Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

[z0mb0]

@SCSI I agree with you on the part about Nuremberg Code not belonging in a religious exemption request. However in Pennsylvania they do allow religious and philosophical objections, where philosophical is defined as "on the basis of a strong moral or ethical conviction similar to a religious belief". I'm not a lawyer but I assume it's not a good idea to mix together religious and philosophical objections. I also don't know if beliefs about the ethics and morals of the Nuremberg Code would count as a conviction similar to a religious belief, and I don't think it's as convincing of an argument to an HR worker, so I would only use it as a backup appeal if that is possible. I don't plan on getting legal counsel as I don't think I could win a legal case (or want to go through one) and at most I would have an attorney's letter just to scare them.

I know the advice is to wait until the deadline but I'm tempted just to submit one early and get the situation over with. If they ask more questions well I will request to answer in writing.

I may be wrong doesn't Pennsylvania have a bunch of weird laws and statutes still on the books because of their Quaker history? and It depends on the religion. scientology or paganism not so much. Islam or Catholicism you have a lot of philosophical explicitly stemming from and tied back into the faith. You would need to show the links but if done right it may be a stronger argument.

 

[The Spoony One X]

View attachment 2912117

It should come as no surprise that the usual fact checker have already deboonked this. It's just a coincidence that we are being told from many sources that it's normal for young people to have serious illnesses that they were not known to have before and it's nothing to do with anything they have put in their bodies recently.

Three shots of mrna is the warning sign I know best.

 

[z0mb0]

It should come as no surprise that the usual fact checker have already deboonked this. It's just a coincidence that we are being told from many sources that it's normal for young people to have serious illnesses that they were not known to have before and it's nothing to do with anything they have put in their bodies recently.

Three shots of mrna is the warning sign I know best.

There's no connection and if anyone says otherwise i swear to god it's going to 5 shots.

 

[Bungdit Din]

Some thunks.

Spoiler: Doomsperging.

I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop - no way this is over. The Agenda will continue, and They will keep fucking us. Only questions are how and when. Because we know what They want.

When's the next exercise/simulation/rehearsal? The EU cyber attack thingie. Few weeks?

So, Q2 or Q3 this year - major power outtages and shortages - and likely internet/comms/social media[?] disruption - all blamed on muh Russian hackers (by the looks of things, given Ukraine).

Only going to get worse.

 

[z0mb0]

Some thunks.

Spoiler: Doomsperging.

I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop - no way this is over. The Agenda will continue, and They will keep fucking us. Only questions are how and when. Because we know what They want.

When's the next exercise/simulation/rehearsal? The EU cyber attack thingie. Few weeks?

So, Q2 or Q3 this year - major power outtages and shortages - and likely internet/comms/social media[?] disruption - all blamed on muh Russian hackers (by the looks of things, given Ukraine).

Only going to get worse.

if i had to speculate on your hypothetical it's not Q2 Q3 this year to worry about but probably next. See you gotta go over the results and stats with a fine tooth comb to refine shit so when it's game time not rehearsal there no/no meaningful fail points then implement them and have redundancies. Q3 next years gonna be fun though. That'll be about when this mass delusion of things functioning will be exhausted so right on time for the great reeeeeeeeeeset. I'm a psychotic sperg though so make of that what you will.

 

[awoo]

I may be wrong doesn't Pennsylvania have a bunch of weird laws and statutes still on the books because of their Quaker history? and It depends on the religion. scientology or paganism not so much. Islam or Catholicism you have a lot of philosophical explicitly stemming from and tied back into the faith. You would need to show the links but if done right it may be a stronger argument.

The PA vax laws for schools are pretty straightforward: religious belief exemptions or "philosophical exemptions" which they vaguely define as moral or ethical beliefs that are like a religious belief.

I am not a lawyer on this, but according to https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/08/13/guide-to-religious-exemptions/,
"Legally, getting a religious exemption should be a slam-dunk. It’s all there in the EEOC guidance on Title VII, Section 12, but the problem is that we no longer live under the rule of law, only the rule of power. Schools and Employers are doing whatever the hell they damn want, regardless of the law. Still, you have to try to use the law and the threat of a lawsuit."

What makes religious exemptions so powerful is that the EEOC guidelines for The Civil Rights Act generally allows any "sincerely held religious beliefs", including ones that do not appear logical to others or only a few people adhere to it. It also includes religious practices even if the employee's affiliated religious group does not espouse that practice, or the employee hasn't publicly demonstrated the practices before.
In general, "Although courts generally resolve doubts about particular beliefs in favor of finding that they are religious, beliefs are not protected merely because they are strongly held. Rather, religion typically concerns “ultimate ideas” about “life, purpose, and death.”"
If asked further questions I plan on sending these guidelines to HR or perhaps getting an attorney letter to inform and scare them. If I make my exemption request due to "my purpose in life and ultimately serving God", it should get through, but maybe HR will not believe me and try to fish for evidence against it. The biggest thing they have against me is that I got a covid shot last year, but I told them my religious beliefs have evolved as I've read more Scripture and had more life experiences.

Section 12: Religious Discrimination | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

DIRECTIVES TRANSMITTAL Number 915.063

www.eeoc.gov

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

They won't. These people trusted the science, listened to the experts, and obeyed the elite, and not only did it accomplish nothing, they have been explicitly harmed by what was done to them. If this ever comes to light in the mainstream (it won't) the streets will run with blood.

All they have to say is "the vaccines would've worked fine except for Donald Trump rushing them out with the help of his corrupt allies in Big Pharma" and suddenly We Have Always Been at War With Big Pharma. The government does a show trial for some Pharma execs, hits them with a fine a little larger than Purdue Pharma got to show they take it seriously (which through legal chicanery will never be fully enforced), and establishes a bunch of bureaucracy to distribute payments and help for those who suffered vaccine injury. Everything else is covered up, Democrats show how great they are as always, Republicans lose.

All your research and bullshit lies established a shitload of deaths at the 5 and 2 year mark. Or are you going to go full Journalist and just forget your sperging about population decline being apparent by this point

Please, no doomer on doomer violence in this thread.

 

[awoo]

All they have to say is "the vaccines would've worked fine except for Donald Trump rushing them out with the help of his corrupt allies in Big Pharma" and suddenly We Have Always Been at War With Big Pharma. The government does a show trial for some Pharma execs, hits them with a fine a little larger than Purdue Pharma got to show they take it seriously (which through legal chicanery will never be fully enforced), and establishes a bunch of bureaucracy to distribute payments and help for those who suffered vaccine injury. Everything else is covered up, Democrats show how great they are as always, Republicans lose.

Times like these I really wish I had a rating. For so many posts here...

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

It’s a good question. Antidotally, I know a large handful of people who have died this year… Mostly older… mostly vaxed. Hard to say what caused what. My grandpa is a good example - he has had known kidney issues for years but was stable, got vaccinated and started a 6 month slide into kidney failure and died last month. Can’t really blame the vaccine for that, can you?

Not in old people per-se, but in teenagers & young adults having strokes, myocarditis and blot clots.

 

[awoo]

Not in old people per-se, but in teenagers & young adults having strokes, myocarditis and blot clots.

I expect lawyers and statisticians hired by wrongful injury plaintiffs will be the only ones with the energy to sift through all the data to prove anything. Though maybe some blessed autists will do it also.

 

[SCSI]

@SCSI I agree with you on the part about Nuremberg Code not belonging in a religious exemption request. However in Pennsylvania they do allow religious and philosophical objections, where philosophical is defined as "on the basis of a strong moral or ethical conviction similar to a religious belief". I'm not a lawyer but I assume it's not a good idea to mix together religious and philosophical objections. I also don't know if beliefs about the ethics and morals of the Nuremberg Code would count as a conviction similar to a religious belief, and I don't think it's as convincing of an argument to an HR worker, so I would only use it as a backup appeal if that is possible. I don't plan on getting legal counsel as I don't think I could win a legal case (or want to go through one) and at most I would have an attorney's letter just to scare them.

I know the advice is to wait until the deadline but I'm tempted just to submit one early and get the situation over with. If they ask more questions well I will request to answer in writing.

Yup, non-theistic secular philosophy often "counts as" a religion for the purposes of 1st Amendment law these days, even if a statute doesn't specifically include it in the name. That wasn't always the case, states like Pennsylvania specifying it in their statutes as you spotted were an important part in modernizing the meaning of "religion" in the context of law, and part of the reasoning for expanding the umbrella somewhat was based in recognizing that there was discrimination against atheist and agnostic people that was pretty much indistinguishable in character from more easily-classifiable discrimination against theistic religious minorities that had been explored in the courts in the past.

Prior to individual states clarifying their own laws like Penn, US vs. Seeger ( <- overview) (syllabus walkthru) and Welsh v. United States (<- overview) (syllabus walkthru), two Vietnam war conscientious objector cases, were also critical in expanding religious exemption eligibility to deeply-held philosophical motivations under at least limited circumstances. (I dug up and attached copies of the opinions for both cases.)

Spoiler: Seeger and Welsh Quicksperging

According to Seeger, the sincere belief must be something so important, and so central to the person's moral worldview it has a claim on their behavior on par with that of the moral commandments of a deity, and an actual belief in a god isn't actually required. (Ignore the inclusion of the world "philosophical" in the quote below, that detail is misleading -- it was being used to describe non-theistic codes that weren't "ultimate priority" tier, and the followup to this case, Welsh, clarifies that.)

The test of religious belief within the meaning of the exemption in § 6(j) is whether it is a sincere and meaningful belief occupying in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of those admittedly qualified for the exemption.

We have concluded that Congress, in using the expression "Supreme Being," rather than the designation "God," was merely clarifying the meaning of religious training and belief so as to embrace all religions and to exclude essentially political, sociological, or philosophical views. We believe that, under this construction, the test of belief "in a relation to a Supreme Being" is whether a given belief that is sincere and meaningful occupies a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by the orthodox belief in God of one who clearly qualifies for the exemption. Where such beliefs have parallel positions in the lives of their respective holders, we cannot say that one is "in a relation to a Supreme Being" and the other is not. We have concluded that the beliefs of the objectors in these cases meet these criteria, and, accordingly, we affirm the judgments in Nos. 50 and 51 and reverse the judgment in No. 29.

Welsh expands and clarifies that politics/sociology/etc can be bound up in these moral concerns and that their being intertwined isn't instantly fatal to an exemption claim, and how to split what does and doesn't qualify for exemption:

Section 6(j) contravenes the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by exempting those whose conscientious objection claims are founded on a theistic belief, while not exempting those whose claims are based on a secular belief. To comport with that clause, an exemption must be "neutral" and include those whose belief emanates from a purely moral, ethical, or philosophical source.

"The test might be stated in these words: a sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of those admittedly qualifying for the exemption comes within the statutory definition."

We certainly do not think that § 6(j)'s exclusion of those persons with "essentially political, sociological, or philosophical views or a merely personal moral code" should be read to exclude those who hold strong beliefs about our domestic and foreign affairs or even those whose conscientious objection to participation in all wars is founded to a substantial extent upon considerations of public policy. The two groups of registrants that obviously do fall within these exclusions from the exemption are those whose beliefs are not deeply held and those whose objection to war does not rest at all upon moral, ethical, or religious principle, but instead rests solely upon considerations of policy, pragmatism, or expediency. In applying § 6(j)'s exclusion of those whose views are "essentially political, sociological, or philosophical" or of those who have a "merely personal moral code," it should be remembered that these exclusions are definitional, and do not therefore restrict the category of persons who are conscientious objectors by "religious training and belief."

Harlan's concurring opinion has some phrasing that ends up clearer than the majority opinion despite the fact that he doesn't 100% agree with them.

Today, the prevailing opinion makes explicit its total elimination of the statutorily required religious content for a conscientious objector exemption. The prevailing opinion now says: "If an individual deeply and sincerely holds beliefs that are purely ethical or moral in source and content, but that nevertheless impose upon him a duty of conscience to refrain from participating in any war at any time" (emphasis added), he qualifies for a § 6(j) exemption.

The ethical/moral character of the belief and the fact that the nature and strength of the belief are such that it imposes a duty of conscience to act or not act in a certain way are critical characteristics for spotting a non-theistic motivation that is functionally religious and therefore protected.

I hope that bit of background and flybys of Seeger and Welsh were at least vaguely helpful in giving you a sense of what the government is looking for with justifications that are tougher to argue than black and white direct commandments explicitly forbidding what they're trying to mandate, especially ones that aren't purely theistic in nature.

As for getting a lawyer, I was more meaning just seeing about a quick consult for some face to face advice on what to say and what not to say, and perhaps help in drafting your answers about the basis for your exemption request, rather than going all in and preparing to actually sue. That would definitely be a time-consuming ballache.

Addendum -- Saw your new post right as I was about to post this that you're going to go with an argument from a Christian perspective, rather than a purely philosophical one. I've added a recent paper on religious exemptions from centrist and liberal wings of Christianity (and other religions) in case its useful, since so much of what's currently out there regarding the covid mandates is coming from the most conservative branches and I don't know what your own views are. More ammo and inspiration never hurts.

 

[z0mb0]

The PA vax laws for schools are pretty straightforward: religious belief exemptions or "philosophical exemptions" which they vaguely define as moral or ethical beliefs that are like a religious belief.

I am not a lawyer on this, but according to https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/08/13/guide-to-religious-exemptions/,
"Legally, getting a religious exemption should be a slam-dunk. It’s all there in the EEOC guidance on Title VII, Section 12, but the problem is that we no longer live under the rule of law, only the rule of power. Schools and Employers are doing whatever the hell they damn want, regardless of the law. Still, you have to try to use the law and the threat of a lawsuit."

What makes religious exemptions so powerful is that the EEOC guidelines for The Civil Rights Act generally allows any "sincerely held religious beliefs", including ones that do not appear logical to others or only a few people adhere to it. It also includes religious practices even if the employee's affiliated religious group does not espouse that practice, or the employee hasn't publicly demonstrated the practices before.
In general, "Although courts generally resolve doubts about particular beliefs in favor of finding that they are religious, beliefs are not protected merely because they are strongly held. Rather, religion typically concerns “ultimate ideas” about “life, purpose, and death.”"
If asked further questions I plan on sending these guidelines to HR or perhaps getting an attorney letter to inform and scare them. If I make my exemption request due to "my purpose in life and ultimately serving God", it should get through, but maybe HR will not believe me and try to fish for evidence against it. The biggest thing they have against me is that I got a covid shot last year, but I told them my religious beliefs have evolved as I've read more Scripture and had more life experiences.

Section 12: Religious Discrimination | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

DIRECTIVES TRANSMITTAL Number 915.063

www.eeoc.gov

I'm going to have to dig out the old research books i was reading as this was years ago mind, but PA's common wealth status and Quaker founders did some very specific but profound changes that had a sizable impact on the laws there to come for quite awhile and while by now most have been adjusted to be more in line with the standard there were a few about religious exemptions and shit like that that still were in play but i don't have any oj and without a screw driver i am a bit foggy atm on specifics. I will guarantee they will try and get it ruled a personal preference to not get shot.

If you want to go the rule of power route i will bet money wherever you work has at least 10 local ordinance, building code, health and safety ectectect violations. find your first 10, and tell your manager i found a number of infractions give him the total on the fines. don't do any if then shit that's blackmail. just let them know annoying you has a tangible price to it that the gov will be all too eager to accept. you'll be shocked how quick papers get lost behind desks. not my recommendation but options are optional i guess. i'd say read some Aquinas and do the catholic larp

 

[Bungdit Din]

if i had to speculate on your hypothetical it's not Q2 Q3 this year to worry about but probably next. See you gotta go over the results and stats with a fine tooth comb to refine shit so when it's game time not rehearsal there no/no meaningful fail points then implement them and have redundancies. Q3 next years gonna be fun though. That'll be about when this mass delusion of things functioning will be exhausted so right on time for the great reeeeeeeeeeset. I'm a psychotic sperg though so make of that what you will.

As one psychotic sperg to another, I'd prefer your scenario - I could do with a year of (relative) normalcy. [Apart from anything else, could do with a good reason to cut down on the weed; it keeps a lid on my rage/depression, but I've almost completely disengaged from 'society' - I just don't give much of a fuck anymore.]. Plausible, too - perhaps too many normies are noticing things, and need to be lulled back to sleep before They stamp again on the accelerator. Complete collapse - necessary to Build Back Better - remains the goal, I believe. I'm curious how they're going to (re)introduce digital IDs, though. Probably just... convenience. Make life increasingly frustrating for those who don't adopt an integrated 'do-it-all' passport/app. Not like the average retard isn't thrilled to rush out and buy the latest self-surveillance device. Fuck 'em.

Guess the tell may be how different regions wind down or continue to ramp up the totalitarianism. Cat's out of the bag in Bongland, so the urgency to jab (and boost) is going to get harder to sell in 'developed' countries. Next push - and next major revenue stream for pharma (via IMF-style loans to the relevant govs, no doubt) - will probably be in Africa and the Third World. Then famine.

 

[SCSI]

@SCSI @borsabil @Lichen Bark

You guys are definitely going to want to see this:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

Some very concerning shit.

Biochem is outside my wheelhouse, so feel free to call me a retard if I wrote something below that's completely wrong. But I'm game, I'll give it a shot.

1. Instead of buffing the production of certain key interferons critical to your immune system function, especially against certain cancers and respiratory viruses, it nerfs them.

Spoiler: Snippet

Transfection of cells with the spike gene and subsequent spike protein production results in those
cells generating exosomes containing microRNAs that suppress IRF9 production while activating a range
of pro-inflammatory gene transcripts [50]. Since these vaccines are specifically designed to induce high and
ongoing production of spike proteins, the implications are ominous. As described above, inhibition of IRF9
will suppress TRAIL and all its regulatory and downstream apoptosis-inducing effects. IRF9 suppression via
exosomal microRNA should also be expected to impair the cancer-protective effects of BRCA2 gene activ-
ity, which depends on that molecule for its activity as described above. BRCA2-associated cancers include
breast, fallopian tube, and ovarian cancer for women, prostate and breast cancer for men, acute myeloid
leukemia in children, and others [51].

2. The way the vaccine is designed glitches out the victim cells, and makes them spew out spikes with little to no control. It effectively turns off the cell's safety mechanisms that might stop it before it starts spitting out malformed proteins or otherwise acting rather cancer-like, and the fact that the proteins are designed to look human-ish makes it harder for your immune system to recognize the cell's gone nuts before it fucks something else up.

Spoiler: Snippet

However, the optimized analogue cap formation of synthetic mRNAs inevitably forces the recipient cells to
undergo a cap-dependent prolonged translation, ignoring homeostatic demands of cellular physiology [65].
The cap 2’ O methylation carried out by cap 2’ O methyltransferase (CMTR1) serves as a motif that marks
the mRNA as “self,” to prevent recognition by IFN-induced RNA binding proteins [68]. Thus, the mRNA in
the vaccines, equipped with the cap 2’ O methylation motif, evades detection as a viral invasion. Furthermore,
the overwhelming impetus for cells to perform a single and artificial approach to translation according to the
robust capping and synthetic methylations of mRNAs in vaccines is fundamentally associated with disease
progression due to differential rather than normal signaling of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [69].
The regulatory process controlling mRNA translation is extremely complex, and it is highly disturbed in the
context of mRNA vaccines [65,69].

3. If you're unlucky, you happen to get infected with certain kinds of other viruses while your cells are currently wigged out making spikes because the vaccine told them to. This other infection can freak out your overclocked "zombie" cells even worse, increasing the odds that they completely run out of control, and potentially in ways that are more likely to trigger cancer or different autoimmune diseases.

Spoiler: Snippet

The negative-sense RNAs are intermediate molecules produced by the replicase transcriptase complex (RTC)
formed by the nonstructural proteins of coronaviruses (including SARS-COV-2) to provide efficiency in repli-
cation and transcription [88,89]. This, however, introduces another potentially serious complication asso-
ciated with vaccination. Co-infection with other negative sense RNA viruses such as hepatitis C [90] or
infection by other coronaviruses contemporaneous with vaccination periods would provide the necessary ma-
chinery of RTC to reproduce negative sense intermediates from synthetic mRNAs and therefore amplify the
presence of pG4s by negative sense templates. This would result in further epitranscriptomic dysregulation
[91].
Summarizing the topic to this point, the enrichment of GC content in vaccine mRNA will inevitably lead
to an increase in the pG4 content of the vaccines. This, in turn, will lead to dysregulation of the G4-
RNA-protein binding system and a wide range of potential disease-associated cellular pathologies including
suppression of innate immunity, neurodegeneration, and malignant transformation [83]

4. If your cells' safety features that try to keep them from totally running wild breaks badly enough, and you have any cancer lurking in your body, it's basically Miracle-Gro for said existing cancer, and you speedrun carcinogenesis.

Spoiler: Snippet

This process is exceedingly complicated yet tantamount to cellular homeostasis. So, again, it merits sum-
marizing. If pG4s accumulate, as would be expected with an increased amount of GC content in the vaccine
mRNA, this would have an effect of increasing potential G4 structures available during translation events
and this can affect miRNA post-transcriptional regulation. This, in turn, would either favor greater expres-
sion of the oncogenes related to a range of cancers or drive cells to apoptosis and cell death [95]. The case
study described earlier in this paper strongly supports the hypothesis that these injections induce accelerated
lymphoma progression in follicular B cells [56].

5. And if that wasn't bad enough, certain kinds of stress on your body make it more likely your cells freak out and essentially mail all these spike proteins and whatever other malformed garbage they've spewed out to random addresses in your nervous system, potentially causing all kinds of very fun-sounding neurological diseases like Bell's Palsy, among other exciting autoimmune and inflammatory problems.

Spoiler: Snippet

In humans, there is an abundance of mostly asymptomatic picornavirus infections like the Safford Virus with
an over 90% seroprevalence in young children and adults [124]. In either case, whether an apoptotic event
due to a stress-like condition[125] or an mRNA-cap-driven-like carcinomatous effect [126], the miRNA levels
will be increased due to the increased epitranscriptomic functioning and enhanced mRNA decay. Because
of the high demand for gene expression, high levels of certain miRNAs will be expected to be contained in
exosomes via P bodies [127].
Also, under conditions of overwhelming production of spike protein due to SARS-CoV-2 molecular vacci-
nation, it would of course be expected that a significant proportion of over-abundant intra-cellular spike
proteins would also be exported via exosome cargoes [128].
A seminal paper by a research team in India investigated the role of exosomes in the cellular response to
internally synthesized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [50]. They wrote in the abstract:
“We propose that SARS-CoV-2 gene product, Spike, is able to modify the host exosomal cargo, which gets
transported to distant uninfected tissues and organs and can initiate a catastrophic immune cascade within
Central Nervous System (CNS).”
Their experiments involved growing human HEK293T cells in culture and exposing them to SARS-CoV-2
spike gene plasmids, which induced synthesis of spike protein within the cells. They found experimentally
that these cells released abundant exosomes housing spike protein along with specific microRNAs. They then
harvested the exosomes and transferred them to a cell culture of human microglia (the immune cells that are
resident in the brain). They showed that the microglia readily took up the exosomes and responded to the
microRNAs by initiating an acute inflammatory response. The role of microglia in causing neuroinflammation
in various viral diseases, such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV),
and Dengue, is well established. They proposed that long-distance cell-cell communication via exosomes
could be the mechanism by which neurological symptoms become manifest in severe cases of COVID-19.

Assuming I understood the paper correctly, if this ends up getting confirmed after further research, this is going to make Thalidomide look like a mild fart in comparison to the long-term side effects of Pfizer's cash cow.

 

[Bungdit Din]

@SCSI

feel free to call me a retard if I wrote something below that's completely wrong

You're a retard.

The vaccines are safe and effective.

Cancer, like heart failure, is caused by Climate Change.

Don't you believe in Science??!!

/unserious.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

American Thinker posted a good rant about Bojo's decision about the pandemic.

January 23, 2022

Boris’s Salvo of Freedom: Johnson Cancels the Pandemic in England​

By Vasko Kohlmayer

Last week Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, walked into the British Parliament and made the most consequential statement by a political leader since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
This is what Johnson said in part, to the cheers of the assembled parliamentarians:

“Next week mandatory [vaccine] certification will end… We will end the compulsory use of Covid status certification in England… From now, the government is no longer asking people to work from home and people should now speak to their employers about arrangements for returning to the office… [T]he government will no longer mandate the wearing of face masks anywhere… we will trust the judgement of the British people and no longer criminalise anyone who chooses not to wear one [mask]… There will soon come a time when we can remove the legal requirement to self-isolate altogether - just as we don’t place legal obligations on people to isolate if they have flu… We will set out our long-term strategy for living with Covid-19, explaining how we hope and intend to protect our liberty and avoid restrictions in future by relying instead on medical advances…”

YouTube screengrab (cropped)
Astonishingly, Boris Johnson made this seminal declaration at the height of the flu season during which Britain has been posting record numbers of Covid cases.
Nevertheless, Boris Johnson decided to cancel the pandemic in England… just like that with a few words. The British Prime Minister ended his nation’s oppressive dystopian nightmare with a few sentences.

It is crucial that we grasp the immense significance of Johnson’s simple act. While Covid runs seemingly wild and other countries are taking increasingly repressive measures against their populations – Austria, for example, intends to fine and jail those who refuse the Covid jabs – Johnson dared to cancel the “pandemic” just when it reached its peak.
By his act, Boris Johnson laid bare the insidiousness of the world’s totalitarians and exposed the global ruling elite’s response to the so-called Covid pandemic for the gargantuan fraud that it is.
By no longer requiring Britons to hide at home, Johnson admitted that the lockdowns were a scam.
By no longer requiring British population to wear face diapers, Johnson admitted that masks were a scam.
By no longer requiring Covid passes, Johnson admitted that the vaccines were a scam (despite his lip service to it).
Even though all this has been obvious for many months now, the totalitarian globalists did their best to promptly silence and ruin anyone who would in any way dare to intimate the truth. Novak Djokovic is one their latest victims.

An elitist himself, Johnson decided to go against the will and mindset of his globalist comrades. Whatever his reasons, his move was an act of simple common sense and great courage.
Johnson is the first leader on the planet to axe restrictive (and thoroughly useless) Covid measures at the crest of a Covid wave.
By his bold move, Boris Johnson fired a mighty salvo of freedom that will reverberate across the world and that will eventually bring down the global Covid tyranny.
For many people Boris Johnson was a bitter disappointment. Portraying himself as a reasonable man and a conservative he was anything but. Initially wanting to follow the Swedish approach of dealing with Fauci’s virus, he changed his position and went over to the dark side. He progressively became a pandemicist, Covidist and finally a vaccinator.
Now, however, Boris has redeemed himself and showed that he is more than just a semi-funny guy with funky hair.
Boris Johnson now holds the honor of being the first major western leader to thoroughly reject Covidism with its onerous dictates of chicanery and oppression.
By exposing its fraudulent nature, Johnson drove a stake through the heart of Covid despotism. Encouraged by his example, other nations will now follow suit.
This was undoubtedly the British Premier’s finest moment. Boris rose to the great challenge of his time and showed that somewhere behind that buffoonish exterior stands a strong man capable of making honest decisions.

Because of what he did this week, Johnson will go down in history the Great Covid-19 Cancellator. His act of singular courage (for a politician) will earn Johnson a place in the annals of history as one of the brave fighters in mankind’s cause of freedom.
As Boris himself would say, let’s “have a drink.” We, however, cannot rest for long, for there are other great battles to fight against the forces of oppression that threaten to engulf mankind.
The specter of totalitarianism is, indeed, haunting the globe. From Austria to Canada to Australia a ruthless cabal of global elitists, oligarchs and technocrats seek to subjugate and exploit populations for their own purposes and enrichment. The people of the world must wake up and rise against it.
But for now, viva Boris. And long live freedom.

 

[teriyakiburns]

If (big, big if) that paper is remotely correct, we're in for a world of hurt.

If (another big fat if) the outcome includes a mass wave of dementia, they'll try and blame it on other things. Concerned parties here in the UK have been predicting a mass wave of deaths from nvCJD - or mad-cow disease - since the 90s. It's never emerged, simply because the risk of crossover was so low to begin with, while changes to regs around what parts of the cow can be sold have rendered that risk non-existent, but they've never stopped predicting this wave of deaths from CJD. nvCJD presents as a rapid onset cognitive decline as the brain is eaten up by misfolded proteins. Pretty horrifying to watch from the outside. Given what this paper described, I'd expect this particular side effect to present in a similar way, which means they'll try claim it's CJD finally putting on its appearance. The fact that it would be mostly in people who weren't even alive when the slaughterhouse regs were changed is neither here nor there...

 

[The Ultimate Ramotith]

Remember the bus ad from Toronto posted a number of pages ago, the one about how it's normal for children to have strokes? The machine will tell these people that what is happening is normal, and they will gargle the semen of daddy state most voraciously.

If it were ever publicly acknowledged that these injections were pushed on the public by people who knew the harm it would cause, the ensuing carnage would make 1776 look like 1938. The last thing the government wants is its rabid followers suddenly turning on them like a starving dog. You've witnessed for yourself how far these people were willing to go against people they thought had wronged them. They'll do much worse to someone who actually has. Remember, normies don't have morals. If the credibility of the state suddenly vanishes, welcome to Planet of the Apes.

Sure is a good thing Operation Paperclip has been running for years and the masses have been conditioned to accept what the glowing box tells them is the truth without question.

Remember tha they are in a cult. After all, I saw pro-mask tweets aying that, even if th epidemic is over, they would still be wearing a mask since they are so 'considerate' and 'pro-life'.
If things always wen the wa you say, Max Coyote (from the Korps in Animal Control) would have detrooned a long time ago.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Remember tha they are in a cult. After all, I saw pro-mask tweets aying that, even if th epidemic is over, they would still be wearing a mask since they are so 'considerate' and 'pro-life'.
If things always wen the wa you say, Max Coyote (from the Korps in Animal Control) would have detrooned a long time ago.

"Pro-life"....yeah, right until we mention abortion.

Meanwhile US Regulators clear that shitty remdesivir.

US Regulators Clear Remdesivir for COVID-19 Outpatient Use

Some nonhospitalized patients seeking treatment for COVID-19 can now use the antiviral remdesivir after U.S. drug regulators on ...

www.theepochtimes.com

Some patients seeking treatment outside hospitals can now use the antiviral remdesivir after U.S. drug regulators late Friday expanded approval of the drug.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said the expansion was supported by a study run by Gilead Sciences, which developed remdesivir, showing the drug cut the risk of hospitalization by 87 percent among people who tested positive for COVID-19.

No other research was cited by the FDA.

The study was done before the Omicron variant of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus became dominant in the United States, though the National Institutes of Health-convened COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel said recently (pdf) the drug “is expected to be active against the Omicron” strain.

The panel recommended remdesivir be made an option for non-hospitalized patients alongside the already-available monoclonal antibody treatment sotrovimab from GlaxoSmithKline.

Monoclonal antibodies require a one-time intravenous infusion, versus IV administration across three straight days for remdesivir.

Dr. David Boulware, an infectious diseases specialist at the University of Minnesota who studies COVID-19 treatments, said in a social media post that the Gilead study was small—562 people were enrolled, about half of whom received a placebo—and that a followup randomized controlled study would likely find a lower effectiveness against hospitalization.

Remdesivir also did not reduce the viral virus load in patients, unlike COVID-19 pills from Pfizer and Merck, two other treatment options, he noted.

The FDA’s move means individuals 12 or older who weigh at least 88 pounds, have tested positive for COVID-19, are not hospitalized, and are deemed at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19 can now get the drug, which was previously restricted to hospitalized patients.

The FDA also authorized the drug for children younger than 12 who weigh at least 3.5 kilograms (7.7 pounds) and meet the same criteria.

“Today’s actions provide adults and pediatric patients, with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk of severe COVID-19, with a treatment option they could receive outside of a traditional inpatient hospital setting, including at skilled nursing facilities, home healthcare settings and outpatient facilities such as infusion centers,” Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement.

At least, New Hampshire desserve some kudos for seeking the use of Ivermectin under law as a alternative treatment.

New Hampshire Seeks to Make Ivermectin an Alternative COVID Treatment Under Law

New Hampshire is poised to become the first state in the United States to make Ivermectin available as ...

www.theepochtimes.com

New Hampshire is poised to become the first state in the United States to make Ivermectin available as an over the counter medication and sanction it as a protected treatment for COVID-19, under a bill before the House Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs Committee.

While similar bills proposed in three other states have been ill received, the primary sponsor of the New Hampshire bill told The Epoch Times she expects a slightly amended version to garner enough votes from the Republican majority committee to send it for approval to the GOP-controlled House of Representatives.

The House has already shown support for other COVID-related bills including statewide bans against both government and private-imposed mandates related to the virus.

“I have absolutely no doubt lives will be saved if human grade Ivermectin was available to COVID patients,” state Republican Rep. Leah Cushman, also a registered nurse, told The Epoch Times about her proposed bill HB3005.

‘Dangerous’ Says Doctor​

But Dr. David Levine of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center said that prescribing Ivermectin is “dangerous and totally out of line with standard of medical care around the world.”

“I would never want this medication prescribed to myself or my family and would take legal action against anyone who recommended this to my loved ones,” Levine wrote in his written testimony on the bill.

Dr. William Palmer, governor of the New Hampshire Chapter of the American College of Physicians, who also submitted written testimony on the bill, said he was concerned that if passed it would have the potential to overwhelm the state’s health care system with cases of “Ivermectin-induced side effects.”

Dr. Paul Marik, neurocritical care doctor who has published more than 600 peer review papers in his field, testified that Ivermectin, “is one of the safest drugs on the face on this planet.”

According to Marik human-grade Ivermectin is approved for the treatment of viruses in 79 countries.

Quoting the World Health Organization’s own data, Marik pointed out that 3.7 billion doses have been dispensed to humans since its discovery in 1987 as an anti-parasitic drug.

“So somehow Japanese people, Indian people, Brazilian people can tolerate it safely but it’s toxic in Americans. You have to be kidding,” Marik said.

Marik, who is a co-founder of the physician-comprised advocacy group Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), recently resigned from his position at the Eastern Virginia Medical School over his legal battles with the hospital for treating COVID patients with Ivermectin and other alternative medications.

He faced disciplinary action by medical licensing boards for promoting alternative treatments of other diseases

 

[The Ugly One]

You ever notice that when Branch Covidians say something is "dangerous," they never quantify the danger? Come to think of it, they don't do that with "safe and effective," either.