Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Magnificent Penis]

The most boring outcome is if it gets chucked at the trial court level because Russhole fails to comply with court orders, then found moot and cert. denied.

IANAL but I thought the fact that it was the 10th Circuit decision, it is not invalid just because the district court dismisses the original claim because it now is a whole separate thing that can be cited as precedent.

Two questions.

1. Of the 8000 or so petition filed to the Supreme Court, how many end up being docketed for meeting the bare minimum?

2. Does the fact that neither lower courts placed a notice hold any significance?

Again, not a lawyer, but I'm fairly sure those 8000 figure already are the ones that got docketed, I hardly think they include the ones that didn't even pass the smell test into the statistics.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

I genuinely wonder what Clarence Thomas thinks of Kiwi Farms.

>Be Clarence Thomas
>Know that if I didn't eat breakfast this morning I'd be hungry
>Go to the office after a hearty breakfast
>Intern walks in
>"Here's a free speech case, sir. You're the deciding vote as to whether or not it's seen."
>Take a look
>Joshua Moon et al., Petitioners, v. Russell G. Greer
>Hmm, Russell wants to censor the Kiwi Farms
>What the heck is a Kiwi Farm?
>Look it up
>See the random.txt:
>"How do you do a triangle fill? It's fuckin' algebra, little nigger!"
>Look at new sperging sidebar
>See @Bargain Bin Laden's latest deep thought:
>"If your nut sack could sack nuts, how many sacked nuts could your nut sack fit?"
>Close Kiwi Farms
>Sit back, think for a bit
>How would my enemies react if this case was taken?
>Call intern in
>Hand document back
>"I think we'll take this case, yes."

I know this isn't how it works, I'm just being funny

 

[Bargain Bin Laden]

>Be Clarence Thomas
>Know that if I didn't eat breakfast this morning I'd be hungry
>Go to the office after a hearty breakfast
>Intern walks in
>"Here's a free speech case, sir. You're the deciding vote as to whether or not it's seen."
>Take a look
>Joshua Moon et al., Petitioners, v. Russell G. Greer
>Hmm, Russell wants to censor the Kiwi Farms
>What the heck is a Kiwi Farm?
>Look it up
>See the random.txt:
>"How do you do a triangle fill? It's fuckin' algebra, little nigger!"
>Look at new sperging sidebar
>See @Bargain Bin Laden's latest deep thought:
>"If your nut sack could sack nuts, how many sacked nuts could your nut sack fit?"
>Close Kiwi Farms
>Sit back, think for a bit
>How would my enemies react if this case was taken?
>Call intern in
>Hand document back
>"I think we'll take this case, yes."

I know this isn't how it works, I'm just being funny

I would give Clarence Thomas a big wet kiss on the cheek.

 

[AnOminous]

IANAL but I thought the fact that it was the 10th Circuit decision, it is not invalid just because the district court dismisses the original claim because it now is a whole separate thing that can be cited as precedent.

They very rarely hear a case that is already decided on other grounds.

 

[Magnificent Penis]

They very rarely hear a case that is already decided on other grounds.

Well, now you have me rooting for the pro se tard shield to prevail and hoping that the district judge grants Russel's stay. Thanks, jerk.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Well, now you have me rooting for the pro se tard shield to prevail and hoping that the district judge grants Russel's stay. Thanks, jerk.

Ah, no, one of the parties should file a different stay, not a 90 day one, but one pending the results of SCOTUS appeal. First one would accomplish fuck all (unless SCOTUS is super kind or super mean).

Edit:
I just noticed. Mr. Hardin had this served on Russ' ex-lawyers too.

 

[Johnny Salami]

I hope my nigga "Cornpop" Clarence reads one of the random.txt.

 

[whatever I feel like]

Is Greer's case dead now, did he file his required documents in time?

 

[Depressed_Oni]

it’s a good step in the right direction, I’ll be watching on the 18th to see if it’s rejected. Godspeed to Hardin, and our Fearless Sneeder.

 

[DavidS877]

Ah, no, one of the parties should file a different stay, not a 90 day one, but one pending the results of SCOTUS appeal. First one would accomplish fuck all (unless SCOTUS is super kind or super mean).

Edit:
I just noticed. Mr. Hardin had this served on Russ' ex-lawyers too.

Nice, it still has Greer's self-reported address. I guess that makes sense as he still hasn't filed a correction with the district court.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

did he file his required documents in time?

He did not

Is Greer's case dead now

Depends on the Judge

I’ll be watching on the 18th to see if it’s rejected

It could also be rejected on the 25th, April 1st, April 15th, etc

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Depends on the Judge

If ima judge that got overturned by my 10th district and it’s now up to the supremes, I kinda feel I let it ride because a slap down of someone overturning you has got to be the absolute best

 

[Useful_Mistake]

If ima judge that got overturned by my 10th district

The original judge left in December after it was handed back down to her.

 

[Harvey Danger]

>Be Clarence Thomas
>Know that if I didn't eat breakfast this morning I'd be hungry
>Go to the office after a hearty breakfast
>Intern walks in
>"Here's a free speech case, sir. You're the deciding vote as to whether or not it's seen."
>Take a look
>Joshua Moon et al., Petitioners, v. Russell G. Greer
>Hmm, Russell wants to censor the Kiwi Farms
>What the heck is a Kiwi Farm?
>Look it up
>See the random.txt:
>"How do you do a triangle fill? It's fuckin' algebra, little nigger!"
>Look at new sperging sidebar
>See @Bargain Bin Laden's latest deep thought:
>"If your nut sack could sack nuts, how many sacked nuts could your nut sack fit?"
>Close Kiwi Farms
>Sit back, think for a bit
>How would my enemies react if this case was taken?
>Call intern in
>Hand document back
>"I think we'll take this case, yes."

I know this isn't how it works, I'm just being funny

Now, more than ever, it is critical that Null keeps the kiwifarms.net redirect going. CT's my nigga, but you can't expect him to figure out .st or use Tor.

Wait... I just searched the SCOTUS petition, and none of the URLs for Kiwifarms show up! Josh, you absolute nigger, how the hell did you miss that opportunity to put it in the record?!?

 

[Stoneheart]

It could also be rejected on the 25th, April 1st, April 15th, etc

You are forgetting that this is clown world, so the case will be taken or dismissed on the first of april.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

>your honor, the sign is a subtle joke...

 

[DavidS877]

Seems that the 4D chess move would have been/would be for Moon/Hardin to request a stay at the district court pending the Supreme Court outcome to make sure Greer can't screw up the appeal by getting it kicked out of the district court.

 

[Account]

ROBERTS: I keep on hearing about "sneed." Just what is sneed?

HARDIN: If it pleases the court, the sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called “Sneed’s Feed & Seed”, where “feed” and “seed” both end in the sound “-eed”, thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was “Formerly Chuck’s”, implying that the two words beginning with “F” and “S” would have ended with “-uck”, rhyming with “Chuck”. So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called--

THOMAS: Chuck's Feeduck and Seeduck.

HARDIN: Um, uh, yes Justice Thomas.

 

[hamsteak]

I honestly think that getting this remanded back to the 10th court would be a fantastic and realistic option. That ruling was fucking stupid and they should be made to feel bad for it.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Ah, no, one of the parties should file a different stay, not a 90 day one, but one pending the results of SCOTUS appeal. First one would accomplish fuck all (unless SCOTUS is super kind or super mean).

Edit:
I just noticed. Mr. Hardin had this served on Russ' ex-lawyers too.

Digital Justice foundation sweating bullets again. Very nice. How's that plan to bankrupt Null going assholes.