MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

First title

second title

third title

Fourth title

Fifth and Sixth title

Seventh title

eighth title

Ninth title

tenth title

All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.

Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)

 

[*Asterisk*]

Illegal immigrants. Not just Mexicans. Or are you implying all Mexicans are criminals.

No, but you certainly seem to be judging by your next point.

From Wikipedia
"Curiel is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, a nonprofit professional association of Latino lawyers that is affiliated with a statewide organization, the La Raza Lawyers of California.[37][38] Neither these groups nor Curiel are affiliated with the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), an unrelated advocacy group.[37]"
Definitely no biases here, no siree!

Then why should Trump care? Doesn't he only wanna deport criminals and not wetbacks indiscriminitely? Because this sure as shit sounds sounds exactly like the two-faced 'state's rights' defence Strom Thurmond and company used in the mid-20th Century to ensure eternal life for Jim Crow.

Did you just amass a bunch of "silly dump dumbo Drumpf" as an attempt at an argument? The other guy said Trump went on to attack anyone of a darker skin tone or something (AKA the old and tired "DAS RAYCISS!!!!") and this guy was white, so what are you even insinuating here.

Racist shitlickers always find ways to subdivide and fight amongst their own kind. Trump has repeatedly attacked Cruz in the lowest fashion possible explicitly on his Cuban heritage. Their mutual European heritage means just as little in Trump's eyes as the Tutsis mutual blackness meant to the Hutus.

Critizicing muslims for anything at all is racism. Okay.

Of course it's not. I'll do it right now: FUCK MUSLIMS.

Now that's out of the way, let's get to the meat: Donald Trump wasn't criticising Islam, a government, a law, or a philosophy; he was invalidating a Pakistani family's loss under the rational that -- even when killing the very clerical fascists whom poison the Muslim world to this day -- Pakis can never move away from being theocratic goose-steppers.

That's not 'controversial', it's the exact kind of demagoguery that Jeremiah Wright got raked over the coals for when he accused the white man of inventing AIDS.

An opinion piece on a newspaper from almost thirty years ago, where again he makes no mention of race. What does this have to do with what I was responding to?
"He gives "big important" speeches where he says five dollar words to "prove he's not racist" to white people then follows it up with more vehement screeds against everybody of a dark skin tone to all white audiences."

They have the whole piece capped in the second photograph. He's calling for the reimposition of underage executions for a charge thatbexplicitly touches on the city's racial resentment. I'll upload it right now:

Trump paid for this shit out of his own pocket to be posted in four NYC papers, including the Times and the Post. There were hundreds of rapes and murders in 1989 New York. You think it was a cooincidence that Der Drümpfart chose a black-on-white interracial rape to call for the execution of underage defendants?

Of course not! He chose the Central Park Five because they were niggers and wetbacks accused of raping a white maiden, and he wanted to punish as many niggers and wetbacks as possible so their whole communities would know their place relative to the white man. It's the reason why he has David Duke's endorsement.

Trying to deny Trump's racism is tantamount in ignorance to reality only to denying Michael Jackson was a closeted homosexual and pedophile.

More importantly, even if the niggers and wetbacks he tried to lynch were guilty white men of the age of majority, CIVIL LIBERTIES END WHEN AN ATTACK ON OUR SAFETY BEGINS shall always and forever be the rallying cry of the Hitler-Heilers.

Fuck the fat fucker to death with Mr. Garrison's cock and a copy of the Constitution.

 

[Joan Nyan]

No, but you certainly seem to be judging by your next point.


Then why should Trump care? Doesn't he only wanna deport criminals and not wetbacks indiscriminitely? Because this sure as shit sounds sounds exactly like the two-faced 'state's rights' defence Strom Thurmond and company used in the mid-20th Century to ensure eternal life for Jim Crow.


Racist shitlickers always find ways to subdivide and fight amongst their own kind. Trump has repeatedly attacked Cruz in the lowest fashion possible explicitly on his Cuban heritage. Their mutual European heritage means just as little in Trump's eyes as the Tutsis mutual blackness meant to the Hutus.


Of course it's not. I'll do it right now: FUCK MUSLIMS.

Now that's out of the way, let's get to the meat: Donald Trump wasn't criticising Islam, a government, a law, or a philosophy; he was invalidating a Pakistani family's loss under the rational that -- even when killing the very clerical fascists whom poison the Muslim world to this day -- Pakis can never move away from being theocratic goose-steppers.

That's not 'controversial', it's the exact kind of demagoguery that Jeremiah Wright got raked over the coals for when he accused the white man of inventing AIDS.


They have the whole piece capped in the second photograph. He's calling for the reimposition of underage executions for a charge thatbexplicitly touches on the city's racial resentment. I'll upload it right now:

View attachment 131910

Trump paid for this shit out of his own pocket to be posted in four NYC papers, including the Times and the Post. There were hundreds of rapes and murders in 1989 New York. You think it was a cooincidence that Der Drümpfart chose a black-on-white interracial rape to call for the execution of underage defendants?

Of course not! He chose the Central Park Five because they were niggers and wetbacks accused of raping a white maiden, and he wanted to punish as many niggers and wetbacks as possible so their whole communities would know their place relative to the white man. It's the reason why he has David Duke's endorsement.

Trying to deny Trump's racism is tantamount in ignorance to reality only to denying Michael Jackson was a closeted homosexual and pedophile.

More importantly, even if the niggers and wetbacks he tried to lynch were guilty white men of the age of majority, CIVIL LIBERTIES END WHEN AN ATTACK ON OUR SAFETY BEGINS shall always and forever be the rallying cry of the Hitler-Heilers.

Fuck the fat fucker to death with Mr. Garrison's cock and a copy of the Constitution.

Why is it automatically racist to think that minorities committed a crime when that's what the police were saying? Ignoring the fact that the police had the wrong people (which Trump couldn't have known) everything in that letter is great and I love him even more now that I've read it.

 

[Pikimon]

He refused to rent to welfare recipients, it wasn't based on race.

Well you say that, but when they conducted a sting on his properties they found some interesting things.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/12/15/doj-trump-s-early-businesses-blocked-blacks.html

The lawsuit—which Trump Management settled in 1975 with a consent decree, and which they noted at the time did not constitute an admission of wrongdoing—detailed numerous instances of a racial code that Trump-owned buildings allegedly used to indicate if an applicant was black or otherwise “undesirable.”

A super who worked for the Trumps, Thomas Miranda, allegedly told the DOJ that Trump Management staffers had instructed him to “attach a separate sheet of paper to every application submitted by a prospective ‘colored’ renter.”

“Miranda was to write a ‘C’ in order to indicate to management that the prospective renter was ‘colored,’” the DOJ noted in court documents.


Elyse Goldweber, an attorney on the case, claimed Miranda had been reluctant to talk to her and have his name disclosed because “he was afraid that the Trumps would have him ‘knocked off.’” Miranda was also allegedly afraid to reveal to the Trumps that he was Puerto Rican and instead told them he was South American because he thought they “did not want Puerto Ricans living or working in the building,” according to Goldweber’s documentation

According to the DOJ, Alfred Hoyt, a black man, was told there were no two-bedroom apartments at Trump’s Westminster apartment complex in Brooklyn. His white wife, Sheila, was offered a two-bedroom apartment the very next day. They were admitted to the building after filing a complaint with the New York City Human Rights Commission.

According to the DOJ, just a week later, in 1972, Godfrey Jacobs—a black tester for the Urban League—was told there were no vacancies at the Beachaven Apartments in Sheepshead Bay. Yet George Sim Johnston, a white tester, was offered a rental at that building on the very same day.

The DOJ claimed that Henrietta Davis, a black woman, tried to rent an apartment at the Fontainebleau in Brooklyn in 1972. She said she was told by the super that he had no authority to accept rental applications. And yet when Muriel Salzman, a white Urban League tester, went to the Fontainebleau directly after Davis, she was told that two apartments were free and she could rent either of them.

They wouldn't even accept her application, so how would they know if she was on welfare?

It goes on like this. There are some justifications I can think of for why this case shouldn't be an issue currently. The idea that it was related to welfare rather than race isn't one of them.

 

[Brandobaris]

Why is it automatically racist to think that minorities committed a crime when that's what the police were saying? Ignoring the fact that the police had the wrong people (which Trump couldn't have known) everything in that letter is great and I love him even more now that I've read it.

People think racial profiling is bad when statistics back it up. Also, statistics are sexist and racist.

 

[Joan Nyan]

People think racial profiling is bad when statistics back it up. Also, statistics are sexist and racist.

That letter doesn't even say anything about racial profiling though

 

[*Asterisk*]

Why is it automatically racist to think that minorities committed a crime when that's what the police were saying? Ignoring the fact that the police had the wrong people (which Trump couldn't have known) everything in that letter is great and I love him even more now that I've read it.

They were teenagers without lawyers, brutally beaten by the officers, and none of them individually confessed to the crime.

Not that any of the details remotely matter. The only reason Donald Trump launched ads about the Central Park Five rather than the Lincoln Place Three is because Trump Tower's on the South Corner of Central Park. A short-term worry about real-estate prices was more important to Trump than the future of four niggers and a PR.

Ignoring the fact that the police had the wrong people (which Trump couldn't have known) everything in that letter is great and I love him even more now that I've read it.

Then whoopdie-doo for you.

CIVIL LIBERTIES END WHEN AN ATTACK ON OUR SAFETY BEGINS

Be sure to remember these words when a Gestapo enthusiast knocks your teeth out with a pair of steel-toed boots. You were probably committing some sort of terrorist action anyway.

 

[Without A Gout]

Meanwhile, on Hillary Clinton's campaign:

That sure sounds like some seriously violent hacking. More fuel for the fire, unfortunately.

 

[Joan Nyan]

They were teenagers without lawyers, brutally beaten by the officers, and none of them individually confessed to the crime.

Not that any of the details remotely matter. The only reason Donald Trump launched ads about the Central Park Five rather than the Lincoln Place Three is because Trump Tower's on the South Corner of Central Park. A short-term worry about real-estate prices was more important to Trump than the future of four niggers and a PR.


Then whoopdie-doo for you.

CIVIL LIBERTIES END WHEN AN ATTACK ON OUR SAFETY BEGINS

Be sure to remember these words when a Gestapo enthusiast knocks your teeth out with a pair of steel-toed boots. You were probably committing some sort of terrorist action anyway.

Their civil liberties end when an attack on our safety begins. I'm not a rapist.

 

[*Asterisk*]

Their civil liberties end when an attack on our safety begins. I'm not a rapist.

We have no proof of that.

Prepare your anus for the least pleasant violation of her life.

 

[kobebyarlant]

Meanwhile, on Hillary Clinton's campaign:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=wMvPmkhq6mk
That sure sounds like some seriously violent hacking. More fuel for the fire, unfortunately.

CNN tomorrow morning: "It's totally normal for a presidential candidate to have a 3 minute long coughing fit."

 

[Ruin]

CNN tomorrow morning: "It's totally normal for a presidential candidate to have a 3 minute long coughing fit."

That's an MSNBC headline. A CNN headline would be more like

Evil racist rapist Donald Trump unleashes bio weapon on first women presidential candidate! Is there nothing this man won't do to kill Mexicans and black people?

 

[melty]

I don't know why there's such obsession with the candidates health. Everyone hates them anyway, wouldn't it be better if they kicked the bucket after getting elected

 

[Mungo]

That's an MSNBC headline. A CNN headline would be more like

Evil racist rapist Donald Trump unleashes bio weapon on first women presidential candidate! Is there nothing this man won't do to kill Mexicans and black people?

Unfortunately, that's the narrative that the left has decided to spread. I would argue, however, that the right is no better, just in this case not as well-covered on mainstream news channels.

I sincerely hope that this election steers people away from the more biased news sources. I don't know a single person that still relied on CNN as an impartial source of news, but I hope this is the final nail in the coffin.

I don't know why there's such obsession with the candidates health. Everyone hates them anyway, wouldn't it be better if they kicked the bucket after getting elected

It's pretty typical whenever an older candidate runs for office. In Hillary's case, I think it's more that she's an old lady, and not that she's secretly hiding stage 4 lung cancer.

We have to remember that we have elected a 70 year old, a guy who was on multiple pills and shots a day, and a guy who literally couldn't stand without assistance to the presidency. Hillary tripping on some stairs and having a coughing fit is not exactly grounds to declare her physically incompetent, especially when there are so many other, better arguments to use against her.

 

[Ruin]

Unfortunately, that's the narrative that the left has decided to spread. I would argue, however, that the right is no better, just in this case not as well-covered on mainstream news channels.

I sincerely hope that this election steers people away from the more biased news sources. I don't know a single person that still relied on CNN as an impartial source of news, but I hope this is the final nail in the coffin.

I wasn't defending right wing media. I was trying to be funny.

 

[Mungo]

I wasn't defending right wing media. I was trying to be funny.

I know, I just find it healthy to remember that most American news corporations are as neutral as bleach and about as toxic.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

That isn't even a productive cough. Wonder what the hell is going on there.

 

[cunt_infinity]

Hillary could just shit herself on stage and the media would still say it's normal and totally not alarming.

 

[*Asterisk*]

I don't know why there's such obsession with the candidates health. Everyone hates them anyway, wouldn't it be better if they kicked the bucket after getting elected

Of course.

It's the principle that matters here. Neither candidate is honest nor forthcoming about shit everyone else gets a complimentary anal-probing over. Clinton has no backups of thousands of her e-mails, which'll leave her with no proof that everything in the inevitable Russian leak next month will be anything but exactly as awful as it looks. Trump even claims to weigh just under two hundred pounds -- that's fifteen stone for you UK Kiwis and 90 kilos for you Eurofags -- despite an aversion to any excercise more rigorous than golfing and a diet of nothing but fast food for a half-century.

It'll only go downhill from here.

That isn't even a productive cough. Wonder what the hell is going on there.

Hillary refuses to respect the wisdom of the man who really deserves to be Our Next President, Jordan Michael Houston.

 

[IwegalBadnik]

We have to remember that we have elected a 70 year old, a guy who was on multiple pills and shots a day, and a guy who literally couldn't stand without assistance to the presidency. Hillary tripping on some stairs and having a coughing fit is not exactly grounds to declare her physically incompetent, especially when there are so many other, better arguments to use against her.

Not to mention, "what difference does it make?" Pence and Kaine have been selected as the VP nominees and should Trump or Clinton become incapacitated as president-elect, the vice president-elect would proceed on.

That's just one reason why VP choices should be considered relevant to people.

 

[Brandobaris]

I don't know why there's such obsession with the candidates health. Everyone hates them anyway, wouldn't it be better if they kicked the bucket after getting elected

Well in principle if I'm running a Corporation, and I hire someone who tells me they are fine, but they lied and they actually have a degenerative disease, that will result in them being incapacitated 3 months in. I'd assume they could be charged or at least sued.

If they told me the truth I never would've hired them.