📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
sheepworldvizor said:
Being a tranny is theft. It’s the theft of womanhood.
Click to expand...
Narcissistic little thieves, but to be fair.. They're not that good either. (as we see on the daily.) Besides, with their weak, weak estrogen muscles they couldn't run off with that anyway. Nor get very far..
 
Homofascism said:
These are so funny, insults are meant to be offensive and hurt. This makes me go “why yes I am, nice to meet you”. It’s funny cause as soon as you say “sir or ma’am” they spaz out and obsess about it for days, their mentals go into a spiral and all they can think about is 41%.
Click to expand...
"sexist"
they've got this the wrong fucking way lmao
they are the most sexist ones on earth, where men and women have to put their shit aside on a regular basis in an understanding for each other which does not include trannies or fags

fags and trannies exist purely from inviting sexism as OK, they live off being sexist
calling people TERFs is sexist, calling you a dirty fucking faggot is not sexist, it's homophobic. LMAO

we're talking about offending the only two genders that exist on earth OR the millions of sexual social statuses that people can make up on a fucking whim.
faggots are THE MOST sexist, they breed off pure sexism, they endorse hatred for straight people because straight people wont let them rule the world with pedophilia.

they are bending their social status as fags to try and say its sexist to hate fags, however sexist is hating gender and THATS ACTUALLY WHAT FAGS ARE ALL ABOUT LMAO.
calls us sexist because we don't agree with how they take it in the ass or ear or between the boobs, they think how they like dick between their fake boobs is offendable by law in the form of sexism and IT'S NOT.
you can't be a fag and call someone sexist when they don't like your faggyness, sexist is offending one of two only genders on earth as a whole.

like hating all women as a faggot and being unable to date them. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm??????? HMMMMMMM?????? yeah. fucking morons.
the "homophobic" phrase for hating straight people IS BEING GAY. so anything they say about straight people is sexist, they are a cult of sexism.
 
Last edited:
Peaches the Wonder Cat said:
Something I need to say about people who say "I personally could never date a trans women they have a penis"Community Only (self.trans)

You know the type, "i could never date a trans women or have sex with them, they have a penis!"
Well I see a lot of talk of people saying that they're allowed to think that. And I'm not disagreeing, they're allowed to say no to sex or relationship for whatever reason they want.
But I want to add something. By saying that they're admitting that a pussy is more important to them than your relationship, love, friendship, and commitment. And that they don't truly view us as women. As simple as that.

Top comment:
Click to expand...
“And I’m not disagreeing, they’re allowed to say no to sex or relationship for whatever reason they want.” Oh. Good to know, phew. How do you type this with no self awareness of how you sound? I know we get kinda jaded to this stuff but the idea of arguing with people about their innate sexual attraction is just so fucking creepy, it’s wild how normalized and encouraged it’s become.

“By saying that they’re admitting that a pussy is more important to them than your relationship, love, friendship, and commitment.” The fact that this hon just calls women “a pussy” speaks volumes more than any of his other weird little thoughts. I reckon a pussy isn’t capable of relationships, love, friendship, and commitment anyway. The autism is palpable.
 
Programmer Socks said:
All trannies do this. Both of my experiences IRL of transvestites were to do with items of clothing "mysteriously" vanishing when certain males had been present. Trannies are opportunistic thieves, liars, untrustworthy, selfish and unable to control their fetish. They don't value friendships or family above their fetish, and in the case of this idiot Sam Brinton, his fetish was more important to him than his job and reputation. The compulsion to steal from other people rather than buying their own clothing must be exciting for them. It's worryingly common as well.
Click to expand...
https://notthebee.com/article/remem...hes-police-just-found-the-outfits-in-his-home

Sam Brinton had 7 months to dump the stolen merch!
The designer complained about him back in FEB??? And the tweet went viral so we all saw it and no question Sam himself saw it.

Most thieves would go oh fuck and dump the shit immediately, but. he. didn't.
which interests me. not a regular thief, a pervert thief.

only his hubris and/or fetishistic attachment could make him keep it after she snitched on him.

I say fetish since he gave that white supremacy workshop while wearing some of this African designer's clothes, which sounds like a bizarre fetish to me.
My question: how did he know her luggage would contain exactly what he wanted?

He must have clocked this designer & her styles or he wouldn't know exactly what he was getting and that it would be what he wanted to wear, esp at a white supremacy workshop. JFC.

This is stalking as well as theft, or he would have grabbed a random suitcase and found a bunch of old lady shorts and flip flops.

So what he did was stalk a designer to steal what she had posted online already and coveted specifically.

No news outlets are writing that though, because that would make him look like more of a pervert than he looks already.
they are still protecting him and minimizing stalker aspect of his crimes.

He targeted her and you just know he's done it before.
 
HERE YOU GO said:
like hating all women as a faggot and being unable to date them. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm??????? HMMMMMMM?????? yeah. fucking morons.
Click to expand...
Not being sexually attracted to women doesn't mean you hate women.

HERE YOU GO said:
being gay AT ALL is inviting sexism, saying you are gay is admitting to being a sexist. saying you are straight is NOT OFFENSIVE TO ANYONE because it's normal.
straight is not the adjacent of anything positive, straight is neutral with no left or right, t's the foundation of it all.
Click to expand...
How does being attracted to dudes as a dude make you sexist inherently?

HERE YOU GO said:
when you are straight you are hurting no one by default but when you are gay you are admitting you are sexist and there isn't a second way around it to be gay and not be sexist at the same time.
if you are gay at all you will always be gay and sexist at the same time.
Click to expand...
Straight men are the ones who cause unwanted pregnancies and rape women. That's a lot more misogynistic than not having it in you to sexually hurt women.

Yes, gay men can be misogynistic and bitter towards women. They can also be absolute degenerates (see circuit queen thread), and it took them a long time to disavow NAMBLA. But I don't understand how being a homosexual male inherently makes you sexist.

Also, Sam Brinton just proves that gay men can get AGP and that it's probably useless to have the HSTS vs AGP distinction since the HSTSs have AGP too. In my opinion a more accurate typology of TIMs would be: parent-led TIMs (mainly kids like Jazz Jennings and Kai Shappley who were trans by their parents), ROGD TIMs (boys and young men with no prior history of sexual crossdressing who identify as trans after getting exposed to troonism -- much of this cohort has autism and/or trauma, or they just want attention or are rebelling against their totally lame transphobic parents), safety TIMs (gay men from cultures like Iran where they have to troon out or face death), and AGPs. The HSTS distinction for western TIMs just covers a different type of AGP -- there's no need for them to transition for safety since gay rights are widely accepted in the western world.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen anybody mention birdy.rose aside from some weird art she did. She is in the same TT space as that stupid bitch that had a public meltdown because someone called her and her enby wife "ladies". Both are also autistic lol.
Birdy is an enby pooner with a feminine frog voice that looks like an AGP Frankie Muniz. She used to do somewhat decent painting and while she was trooning out for a while, didn't look nearly as insane while trying to appear male. Now she is exclusively making wordsalads relating to troon shit.

Let's start with this one:


How could I say anything bad to this fellow human being in financial peril? Well it could have something to do with her entitlement to other people's money, merely because she decided to take this road:


The first one was shitty e-begging with emotional manipulation, this one was clear dry-begging. She loves to shit on "cis allies" until the rent is due. You'd think this is propaganda to make "cis" people hate her kind.


BONUS: Her complaining people aren't masking in twenty fucking twenty three. All of her "problems" root back to white supremacy somehow so I guess not masking is the modern T4 program.
 
Crusty Old Sock said:
If I follow your logic if you're a straight man you're sexist against men, because you don't want to fuck them.
Click to expand...
No, no, that's ridiculous. Here, let me help you. It's actually really simple when you break it down.

You see, if a straight man won't fuck a trans woman (with or without cockchop), he's a transphobe.

If a lesbian won't fuck a trans woman (again with or without cockchop) she's a TERF.

If a gay man won't fuck a trans man, or a straight woman won't fuck a trans man (with or without the rotdog installed), they're transphobic.

If you're trans and won't fuck another trans person, no matter your claimed sex or sexual preference, you have internalized transphobia.

If any of these apply, and the other person is any race other than white, you're also racist.

Basically, sexual preference doesn't matter anymore. All that matters is that if you wouldn't fuck a Person of Gender, for whatever reason, you're a gross bigot, and thus a Twitter mob should form, dox you, and get you fired from your job. That's the world we're living in right now. Ain't it great?
 
The philipooner talking about bulking vs recomp is so fucking funny it actually short circuited my brain for a second.

1. Bitch has literally nothing to recomp. She's skinny fat. The only solution to that is to fucking lift, and lift heavier at that. But based on her body as is, and that dumbbell, there's little to no chance of her actually going heavy. And even if she did, I can find at least 20 videos of, relatively, average male lifters shattering women's world records with the ease of a warm up back to back.

2. Recomps are fucking hard and take forever. It's a very fine balance of eating JUST above or below or right at maintenance with zero wavering for months, if not years depending on where you're starting from and what you're wanting to achieve. But again, she's fucking skinny fat. It would be a colossal waste of time and effort to recomp.

3. Bulking only is only worth it if you're willing to shovel calories into your face, while making sure you're not just cramming a bunch of ice cream and Burger King down your gullet. Nutrition is important even on a bulk, youre just able to go to the "unhealthy" options more often than you would otherwise. Strongmen and power lifters/steroid users might be able to get away with eating 5-10k calories of bullshit, but naturals are just gonna get bloated and fat as fucking shit. Especially if they're DYELs like her and aren't willing to lift heavy the way they need and should. And even then, when it comes time for the cut, you're 100% going to lose size and strength. The best you can do is try to keep your current routine as close to what it is, but you'll always see a drop in both size and strength during your cut.

4. Worrying about bulking or recomping after only less than a year of serious, dedicated lifting is beyond retarded and just shows she's not that serious, isn't very knowledgeable, and absolutely would not stick to it anyway.

5. And the retarded question of "how much muscle could I realistically put on" is just such a fucking crap shoot its not worth asking or worrying about in the first place. You will literally never know just how much size you can put on. There's so many factors that go into how much muscle a person can build that it's impossible to ever know for sure. It's like wondering if you've hit your peak as a natural: the answer is always NO because you'll never live long enough to find out.

If this retard was an actual man, she'd be the type to hop on the gear within the first year and half of not getting Arnold tier biceps and a 50+ inch chest and think it's because she's a "hard gainer" after watching a few Greg Doucette and MPMD videos.
 
goat sneed said:
BONUS: Her complaining people aren't masking in twenty fucking twenty three. All of her "problems" root back to white supremacy somehow so I guess not masking is the modern T4 program.
Click to expand...


How the fuck is ableism a tool of white supremacy? Non-white cultures would have thrown raging invalids like you into the fucking sewers.
 
Jammidodger enlightens us on good trans anatomy.

Later, has a YouTube short on what a woman is thanks to ChatGPT. It takes several paragraphs to define a woman. Taaadaaaa~

Odd, though, that there is no such struggle over what a man is.

What a similarity!

This one is funny. Jaime complains that an old photo of her on an FFS website isn't applicable, as she didn't get FFS. Of course, without the beard (and even at certain angles) no one would doubt that she is a woman.
 
ZsaZsaBinks said:
TBH everyone in the mainstream science community has to go along with trans crap or else get cancelled. And if they have a job in such a profession they risk getting fired.
Click to expand...
It probably won't surprise anyone here to learn that even in the most prestigious scientific journals, "gender" is now used to mean "sex". I swear to God, if I read one more methods section that describes the genders of the mice used for an experiment, I'm probably going to make a regrettable decision in Minecraft.

goat sneed said:
How could I say anything bad to this fellow human being in financial peril? Well it could have something to do with her entitlement to other people's money, merely because she decided to take this road:
Click to expand...
She's awful. None of the health conditions she's claiming are necessarily emergent. All of it can wait until she has Medicaid coverage.

Even the naevus on her retina is not going to kill her immediately, and it's extremely unlikely that it's actually a matter of concern anyway. Plenty of people are walking around with benign choroidal naevi without being aware. Uveal (eye) melanoma, while the most common intraocular malignancy in adults, is exceedingly rare, with <5 cases per million people diagnosed each year. Even if she does happen to have a choroidal melanoma, which I find highly doubtful, she's not going to die before she can apply and be approved for emergency Medicaid coverage. Since she's crybegging for money from total strangers online, I assume that she qualifies.

EpiPens are expensive. This has been a complaint among people with severe allergies since time immemorial. It sucks, it's unfair, and I, too, would rather spend my money on piles of gack or Hemingway first editions. The manufacturer provides coupons and an income-based assistance program for patients who are indigent, uninsured, or otherwise not able to afford the cost of the prescription. There are also more affordable generic epinephrine autoinjectors available now. This was not true even a few short years ago: until Teva Pharmaceuticals received FDA approval for a generic epinephrine autoinjector in late 2018, Americans with life-threatening allergies either shelled out for the name-brand EpiPen or just hoped they could make it to the emergency room before dying of anaphylaxis. I sympathize with anyone who struggles to pay for an epinephrine autoinjector, because it's not something that it's safe to try to go without. Also, pro-tip for my allergy friends: it's almost certainly safe to use an expired epinephrine autoinjector, as long as the solution inside is colorless, clear, and without visible particulates. Studies have found that epinephrine autoinjectors retain sufficient potency to remain effective for at least 50 months past their expiration date. If all you have is an expired EpiPen, use it and seek immediate medical attention. That said, considering her allergy is to Hymenoptera venom, it should be possible for her to simply avoid the offending insects until she's able to acquire an epinephrine autoinjector, particularly since the weather is growing cooler in the United States and it's not like these people ever go outside.

Despite the length and intensity of my sperging above, I don't actually give a shit about this crybaby moron or her completely pedestrian health concerns, but the cat situation really pisses me off for several reasons. First, yes, unexpected things happen, and good veterinary care is expensive. However, if you choose to have a cat with a preexisting health issue, like chronic kidney disease (CKD), it's pure neglect to fail to set aside at least a bit of money to cover sudden expenses related to emergent veterinary care. First and foremost, it's unfair to the animal. It's also inconsiderate to put a veterinarian in the position of having to choose between helping a suffering animal and keeping food on his own table. That's a shitty thing to do to someone.

Further, CKD is quite common in cats. While it's not curable, it is controllable, and especially if it's caught early, affected cats can have an excellent quality of life for years. If I were a betting Kiwi, I would wager that this gormless attention-seeker has not provided her cat with routine veterinary care and now he is beyond help. From the symptoms she describes, the cat is in the final stage of CKD, and even with heroic measures, he is unlikely to survive. He's certainly not going to have any quality of life, and I question the ethics of continuing to put him through undoubtedly futile treatment. He's sick beyond healing, and because of her selfishness and irresponsibility, he's spending his final hours trapped in an unfamiliar and stressful environment, in pain, being poked and prodded by strangers, suffering needlessly.

Even if she could afford the cost of emergency veterinary care, at some point, you are no longer doing things for the cat but doing things to him, and it's unbelievably cruel and selfish to continue. It makes it even worse that she's apparently expecting Internet strangers to pay her to effectively allow her cat to be tortured. He doesn't know why he was taken from his cozy safe home or what he did wrong to make everyone around him keep hurting him. He is trying to tell everyone that he is so very tired, and being the very good kitty I am sure he is, he deserves to rest now. He's completed his work here.

The humane thing to do in this situation is euthanasia, not thousands of dollars of pointless intervention. I've said this before, but owning an animal is not a human right. If you cannot afford veterinary care, you cannot afford to have a pet. I guess it sounds harsh, but (as you can probably tell) it really bothers me when people use poverty as an excuse to treat animals poorly and it disturbs me even more when they pursue invasive treatment like this for animals who cannot consent.

Goddamn, this got really long and intensely spergy. I'm sorry; I just have so many feelings.
 
FuckedOffToff said:
Yes, it's my parental responsibility to make sure my children don't have any contact at all with people like you, either on the internet, or in real life, and it's my children's right to grow up unmolested.
That's not what you mean though, is it, you just want to keep secrets with other people's kids, you sick predatory fucker.
Click to expand...
So by this retards logic, if a child has been raped and physically abused by a friend or family member, but has been gaslit into not saying anything, its the parents fault. Fucking christ.
 
Thomas Eugene Paris said:
The humane thing to do in this situation is euthanasia, not thousands of dollars of pointless intervention.
Click to expand...
That cat is 18 years old. Let it go. But that troon has to make some extra cash out of his moribund and doubtless neglected cat.

Poor girl, he can't even afford to shave -- or perhaps because no cis allies are around to teach him?
 
Lazy Printer said:
Could you kindly share the wojak image? Please, I don't have Facebook.
Click to expand...
trad.jpg
 
DoubleD said:
It it, like, a flex to choose the least flattering photo of yourself (from 4+ years ago) and juxtapose it with a childhood portrait?

View attachment 5346307
(Link, Archive)

Anyway, happy birthday Jinkx Monsoon.

You look like you just ate that child.


View attachment 5346316
Click to expand...
Holy shit. I'm half asleep catching up on the thread and thought someone had skitzo-posted a picture of a lizard person who's skin suit was failing. This thing is gonna eat me in my nightmare tonight.
 
HERE YOU GO said:
"sexist"
they've got this the wrong fucking way lmao
they are the most sexist ones on earth, where men and women have to put their shit aside on a regular basis in an understanding for each other which does not include trannies or fags

fags and trannies exist purely from inviting sexism as OK, they live off being sexist
calling people TERFs is sexist, calling you a dirty fucking faggot is not sexist, it's homophobic. LMAO

we're talking about offending the only two genders that exist on earth OR the millions of sexual social statuses that people can make up on a fucking whim.
faggots are THE MOST sexist, they breed off pure sexism, they endorse hatred for straight people because straight people wont let them rule the world with pedophilia.

they are bending their social status as fags to try and say its sexist to hate fags, however sexist is hating gender and THATS ACTUALLY WHAT FAGS ARE ALL ABOUT LMAO.
calls us sexist because we don't agree with how they take it in the ass or ear or between the boobs, they think how they like dick between their fake boobs is offendable by law in the form of sexism and IT'S NOT.
you can't be a fag and call someone sexist when they don't like your faggyness, sexist is offending one of two only genders on earth as a whole.

like hating all women as a faggot and being unable to date them. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm??????? HMMMMMMM?????? yeah. fucking morons.
the "homophobic" phrase for hating straight people IS BEING GAY. so anything they say about straight people is sexist, they are a cult of sexism.
Click to expand...
I deslike homos as much as the next guy buy you are being ridiculous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom