Noticed today that California changed the way they report this metric again
It's odd how the vaccines seem to be working so well in California compared to the rest of the planet? Maybe it's the nice weather, the number of Mexicans or something in the water?
Here's the data from Denmark
The UK
The above data is already heavily manipulated to put the best spin possible on vaccine efficacy by, for example, moving mild cases among the unvaxxed into the unlinked column and treating breakthrough cases less than 2 weeks after the jab as unvaccinated or unboosted. Even then they can't hide the fact that receiving the vaccine is making people MORE prone to infection.
I swear the Burgers are just making shit up at this point.
Here in Australia I listened to one of our top virologists discuss the vaccines. Get this, apparently vaccination is much better than natural immunity because having antibodies from infection only lasts a couple of months and you'll have no protection when variants come along. He took the reasons why the vaccines are completely useless, did the old switcheroo, and made it a selling point for the jab. Utterly shameless and the definition of misinformation.
We're also rolling out booster doses for teenagers because.....reasons.
"We have 95% if the population double vaccinated and we have 8 million boosted."
"Are you looking to vaccinate younger teens?"
"We have spoken to Pfizer. I have written to Pfizer and we're encouraging them to go through that process if they're ready to do that".
So to sum up the decision whether or not to jab children with a 3rd vaccination is entirely dependent on whether or not Pfizer want to do that.
Note not one single explanation or citation of a research paper to explain why children need to be boosted. I can only assume that it's in the written terms of the contract that the government signed with Pfizer to keep using their shitty product no matter what.