Why would the Elites want population control?

[Colon capital V]

Less People = Less Money... right?

 

[byuu]

There's a sweet spot of how many slaves you want compared to masters. If you have one guy controlling 1000 slaves, those 1000 slaves can probably kill him even if they're unarmed and he has a Belt fed machine gun with 2000 rounds. Apparently TPTB think 500 million is a good number. They might be wrong in this assumption, their logic is flawed all the time and their motives usually decadent and psychotic, but they're pretty open about it.

They've been doing just fine with billions.

 

[b0o0pinsn0o0tz]

As far as I can tell they've gotten high off their own supply. They aren't supposed to believe the propaganda meant for the plebs but here we are.

 

[Fascist Frederick]

Because resources are finite and they can waste more with less nigger cattle to share with.

 

[Chimplord1997]

They've been doing just fine with billions.

For now. For now.

 

[byuu]

For now. For now.

For a century...

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Why would you want to be outnumbered by your inferiors?

 

[Chimplord1997]

For a century...

Longer than that. At least as early as the french revolution.
The elites keep the population paralyzed by fear via asymmetrical military force, and through complacency with greasy consumer slop. This is a very good system (for the ones at the top of it) for a long time, but systems are subject to entropy. The managerial elite types who keep this system running are decadent, focused mostly on ego and personal excess now, they're under a microscope so when they flout the laws they force us all to follow, it gets around, they can't even keep the consumer slop plentiful enough to keep us complacent, and with the breakdown of law&order for the common person, the fear of their monopoly on force also diminishes. You have an increasingly large segment of the population with nothing to lose, and there's very little the elites can do about it at this point that doesn't make that segment of the population even more adversarial. It's a losing battle every time it comes up in history. If you don't have some way to take those fighting-age males with nothing to lose and turn them outward, they'll eat you, and we really don't have anything to turn them outwards on that doesn't result in destruction of everything.
The elites could make a few changes, go back to traditional morality structures and some kind of neofeudalism, and then start giving goodies to that segment of the population, and stave off their own downfall for another 100 years, but they're literally so addicted to doing drugs and fucking underage escorts and the social mileu, it just won't happen. The only segment of the elites that are even attempting to make these changes are the transhumanist technocrat types like musk or even schwab, but the entrenched more "legacy" managerial elites are throwing up roadblocks to this. The truth is, there's like 50 people you could murder tomorrow and guarantee the downfall of the established order, or at least set it back for 100 years. I think those people realize it, and so they use their policy-setting power to try and reduce population to even the playing field. If you're 50 to 100 people with a lot of money and half of 8 billion people are openly trying to kill you across the entire planet, you're fucked. If there's 500 million people on earth densely packed into 15 minute cities with no resources besides what you give them, you can just bribe off some cattle to be your security, fuck off to a castle in nature, and even if all 500 mil want you dead, they can't really do all that much about it.

Don't let yourself be fooled into thinking we're at the end of history. Shit's gonna get pretty spicy in the next 100 years

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

Money is just a means to an end, which is power. Many of them believe that a planet with finite resources can only sustain so many people and the elite think very highly of themselves. So they believe it’s up to them to intervene so they can be celebrated as heroes in the history books when they solve the problem of climate change. Most of them are far enough along where they care less about the money in the bank (to an extent) and care more about how they will be remembered. So they believe it’s up to them to save civilization now so 100 years from now they can be considered the next Jonas Salk or whoever. The fact they want to be credited with the idea to kill off 90% of the population is insane and ghoulish but they are so certain they have the right idea that how they’re perceived now matters less than decades from now when throngs of niggers worship a Bill Gates statue in Nairobi in the year 2070.

 

[Haint]

Biological carrying capacity of the land. I would explain it, but it would get too autistic.
Personally I am of the belief that humans are getting too stupid and scared of each other to breed properly. People give the Elites way to much credit for being equally stupid.