🌟 Internet Famous Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yeah, it's kinda baffling. I was watching Noah Caldwell-Gervais, an obvious lefty that still makes decent videos
Does he? Always found his video to be kinda shit. He try hards a lot to sound smart and cant help but shove his dumb progressive takes everywhere. I remember back when he did a Call of Juarez retrospective and he kept talking about cultural appropriation and whatnot, making nonsense comparisons between CoJ: The Cartel and le racist republicans.
 
The best part is you know if they'd made all the zombies white then they'd have criticised the game for whitewashing the proud kang nation of Africa.

You can't win.
I remember Left 4 Dead 2 (should've called it Left 5 dead) got some flack for portraying black zombies. There defense was that there are black people in New Orleans = there are black zombies in New Orleans. Make sense to normal people, but those were much more innocent times. I think some games would just got immideately attacked by twitter. Like for example GTA San-Andreas

Screenshot 2021-10-31 at 08.49.57.png
 
The best part is you know if they'd made all the zombies white then they'd have criticised the game for whitewashing the proud kang nation of Africa.

You can't win.
And if they'd decided to avoid that racial hornet's nest altogether and set their story in a predominantly white country, there's "insufficient representation of Black bodies in media" and "game studios are perpetuating white supremacy".

I wish I were being the least bit hyperbolic or satirical, but it's exactly what they would say. God, these people are fucking insufferable.
 
I love when Jim gets so butthurt at people criticizing him and in the same breathe says he is the happiest he has ever been and that people hate him for his happiness. No you are not happy Jim. I know this because happy people don't get hanged up over criticism or are opiate addicts. I have never meet a drug addict who is happy. Jim is, right next to Movie Bob, one of the most miserable men I have ever come across. If he wasn't such a freak I would pity him.
 
Last edited:
man, the monumental downfall of JS over the years really did make the TB association in this thread dirty. The fov wizard deserved better
 
man, the monumental downfall of JS over the years really did make the TB association in this thread dirty. The fov wizard deserved better
What makes you people think that if TB didn't die of ass cancer that he wouldn't be bending over backwards for his buddy Jim? Dude got assblasted at the Trap question.
 
What makes you people think that if TB didn't die of ass cancer that he wouldn't be bending over backwards for his buddy Jim? Dude got assblasted at the Trap question.
meh the trap question was pretty overblown, it was a knee jerk reaction hardly indicative of anything, TB being hated by those people after the GG situation as well wouldn't really help.
Dude had a good support structure, a good family, a solid career that actually evolved as time went by and he actually seemed to enjoy playing video games for a change, and wanted them to do better instead of just whining non-stop and being jaded about his job like a lot of the people in that "area" that trooned out were. He also didn't seem to resent his audience.
At the end of the day nobody can say for sure if he would've went down this road or not, but I find it highly unlikely.
 
meh the trap question was pretty overblown, it was a knee jerk reaction hardly indicative of anything, TB being hated by those people after the GG situation as well wouldn't really help.
Dude had a good support structure, a good family, a solid career that actually evolved as time went by and he actually seemed to enjoy playing video games for a change, and wanted them to do better instead of just whining non-stop and being jaded about his job like a lot of the people in that "area" that trooned out were. He also didn't seem to resent his audience.
At the end of the day nobody can say for sure if he would've went down this road or not, but I find it highly unlikely.
I think TotalBiscuit would "denounce" the "transphobes" Jim keeps complaining about, but I don't think he'd go much further than that.

By the end of his life TB wasn't very close to Jim (not that they were all that close to begin with), and although I have no doubt he'd parrot the woke talking points as a matter of course (plus his wife was already quite woke at the time), TB had something that clashed with Jim's current situation: a sense of dignity. Sure, he was definitely capable of making fun of himself, but he fancied himself a professional and there were definitely jokes he saw as beneath him. And if he kept to his usual work schedule, he wouldn't have enough time to be terminally online on twitter. That seems to be the key factor on most gaming lolcows these days, tranny or not.
 
View attachment 2772019
You ever think of fat middle aged men dressing up as women and just think wow, fuck everything, just fuck everything, it's all fucked?
This tweet sums modern Jim up perfectly. Kneejerk, hyperbolic reaction to something he has surface-level knowledge of (at best), with zero effort to elaborate or put forward an argument beyond 'I don't like/understand it, so it's bad'.

I still don't understand crypto that well, but I know enough to know this reaction makes no sense. I guess now the lootbox teat has been milked to the point of producing only dust crypto/NFTs are Jim's new dead horse.
 
I love when Jim gets so butthurt at people criticizing him and in the same breathe says he is the happiest he has ever been and that people hate him for his happiness. No you are not happy Jim. I know this because happy people don't get hanged up over criticism or are opiate addicts. I have never meet a drug addict who is happy. Jim is, right next to Movie Bob, one of the most miserable men I have ever come across. If he wasn't such a freak I would pity him.
The fact that he trooned himself out also proves that he's still very much unhappy.
 
I have zero knowledge on crypto or how lefties view it but surely he should be championing it as a way to subvert the evil capitalist governments?
In ideological terms: low-information lefties don't like crypto because it's been hammered into their heads that it's bad for the environment due to how much electricity those calculations require. And you gotta save the world, y'all!

In practical terms: low-information voters (in general) are pawns to moneyed interests and both strong centralized governments and banks hate crypto since it gives the peasantry a way to operate outside of their control.
 
In ideological terms: low-information lefties don't like crypto because it's been hammered into their heads that it's bad for the environment due to how much electricity those calculations require. And you gotta save the world, y'all!
I think they hate it because they sense the threat of something uncontrollable and decentralized. They don't like the web-site? They cancell it and visa/master card fags switch its payments off (see KF, Gab, Parler, newmerous crowdfunding campaigns). But with crypto they are fucked, I can donate my monero to anything, from Taliban to lgb alliance and they would be powerless to do shit. Actually same logic as with totalitarian govs, they just hate freedom and independently thinking people.
 
I think they hate it because they sense the threat of something uncontrollable and decentralized. They don't like the web-site? They cancell it and visa/master card fags switch its payments off (see KF, Gab, Parler, newmerous crowdfunding campaigns). But with crypto they are fucked, I can donate my monero to anything, from Taliban to lgb alliance and they would be powerless to do shit. Actually same logic as with totalitarian govs, they just hate freedom and independently thinking people.
You're saying the quiet part loud there. Most idiots are effectively operating under that angle, but they either don't know it or delude themselves into thinking their cause is fair and just. Hence the "SAVE THE PLANET" and "THAT'S A TOOL OF THE ALT-RIGHT" angles.
 
Last edited:
You're saying the quiet part loud there. Most idiots are effectively operating under that angle, but they either don't know it or delude themselves into thinking their cause is fair and just. Hence the "SAVE THE PLANET" and "THAT'S A TOOL OF THE ALT-RIGHT" angles.
Don't forget simple sour grapes, some people have made a lot of money off crypto but Jim and the wokies haven't and that's wrong.
 
In ideological terms: low-information lefties don't like crypto because it's been hammered into their heads that it's bad for the environment due to how much electricity those calculations require. And you gotta save the world, y'all!
Their way of trying to explain it to normies is so fucking far off the mark as well, and show's how little they understand. Gonna go on a bit of a crypto sperg for a bit so apologies in advance.

One of the big comparisons they love to make is comparing the energy consumption of bitcoin to something like Visa. This is such a false equivalency that we're already into concave skull territory. Visa is simply a payment system. It relies on the existence of an underlying financial infrastructure, namely, the US dollar and everything that gives and maintains it's value.
Bitcoin IS its own financial infrastructure. It is it's own full monetary stack, it's ability to make payments between users on the network is only one small part of it. If you wanted to really compare Bitcoin's power drain to something you should compare it to the US dollar itself. Bitcoin's value comes from the blockchain, a shared ledger that's difficult if not impossible to tamper with. The dollar's value comes primarily from the strength of the US government. So have to calculate the energy usage of aalll the relevant federal agencies+ the federal reserve, INCLUDING the United States Military. That's a massive pillar of the dollar's value, is America's military might. And if Jim expects me to believe that the blockchain consumes more energy that the largest industrialized army in the world he's got some serious brainrot.

Second they don't understand crypto's energy mix. Crypto miners love going after what are known as "stranded energy assets" basically electricity that is being generated but not being used. This is why big mining operations got set up in China despite China's somewhat negative attitude towards crypto. The Chinese built a bunch of hydo-power stations in southern provinces that were far away from major cities, but didn't bother building the infrastructure to transport that power to anywhere it could be put to use. Miners saw this and were like aww yiss free energy, and it's renewable. Granted not all, probably not even most of the energy crypto uses is renewable, but miners definitely like to go after it when they can, even in unexpected ways. One of the more extreme examples is miners going after natural gas. Oil drilling produces methane as a byproduct, but that methane doesn't really get captured or used. Miners started setting up natural gas rigs to capture this methane and use it as fuel for their mining pools. Now this isn't totally environmentally friendly, but burning methane to produce CO2 is way better for the environment than just methane on it's own.

Then there's the issuance factor. This isn't applicable to all cryptos but for Bitcoin, which is obviously the biggest and baddest of them all, the energy consumption isn't because of transactions and fees like so many of these brainlets like to say on repeat. It's because miners for the moment make most of their money from being issued NEW Bitcoins. For those who don't know crypto at all, I'm sure you're all familiar with the "money printer go brrr" meme. Well the creator of bitcoin designed it so you don't get to just print new bitcoins for nothing, you actually have to earn it by expending resources, namely energy. This is going to be the case until the last bitcoin is mined in 2140 (it's going to take that long because the amount you get for mining blocks gets halved every 4 years)

Lastly, and this one annoys me the most, they make these fucking insane predictions about what crypto's energy consumption is going to grow to in the future using variables they cannot POSSIBLY know. Like, they're literally just pulling shit out of their ass. There's this idea that crypto miners are all lavishly wealthy, and while they do make good money, what alot of people don't know is that for the big mining pools, profit margins are actually pretty thin. Most of what they mine goes back into operating costs. Investment funds and private investment firms rarely like to fund mining operations because they're really not that profitable, if you just purely wanted to make big money on crypto you'd probably be better just trading it on an exchange. I saw one article (i think it was the new york times..?) that tried to say within the next 5-10 years the energy consumption of bitcoin could double, or grow even more than that. This is probably the single stupidest statement I've ever heard someone make about Bitcoin. Because remember, bitcoin issuance gets halved every 4 years, so miners are gonna get less per block that they mine. That means in order for miners to remain within their already thin profit margins the value of bitcoin would also have to DOUBLE every 4 years. And there is absolutely no fucking way they could know or predict that happening. There's not a soul alive who could reliably tell you whether bitcoin is going to go up or down within the next 4 months, let alone say with absolute certainty that it is going to predictable DOUBLE every 4 years.
Also worth noting one of the reasons mainstream media started cracking down harder on crypto in the last year or so is when the George Floyd shit was happening and all the big businesses were bending over backwards to support BLM, Coinbase, the biggest crypto exchange kept their mouth shut, the new york times noticed this and the CEO put out a statement basically saying the company isn't gonna commit to any political causes, instead focus on its mission of making crypto use more widespread and accessible. Globohomo's sure didn't like that. Coindesk wont donate to BLM = crypto is white suppremacy.

Final sidenote to Jim about NFT's. NFT's only make up a fraction of the transactions settled on the Ethereum blockchain. Which by itself has a much lower energy consumption than bitcoin's blockchain cause it runs on PoS. If you wanna moralize and make me panic about the oceans boiling come to me with some actual solid numbers. Otherwise pop another painkiller and cope seethe and dilate.

Okay I'm done, thank you for listening to me SNEED
 
Back
Top Bottom