Zoophilia Megathread - Exposing those who believe 'ethical consent' is a reality when sexually abusing animals.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
If things like moodboards for LGBT MAPs (Minor-Attracted Persons) exist, then I guess it was bound to happen for someone to create a zoophile moodboard.
792833

archive.is

☁️ Howl 🐾 on Twitter: "I know this got some crazy attention last tim…

archived 9 Jun 2019 10:43:55 UTC
archive.is archive.is
 
Might as well halal everyone in the Animal Control board while we're at it.
 
I think we should create a prefix or tag for this thread and all threads related to people who are confirmed zoophiles. Just like the prefix all the zoosadist threads has.
 
Null said:
Seems against the witch hunting ethos. Zoosadist shit could be excused because we had names and crimes, this is just "jim retweeted it so alright kf army lets go give em heck"
Click to expand...
The "exposing those..." in the title rather than the typical description gives it a very vigilante/morally outraged feel rather than lulzy
 
Sword Fighter Super said:
If he's willing to roleplay this disgusting shit, what would keep him from taking the next step to actually acting it out?
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, I don't disagree that's it's gross and weird. But the whole "If you do x virtually then what stops you from doing it in real life?" is that same tired argument that's been thrown against video games for the past few decades and I'm sick of hearing it. It's not a smoking gun.
 
Notan Alte said:
We already have a thread on him, but Adam Johnston/YMS is a zoophile. Check it out in animal control.
Click to expand...

Thanks! I've added him to the 'Zoophiles with KF Threads' section.

Great Dane said:
Corrections needed in 'Other Known Zoophiles'
@MollyJaneZetahttps is actually just @MollyJaneZeta, take out the https archive
@flehmen-fearlof is actually @flehmen_fearlof, underscore not dash. Account is locked.

Consider adding this zoophile to the 'Other Known Zoophiles' list
View attachment 792939
April 20, 2019 archive

732482



732477



732480



732474

http://archive.li/9h6MR
Click to expand...

Thank you! I've fixed those links & added ZereftheFolf as well.
 
Chairman of Eurofurence Cheetah is a zoo


Oh and look the head of security for that con Dhary Montecore, Eurofurence photographer and partner to Dhary Jason Blake / Jason Otter (see below) own dog currently and while no longer displayed on Dhary's Twitter, leopards can't change their spots. A tiger can't change its stripes in Dhary's case

Jason also goes by Riverdogge. Unconfirmed but a guest account appeared using the same username, posted once then disappeared. Potential autistic attempt to throw others under the bus to protect himself and his partner?
 
Last edited:
Cricket said:
The "exposing those..." in the title rather than the typical description gives it a very vigilante/morally outraged feel rather than lulzy
Click to expand...

You're right; I'll fix it later today. I have some more info to add to the OP as well (new accounts + working on gathering more screenshots of material that isn't just "ree they're degenates")

edit: I'll fix it when I have more time on my home PC. Probably won't be until this weekend.
 
Last edited:
Blood Bath & Beyond said:
In this particular case I don't really see anything wrong with being morally opposed to dog-fuckers, but hey, maybe I'm just old-fashioned.
Click to expand...
That's not the issue. The point is that it's more witch hunting than funny in a forum that features lolcows to laugh at rather than going on moral crusades. If a minor change to the title of a thread reflects that, then why would you be opposed? You can still be outraged by dog-fuckers if the thread title has a more mocking and less vigilante description.
 
Cricket said:
That's not the issue. The point is that it's more witch hunting than funny in a forum that features lolcows to laugh at rather than going on moral crusades. If a minor change to the title of a thread reflects that, then why would you be opposed? You can still be outraged by dog-fuckers if the thread title has a more mocking and less vigilante description.
Click to expand...

Sorry bud, but there is a difference between some sperg who makes an ass of themselves over and over and people who are actively abusing animals. Maybe you forgot, but it was a member of KF who actually went to Cuba to hunt down that disgusting piece of shit "Woof". In any other case we'd probably consider that going way beyond pozloading my neghole and a ban/mock worthy excursion, but that guy is a hero. I don't think that every single furry and dog-fucking freak should be hunted down or actively harassed by KF, but people are going to do what they want to do whether or not a single word is removed from the title of the thread, so you being so hung up on one word is honestly a bit downsy. I don't care if the title is changed, but I also don't think it matters at all if it isn't.
 
Last edited:
I mean, I know that the shit going on in this thread isn’t funny and that the internet vigilante angle is very apparent, but Kiwi has plenty of threads on people that aren’t funny but are just plain horrifying. I don’t think it not being funny really matters as much as the presentation that comes off like you’re thinking “I’m doing the world a service!” It’s KiwiFarms. It’s not a place to take yourself serious. Compiling information on these sick fucks is fine, but that’s all you’re doing. It’s not like you’re helping the world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom