MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

First title

second title

third title

Fourth title

Fifth and Sixth title

Seventh title

eighth title

Ninth title

tenth title

All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.

Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)

 

[niggers]

im voting trump just so i can hopefully see @AnOminous cry

 

[AN/ALR56]

America has lost its respect.
Everyone here thinks you're all pussy when both China and Russia completely fucks up your plans in the middle East and you aren't doing shit.
Apologizing for Hiroshima is one of the most retarded things you have ever done.
Did japan ask forgiveness to firebombing the Chinese and gassing them to death?.
Also,how you can end terrorism when your closest allies support it?.

 

[XYZpdq]

"As for scandels I think Trump U tops Benghazi."

How many Americans were left to die at Trump U again?

At this point what difference does it make?

 

[JU 199]

Vote trump to trigger tumblr forever

MAKE TROLLING GREAT AGAIN!

 

[DZ 305]

America has lost its respect.
Apologizing for Hiroshima is one of the most retarded things you have ever done.

Good thing Obama never apologized for erasing a city from the map. And as for the most retarded thing we have done, I'm pretty sure that list is longer. If we want to discount unleashing the power of the atomic bomb we have the Korean war, Vietnam, Second Iraq war, the Iranian coup, Nicaraguan death squads, selling Iranians weapons to fund the Contras, and the Bay of Pigs are all viable subjects.

It's tempting to examine historical precedent but nobody before has ever held the nuclear and military advantage the US has over other nations. We lost Iraq and Afghanistan because we didn't have the balls to use it. Trump slaughtered a sacred cow by calling for the execution of terrorists families, a so-called "war crime". But really, it's what's gotta be done to conquer and destroy these cultures. Trump is the best shot we have to exterminate and extinguish certain cultures and assimilate their people, whether militarily, or preferably economically (think Reagan and the USSR).

If we had the balls to actually hit people, it's not like they'd be able to hit back. It may sound crass, but I say club the whole damn world. It won't even take a draft because we are the best when we actually have the balls to fight. We'll win.

Do you hear yourself? You think we should kill extended families? Even if they have no ties to terrorists? That's fucked up on so many levels. Trump is advocating for unjust war. Simple extermination isn't justifiable, or else you begin to become a monster.
We 'lost' Iraq and Afghanistan because we had no plan. We got rid of Saddam and the Taliban and sat on our asses while pissing off the people living in sovereign nations, sending our soldiers to patrol and be blown to pieces because people wanted to play global policeman. We covered up, and still do cover up, the amount of civilians we accidentally kill. Nobody in American politics calls out the Saudis for exporting Jihadist extremism and funding for it. Nobody demands that Israel step up to the plate and help take care of its back yard, while ISIS plans their extermination. And those are our two big allies. Trump happily sucked on Israel's cock but openly planned demanding that our other allies pay more for their own security.

How many Americans were left to die at Trump U again?

And how many people we accused of committing a crime during Benghazi? The Benghazi commitie has been around for 4 years, and yet they seem to have found nothing.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/house-benghazi-committee-lawyer-american-lives-223207

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/211361.pdf
Please tell me the outrage we had for the 60 deaths in 13 embassy attacks under George W. Bush alone, and the several deaths and security breeches after Benghazi.

 

[AnOminous]

Trump says questionable things like wanting to "print the money",

That's well beyond "questionable." That is threatening to destroy the economy utterly. This is how you end up like Zimbabwe.

Printing money also steals the value of existing money and is essentially a completely unavoidable tax on all money. It's the ultimate in thievery.

 

[DZ 305]

That's well beyond "questionable." That is threatening to destroy the economy utterly. This is how you end up like Zimbabwe.

Printing money also steals the value of existing money and is essentially a completely unavoidable tax on all money. It's the ultimate in thievery.

But that doesn't matter because he promises to keep trying supply side economics, the thing that hasn't worked any time it has been tried. And he promised to get rid of all those 'paper hat' minimum wage jobs(because nobody has a real job anymore because Obama) by bringing back the factory and mining jobs, but without the benefits of union or OSHA protection that everyone takes for granted because they never have to worry about their company putting up suicide nets

 

[AnOminous]

It's tempting to examine historical precedent but nobody before has ever held the nuclear and military advantage the US has over other nations. We lost Iraq and Afghanistan because we didn't have the balls to use it.

I don't know if you've noticed this, but at least two other countries (Russia and China) have the nuclear capability to wipe out the world as we know it, too. And once you wreck the entire world once, there is no marginal utility in the ability to do it another dozen times.

 

[JU 199]

I don't know if you've noticed this, but at least two other countries (Russia and China) have the nuclear capability to wipe out the world as we know it, too. And once you wreck the entire world once, there is no marginal utility in the ability to do it another dozen times.

Who cares about inconvenient facts when you have an inferiority complex

 

[autisticdragonkin]

I don't know if you've noticed this, but at least two other countries (Russia and China) have the nuclear capability to wipe out the world as we know it, too. And once you wreck the entire world once, there is no marginal utility in the ability to do it another dozen times.

I question whether Russia and China actually would destroy the world just because America destroyed the Islamic World. Both of them hate it too. They would probably publicly condemn the actions of the USA but not go to war over it and be secretly grateful at least to some extent. It would definitely harm the economy for a long time but it would be far from the end of the world.

 

[DuskEngine]

Both of them hate it too.

where does this idea come from

Putin has gone to great lengths to ensure that Chechnya remains under the control of an authoritarian Islamic leader with a long string of human rights abuses with the only caveat being that he kowtow to Putin

 

[autisticdragonkin]

where does this idea come from

Putin has gone to great lengths to ensure that Chechnya remains under the control of an authoritarian Islamic leader with a long string of human rights abuses with the only caveat being that he kowtow to Putin

It comes from the Islamic terrorism directed towards China and Russia too. They are more effective at dealing with it but the leader of Chechnya is there due to an uneasy compromise in order to suppress Islamic terrorism. It is very unlikely that Russia would go to war with America just because Chechnya is angry, they probably would just send in the military to suppress Chechnya again

 

[DuskEngine]

It comes from the Islamic terrorism directed towards China and Russia too. They are more effective at dealing with it but the leader of Chechnya is there due to an uneasy compromise in order to suppress Islamic terrorism. It is very unlikely that Russia would go to war with America just because Chechnya is angry, they probably would just send in the military to suppress Chechnya again

Yes, and that is Russia making a Faustian deal with one Islamic leader who has, for example, defended honour killings because it is apparent that men own their wives, and in another instance promised to organise violent protests against newspapers that reprint Charlie Hebdo cartoons. This is largely indistinguishable from the Islamic world that Russia supposedly hates, except that it is politically allied to Putin's rule.

I do agree that Russia wouldn't nuke America in response to Chechen outcry (that's a very silly idea) but that's not the point I was arguing about. My point is that Putin supports rulers who endorse policies that approximate the Islamic State's, and you cannot seriously claim that he is opposed to authoritarian Islam unless you are the sort of idiot who takes a politician at their word.

 

[*Asterisk*]

It's best not to vote on policy this election.

Hillary Clinton will say and do absolutely anything for the sake of short term gains in opinion polls and fattening her own pockets. All meaningful statements she makes on issues are guaranteed to be followed by evasion and flip-flops, and her primary strategy for handling gridlock has always been agreeing with everything the gridlockers say; only attacking them for not going far enough. She's as empty as a mannequin made of acetate, and I will never forgive Obama for appointing her Secretary of State after the shit she pulled during the '08 campaign.

Donald Trump? Same shit; different party. The only real difference between the two is in temperment and intelligence. Hillary Clinton has already shown herself capable of letting tens of thousands of Yugoslav civilians be massacred for matters as minor as advancing her disastrous "Hillarycare," which combined the worst elements of both capitalism and socialism. This is contemptible, but it still doesn't show that she'd do something like fire cruise missiles at Cancún when she meant to hit Khartoum.

Donald Trump is the worst kind of dumb. He's unspeakably retarded, always acts like he's the smartest guy in the room, and is incapable of acknowledging that he was ever played or swindled by someone else. Hillary has those last two points, but just because she's nowhere near the supergenius she thinks she is doesn't mean she overestimates her intellect like Der Drumpfenführer. She got herself into Yale. Donald's Daddy got him into Fordham, and even then he couldn't cut it.

Not that I think it should be necessary. We've had plenty of great politicians who tanked it while they were in school. But if Trump actually possesses a brain rather than a hormone-pumping lump of nerves and tumors, he sure as shit hasn't displayed it even when it'd be to his advantage.

 

[Picklechu]

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are both crooked, are both liars, and are both Democrats. Both of them will say and do anything to get ahead. The only major difference, once you strip away rhetoric, strategy, who they're trying to appeal to, etc, is that Clinton is at least relatively competent when it comes to government and she has experience that is relevant to being president.

I honestly never thought that I would not vote for the Republican nominee in a presidential election. Since Donald Trump will, unfortunately, receive my state's electoral votes by default, I at least won't have to worry about helping to elect Hillary Clinton by not voting for him. Therefore, I feel relatively liberated to vote for Gary Johnson, David French, or some other third party/write-in/independent candidate.

 

[*Asterisk*]

I honestly never thought that I would not vote for the Republican nominee in a presidential election. Since Donald Trump will, unfortunately, receive my state's electoral votes my default, I at least won't have to worry about helping to elect Hillary Clinton by not voting for him. Therefore, I feel relatively liberated to vote for Gary Johnson, David French, or some other third party/write-in/independent candidate.

I'm looking to do the same myself this year.

There's no way in Hell's Frozen Core New Mexico'll vote for a man who'll build a wall locking us on Tenochtitlan's side.

 

[JU 199]

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are both crooked, are both liars, and are both Democrats.

 

[Randy Lahey]

Trump combines the best attitude with the worst competency. Hillary has both the worst attitude, and the worst competency.

You know if Hillary wins then we're getting four more years of Obamanomics. Obama has been a staggering, colossal, monumental failure with the economy and Democrats like to tout his millions of minimum-wage paper hat jobs as reducing the unemployment rate. Hillary will basically continue our swirl down the drain; she's said explicitly that she endorses much of what Obama did.

Doc Thompson compared this to having a hundred dollars and deciding whether or not you're going to burn it, or blow it all on lottery tickets. Both are pretty fucking stupid to do. Hillary is burning the hundred dollars; if we wins, we know we're getting the shitty, poor, and sensitive country we have today. But Trump is the lottery tickets. Trump says questionable things like wanting to "print the money", but his nationalist, un-empathetic attitude that holds Western people as the superior race deserving of the spoils is top-notch. Am I willing to chance more QE for the decimation of inferior cultures economically and militarily? Maybe. Nobody else has openly committed themselves to stomping our boots on the undeserving non-Western people of the world. It's a terrific message and one that brings us unity within the country, something that Obama's divisive rhethoric has not brought us. Trump isn't afraid to say we're in charge, we make the rules, and lots of non-Western races will suffer dearly to uphold this status quo. That's American superiority, and I'm proud to endorse it.

With Hillary, you lose. Four more years of apologies for being superior, and dogwhistled admissions that Muslim, Mexican, and Chinese cultures are superior to ours.

It's a pretty solid chance he's not going to fix anything, but hey, he might.

So you're saying that I should buy lots of lottery tickets?

 

[Hat]

Trump more closely resembles the old Democrats like Jackson than he does the Republicans of today with his populism, which ideologically is more democratic anyway. That's not even mentioning Trump's long-term support of the ideals of the Democratic Party.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

Trump more closely resembles the old Democrats like Jackson than he does the Republicans of today with his populism, which ideologically is more democratic anyway. That's not even mentioning Trump's long-term support of the ideals of the Democratic Party.

I think at this point the parties have completely switched places having only done so halfway in the great depression