SojiroSakura
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2017
The screenshots are enough for me to believe it 100%. But if those aren't enough for some, wait and see how salty he'll get from questions and how many people get banned during FishCraft
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Phil’s actions in his filing and the 341 hearing automatically triggered a 2004, there’s no judgment call for the trustee when records are incomplete and the applicant is combative.Well I really hope that Midfirst or Citi request a 2004 Exam. And as we all know he doesn't do MTX for his streams, hardly ever in fact so...
Is that just an assumption? Or are they 100% going to do a 2004?Phil’s actions in his filing and the 341 hearing automatically triggered a 2004, there’s no judgment call for the trustee when records are incomplete and the applicant is combative.
It is required by law that any reporting irregularities or unanswered questions asked of the applicant result in a 2004 to guarantee there are no hidden assets or other fraud.Is that just an assumption? Or are they 100% going to do a 2004?
View attachment 1229045
while he is not the only one who abbreviate BECAUSE to "bc", it is certainly not something that everyone uses and in fact DSP is the only other person i know that use that abbreviation all the time, so its unique enough I think
View attachment 1229069
View attachment 1229070View attachment 1229071View attachment 1229072
I'm not sure why people are doubting this, it's the final nail in the coffin that already had so many nails it's more metal than wood...
From Rumplestiltzkin, screenshots showing that he did in fact do a bunch of chargebacks.
View attachment 1228977View attachment 1228979View attachment 1228980
Hilarious that he thinks someone should pay for a pleasant experience, get shit on as well as watching others get berated, and not do a legitimate chargeback for services not rendered. No one gave money to get shit on. Also, I still stand by him NOT going after someone using his brand as evidence it's really him. Does someone claiming bankruptcy really need someone else making him look bad?And just like that, here are some more screenshots from the same source as before. @Slander Man, the initial disclosure mentioned that the source had asked whether WWE Champions was brought up in chat, and the provider of the screenshots said it wasn't. Source says these are probably the last screenshots we're going to get, so at this point, you are all welcome to decide whether or not you believe them.
I know some will still doubt it with the escort saga, but I think it matches well with what we've seen publicly from Phil, and the Rumplestiltzkin chargebacks back it up.
View attachment 1229029View attachment 1229028View attachment 1229027
That will never happen. Even if its 100% proven he would still deny it on stream.I don't think many of us need convincing. I just want it to reach the point where Piggy has no choice but to confront all of this.
Publicly, preferably.
I don't think many of us need convincing. I just want it to reach the point where Piggy has no choice but to confront all of this.
Publicly, preferably.
unless someone breaks into his house and ties him down mid-stream, he wont publicly confront itI don't think many of us need convincing. I just want it to reach the point where Piggy has no choice but to confront all of this.
Publicly, preferably.
Is there a breakdown of the escort saga? Thanks
lol @ admitting he's using the financial life jacket and hat as gacha on the pigs. Brilliant!https://youtube.com/watch?v=Lt5bArTn0_I
GDLK thumbnail.
Thanks!Sorry if late, I'm still catching up, but Metokur did the best encapsulation that I'm aware of. I'll never fucking know how he sorted out, summarized & translated that whole shitshow so well, but if you haven't already seen it, here:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=iXwC9jpb8GU
Phil has a large amount of autistic haters that follow him and would do things like this. Including people that befriend him the most and moderate his chat.I'm not sure why people are doubting this
Is that just an assumption? Or are they 100% going to do a 2004?
There is no doubt it will be a dismissal with prejudice. There was no reversal of fortune, and at no point has he had inadequate income to cover his personal and business expenses AND repay his creditors. Add in his obfuscation of his finances in his court filings and his offer to answer a question to the CitiBank troll “Offline” DURING HIS 341 HEARING, Phil put the trustee in a position where she has no recourse but to launch a 2004 examination. Without a 2004, his claim was likely to be rejected. With a 2004 exam, his case checks so many of the boxes on the bankruptcy fraud checklist that he isn’t just looking at dismissal without prejudice, he will have the IRS and the Washington Bureau of Revenue spelunking in his colon until they hit the mother lode.I think that's his best case scenario. I actually think they have enough just to throw out his case entirely for fraud, maybe with prejudice. I don't think they'll even do a 2004 examination until they already know all the answers because pigroach is so obviously just going to lie.