💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
I can't believe this scum of a human being is seriously mad at the fucking priest for not only doing his job, but also doing the right thing of reporting child neglect/child abuse because it's "my friend". Burn in hell, Kurt. You fat, ugly, sweaty loser.
This incel piece of shit, allegedly a lawyer, is trashing someone for NOT COMMITTING A FUCKING CRIME.
 
Minnesota has proclaimed today "George Floyd Remembrance Day," in honor of Nicholas Robert Rekieta
GOcUAo8WcAEBOLX.jpg
Congratulations Nicky!
 
The fact that I can't say, "Rekieta 100% did not physically nor sexually abuse his children," is itself a condemnation.
I cannot comfortably say Nick did not abuse his children. He's alluded to beating them unprompted, made multiple jokes about child molestation, and verbally attacked his children on-stream. Nick muddied the water so much that I can't rule out anything.
you can't say that 100% about anybody unless you literally live in their house yourself.
 
Why does the first page of complaint mention a drug charge for both Nick and Kayla but in the last page the charges change to "knowingly allowing physical/sexual abuse of a child" in regards to Kayla? I don't believe it's a typo, the prosecution can't be this retarded. I hope the August hearing clarifies the charges more.
 
There isn’t anything to “defend”. I haven’t seen anyone argue that Nick dindu nuffin.

People are going to question you when you have insurmountable rage about some rando online who developed an alcohol and drug addiction and then ended up being an asshole to people and fucking up his life in like a year as a result.
Nigga please. There's a shit load of defending and sweeping up going on.

I have every right to be pissed off. I, as someone who has been critical of Nick, is getting blamed by his stupid faggot "friends" for his fuck up.
 
Oh and it's not a "sad situation". A fatal car accident is sad, cancer is sad, Nick and Kayla are just run of the mill junkies who neglect their kids. They have zero reason or excuse for being degenerates and both should know better. Stop making excuses.
The amount of defense and whitewashing being run for this piece of shit is insane.
 
putting myself in Nick shoes, i would have done the same, hoping my crackwhore wife and crackslut sidepiece are awake enough to flush shit down the toilet. Didn't work but that's the right move if you only care to have a lighter sentence
I understand. And I bet many addicts would behave similarly. Why make the cops job easier when they're there to fuck with you? Why not throw the warrant and passively resist like a petulant child?

At that moment, the jig was up. Cops were there with a warrant, and his home is an actual, factual crack den. The door is opening one way or another. Providing the code would've been accepting the inevitability of his situation and preventing bad from getting worse. But instead, he revealed that he's not just some stressed out lolbertarian going through a rough patch. Nope, he's a common junkie.
 
Why does in the first page of complaint mention a drug charge for both Nick and Kayla but in the last page the charges change to "knowingly allowing physical/sexual abuse of a child" in regards to Kayla? I don't believe it's a typo, the prosecution can't be this retarded. I hope the August hearing clarifies the charges more.
Read the charge descriptions, they both have the same charge description despite Kayla getting a different statute referenced. There is the fuckup somewhere, the question is where.
 
I don't even understand the "it's kiwifarms fault' narrative on this one, at least with Keffals there was a swatting being falsely attributed to kiwis, with this we know who reported it to CPS, and that it was someone who has probably never heard of kiwifarms in their life, and we know it wasn't a false report because they did in fact find drugs and an environment that does not sound like it was fit for children.
I wish we could take the blame for this one. Would be our crowning achievement "We kicked the first domino that ended a year+ long child abuse cycle".
 

Cope stream. Someone archive pls. I'm phone fagging. Even when we don't do it, we do it.
This bitch made a video making fun of him for his infamous stream, then she took it down but the livestream is still up. Now she's moralfagging about meanie farmers when she was making fun and laugh at him at his lowest point.
(sorry I'm a little bit MATI)
 
Rate me optimistic, but I think this is a typo. If you look on the order for detention for Kayla, it's the exact same description for the charge against Nick.
What you posted shows the a/a2 citations and Nick's shows the b2. The charge description is the same, so the question is if the error is the citation or the charge description on her sheet.

If the charge description is the error, then it seems they did what I thought but still think is crappy statutory drafting bc b2 is a neglect, not abuse, charge: nick is charged with the act and Kayla is charged with permitting it. If that's right, then they seem to perceive him as the primary decision maker or owner of the drugs. Doesn't seem right.

On the other hand, if the error is the citation, seems like a hard error to make to go and grab a completely different reference for no reason. Forgetting to change the charge description if duping a document seems a more likely oversight, but @break these cuffs makes a good point:
There was also the reverse of the document that named the pastor. From what we could read it said something about no reports of physical/sexual abuse. Unfortunately we don't know the full context. We also can't say they didn't do some investigating and turn something up in the week before they came knocking, but at least it's something pointing the the fact it isn't worse.
Good observation. And as much as I think Nick is garbage, I'd rather this didn't turn into some true horror show.
 
I just want to know what the brown substance is. All I can think of is heroin or maybe THC wax
impure cheap cocaine?
crushed ecstasy pills?
If you ground up some psychedelics it could look like that
I'm skeptical of the heroin thing, shouldn't we have known by now? Opiates are probably way easier to test for than something else out of the ordinary, there's field tests for that and everything. Without a picture who knows though, authorities can be retarded sometimes. If it is heroin thats honestly really incredible lol, that faggot really thought he was invincible. Massive L if true.

I don't know why this guy wanted so many kids if he just wanted to party deep down the whole time.
 
This bitch made a video making fun of him for his infamous stream, then she took it down but the livestream is still up. Now she's moralfagging about meanie farmers when she was making fun and laugh at him at his lowest point.
(sorry I'm a little be MATI)
We're all a little MATI today, drugs and guns around kids, lies about the farms and grifters faking being Nick's friends.

1716666170186.png
 
I can't believe this scum of a human being is seriously mad at the fucking priest for not only doing his job, but also doing the right thing of reporting child neglect/child abuse because it's "my friend".
Isn't this dude the one who was saying human trafficking should be reported, and rolled his eyes and acted appalled that Nick said he's never do it?
 
This incel piece of shit, allegedly a lawyer, is trashing someone for NOT COMMITTING A FUCKING CRIME.
Wait, you're right, the lawyer resents the heroic priest because he obeyed the law and didn't commit a misdemeanor to enable Nick and Kayla to continue ("ALLEGEDLY") endangering their five children.

He's mad that priests aren't breaking the law to protect his friend, but he's CRYING because he wasn't invited into the coke-sex parties. He's fucking scum.
 
Back
Top Bottom