MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

First title

second title

third title

Fourth title

Fifth and Sixth title

Seventh title

eighth title

Ninth title

tenth title

All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.

Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)

 

[JU 199]

Trump more closely resembles the old Democrats like Jackson than he does the Republicans of today with his populism, which ideologically is more democratic anyway. That's not even mentioning Trump's long-term support of the ideals of the Democratic Party.

Nah, I don't agree. 85% of the Republican base approve of the Donald now and he always had the lead in the primaries. The base of the GOP thought he was conservative enough. Either conservatism doesn't matter that much to them or conservatism has mutated.

 

[AnOminous]

where does this idea come from

From a place of pure, unadulterated autism.

 

[*Asterisk*]

Nah, I don't agree. 85% of the Republican base approve of the Donald now and he always had the lead in the primaries. The base of the GOP thought he was conservative enough. Either conservatism doesn't matter that much to them or conservatism has mutated.

The former, from the looks of things.

Ann Coulter wouldn't be giving The Hairpiece a free pass to perform "abortions on the White House lawn" if she had an actual goal beyond winning the next election. The Democrats did the same thing with the Clintons in the 90s. Jerry Brown was just more qualified, more charming, more charismatic, and less cucked than Ted Cruz.

The whole thing's just sad to watch. Coulter and Co. already know Mr. Two-Corinthians is playing the same game of three-card montie Billary played in the 90s. They just give so little of a shit about anything aside from winning, they're deliberately brainwashing themselves into believing the new dealer'll let them win a couple times after he's fleeced them to satiation.

 

[Marvin]

Nah, I don't agree. 85% of the Republican base approve of the Donald now and he always had the lead in the primaries. The base of the GOP thought he was conservative enough. Either conservatism doesn't matter that much to them or conservatism has mutated.

If such a change happened only popped up in the past 10 years, it's extremely valid to critique it.

Another way to put it: do you think the republican party would stand by such a change if a less viable candidate tried to exploit it? No? Then it's probably not a solid expression of their values, and only an opportunistic expression.

 

[Reddit Avenger]

It's best not to vote on policy this election.

Hillary Clinton will say and do absolutely anything for the sake of short term gains in opinion polls and fattening her own pockets. All meaningful statements she makes on issues are guaranteed to be followed by evasion and flip-flops, and her primary strategy for handling gridlock has always been agreeing with everything the gridlockers say; only attacking them for not going far enough. She's as empty as a mannequin made of acetate, and I will never forgive Obama for appointing her Secretary of State after the shit she pulled during the '08 campaign.

Donald Trump? Same shit; different party. The only real difference between the two is in temperment and intelligence. Hillary Clinton has already shown herself capable of letting tens of thousands of Yugoslav civilians be massacred for matters as minor as advancing her disastrous "Hillarycare," which combined the worst elements of both capitalism and socialism. This is contemptible, but it still doesn't show that she'd do something like fire cruise missiles at Cancún when she meant to hit Khartoum.

Donald Trump is the worst kind of dumb. He's unspeakably retarded, always acts like he's the smartest guy in the room, and is incapable of acknowledging that he was ever played or swindled by someone else. Hillary has those last two points, but just because she's nowhere near the supergenius she thinks she is doesn't mean she overestimates her intellect like Der Drumpfenführer. She got herself into Yale. Donald's Daddy got him into Fordham, and even then he couldn't cut it.

Not that I think it should be necessary. We've had plenty of great politicians who tanked it while they were in school. But if Trump actually possesses a brain rather than a hormone-pumping lump of nerves and tumors, he sure as shit hasn't displayed it even when it'd be to his advantage.

I'm personally just sticking with the tried and true philosophy of "vote for the meme candidate since my vote is virtually meaningless anyways seeing as I live in the liberal utopia that is Massachusetts."

At least there's local elections which in the long run effect me more than the general election anyways. Even if Elizabeth Warren is pretty much a shoe-in this year seeing as she's become this money-shitting superstar in the Democratic party.

 

[IwegalBadnik]

I think at this point the parties have completely switched places having only done so halfway in the great depression

The early 20th century is about the time when the poles of the main political parties in the United States shifted and eventually reversed. After this reversal, Republicans tended to hold more conservative views while Democrats tended to hold more liberal views.

 

[KatsuKitty]

Do you hear yourself? You think we should kill extended families? Even if they have no ties to terrorists? That's fucked up on so many levels. Trump is advocating for unjust war. Simple extermination isn't justifiable, or else you begin to become a monster.
We 'lost' Iraq and Afghanistan because we had no plan. We got rid of Saddam and the Taliban and sat on our asses while pissing off the people living in sovereign nations, sending our soldiers to patrol and be blown to pieces because people wanted to play global policeman. We covered up, and still do cover up, the amount of civilians we accidentally kill. Nobody in American politics calls out the Saudis for exporting Jihadist extremism and funding for it. Nobody demands that Israel step up to the plate and help take care of its back yard, while ISIS plans their extermination. And those are our two big allies. Trump happily sucked on Israel's cock but openly planned demanding that our other allies pay more for their own security.

Trump, nor I, are not advocating that we simply go door-to-door shooting women and children in the head for no reason.

Trump is advocating that, when ISIS uses women and children's houses (and even themselves) as military targets, we treat them as military targets. They're eating our lunch because they know our one weakness is how pussy we get when a school or hospital suddenly gets involved. Great place to hide infantry or weapons. If I was ISIS, you don't think I'd be doing the same thing? It's like they know what buttons to push with us. That's gotta stop, as hard as it may be.

The Islamist culture of belligerence and cancerous metastasis must cease to exist, no matter what it takes. To put it in its most simplest terms, they started it. And they're doing a hell of a lot worse than anything we've done or you can imagine we'll do. This is a problem similar to that of the nuclear attack on Japan. It will take a hell of a lot of brutality upfront, to prevent even more brutality down the line for generations to come.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

The early 20th century is about the time when the poles of the main political parties in the United States shifted and eventually reversed. After this reversal, Republicans tended to hold more conservative views while Democrats tended to hold more liberal views.

But that is not entirely the case because the democrats kept their populism until recently and the republicans have only gained it with Trump

Trump, nor I, are not advocating that we simply go door-to-door shooting women and children in the head for no reason.

Trump is advocating that, when ISIS uses women and children's houses (and even themselves) as military targets, we treat them as military targets. They're eating our lunch because they know our one weakness is how pussy we get when a school or hospital suddenly gets involved. Great place to hide infantry or weapons. If I was ISIS, you don't think I'd be doing the same thing? It's like they know what buttons to push with us. That's gotta stop, as hard as it may be.

The Islamist culture of belligerence and cancerous metastasis must cease to exist, no matter what it takes. To put it in its most simplest terms, they started it. And they're doing a hell of a lot worse than anything we've done or you can imagine we'll do. This is a problem similar to that of the nuclear attack on Japan. It will take a hell of a lot of brutality upfront, to prevent even more brutality down the line for generations to come.

Japan used to be like the Islamic world but much more powerful. One important thing is that in addition to brutally cracking down on anti western activity that we also fund industry in the middle east afterwards

 

[DZ 305]

Trump, nor I, are not advocating that we simply go door-to-door shooting women and children in the head for no reason.

Trump is advocating that, when ISIS uses women and children's houses (and even themselves) as military targets, we treat them as military targets. They're eating our lunch because they know our one weakness is how pussy we get when a school or hospital suddenly gets involved.

"The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. They care about their lives, don't kid yourself. When they say they don't care about their lives, you have to take out their families,"

If that isn't what he meant, he should have clarified. The fact he hasn't suggests he would target civilians. Maybe he only suggested we don't target legitimate military targets enough, that isn't necessity being a pussy.
The way people talk about how simple the solution is to defeating ISIS is is concerning. How many people would you willingly let die, or directly kill in order to stop ISIS? Would you be willing to murder 5 jihadis and 1 child? I wouldn't

We're losing the war in the Middle East because of empathy and moralism.
The America I want to see, and millions of Trump voters want to see, is neither empathetic nor sensitive....except to Americans. That's what's so refreshing about Trump; he espouses a message of not taking it up the arse just because we're such a compassionate world player.

You're insane. You think that these wars, that serve as nothing more than projections of power, are being 'lost' because we're not bombing anyone that gets in our way? If I saw a nation acting like that, a bunch of egotistical pricks demanding we give them their way on everything, or else we'd get beat up, while they wave around their shiny new death machines, I'd fucking fight them to the death.
You and Trump seem to misread Roosevelt's ideas.

 

[KatsuKitty]

If that isn't what he meant, he should have clarified. The fact he hasn't suggests he would target civilians. Maybe he only suggested we don't target legitimate military targets enough, that isn't necessity being a pussy.
The way people talk about how simple the solution is to defeating ISIS is is concerning. How many people would you willingly let die, or directly kill in order to stop ISIS? Would you be willing to murder 5 jihadis and 1 child? I wouldn't

As many as it takes. I have no empathy for them because we are superior, even if they are civilians.

Sorry, but it's war, they're wrong, and we got bigger fists.

 

[Captain_Asshole]

As many as it takes. I have no empathy for them because we are superior, even if they are civilians.

Nice mentality. Totally unlike those filthy jihadists.

EDIT: Wait, Hitler would be a better comparison.

 

[DZ 305]

As many as it takes. I have no empathy for them because we are superior, even if they are civilians.

Sorry, but it's war, they're wrong, and we got bigger fists.

The ends do not justify the means. Ever. Its intrinsically evil to willfully murder. And what the fuck do you mean superior? What pot of racial worshiping did you drink from the alt-right? Because they all forget the importance of Christianity to the success to the West.

With Hillary, you lose. Four more years of apologies for being superior, and dogwhistled admissions that Muslim, Mexican, and Chinese cultures are superior to ours.

Because nobody else has ever used dog whistle racism at all, especially not this election cycle.
You really are showing just how insecure you are. You are so hurt that people don't like American exceptionalism and get mad that somebody doesn't make you feel special. Guess what, we're not. You have proven people are silly enough to buy the narrative that all Obama has done is hurt America because he made it uncool to have "superior culture". Like the kind that has been slowly exported globally since the end of the second world war?

 

[*Asterisk*]

The ends do not justify the means. Ever. Its intrinsically evil to willfully murder. And what the fuck do you mean superior? What pot of racial worshiping did you drink from the alt-right? Because they all forget the importance of Christianity to the success to the West.

There are plenty of times where the ends justify the means.

Military coups are means to an end. But there are times when they're your only option. Like when a mentally-impaired orangutang-hybrid is only months away from gaining access to nuclear weapons.

 

[kobebyarlant]

Bernie Sanders cares that the little people are hurting. Unfortunately, the little people are hurting because his supporters bashed them on the heads with rocks.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

The ends do not justify the means. Ever. Its intrinsically evil to willfully murder. And what the fuck do you mean superior? What pot of racial worshiping did you drink from the alt-right? Because they all forget the importance of Christianity to the success to the West.

Christianity is not just what you say it is. It is a broad tradition of which encompasses several things nothing like what you described. Murder being intrinsically wrong is not one of them

 

[KatsuKitty]

Nice mentality. Totally unlike those filthy jihadists.

EDIT: Wait, Hitler would be a better comparison.

Western European people build empires where free people invent and create. In a former era where our leadership and command was prideful and forceful, the world has become a better place to live.

Jihadists strap bombs to themselves and walk into markets selling the same shit for hundreds of years.

The world under other races is truly a terrible thing to envision.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

I don't understand why people are so adamant against killing civilians. ISIS is in total war with everyone who is not a rebel supporting the war effort and they have signed no treaties preventing the usage of such tactics. In fact even if ISIS signed treaties they would be breaking them so as a result it is perfectly acceptable to target their civilians and use WMDs on them because they are doing the same things

 

[Ruin]

I don't understand why people are so adamant against killing civilians. ISIS is in total war with everyone who is not a rebel supporting the war effort and they have signed no treaties preventing the usage of such tactics. In fact even if ISIS signed treaties they would be breaking them so as a result it is perfectly acceptable to target their civilians and use WMDs on them because they are doing the same things

The thousands of women and children brutally murdered by ISIS are a small price to pay so smug hipsters and sjws can suck down 36 ounce fraps and feel morally superior to everyone else.

Fuck them, they're just smelly brown people right?

 

[Picklechu]

I'm personally just sticking with the tried and true philosophy of "vote for the meme candidate since my vote is virtually meaningless anyways seeing as I live in the liberal utopia that is Massachusetts."

At least there's local elections which in the long run effect me more than the general election anyways. Even if Elizabeth Warren is pretty much a shoe-in this year seeing as she's become this money-shitting superstar in the Democratic party.

She's not up for reelection until 2018. She may be the Democratic VP nominee; otherwise, she won't appear on the ballot this year.

 

[Kazami Yuuka]

I don't understand why people are so adamant against killing civilians. ISIS is in total war with everyone who is not a rebel supporting the war effort and they have signed no treaties preventing the usage of such tactics. In fact even if ISIS signed treaties they would be breaking them so as a result it is perfectly acceptable to target their civilians and use WMDs on them because they are doing the same things

Vlad the Impaler (and the Mongols) had it right. Horrifically execute your enemies and send a clear message that any other enemies will suffer the same fate. Being "humane" is a farce when your enemy doesn't play by the same rules. ISIS will run pissing in their pants.

Spoiler: Fun for the family

• Compelled to drink molten lead
• Burning on the stake
• Machine gunning
• Quartering
• Hanging, drawing, and quartering
• Drowned in boiling water

Don't want to be subjected to these deaths? Then don't join ISIS.
EDIT: I'm not 100% serious. Maybe about 25-33%.