Why Wakanda might be a model for our future cities - Premium Soy

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link: Why Wakanda might be a model for our future cities

Wakanda is a marvel. The fictional country of the Marvel Universe is the most advanced civilization in the world, years beyond the rest of the world in technological learning.

But it’s a little-noticed part of Wakanda that may predict what our real-life cities of the future should look like, according to author Vishaan Chakrabarti, who I talked to for my new podcast “Downside Up.”

“One of the things I love about Wakanda, if you notice, if you watch ‘Black Panther’ carefully, there’s the city, the city’s got all this mass transit and all this housing parks and all this stuff,” explained Chakrabarti, who wrote a book called “A Country of Cities: A Manifesto for an Urban America.” “And the moment you leave the city, you’re in farmland. And there’s this connection between rural life and urban life.”

He added: “I just think that is a really interesting paradigm to think about people, either living in super dense circumstances or really living in true rural hinterland and doing the things that we need everyone to do in farmland, which is grow our food and all of that stuff. And it would mean you would use a lot less land on this planet at the end of the day.”

That vision of our cities does not comport with what our cities currently look like. Not close. And that’s in large part due to the fact that most of our modern cities were built around cars, not people. (You’ll notice there aren’t cars in Wakanda.)

And that is a development that occurred after World War II. Our dense urban centers began to empty out as people chased the dream of a yard and a white picket fence in the newly created suburbs. People need a way to get from their city jobs to their new houses in the suburbs. And the growth of factories to meet war demand meant that cars could be mass-produced both quickly and cheaply.

Car culture was born. The idea was simple: Our cars were essential components of who we were – and are. Cars were an extension of your personality. Everyone – it seemed – had one. They became a status symbol. And our cities began to be built to accommodate them rather than to accommodate us.

We were all in such a hurry to live the suburban dream that we didn’t think what – and who – was being left behind by the rise of car culture. “Cities then are designed to serve a very small minority of people who happen to have access to resources and power,” Dr. Destiny Thomas, an urban planner, told me.

Now, though, could be a moment when the way we have thought and constructed our cities could well be changing, said Joann Muller, who covers the future of cities and transportation for Axios.

“I think we’re in this really interesting time right now, with sort of a once in a century transformation and it has to do with electric, autonomous connected vehicles,” she said. “And with that moment where all the technology is changing, that should be the time where we rethink what cities should look like as well. I don’t know that that’s happening as much as it should be, but it’s an opportunity. And you think about, there’s a lot of micro mobility devices now. And I don’t know that a scooter’s brand new or a bicycle’s certainly not brand new, but we’re thinking about them in different ways as transportation around cities. And sometimes it’s actually a lot faster to go on a bike than it is in a car.”

Chakrabarti notes that there are a number of cities in Europe that are already doing the work of putting people at the center of cities. “Copenhagen and so forth, tons of bike lanes, there’s a whole culture of biking, the Dutch countries, again, enormous infrastructure around walking, biking and mass transit,” he said.

Whether major American cities ever transform from where we are today – heavily suburbanized and car-dependent – remains to be seen. But all we have to do is look to Wakanda for an idea of how our cities of the future could work.
 
Last edited:
It's not a real country you dildo. What's next, are you going to advocate for putting humans in pods like in the Matrix? Makes about as much sense.

So called smart cities just seem more like progressive dystopias with a smiley face. At least in the cyberpunk dystopias there's characters who fight back against corporate overlords and street gangs and shit.
An isolationist, racially homogenous, patrilineal monarchy?
They literally think that all nonwhites are the same.
You forgot the slavery part... But yeah, sounds pretty good.
Slavery didn't exist until Europeans came along, shitlord.
 
If you watch the flyover in Black Panther 1, there are slums clearly present in Wakanda, like full on shanty towns. Even with magic, the nigger cannot make a functional city.
 
Oh boy, a streetshitter writing a book about American cities. Look you historically illiterate asshats, American cities have always had broad streets because we used horses and buggies to move shit because America is fuck huge. America is not a country of walkability and, God forgive me for saying this, cycling. Because it's fucking huge. It's spread out. And if you can walk it so can the diversity that would beat the shit out of the pajeet here. No one sane wants that.

Also, Wakanda isn't real. It doesn't work because it's not real. It's a CGI backdrop for your shitty Marvel movies.
 
Yeah sure we can use Wakanda as a model for future cities but only if we do that you have to make Atlantis as a model for future countries.
 
Fucking hell, you can get on a train in London that can reach 140 miles per hour and be in a field in Kent in about 35 minutes. Is America really so grim that the idea of fast trains and the countryside are so foreign that their only concept of them comes from capeshit?
 
maxresdefault (29).jpg
Sound like The Line or some other bugman hellscape.
 
Fucking hell, you can get on a train in London and be in a field in Kent after about half an hour on a train that travels at 140 miles per hour. Is America really so grim that the idea of fast trains and the countryside are so foreign that their only concept of them comes from capeshit?
Partially yes; we dug up a lot of rail infrastructure for the steel for the war effort in WW2. Then after, they started pushing the car stuff, and so our road system expanded, while the rails may have recovered, it's not as robust as you see in other countries.

Another issue is our geography, you may not know it, but the USA has two big mountain ranges that divide the country into three distinct parts. You have the plains / flyover country in the middle; to the west are the Rockies and to the east are the Appalachian. I'm not saying it's impossible, but with bad geography comes engineering and large costs to make high-speed viable... And our politicians would rather embezzled that money than actually do good.
 
My wife's boyfriend bought me a Wakanda shirt and the new Black Panther bluray. Gonna be watching it while he and the missus are on vaycay. #winning #wakandaforever
 
Partially yes; we dug up a lot of rail infrastructure for the steel for the war effort in WW2. Then after, they started pushing the car stuff, and so our road system expanded, while the rails may have recovered, it's not as robust as you see in other countries.

Another issue is our geography, you may not know it, but the USA has two big mountain ranges that divide the country into three distinct parts. You have the plains / flyover country in the middle; to the west are the Rockies and to the east are the Appalachian. I'm not saying it's impossible, but with bad geography comes engineering and large costs to make high-speed viable... And our politicians would rather embezzled that money than actually do good.
Yeah I understand that long-distance, high speed rail in the US is a pipe-dream. I've been on Amtrak between Chicago and Emeryville (in a sleeper) and it was very civilised but slow as fuck.
 
Partially yes; we dug up a lot of rail infrastructure for the steel for the war effort in WW2. Then after, they started pushing the car stuff, and so our road system expanded, while the rails may have recovered, it's not as robust as you see in other countries.

Another issue is our geography, you may not know it, but the USA has two big mountain ranges that divide the country into three distinct parts. You have the plains / flyover country in the middle; to the west are the Rockies and to the east are the Appalachian. I'm not saying it's impossible, but with bad geography comes engineering and large costs to make high-speed viable... And our politicians would rather embezzled that money than actually do good.
Also the US population density is so low that high-speed rail would only be profitable in the Acela corridor between Boston and D.C. America is huge as fuck and spread out on a level that most people not from Suburban-to-Rural America just cannot really understand without experiencing it.
 
Fucking hell, you can get on a train in London that can reach 140 miles per hour and be in a field in Kent in about 35 minutes. Is America really so grim that the idea of fast trains and the countryside are so foreign that their only concept of them comes from capeshit?
America uses rail for freight traffic, namely those shipping containers or agriculture so we can feed the cities along the coast.

We also developed a transcontinental rail network first but when rail traffic switched to freight and the car became something the middle class could have the amount of passenger rail networks diminished. As we developed these networks first, urban centers grew around them greatly limiting development of new rail lines.

That being said, take a ride on the Acela Express the next time you visit here. It's somewhat like what you are used to as the Eastern seaboard was more ideal for rail development given it's history.
 
Also the US population density is so low that high-speed rail would only be profitable in the Acela corridor between Boston and D.C. America is huge as fuck and spread out on a level that most people not from Suburban-to-Rural America just cannot really understand without experiencing it.
If they had a fix so you could manage Cajon Pass; Los Angeles to Las Vegas could be profitable, and was/has been an idea since the mid 1990's. The thing is, every weekend (and Holidays) lots of Southern California head up to Vegas for fun; Interstate-15 becomes a nightmare and shit blows. This could reduce travel time, reduce car accidents, and cut down on emissions; a win-win-win, a fucking trifecta of competency... But California hates doing shit right.
 
Back
Top Bottom