Without the US, is Israel nothing?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Last week, US President Donald Trump embarked on his first official overseas tour since taking office, choosing to visit three key Gulf nations – Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.

This itinerary was both unexpected and, in many ways, unprecedented. Unlike his predecessors, who traditionally began their foreign policy engagements with visits to long-standing Western allies, Trump opted to prioritize America’s Arab partners, deliberately bypassing Israel – Washington’s principal strategic ally in the region. This marked the first time in decades that a sitting US president visiting the Middle East consciously excluded it from the agenda.

This decision signaled a potential recalibration of Washington’s priorities in the region. Relations between the Trump administration and the Israeli leadership, particularly Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, were already strained in the early stages – largely due to Israel’s growing intransigence on the Palestinian question and the increasing influence of far-right factions within the Israeli government. Faced with mounting frustration over Israel’s hardline policies, the White House appeared to pivot toward a more pragmatic, less confrontational, and economically advantageous partnership with the Gulf monarchies.

However, the rationale behind this shift extended beyond political calculation. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar have long played a pivotal role in sustaining American influence in the Middle East – not only because of their strategic geography but also due to their substantial investments in the US economy and multi-billion-dollar arms contracts. For a business-minded president eager to showcase the profitability of foreign policy through economic deals, these nations represented ideal counterparts.

The lavish receptions afforded to Trump during his Gulf tour might have been dismissed as mere pageantry were it not for their deeper symbolic resonance. The true significance of the visit lay in what it revealed about broader geopolitical currents: namely, the transformation of the Gulf monarchies from regional players into increasingly assertive global actors.

Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are no longer content with being perceived as passive participants in American-led regional frameworks. Instead, they are positioning themselves as independent centers of power in an emerging multipolar world order. Their growing international stature stems from several interrelated factors.

First, these countries have embraced ambitious and forward-looking development strategies, investing heavily in infrastructure, clean energy transitions, technological innovation, and global finance. No longer simply hydrocarbon exporters, they are becoming hubs of digital transformation, international logistics, Islamic finance, and global policy discourse on issues ranging from security to sustainable development.
 
Without India, Israel is nothing. If the kikes betray Bharat, they won't even last a week before every synagogue in Israel is converted into a Hindu temple.
 
Why would Donald Trump visit Europe? He's already bent them over a table with just a few phone calls and some harsh words to reporters. If he really needs to remind them of their place, he can just send Vance again.
 
Why would Donald Trump visit Europe? He's already bent them over a table with just a few phone calls and some harsh words to reporters. If he really needs to remind them of their place, he can just send Vance again.
us-president-donald-trump-speaks-with-irish-prime-minister-leo-varadkar-to-congratulate-him-on.webp

"Listen to me Ursula and listen good, if we can't see eye to eye I might have to send JD to "visit" the pope again"
 
Not really sure why the title is different than the actual article of half is missing. Or that it's two months old and turned out to be completely false post Iran war.

Anyways the other Muslim countries are in the usual monarchical issue of one big revolution turning them to third world countries.
 
Just to answer the question in the article headline, if it weren't for the US, Israel would be a parking lot for Disneyland Syria.

Truer words, though I do find it funny that Redditors insist the US has Israel by the balls, and not the other way around. Bibi and Mossad must have some Fruit Gushers-level of juicy dirt on our elected officials, why else would Shrek Fetterman ONLY put on a suit when Bibi comes to visit congress, and why would Trump be pulling out Bibi’s chair at a meeting like an awkward teenage boy on his first date?
 
Truer words, though I do find it funny that Redditors insist the US has Israel by the balls, and not the other way around. Bibi and Mossad must have some Fruit Gushers-level of juicy dirt on our elected officials, why else would Shrek Fetterman ONLY put on a suit when Bibi comes to visit congress, and why would Trump be pulling out Bibi’s chair at a meeting like an awkward teenage boy on his first date?
The thing is once these people start dying off and there's enough people in Congress where "Free Palestine" Democrats and "Fuck Israel" Republicans have enough voting power to block bills when it comes to funding for Israel, things are going to change really quickly.
 
Back
Top Bottom