Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Has the spartacus document been posted yet?

This should be in the OP



Here are the first few pages:

1632947001052.jpg 1632947231602.jpg 1632947359515.jpg 1632947467224.jpg
 
Has the spartacus document been posted yet?

This should be in the OP



Here are the first few pages:

View attachment 2582209View attachment 2582210View attachment 2582211View attachment 2582212
Pretty sure this is @Drain Todger's work. Kinda crazy that it got picked up by Zerohedge tbh, but he's really good at sourcing his shit.
 
People losing mind over it in every telegram anti vax group i have been to. Its being credited as a work "of highly educated group of PHDs in med field".

:story:
Lmao as much as I like the guy's rigor, calling @Drain Todger a PhD in anything but internet sleuthing and having a lot of free time is hilarious. Good job mate, I think this is one of the rare few times that shit from the farms goes off reservation and into the wild, you should be proud.
 
CNBC made a 17 minute doc on how they're totally NOT putting chips in the vaccines (we pinky swear).


I, nor anyone that I know, thought they were putting tracking devices inside the jabs. But them having to go out of they way to say they aren't kind of makes me think they are.

~3k upvotes ~7k downvotes
 
Kinda worried drain todgers work is getting as he will follow the inevitable path of the autist and keep chasing the obsessive high into the realm of UFOs and government mind control and thereby allowing his initial work to be rejected out of hand
 
I, nor anyone that I know, thought they were putting tracking devices inside the jabs.
They just keep putting up that strawman for people on one side to feel righteous for being mad at people who are skeptical, and to make some who are skeptical feel embarrassed for potentially being on the same side with the very few people who actually do believe in the crazier conspiracies.

I was watching a stream of Hasan Piker's (the worst thing that the nation of Turkey has ever produced) the other day where he did the same thing, including putting on a "redneck" accent and talking about how people who don't want to get the vaccine are just afraid that it's going to make them gay, or want to troon out, or some other juvenile sexual thing as a peer pressure tactic and as a way to assign an insecurity worthy of mockery upon those who have chosen to abstain.
 
CNBC made a 17 minute doc on how they're totally NOT putting chips in the vaccines (we pinky swear).

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2S2v45_NSYs
I, nor anyone that I know, thought they were putting tracking devices inside the jabs. But them having to go out of they way to say they aren't kind of makes me think they are.

~3k upvotes ~7k downvotes

Archived.



Bonus:

1632983262800.png
 
Lmao as much as I like the guy's rigor, calling @Drain Todger a PhD in anything but internet sleuthing and having a lot of free time is hilarious. Good job mate, I think this is one of the rare few times that shit from the farms goes off reservation and into the wild, you should be proud.
Actual biologists, immunologists, and neuroscientists have read it, and are undoubtedly shidding and farding right now.

Kinda worried drain todgers work is getting as he will follow the inevitable path of the autist and keep chasing the obsessive high into the realm of UFOs and government mind control and thereby allowing his initial work to be rejected out of hand
Putting RF-reactive nanoparticles in people’s brains and then hitting those nanoparticles with RF is an entirely scientifically plausible method of altering mood and behavior from afar. DARPA has pursued minimally-invasive injected BCI tech for years, and scientists with DARPA funding and seeming neural lace tech under their belts are colleagues with the same people who made these vaccines. See James Giordano’s clips on YouTube.

Actually, come to think of it, the whole Anti-vaccine/Anti-5G movement over the last several years always seemed highly inorganic, like a psyop where they were priming people not to take them seriously. Who would have guessed it was both, together, that produced the effect they wanted?
 
I have been irritated by @Drain Todger's initial histrionics over Le Coof, I'll admit.

That said: His letter, his Damascene conversion, his utter willingness to put in the research on his own time and do it so meticulously and in such an open-minded way is breathtaking in it's scope and in how it truly is an endeavour to learn and know more.

Genuinely the finest example of weaponised autism I have ever seen in my entire life, and that coupled with his willingness to sniff out information, it's the finest research paper I've ever seen.

Godfuckingspeed you glorious, glorious bastard.
 
CNBC made a 17 minute doc on how they're totally NOT putting chips in the vaccines (we pinky swear).

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2S2v45_NSYs
I, nor anyone that I know, thought they were putting tracking devices inside the jabs. But them having to go out of they way to say they aren't kind of makes me think they are.

~3k upvotes ~7k downvotes
They probably are putting things in the vaccines, but not wild stuff like mind control chips. It's probably things like heavy metals or other detrimental substances that get in there not because of some nefarious Illuminati plot, but "simple" (read: criminal) negligence during the manufacturing process. I mean hey it's not like they can be sued for this shit so why should they care about proper protocol?

It's so they can say "Haha look at these conspiratards thinking there are tracking chips in the vaccines, laugh at them! But please ignore the industrial chemicals that actually are in there due to safety protocols being ignored in favor of increased production and revenue."
 
I have been irritated by @Drain Todger's initial histrionics over Le Coof, I'll admit.

That said: His letter, his Damascene conversion, his utter willingness to put in the research on his own time and do it so meticulously and in such an open-minded way is breathtaking in it's scope and in how it truly is an endeavour to learn and know more.

Genuinely the finest example of weaponised autism I have ever seen in my entire life, and that coupled with his willingness to sniff out information, it's the finest research paper I've ever seen.

Godfuckingspeed you glorious, glorious bastard.
When I initially saw what was happening in Wuhan, I was worried sick. Literally sick. After seeing that vid of people in Wuhan screaming through the night, I had a massive panic attack and nervous breakdown at work within earshot of my boss. I was lucky that my supervisor at the time was a guy who was very familiar with panic attack symptoms because his wife and daughter get them. When I went to the clinic, my rest heart rate was 130+ and they gave me buspirone and lorazepam.

I thought my coworkers were going to die. I thought my friends were going to die. I was banned from three forums and ostracized by everyone I knew online, because I cared for them dearly and was trying to warn them about something that I thought would kill them.

Everyone thought it was a false alarm. No one thought this nightmare of lockdown tyranny and supply chain disruptions would last as long as it has. Now, I see this for what it really was. They planned this. All of this. The people in power are, by definition, terrorists. They are psychopaths, manipulating billions of people with terror.

I think the biggest problem in the world right now is that people do not have a very well developed concept of evil. They don’t actually believe that evil exists. I always used to argue with these people, and it’s remarkable, the mental gymnastics that they use to deny the existence of evil. They really, sincerely think that everything is just shades of gray and truly evil people do not exist. That is why they are unable to conceive of something as heinous as all of this being deliberately planned and executed by the power elite to deprive them of their rights, dignity, and essential freedoms.
 
My agency just got a new HR director, as the old one retired, this new guy comes in and five days later they are pushing the vaccine. I had to sit though a fucking meeting today with all the unvaccinated people and be lectured to by some fucking cunt from the public health department. Apparently, even though I got COVID and beat it I have "a duty to the public I serve" to get the fucking vaccine. Think god I live in Idaho, which will be the last places to fall to the fucking mandates but this shit is getting annoying. Already talked, to my union rep and will talk to the doctor we use.

If Idaho falls and I am forced to get the vaccine, I will take disability for the next few months. I have natural immunity and all the vaccine will do is make me sick as fuck. I will either claim chronic fatigue or PTSD (if the vaccine makes me really fucking sick) to get the time off. I will return right before they require me to be examined independently and go out for another few months when I get the second shot. I am thinking either my old partners cabin past Sandpoint. A few dozen acres and the only way up is through an easement that is gated off. Nice place, satellite TV and Internet, deep freeze, etc. I would love taking my doggos up there and get in touch with nature. Best part is that any PI's or anything know better than to start trespassing on land up there so I can hike and fish to my hearts content.
 
Putting RF-reactive nanoparticles in people’s brains and then hitting those nanoparticles with RF is an entirely scientifically plausible method of altering mood and behavior from afar. DARPA has pursued minimally-invasive injected BCI tech for years, and scientists with DARPA funding and seeming neural lace tech under their belts are colleagues with the same people who made these vaccines. See James Giordano’s clips on YouTube.

Aside from the generic problems with passive RFID devices (miniscule space for an antenna, difficulties overcoming any kind of a barrier like skin or bone past extremely short distances, resulting in an interactable range of typically a few inches to a foot or two in distance) that haven't really changed in meaningful ways in the 20 years since the tech became commercially available, there's a non-technical issue I'm failing to see how the theoretical mind-control payload into an injected vaccine is going to overcome -- getting it into precisely the right place in the brain. All the tech I've been watching for years (hardcore VR nerd, Neuromancer or bust I say) is highly particular about where in the brain or nervous system it sits in order to accomplish the fascinating but still primitive effects we can achieve.

Those devices all have the advantage of being openly and knowingly implanted or otherwise interfaced with the recipient, so it can get installed where it needs to be, no faffing around. Stealth-implanting stuff by an injection far removed from the brain, especially when you're dealing with retard nurses and medtechs who can't even be arsed to reliably hit the right target in your arm, and then hoping that the RF-sensitive nanoparticles somehow end up all the way in your brain, and in the right areas in sufficient concentrations to boot... Let's just say it strikes me as the techno-spycraft equivalent of firing a shotgun while standing in Maine and hoping you hit a passing bird in Vermont.

And that's not even getting into whether or not the proposed technology, as it actually physically exists in 2021, not as a concept in a research whitepaper, can reliably accomplish precise manipulation of peoples' state of mind and emotion, the most nebulous, squishy things, when we still have to customize for each user the basic interfaces that exist and do things as simple and concrete as brain-to-text typing. Hell, even pharmaceuticals, something that's been developed for a few thousand years, still can't 100% predict how any given drug is going to affect any given patient, and that's far better understood.

Don't take this as a general dump on the research you've been doing, I've generally enjoyed reading your contributions to this thread and am delighted that your letter's stirring up the COVID hornets' nest. Consider it a friendly cautionary nudge from a fellow sperg with a relevant technical interest.
 
Last weekend I was in a spa town in a neighbouring country, very close to the border. Eastern european country, had a very high death toll.
But nobody gave a shit about masks. While my own country is still going crazy, this land of based semislavs just did what they always do and stopped giving a fuck.
Although to be fair, people here are also not really caring that much anymore. I brought an electronic device to a repair shop and while chatting to the guys there nobody cared about masks anymore.
The governments might not approve of non-new normal coming back, but it is coming back in places. Feels good.

/edit:
Aside from the generic problems with passive RFID devices (miniscule space for an antenna, difficulties overcoming any kind of a barrier like skin or bone past extremely short distances, resulting in an interactable range of typically a few inches to a foot or two in distance) that haven't really changed in meaningful ways in the 20 years since the tech became commercially available, there's a non-technical issue I'm failing to see how the theoretical mind-control payload into an injected vaccine is going to overcome -- getting it into precisely the right place in the brain. All the tech I've been watching for years (hardcore VR nerd, Neuromancer or bust I say) is highly particular about where in the brain or nervous system it sits in order to accomplish the fascinating but still primitive effects we can achieve.

Those devices all have the advantage of being openly and knowingly implanted or otherwise interfaced with the recipient, so it can get installed where it needs to be, no faffing around. Stealth-implanting stuff by an injection far removed from the brain, especially when you're dealing with retard nurses and medtechs who can't even be arsed to reliably hit the right target in your arm, and then hoping that the RF-sensitive nanoparticles somehow end up all the way in your brain, and in the right areas in sufficient concentrations to boot... Let's just say it strikes me as the techno-spycraft equivalent of firing a shotgun while standing in Maine and hoping you hit a passing bird in Vermont.

And that's not even getting into whether or not the proposed technology, as it actually physically exists in 2021, not as a concept in a research whitepaper, can reliably accomplish precise manipulation of peoples' state of mind and emotion, the most nebulous, squishy things, when we still have to customize for each user the basic interfaces that exist and do things as simple and concrete as brain-to-text typing. Hell, even pharmaceuticals, something that's been developed for a few thousand years, still can't 100% predict how any given drug is going to affect any given patient, and that's far better understood.

Don't take this as a general dump on the research you've been doing, I've generally enjoyed reading your contributions to this thread and am delighted that your letter's stirring up the COVID hornets' nest. Consider it a friendly cautionary nudge from a fellow sperg with a relevant technical interest.
I'd agree with that. I have zero knowledge in the medical field, but I literally wrote my masters thesis on graphene and quantum dots and all that stuff. I know graphene and condensed matter physics quite intimately, and I tried explaining to him that he's very likely barking up the wrong tree here, but as it often happens with autists, it's hard getting through the fixation. Kinda sad to see the more outlandish theories ending up in the document because it takes away from the real content.
And it made me less trusting of the other content. If he can confidently butcher physics and only one with an actual degree and specialisation in that part would notice, how butchered is the rest and I'd never know?
 
Last edited:
I have no words.






Aside from the generic problems with passive RFID devices (miniscule space for an antenna, difficulties overcoming any kind of a barrier like skin or bone past extremely short distances, resulting in an interactable range of typically a few inches to a foot or two in distance) that haven't really changed in meaningful ways in the 20 years since the tech became commercially available, there's a non-technical issue I'm failing to see how the theoretical mind-control payload into an injected vaccine is going to overcome -- getting it into precisely the right place in the brain. All the tech I've been watching for years (hardcore VR nerd, Neuromancer or bust I say) is highly particular about where in the brain or nervous system it sits in order to accomplish the fascinating but still primitive effects we can achieve.

Those devices all have the advantage of being openly and knowingly implanted or otherwise interfaced with the recipient, so it can get installed where it needs to be, no faffing around. Stealth-implanting stuff by an injection far removed from the brain, especially when you're dealing with retard nurses and medtechs who can't even be arsed to reliably hit the right target in your arm, and then hoping that the RF-sensitive nanoparticles somehow end up all the way in your brain, and in the right areas in sufficient concentrations to boot... Let's just say it strikes me as the techno-spycraft equivalent of firing a shotgun while standing in Maine and hoping you hit a passing bird in Vermont.

And that's not even getting into whether or not the proposed technology, as it actually physically exists in 2021, not as a concept in a research whitepaper, can reliably accomplish precise manipulation of peoples' state of mind and emotion, the most nebulous, squishy things, when we still have to customize for each user the basic interfaces that exist and do things as simple and concrete as brain-to-text typing. Hell, even pharmaceuticals, something that's been developed for a few thousand years, still can't 100% predict how any given drug is going to affect any given patient, and that's far better understood.

Don't take this as a general dump on the research you've been doing, I've generally enjoyed reading your contributions to this thread and am delighted that your letter's stirring up the COVID hornets' nest. Consider it a friendly cautionary nudge from a fellow sperg with a relevant technical interest.
I actually agree. This is way trickier than it sounds.

If you’re using a neuralnanorobot that can discriminate between and decode different signals selectively, do processing on its own (digital-to-analog signal processing and vice versa) and identify its own position in the brain, the transceiver can be relatively simple. However, the tech to do that doesn’t really exist, and if it did, the nanomachines themselves would be prohibitively expensive to make at such large scales.

If you’re using a bulk conductive material in the tissue instead, then it’s simple and easy to make the material, however, getting it into the brain tissue in a consistent and evenly distributed manner is a difficult proposition. Also, all the processing and localization of effects would have to be done by the transceiver array itself. If we assume the source is a 5G phased array base station, then we are talking about a level of beamforming precision that is previously unheard-of. Millimeters, on a moving target. Very hard. Not to mention, lots of water molecules in the way, attenuating the signal. It’s not as easy as it sounds on paper.

Doing something like this would have required extensive human testing beforehand, likely on a large cross-section of unwilling people. Can anyone think of any countries where they have concentration camps with lots of readily-accessible test subjects in them? 🤔
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom