You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
💀 HorrorcowNicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.
Legal Vices screen just got juicy. Drex is talking about how we are talking about what a groomer he is. So Drex reads the thread. This Nigger's skin is just as thin as Rekeita's.
I'll give Drex some advice: Just say "if i did anything wrong the girl or her mom should have filed a police report" and shut the fuck up. Trying to defend it and claim you are a good guy for banging a 18(?) year old after what some may call grooming is a losing play to make. You aren't a good guy in this situation.
It is super common for single moms to present their daughters to their boyfriends in hopes they stay around.
I'm pretty retarded with spreadsheets - I'll re-learn - but I'd suggest your updates focus on SirVieVal, NerfMild, MrStirFry99, ACompleteRandom (ofc), and TurboGoat. I was only there for 40 min today and Turbo threatened rape.
You can CTRL-F search them, love. That is all I do. I find something interesting, then I scroll up and down for context.
If there is an attachment link in the range, you can post the link into your web browser (without the quotes and brackets) one at a time, and the picture/GIF will load.
Above is the "What can I expect for my 50 bucks" discussion. And the answer is: a 1-2 hour live podcast similar in tone to a Friday night show. That's it. There will be no serious discussion and no law-related topics. "That has its place, that place is not in Vegas on a drunken February night." Merch? "I'm bad at bringing merch, I don't care." Branca's not bringing books because "books are heavy." Yes, these are actual quotes. You can clearly see how much Nick cares about his first live event. No other planned entertainment was mentioned. And by the way, Nick's not actually organizing anything. That would require effort. What he's doing is just cutting the check and letting the little people do everything for him. Which, while not the best look, and certainly one indicative of what he now thinks his audience is deserving of, might mean that the event will be held in a technically competent manner. No duct-taping microphones together, that sorta thing.
So it's basically 1-2 hours of a shitty zero-prep show with no substance and then a meet-and-greet for the rest of the evening where you get to meet and greet a few cool people and a bunch of nobodies. That's it. "People can go out to bars, hang out, go out to clubs. Do what you do!" Yes, that's another real quote. Read: you'll have to provide your own entertainment.
The obvious problem with that is this: if you're already in Vegas, why waste 50 bucks on a 1-2 hour garbage show, when all the YouTubers you want to see there will immediately exit the "venue" and "go out to bars" elsewhere? Just loiter inconspicuously at the door for a while, then join the company of whoever you like, and no need to pay the shyster lawyer. That's what I'd do, if I happened to be there at the time. And if you're not already in Vegas, why in the motherfuck would you book an expensive vacation for this crap? Who cares about the $50 at this point, you're flying to Vegas, booking a hotel there, etc. etc. just to see some strangers and a podcast that's no different from one you can watch every Friday for free. Except the one you watch for free is 2-6 times longer. Where's the value proposition?
Now, don't expect the event to be a bust in terms of attendance. It's still nearly a month away, Nick's hyping it already, and his audience is big enough that just the overlap of "people who watch the show," "people who are interested enough to want to go to the event" and "people who will coincidentally be in Vegas at the time, or can nudge the dates a bit to accomodate" can easily exceed 100 people. This is not even taking into account all the parasocial leathery paypigs he's accumulated recently. Who knows, maybe he'll even fill out the schedule a bit in the coming weeks. Right now, it just looks like yet another manifestation of Nick's lazy attitude and general lack of effort. But hey, everything's fun with friends, so maybe it would prove to be enough.
Dick Masterson (confirmed), The Lead Attorney (now confirmed), Robert Barnes (now confirmed), Viva Frei (confirmed), Eric Hunley (now confirmed), Mark Groubert (now confirmed), Nate the Lawyer (now confirmed), Dani "WGFD" Ahn (now confirmed), Attorney Tom (easily overlooked still not confirmed), Good Lawgic (might). So apparently all the maybes agreed to come.
Yes. Low effort event, but this matches what he has always done. 'Hey guys! I am travelling to do X! Anyone in the area? Let's meet up in a local bar!' This Vegas shit is just embarrassing because he is purposefully going someone JUST to do this meetup. He needs to man up and be willing to put in the work, but being lazy has gotten him up to a million US dollars in a year (I think) and he has no real reason to change. He has gotten lazy and lucky.
He's also not a hypocrite. Man wanted to fuck, got into shape for the express purpose of fucking, and now he fucks. Simple and direct. And he's a race car driver. Wouldn't that rule out steroids, by the way? Surely he gets tested for doping. "Live fast, die young" is certainly one of the attitudes of all time, and it's one I remember him stating directly.
Legal Vices was streaming at the same time Nick was just a few hours ago. I don't know when but some time after the 5hr mark. https://youtube.com/watch?v=K99AkpecvUk
Legal Vices was streaming at the same time Nick was just a few hours ago. I don't know when but some time after the 5hr mark. https://youtube.com/watch?v=K99AkpecvUk
Ah yes, the KiwiFarms is the big bad organization who likes to destroy random people's lives. No, Drex, we would not try to "destroy her". What would be the possible motivation to? We absolutely would try to determine her identity to validate which of the many dates and ages you've given to us, but you know very well we wouldn't use that information to harm her in any way. Name one time the Farms has ever done that. In any case that whole segment was just the bullshit foundation for an excuse to not do the stream when he realized what a bad idea it would be. @Not Who You Think, I guess we won't be getting stream/interview content to add to your mega-post.
The fact that he keeps saying "I knew her when she was a teenager" is such an attempt at gaslighting. When you say "teenager" people don't think 13 years old. It's technically accurate but not societally accurate and he knows it. I know he knows it because he himself slipped up and said she was a "kid" and then had to stumble over his stupid fucking words outing the real ages. It's similar to how he tried to say 20s back when the story was that she was 20, and then she was 22, and now she's 24.
Steve feigning retardation over "What even is grooming" isn't a good look either but I won't hit him too hard just yet because he seems like he's just the unpopular faggot at school who finally got invited to a party and wants everyone to like him. I could see his micro-expressions when the "teenager" was revealed to be 13 and something tells me he didn't really like hearing that even though he proceeded to give a half-hearted defense afterwards.
And as people have already pointed out; "Perhaps it was YEWWWWWW who groomed her!" blaming the mom and the mom's friends is just ridiculous.
Anyway, I've clipped out the relevant segment to save here for our archives. Not sure if anything happened after this point because Steve decided to butt in with an irrelevant story and derail Drex's ramblings.
Did this nigga learn nothing about the farms? Dont engage with it. period.
The grooming arch is just sus. people would stop talking about it if he just stopped trying to control the narative or what the pick up artist call the "frame"
Hmm... I wonder if the line up of "confirmed" guests for the Vegas meetup will change now that Barnes is changing the date for his. From locals: View attachment 4426888
My guess is anyone with any credibility and respectability will extricate themselves from Rekieta's drunk wine mom gathering about as fast as Viva passively roasted Nick in his in-studio interview with Kyle. You won't have to wait long, don't worry. Additionally, despite Kyle being dry as toast, Viva does a good job. https://rumble.com/v2841zy-live-with-kyle-rittenhouse-viva-frei-live.html
Ah yes, the KiwiFarms is the big bad organization who likes to destroy random people's lives. No, Drex, we would not try to "destroy her". What would be the possible motivation to? We absolutely would try to determine her identity to validate which of the many dates and ages you've given to us, but you know very well we wouldn't use that information to harm her in any way. Name one time the Farms has ever done that. In any case that whole segment was just the bullshit foundation for an excuse to not do the stream when he realized what a bad idea it would be. @Not Who You Think, I guess we won't be getting stream/interview content to add to your mega-post.
The fact that he keeps saying "I knew her when she was a teenager" is such an attempt at gaslighting. When you say "teenager" people don't think 13 years old. It's technically accurate but not societally accurate and he knows it. I know he knows it because he himself slipped up and said she was a "kid" and then had to stumble over his stupid fucking words outing the real ages. It's similar to how he tried to say 20s back when the story was that she was 20, and then she was 22, and now she's 24.
Steve feigning retardation over "What even is grooming" isn't a good look either but I won't hit him too hard just yet because he seems like he's just the unpopular faggot at school who finally got invited to a party and wants everyone to like him. I could see his micro-expressions when the "teenager" was revealed to be 13 and something tells me he didn't really like hearing that even though he proceeded to give a half-hearted defense afterwards.
And as people have already pointed out; "Perhaps it was YEWWWWWW who groomed her!" blaming the mom and the mom's friends is just ridiculous.
Anyway, I've clipped out the relevant segment to save here for our archives. Not sure if anything happened after this point because Steve decided to butt in with an irrelevant story and derail Drex's ramblings.
How many woman has anyone on that panel fucked that they knew as an adult before they were even in highschool? We know Drex fucked a kid he met at 13, and that’s why he is a self confessed groomer. No amount of time will ever make that acceptable. Drex is basically a deadbeat nigger version of Woody Allen with no talent or money.
Yo nick, my dude. My common-law step daughter could surrogate it.
Huh. The unequivocal "I never said or did anything sexual to her when she was a minor, not even innuendo" is legitimately good to hear. The defense of "she didn't hear about any of the swinger gangbanging lifestyle I was into from me, but rather, she heard it from the people who were most pissed at me afterwards: her mother (specifically, from her mother's phone) and her mother's friends" is also rather interesting.
I gotta say, I honestly don't think that Drex groomed her at all. I was like 85% sure before, but now I'm basically at the "beyond a reasonable doubt" point. Now let me move the goalposts a bit, tee-fucking-hee.
The fact that once she came to him asking to participate in all this BDSM/swinger/kink shit, he just did it to her, instead of explaining how ruinous it would be for her later life, is really weird. I mean, he's talking out one side of his mouth about how "these thots get bodycounts in the hundreds, and they can't pair-bond anymore, blah-blah-blah, and that's ruining society" and all that shit. And out the other side come his exploits of organizing the running of coal trains on desperate women who want to spice up their lives. Now, if this girl was anywhere near close to him at all, shouldn't he have delivered a rant of the first variety to her? Instead, he started her down the second route, thus, according to himself, ensuring that she would end up alone, "ran-through," and a burden on the welfare system, like all these other "German shepherds."
I, for one, would like some clarity on that issue. I'm never gonna get it, because Drex is too much of a pussy to meaningfully address any of this. He's already starting to backpedal on doing the show with that girl at all, as seen on the timestamp above.
"If she shows her face, they'll dox her (that's gonna happen anyway), try to destroy her (that's not gonna happen at all, you dumb nigger). If she doesn't show her face, they'll go 'that could be anybody, he's just making this up' (strawman) or 'she's been so gRoOmEd that she's delu-' (that was one of the ideas floated around in the absence of conflicting information). You can't win with these people (bitch, we're, like, the most understanding motherfuckers on the Internet)."
But hey, at least he doesn't seem to be a pedo or a groomer. Well done clearing the bar of "not actually a child predator."
Hmm... I wonder if the line up of "confirmed" guests for the Vegas meetup will change now that Barnes is changing the date for his. From locals: View attachment 4426888
The difference in professionalism between balldo lawyer and VBL is glaringly apparent just from this small update about their event compared to balldo lawyers lazy ass. You lazy faggot who doesn’t listen to the farms because we don’t know what we are talking about so this isn’t advice definitely do not hire some midget wrestlers and definitely don’t hire a bunch of strippers get a fuckton of jello and some of those plastic pools and definitely don’t have branca supply the coke just do a gay little meetup where everyone will stand around awkwardly and you’re going to pull a ralphamale move and not hire a caterer so they are going to be hungry and bored basically what I’m saying is either shit or pull up faggot you won’t
Steve feigning retardation over "What even is grooming" isn't a good look either but I won't hit him too hard just yet because he seems like he's just the unpopular faggot at school who finally got invited to a party and wants everyone to like him. I could see his micro-expressions when the "teenager" was revealed to be 13 and something tells me he didn't really like hearing that even though he proceeded to give a half-hearted defense afterwards.
The story appears to have changed. Before it seemed to be well, actually, she had no idea of Drexel's proclivities before she randomly contacted him with no context. Now it's that she found out by looking through her mom's phone. Well, first of all, when did this happen? What age was that at?
Also, is the idea that she was REALLY interested in knowing everything about her mother's sexual escapades to the point of snooping through her phone?
I know Nick said he wished he knew everything about his parent's sex life, but I don't think that is actually normal teenager behavior.
It wasn't even a micro expression tbh, when Drex said "because I knew her when she was a kid... er 14" that was just straight disgust that flashed over his face for a second.
These people are all grifters, they don't want to fuck up their contact with Nick by shitting on his pet spook, but any normal human being hearing even a sanitized version of that is gonna think he's a fucking creep.
Like I said, I thought maybe we were being aylaawgy about it so I asked my Wife, a few people from work (male and female, all ages) and a couple of our friends when we were out having dinner one night last week, and they all said he was fucking creepy and manipulative and they wouldn't feel safe letting a guy who did that spend time with a young girl they knew.
Its not fucking kosher, no matter how you water that shit down, and I didn't even bring up his shitty excuse about the multiple strangulation at the fag club and how Good Guy Drex was saving her from being sex trafficked till later.
He's fucking brain rotted if he thinks this isn't fucking sick.
Even if we give him the benefit of the doubt that he never was even in the slightest inapropriate with her when she was young, he's still got 3 huge problems -
1 He was her mother's friend. That's just fucking creepy and disrespectful. Maybe it gets to me more because I have a daughter the age she was when he met her, but any other parents here want to tell me what they'd do if a long time friend of theirs got their kid into sicko sadist fetish shit? Found out that friends been pissing on and choking out your daughter while he fucks her? It's fucking abhorrent.
2 He knew her from when she was young. That's a power imbalance and it's just generally creepy as fuck.
And
3 as @Whistlin' Crustacean said, after all the shitting on women he does that are into that shit, he sets his friends kid on that path.
And all of this is discounting his obvious lying cope about the many accidental strangulations and sex trafficking he saved her from.
This guy is fucking scum.
The story appears to have changed. Before it seemed to be well, actually, she had no idea of Drexel's proclivities before she randomly contacted him with no context. Now it's that she found out by looking through her mom's phone. Well, first of all, when did this happen? What age was that at?
Also, is the idea that she was REALLY interested in knowing everything about her mother's sexual escapades to the point of snooping through her phone?
I know Nick said he wished he knew everything about his parent's sex life, but I don't think that is actually normal teenager behavior.
"there wasn't much interest in piggybacking off the Rekieta event"
Personally, I think he's basically irreligious. The fact that he entertains thr Virgin Mary even being raped is kinda over the top for any one that is somewhat serious about their faith.
Non-denoms are a tragic mixed bag. Most non-denoms form due to not wanting to deal with the dramas that come with large church conglomerates with doctrine laid out by people who aren't regular attendees. This doesn't mean that we hate organized religion (and the psyop campaign against it is a whole other story) but rather that they dislike internal fighting and don't want to submit to one institution or another.
On the good side, you'll find very involved churches that take good care of their membership, are very Bible focused, and take pains to check any new ideas that come through against scripture. These are usually in the South/rural communities, have membership derived from Baptist or ex Catholic members of many economic backgrounds, and start from very humble beginnings.
On the bad side, you find "liberal protestants", which is a general catch all term in Christian circles for a protestant sect which pushes a more flowery spiritualism and not Christianity. These churches generally preach a very dishonest form of Christianity which conflaits a personal relationship with God (see: you do not need an intermediary to interact in the form of a Priest like in Catholism or East Orthodoxy or in the Old Hebrew faith, but rather you may speak with him and receive instruction personally, with the aid of your brothers and sisters) with a private relationship (see: whatever you do is between you and God). These are the churches Papists bring up when they talk of Protestants hosting Drag story time and gay flags on the building. These are usually Northern or Urban areas, have members from middle-upper class backgrounds, and are usually plants or have corrupted an existing Church.
While I doubt that Nick is in the worst of these kinds of liberal protestant sects, he is most certainly in a church which is very close to it. If the church is aware of his practices, I cannot imagine my church or any of the other good churches I have been to approving of that sort of behavior. There would, at minimum, be a severe sit down where the elder board and head pastor say "we know what you have been doing, why haven't you come to us? There is clearly a problem here, let us recommend a path forward." If there was unrepentance, more drastic action would have to be taken. Then again, this is all assuming his Church knows of his activities. Depending on his community, he might keep the reality of his job a secret.
Nondenoms are all a meme. There are like 100,000 of them on the US alone amd almost all of them are started by conmen or people that want their own special social club to hang out with on Sundays. Not to mention they each have competing interpretations of the Bible which constantly change as pastors come in and out/pass away, leading to church drama and more splintering. It's really proof of the vapid nature of American religiosity, which is fitting for a person like Nick, who is more interested in an image rather than having any solid religious beliefs.
Personally, I think he's basically irreligious. The fact that he entertains thr Virgin Mary even being raped is kinda over the top for any one that is somewhat serious about their faith.
Like I said, I thought maybe we were being aylaawgy about it so I asked my Wife, a few people from work (male and female, all ages) and a couple of our friends when we were out having dinner one night last week, and they all said he was fucking creepy and manipulative and they wouldn't feel safe letting a guy who did that spend time with a young girl they knew.
Its not fucking kosher, no matyou wter how you water that shit down, and I didn't even bring up his shitty excuse about the multiple strangulation at the fag club and how Good Guy Drex was saving her from being aex trafficked till later.
He's fucking brain rotted if he thinks this isn't fucking sick.
The problem Drexel is running into is that there is basically no way to tell this story, no details you can add or leave out, that doesn't make him sound like a fucking creep.
He just didn't get called out on it because the story was spread out over many streams over a very long length of time and because many people assumed he must be playing a character rather than stating actual events from his life.
He was her mother's friend. That's just fucking creepy and disrespectful. Maybe it gets to me more because I have a daughter the age she was when he met her, but any other parents here want to tell me what they'd do if a long time friend of theirs got their kid into sicko sadist fetish shit? Found out that friends been pissing on and choking out your daughter while he fucks her? It's fucking abhorrent.
I'm starting to think we can scratch the word "friend". I didn't hear him contest the description of "ex" and the new line that her mom's phone was full of mentions of Drexel's sexual escapades doesn't really make sense if they didn't also involve the mother.
I'm starting to think we can scratch the word "friend". I didn't hear him contest the description of "ex" and the new line that her mom's phone was full of mentions of Drexel's sexual escapades doesn't really make sense if they didn't also involve the mother.
