You Got a Fast Car - Is it fast enough so we can fly away, like that couple in Niagara Falls last week?

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
BY DAN KOIS
NOV 27, 2023•6:13 PM

1701185008322.png
A 2022 Bentley burns at the Rainbow Bridge U.S. border crossing with Canada. Saleman Alwishah via Reuters

Over the weekend, the New York Times reported that the car that exploded near the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, New York—killing both occupants of the car, injuring a border control officer, and snarling traffic at the international crossing on one of the busiest travel days of the year—was an ultra-high-end Bentley with a 542-horsepower engine that could go from 0 to 60 in 3.9 seconds. Indeed, when you watch the video released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the car hitting a median as nearby vehicles crawl into tollbooths, you can’t help but admire how fast the Bentley Flying Spur is going when it launches upward as if shot from a cannon.


It does make you wonder, though: Why on earth would someone want to own a car—one meant to be driven on regular old roads in, for example, upstate New York, where its driver operated a small local chain of hardware stores—that can go a reported 175 miles per hour? That’s 110 miles per hour faster than the highest posted speed limit in the state of New York. It’s about 107 miles per hour faster than the highest posted speed limit in Ontario, where the driver hoped to attend a KISS concert. Heck, that’s 90 miles per hour faster than the highest posted speed limit in all of America (on state Highway 130 outside Austin, Texas). Unfortunately, we can’t ask Kurt P. Villani, 53, of Grand Island, New York, or his wife, Monica Villani, also 53, why they bought a car that can go that fast, because they both died horribly when the car exploded.

Why would an automaker manufacture a car with so much engine power that it requires an eight-speed transmission? The obvious answer is: because people pay a lot of money for it. A 2022 Bentley Flying Spur like the Villanis’ sells for upward of $200,000, according to Car and Driver, and that’s the price for a used model. Car and Driver does not reveal the MSRP for a new Bentley but describes it as both “eye-watering” and “eye-popping.” (Once you dry out your eyeballs and stick them back in your head, you’ll see that Car and Driver does recommend you buy the thing, giving the Flying Spur a rating of 10 out of 10.)

Just a few days before the crash at Niagara Falls, I watched Michael Mann’s new film, Ferrari, starring Adam Driver as the Italian car designer Enzo Ferrari. The film fetishizes speed; for long stretches, we thrill along with Enzo to the throaty roar of his top-of-the-line engines as a parade of handsome drivers puts the cars through their paces on race tracks, city streets, and the 1957 Mille Miglia, a thousand-mile race around the roads of Italy. The film portrays Enzo as more or less indifferent to the company’s task of selling sports cars to civilians. When his money man tells him Ferrari needs to sell way more cars to stay afloat, Enzo scoffs at all the other car companies who race in order to sell more cars; he sells cars, he says, only in order to keep on racing. Yet those midcentury years, as Ferrari and Maserati battled other brands for dominance on the track and then pushed ever-faster consumer models into the marketplace, established an expectation on the part of high-end customers: One reason an expensive car costs so much is that it could perform on the race track, given the chance.

But of course that is stupid. American roads are not race tracks, and American drivers are not professional athletes with years of experience driving at dangerous speeds. The faster drivers go on the road, the more likely they are to suffer a crash and for that crash to be fatal—a point that is both bluntly, stupidly obvious and more or less ignored by plenty of drivers, automobile marketers, and road designers. Drivers love to open up a car and see how fast it can go, contributing to an increase in reckless driving year over year. Marketers love to shoot commercials featuring cars tearing down open highways, cruising across sunset-lit beaches, and otherwise showing off their impressive horsepower. That 85-mph highway in Texas? A local television station discovered that the state could have opened the toll road at a lower speed limit, but the Texas Department of Transportation “took advantage of a $100 million payment the private toll road company promised in exchange for an 85 mph speed limit.” Why? Because a higher speed limit, it hoped, would encourage greater use, and thus more toll revenue. Needless to say, on state Highway 130, plenty of people crash their cars and die.

There’s another solution: speed governors, devices that prevent cars from traveling at wildly unsafe speeds. As Slate contributor David Zipper has written, American cars already feature such devices, but most are set comically high—often 155 mph. (Volvo recently made headlines for limiting its cars to a mere 112 mph.) As of 2024, all new cars in Europe must include “intelligent speed assist” technology that sounds alarms and forces a driver to slow down if a car exceeds the speed limit for too long. (It’s not foolproof, and a driver willing to navigate through a lot of menus can turn the feature off.) In the U.S., such regulation has never gotten much traction, thanks to driver resistance and industry indifference. But as Zipper reports, the Department of Transportation recently recommended all automakers install ISA in new cars—and called on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to mandate it. U.S. traffic deaths are skyrocketing because the cars that are going faster and faster on our roads are also bigger and heavier than ever before, so such a move would obviously be a good idea. We’ll see if American stupidity and stubbornness allow it to happen.

For Americans simply love to speed. Even if they don’t actually speed, they love the idea that they could: An executive at a company that makes speedometers told the Associated Press, “People really want to seehigher numbers” on their dashboards—one reason that your minivan’s speedometer may go up to 140 even if your car is unlikely to approach that kind of number. If you are really wealthy, however, you can buy a car that can easily hit—indeed, exceed—that number. And then you might end up driving that fast, maybe on purpose, maybe due to some kind of mechanical flaw. (A spokeswoman for Bentley assured the New York Times that the Niagara Falls crash “was not tied to a recall in 2021 of some models over a risk that their accelerator pedals could become stuck.” If I wrote for Car and Driver, I might call that quote “eyebrow-raising.”) What happens to you, and to the other drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists around you, when something goes just a little bit wrong?

Michael Mann’s Ferrari may glamorize speed, but Mann isn’t shy about showing its consequences. Early in the film, one of Ferrari’s drivers dies on the test track; Enzo immediately turns to another driver and offers him the job. The film climaxes with a horrific crash in the Mille Miglia, caused when a driver, pushing his car to the limit, runs over a small piece of metal in the road. As the Ferrari’s tire blows, Mann shows us the fast car flying away, soaring into the air, beautiful and terrible. Its arc looks spookily like that of the 2022 Bentley Flying Spur, achieving liftoff by the Rainbow Bridge, its driver helplessly slamming on the brakes. The Flying Spur does not offer intelligent speed assist; according to Car and Driver, one of its few driver-assistance features is a forward-collision warning, which comes standard in the car, and which surely must have been blaring as the car plummeted down toward the ground.

Source (Archive)
 
Or, cops could pull over people who go faster than the speed limit and issue tickets.

Why do 'journalists' need to write shit like this?
 
> Why would an automaker manufacture a car with so much engine power that it requires an eight-speed transmission?

high capacity gasoline clip too, yikes
 
In car communities, this kind of thing is called "Lambo Brain" - when a person with a lot of money, but not a lot of common sense or driving experience, buys a supercar and immediately thinks themselves an untouchable God of Roads........ only for them to reduce themselves to a thin red paste on a telephone pole sometime later.

The "Why do you neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed this?" is just commie-journo finger-wagging trying to convince us all that we're the greatest danger to society, those who dare to dream beyond conformity.

Every volume-production car for sale in the US right now is capable of being driven too fast for conditions.

And with advancing tech, we're going to have to fight off this kind of argument again and again and again, that our cars need to be under someone else's control at all times. Even though the vast majority of people are fine behind the wheel.

Yes, there are hundreds of thousands of crashes and thousands of fatalities in cars a year in this country, but what doesn't get noted? The BILLIONS of harmless trips completed safely and without incident by people who can somehow resist the apparently uncontrollable urge to go as fast as your car can go at all times in all conditions.

Do we even know why he crashed? Do we know for certain he was speeding though only a desire to show off, or inattention to the road? And not a mechanical or medical issue? The article doesn't say.
 
Last edited:
This is like blaming the gun and not the person pulling the trigger.

That idiot drove incredibly recklessly and dangerously and killed both of them as a consequence, that's all there is to it. No different from someone driving hammered and going the wrong way on a highway. I don't see any good reason why someone shouldn't need an additional license endorsement to own and operate vehicles with that kind of power. You already have to get one if you want to operate a motorcycle or commercial vehicle.

If you can afford a car like this, you can afford to take the time to learn how to operate it responsibly and take it to a track or somewhere else where you can drive at those speeds safely. Nobody ever has a right to endanger others with reckless driving.

Hell, if there's no track nearby just go out on a stretch of highway in the middle of nowhere at 2 or 3 in the morning.
 
When my dad was selling Fords, he was always trying to talk dads out of buying their 16 year olds brand new Mustangs. This was back in the 90’s, and he would try to direct them to Taurus’, and such.

He wasn’t successful once, and the kid was dead less than a week after the sale, and the dad was trying to deal with the financing for the now completely obliterated car he still owed thousands on.

My dad’s manager had to talk him down because my dad felt such guilt over it. He ended up passing such customers on to someone else if he couldn’t talk them out of muscle cars for their teens.
 
This is going to be the next banner that insufferable people are towing, I can already tell. This is the second article I've seen about "nobody needs a fast car" in recent times. I think this is going to be the new astroturfed thing, I'm pretty sure the fuckcars crowd was also the result of artificial algorithm pushing, but they've lost social capital. There's somebody out there who really doesn't want regular people owning cars, or somebody is trying to manipulate the markets by weakening auto manufacturers.
I have a special kind of spite for these people who want to turn life into some kind of padded cell experience, regardless if this is all AstroTurf bullshit or not. Just because some other retard slams their car into a wall doesn't mean everybody else should be restricted because of it.
 
where the driver hoped to attend a KISS concert.

I don't understand why one would buy a fast car that they can't enjoy unless they took it to a race track or something. I'll cruise in a 70s muscle car. People can do what they want with their money though.
 
The ability to rapidly accelerate can save your or someone else's ass in certain situations, and it's also useful for example when overtaking a truck, or some journo shithead who keeps hogging the left lane because "he's doing the speed limit" (he's actually doing 10 under but he has no idea his speedometer is wrong because he is an idiot). The less time I spend in the oncoming lane, the safer everyone is. Fast cars also bring joy to people who are competent drivers and inclined to like this kind of thing.

This is all completely opposed to a Slate journalist who can never make anything or anyone safer, isn't useful, and doesn't bring any joy to everyone - all he does is make the world just a little bit shittier, whinier, Jewier place.

Ban all journos. Total journo death.
 
If given the option between aging and deteriorating slowly due to cancer or a neurodegenerative disease, or soaring straight to Valhalla with your car, what would you choose?
 
Why would an automaker manufacture a car with so much engine power that it requires an eight-speed transmission?
I drive a 10-gears semi truck from time to time, feeling the raw power of the engine is fun. Granted is not a car but hearing the whistle of the air compressor on every shift is so good. Wait until they learn that there are Lexus cars with 10 gears transmissions, or better, the semis that have 18 gears
 
There's been a push for EV's btw
Going to an EV isn't going to a slower, more sedate car. Even the basic Tesla Model X, costing $200k less, has better performance than that Flying Spur. The Model X Plaid has more power than the original Bugatti Veyron, just without the top speed because Teslas only have a single speed transmission.

Except EVs are even more dangerous in a fire.
 
I drive a 10-gears semi truck from time to time, feeling the raw power of the engine is fun. Granted is not a car but hearing the whistle of the air compressor on every shift is so good. Wait until they learn that there are Lexus cars with 10 gears transmissions, or better, the semis that have 18 gears
You always have more than you think,

Two words. Deep Reduction
 
Why on earth would someone want to own a car—one meant to be driven on regular old roads in, for example, upstate New York, where its driver operated a small local chain of hardware stores—that can go a reported 175 miles per hour?
I'm not a car guy, but like any heterosexual guy (not Dan Kois) I appreciate a well-designed machine, one where all the parts work well, are put together perfectly, and produce something greater than the sum of its parts. A well-designed car is going to go fast, because going is one of the essential things that cars do. There are fast cars that are not designed well, but I don't think Bentleys fall into that category.
 
Back
Top Bottom