At most, there'll be reactions like this trucker protest, which demands nothing but to slow down the slow boil and rewind some policy or another a few years.
This is precisely why the truckers must not only demand the restrictions be lifted, but that they be made illegal.
In the US, there are a lot of red states which have this kind of stuff banned, in one form or another, but it's mostly based on executive orders, which are easily reversed the next time the state gets a blue governor. Last I checked, there are three states in the US with vax passes and shit like that banned not by executive order, but by law passed through the legislature: Arkansas, Florida, and Texas.
We need to be certain that we don't allow our political elites to trap us in this quicksand again; of years-long, never-ending """states of emergency""" with no win condition, over what is effectively the common cold. Canadians MUST make this shit illegal. Amend the emergencies acts at both the federal and provincial levels. A state of emergency is meant to allow for a rapid response, needed faster than a legislature can legislate, such as in the event of a severe natural disaster; it is absolutely an abuse of state of emergency law to renew it every two weeks, 100x in a row. Make vaccine passports uncontrovertibly illegal: strengthen medical privacy laws, and strengthen medical discrimination laws.
This one is a really huge hurdle, but: Canadians need to reopen the constitution, more specifically the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and scrap or substantially reform Sections 1 and 33 of the charter. We absolutely need absolute rights in this country.
Section 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Section 33.
(1) Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15.
(2) An Act or a provision of an Act in respect of which a declaration made under this section is in effect shall have such operation as it would have but for the provision of this Charter referred to in the declaration.
(3) A declaration made under subsection (1) shall cease to have effect five years after it comes into force or on such earlier date as may be specified in the declaration.
(4) Parliament or the legislature of a province may re-enact a declaration made under subsection (1).
(5) Subsection (3) applies in respect of a re-enactment made under subsection (4).
In effect, what Section 1 says is that your rights and freedoms can be infringed, as long as a politician can justify to a judge that this infringement would be reasonable in a "free and democratic society," with something called the Oakes Test. This is a fairly easy legal test to pass, and it is passed most of the time when tested. However, if the politician really fucks up and absolutely cannot justify whatever rights infringement he is proposing to the judiciary, this politician is then free to invoke the notwithstanding clause and do it anyway. So in effect we have no rights at all. This is how Canadians purportedly have a right to free speech according to Section 2 of the Charter, but can also get sent to prison for making a transphobic remark to Jonathan Yaniv; because that has been deemed "justifiable in a free and democratic society." This is also why they have been able to trample all over what are purportedly our fundamental Charter rights during the scamdemic, for example banning protests, or banning emigration for vaccine-free individuals.
All this shit needs to be majorly reformed. It's a huge undertaking, though. Canada would probably need a constitutional convention, after replacing the PM, a majority of premiers, thus a majority of MLAs/MPs in a majority of provincial legislatures and the House of Commons, all with sympathetic agents. Quebec would probably want to obstruct due to language stuff; that's why these clauses are present. But they should either get a French-specific language exception applicable to their province, or Quebec should be granted independence. No more of these broad infringement clauses. Canada keeping Quebec is not worth the Charter being so impotent that it is legal for the entire population to be indefinitely kept under house arrest on the premise of a bad cold going around.
Also, something needs to be done about Canada's media landscape. For one, it should be illegal for the government to send the media hundreds of millions of dollars to air Covid-19 or vaccination PSAs, or otherwise ever transfer tax dollars to media corporations. Also probably scrap the CBC, or substantially overhaul it from top to bottom.
Finally, the longer this contrived crisis goes on, it becomes more and more obvious that these decisions are not mere incompetence, but rather fueled by some blend of malice and corruption. Aside from amending laws or the constitution, there needs to be a major, publicly transparent investigation into why this happened, how this happened, who is responsible, and so on, along with trials. Such people need to be brought to justice through all the proper legal avenues. Part of the role of the legal system is to punish an offender, but another part is to make an example of that person, such that everyone else knows not to do that thing. Future generations of bureaucrats and politicians need to know there are serious legal consequences to this kind of malicious, corrupt power grab.