Why do people hate LGBTQ+?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Solution
Zero Day Defense
People are people, so I don't have a distaste for anybody outside of what they individually do. With that said... oh, boy.

It's not enough to not split the skull of a homosexual or otherwise abuse them on sight, you have to be an "ally". It's not enough that homosexuals be granted a legal union status distinct from that of that named "marriage", they need to be able to be married the same way as a man and a woman (not that state marriage is worth it, but this is relevant). It's not enough that they're able to be married by the state, they need to have their celebration validated by anyone they go to (like bakeries), and-- soon, if it hasn't already started-- they need to be able to be married in even a church that has no ceremony for...
Sort by date Sort by votes
I don’t hate the LGB. The really flamboyant gays kinda irritate me (non flaming gay) but they’re fun to hang with in small doses. I barely tolerate lesbians because literally every single one I’ve met has been a misandristic, spiteful, abusive cunt. Still don’t hate them, just would rather not be around lesbians. Got nothing against bis but I’d rather not get into a relationship with a bi dude because the stereotypes about them being chronic cheaters tend to be true.

I absolutely hate trannies and am on my way to hating anyone who describes themselves as queer, pansexual, non-binary etc. they’re the major degenerates fucking everything up.
 
Upvote 2 Downvote
This is why, even though I'm gay, I haven't been a member of the community for many years now. It's disgusting degeneracy. I'm politically conservative so that automatically puts me on the outs, and I'm fine with that. There are only two genders and if you're born with a penis, you're a man. Sorry. I can't abide the craziness and it makes me embarrassed to be associated with these people.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I don't really care about LGB, I hate the TQ+.
LGB are sexualities, TQ+ are weird fringe sexual kinks being pushed into the mainstream.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I remember the heady and fun nights of going to the local theatre showing The Rocky Horror Picture Show as part of its midnight movie run. Almost everyone there were dressed-up as transvestites from transsexual Transylvaniaaaaaaa...ah ah. We all worshiped Richard O'Brien, Tim Curry, and Meat Loaf, did the Time Warp, shouted at the screen, moaned and jeered at the plethora of sex jokes, male gazed the hell out of Susan Sarandon in her undies, and had a jolly wicked time.

Now, those are just precious memories. I doubt there's a "reputable" theatre in existence that would do a week-long run of Rocky Horror in this day and age.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
As a bi person--we're done. We got same sex marriage in the West and now apparently we're just having a wank. We have even gone backwards by asking people with fixed sexualities to bang someone just cause they say they're that sex. Nor do we seem to care about lgb people in other countries whose abuse is still societally sanctioned.

I agree that trauma probably is one of the factors causing LGB sexuality but i don't agree it's the only one. I think the other is natural/evolutionary population control.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraternal_birth_order_and_male_sexual_orientation

Younger brothers are more likely to be gay than older brothers, possibly due to hormonal changes in the mother. And most women's sexuality is incredibly fluid naturally.

The problem is, after a certain age, sexuality can't be changed by wishing or trying (go on, ask me how I know). It's fixed forever. To vilify us over something we can't change or force us through ineffective conversion therapy is a waste of time and actively harmful, because our sexuality does not prevent us from being contributing members to society or leading meaningful lives. The *trauma* might, but not the *sexuality*.

AGP orientation is also fixed after a certain age, but there are massive differences between AGPs and LGBs.

AGPs are:
A) a self-oriented sexuality
B) that requires distortion of reality ("I am a woman") to be fulfilled
C) and is highly dependent on other people to cooperate with their reality to reinforce it

Thus they always become either extremely narcissistic or, if they are self-aware, still very odd, if this tendency is not kept in check. This entire site is a testament to that. They have no potential for altruism or a focus on anyone but themselves through romantic or sexual love; no bond with another human being can enhance it in any way.

LGBs however are an
A) other-person-oriented sexuality
B) that does not need to distort reality to be fulfilled
C) does not need other people to cooperate with their reality to be reinforced.

and thus, like heterosexuals, homosexuals and bisexuals have the potential for altruism to be expressed through romantic and sexual love. A bond with another human being enhances it greatly.

We see this through children: lgbs often want children; agps are into pregnancy fetishes.

Lgb movements have always had an appeal to love and romance to lean on, even in their most selfish forms. Trans movements have not.

AGPs can never be converted but they must have therapy and accountability (even if just to themselves) in order to live normal lives. LGBs don't need that purely because of their sexuality.

I think trauma may make LBGs more likely to be dysfunctional people, and dysfunctional people- like to take on an LGB label.

It's telling that the latter group have moved on from claiming to be LGB to being non binary or some exotic form of sexuality--but we are still left with a core of traumatised people that form LGB society.

The trauma is what causes the dysfunction, lgb is just a side effect (and again trauma is not the only way to get LGB people)

Things like the high rates of violence in female-female relationships and the pervasive culture of gay men "initiating" extremely young gay men into the culture via sex, needs to be addressed and I don't see how they will be right now, because to say there are problems with gay people is a controversial thing.

Then again, most people I have seen in life, whatever their orientation, are incredibly fucked up. I generally believe therapy all round is in order. As well as therapy for the straights so they stop traumatising children. This will inherently lower the chances of people being gay, but fewer gays isn't actually a bad thing on its own.

We as lgbs shouldn't be seeking to reproduce this condition, but to be a space for those children who do grow up to be lgb, where they can find role models of healthy emotionally balanced people dedicated to self-improvement.

To answer OP's question: lgbs need therapy, straights need therapy...

And trannies have eaten the guts out of the lgb and feminism movements (and we let them) and they need extreme intervention.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
Dwight Frye said:
I barely tolerate lesbians because literally every single one I’ve met has been a misandristic, spiteful, abusive cunt. Still don’t hate them, just would rather not be around lesbians

I absolutely hate trannies and am on my way to hating anyone who describes themselves as queer, pansexual, non-binary etc. they’re the major degenerates fucking everything up.
Click to expand...
wtf facts .
lesbians are one of the most biggest pieces of shits , holy shit why are they such a dick.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Tsurubami Senri said:
what does queer mean?
Click to expand...
It's a slur that is being "reclaimed" by people who are too young to have had it used against them. It means whatever they want it to mean.

I was one of those reclaimers til I found out the people who had it used against them weren't part of the reclaiming. Which kind of bollockses up the whole idea.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom