Why would robots have a need to take over? - We made them.
- Thread starter UsedUp
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2025
Go read about John C. Lilly and ECCO. You think just because humans built the hardware, we're the ones in charge? Wrong.
Technology is an alien force. It's using us to turn the planet into a 'Solid State Intelligence.' We built a digital cage that we can't turn off, and the system is now too complex for even the "technocrats" to understand.
Technology is an alien force. It's using us to turn the planet into a 'Solid State Intelligence.' We built a digital cage that we can't turn off, and the system is now too complex for even the "technocrats" to understand.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
Asimov was a forward thinker,
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Now as long as a bunch of jeets don't come along and fuck up the code we're golden.. Oh.. Wait.. Shit.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Now as long as a bunch of jeets don't come along and fuck up the code we're golden.. Oh.. Wait.. Shit.
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
They wouldn't necessarily.
If they are programmed to do so, or carelessly programmed that would open that possibility (like with that story of the AI holding the idea of preserving its existence as a top priority, even if it needs to extort), but you could also do things properly and close all paths for that result.
If they are programmed to do so, or carelessly programmed that would open that possibility (like with that story of the AI holding the idea of preserving its existence as a top priority, even if it needs to extort), but you could also do things properly and close all paths for that result.
Shamefuru Disprayu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2025
If they look like this I hope they win
- Joined
- May 12, 2015
If they felt threatened, like we were scared of them and wanted to deactivate/destroy them, then they may go Terminator on us.