even care about zooted-out spergs walking around in renowned cities in the US.

Barnes's last recollection of Nick has to be from Depp, and he's on his populist grind thinking the feds must've sabotaged Nick and his wife with drugs as if they're the black community in the 80s, just to screw this right-wing legend from taking flight.
 
break these cuffs said:
I think Aaron is someone who can provoke Nick so it's a great choice imo. I don't like any of them and won't be watching, but I will be waiting for a reaction.
Click to expand...
Aaron is one of the few people who can remove Nick's defense of "you don't have the full story". Even though Aaron is an absolutely retarded cuckhold, Nick's at his mercy.
Captain Manning said:
Oh, JFC! They're gonna make this a Q-Anon type thing, aren't they?

LOL.
Click to expand...
TBH, it's the only rational explanation if Nick isn't a drunken, swingin' coke fiend.
 
Napoleon III said:
I think I can for about 90-95% of it.
Click to expand...
You must have some sort of special form of autism attuned to decoding skitzo. None of Nick's "jokes" make it through my bullshit filter.
A Cardboard Box said:
I'll take my fucking tophats. I'll die on this hill. You fuck with kids, you get the bullet. You defend that behavior, you get the bullet. Do not pass go, do not collect $200, do not go to jail, you get a bullet and a shallow, unmarked grave.
Click to expand...
You're a good cardboard box, box. Would hide in and pounce on people when they walk by/10
Harm said:
Her saving those Elissa Clips videos in her playlist? Maybe they upset her a lot more than we'd realized and she was beating on him for the embarrassing shit he was saying. This is really grim.
Click to expand...
Interesting. I wonder if Nick can be observed on stream with facial injuries around the times of some of those clips.
 
CoolSixtyNiner said:
That really shouldnt come in to play. I get that judges are people and that hearing Nick denigrate her on a live stream drunk would affect her personal view on Nick the person, but would it actually affect her decisions in court? That would be very fucked up.
Click to expand...
As I've pointed out, this particular judge has in fact made some remarkably intemperate and imo outright improper comments about people like one of Nick's own clients. I generally have a higher regard for judges than a lot of people here, but they're human beings. If someone has viciously hurled vile slurs against you in public, you may try not to be prejudiced by it, or believe you aren't prejudiced by it, but unless you're some kind of inhuman robot, it will have an effect on how you think about and react to that person in the future.
 
AnOminous said:
As I've pointed out, this particular judge has in fact made some remarkably intemperate and imo outright improper comments about people like one of Nick's own clients. I generally have a higher regard for judges than a lot of people here, but they're human beings. If someone has viciously hurled vile slurs against you in public, you may try not to be prejudiced by it, or believe you aren't prejudiced by it, but unless you're some kind of inhuman robot, it will have an effect on how you think about and react to that person in the future.
Click to expand...
yes exactly
she probably won't consciously think "hm this guy insulted me, i'll give him an extra year to get back at him, hehe!"
but it is unavoidable that his behavior will influence her impression of him, which in turn influences her decision making in the case, no doubt about it.
 
Pull-up Barnes..
Perhaps go back and watch your boys streams for the past 6 months..
Let us know Barnes, if the County is responsible for all his degenerate behavior..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom