Would the antichrist be a tranny?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Are transgenders even allowed in The Catholic Church?

Not really, no. Genital mutilation of any kind is viewed as a horrid thing to do- it’s the most grievous modification of the body- removal of what god deemed meant for you. He or she is described as a beast of the sea and the darkness and the beyond, a figure that some theorize might be leviathan, but that’s a whole other thing.

There’s no true descriptor from what I understand will pose themselves as a god and trick the world he is what he says until Jesus Christ returns and owns his punk ass like the two bit he is, or in the literal text, “The brightness of his coming.” “The light of his mouth.” in Thelosians 2:1-12. Which means by his very nature Jesus would defeat this figure by merely incarnating, which is bad ass. I ain’t even a believer, that’s just balling.

However, it’s not particularly helpful to his appearance. Some historians theorize they may have been talking about Emperor Nero (666) and Atinochus, who if I remember correctly was the ruler of Palestine. So if you’re wondering what exactly they’d appear as, this is the best bet.
 
The antichrist needs to be charming to and liked by everyone so it's more likely to be your mom.
Well all the texts do indicate that the antichrist will be born from a whore, so...

Are transgenders even allowed in The Catholic Church?
Lord I hope not. They're going to get crotch wound drainage all over the pews, and dilation inside a church seems like how you'd summon satan.
 
1648505630311.png

Isn't Baphomet a hermaphrodite?
 
The antichrist needs to be charming to and liked by everyone so it's more likely to be your mom.
@SandyCat's mom do have a dong though.
She had to go with a sea cucumber, as full SRS was too expensive. But don't worry, it squirts out white liquid better than any franken-dick. And that is the origin of the mayonnaise on the baguettes @SandyCat eat all the time.
download (3).jpeg
 
Not really, no. Genital mutilation of any kind is viewed as a horrid thing to do- it’s the most grievous modification of the body- removal of what god deemed meant for you. He or she is described as a beast of the sea and the darkness and the beyond, a figure that some theorize might be leviathan, but that’s a whole other thing.

There’s no true descriptor from what I understand will pose themselves as a god and trick the world he is what he says until Jesus Christ returns and owns his punk ass like the two bit he is, or in the literal text, “The brightness of his coming.” “The light of his mouth.” in Thelosians 2:1-12. Which means by his very nature Jesus would defeat this figure by merely incarnating, which is bad ass. I ain’t even a believer, that’s just balling.

However, it’s not particularly helpful to his appearance. Some historians theorize they may have been talking about Emperor Nero (666) and Atinochus, who if I remember correctly was the ruler of Palestine. So if you’re wondering what exactly they’d appear as, this is the best bet.
Genital mutilation of any kind... like circumcision, which is a requirement for many Judeo-Christian derivatives?

Anyway, the anti-Christ would be the opposite of Christ, and Christ was practically a tranny himself (scrawny sex-negative pacifist in a dress who's always bitching about social injustice) so the anti-Christ would probably be an enormously muscular violent bull dyke who gives zero fucks.
 
Back
Top Bottom