Opinion Why do neo-Nazis love ‘Haaretz’?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Why do neo-Nazis love ‘Haaretz’?​

The reason that right-wing anti-Semitic extremists frequently cite a radical leftist Israeli newspaper is its hostility to the Jewish state.

A neo-Nazi website claims that Orthodox Jews treat women “like filth,” and says that doing so is commanded by Jewish law. The claim is backed up with quotes from an article from the far-left daily, Haaretz, and even includes a direct link to the Israeli newspaper’s site.

Another post on the neo-Nazi forum claims that Orthodox Jews are spreading the COVID-19 virus in Australia. This, too, is backed up with quotes from and a link to Haaretz.

A third neo-Nazi post includes a call by Haaretz to reprint Adolf Hitler’s anti-Semitic, genocidal book, Mein Kampf, and put it back on sale in German bookstores. Germany currently outlaws the book.

There are actually hundreds of anti-Semitic posts on the site based on “news items” from Haaretz—1,400 references, to be precise. And if it were a little-known publication, perhaps such citing would be inconsequential. As the leading paper among Israel’s ruling elite, however—with subscribers including Supreme Court justices, government ministers, leading journalists, Israel Defense Forces generals and cultural icons—the powerful Hebrew broadsheet with an English-language edition wields enormous influence, both inside and outside the country. Nor is it only the secular elite who read Haaretz. Many left-wing religious Jews are also subscribers.

The neo-Nazi website in question is Stormfront, described by Wikipedia as a “neo-Nazi Internet forum, and the Web’s first major racial hate site … primarily focused on propagating white nationalism, anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial, anti-Catholicism and white supremacy.”

It was founded in 1996 by Don Black, a former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan and a member of the National Socialist White People’s Party. According to a 2014 report by the Southern Poverty Law Center, “Registered Stormfront users have been disproportionately responsible for some of the most lethal hate crimes and mass killings since the web forum became the first hate site on the Internet.”

Stormfront isn’t the only neo-Nazi or white-supremacist website to have a passion for Haaretz. The Daily Stormer, for example, which has more than 300 references to Haaretz, is described by Wikipedia as “an American far-right, neo-Nazi, white supremacist, misogynist, and Holocaust denial commentary and message board website that advocates for a second genocide of Jews.”

Take, for instance, an article titled “Kikes Shoot and KILL TO DEATH Gazan with Hands Up” extensively quotes Haaretz in its claims that Jews “slaughter” people of color. After the Haaretz passages, the author of the piece, Andrew Anglin, opines: “I really honestly hate the kikes and think they should all be stuffed into gas chambers and gassed like insects with diesel fumes from a repurposed Soviet submarine engine.”

Another post, “Israel to Officially Become Jew Ethnostate,” uses quotes from a Haaretz article in a claim that Israel only allows “genetically pure” Jews to live in the country.

Then there’s American neo-Nazi David Duke, described by Wikipedia as “an American neo-Nazi, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, far-right politician, convicted felon, and former grand wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. His publications and politics are largely devoted to promoting conspiracy theories about Jews, such as Holocaust denial and Jewish control of academia, the press, and the financial system. The Anti-Defamation League has described Duke as “perhaps America’s most well-known racist and anti-Semite.”

A search of his website (DavidDuke.com) reveals more than 300 mentions of Haaretz. Links and citations include, among others, the use of Haaretz to “prove” that Jews control the global pornography industry; a column by Gideon Levy about the situation in Gaza; an op-ed equating Israel and Nazi Germany; a story by Amira Hass that compares the Gaza Strip to the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp and much more.

The question that arises from this is why right-wing anti-Semitic extremists would want to cite a radical leftist Israeli newspaper. The answer is two-fold. In the first place, unity between the far-right and far-left is nothing new.

In 1940, Hitler and Communist leader Joseph Stalin signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, to join forces and divide Europe among themselves. Stalin often expressed admiration for Hitler. It was only when Hitler later threatened to take over the Soviet Union that the communists decided to fight the fascists.

In the second place, Haaretz is obsessed with finding the negative in anything Jewish or Israeli. This applies even to organ donations.

Recently, the newspaper admitted what is widely known in the medical community: that observant Jews are by far the country’s biggest kidney donors. But the newspaper claims to know the “real reason” for this incredible self-sacrifice, which has saved hundreds of lives. It is all done for negative, narcissistic reasons, in order to “claim moral superiority.”

Does it bother Haaretz journalists that their views find approval among people who openly say that they seek the destruction of the Jewish people and the State of Israel?

I asked editor-in-chief Aluf Ben this very question. His response was: “What do you want us to do? Anyone is allowed to quote from Haaretz. I have nothing more to say.”

The Jewish people spend enormous sums fighting global anti-Semitism. But before we try and fix the world, perhaps we should take care of the anti-Semitism at home first.
 
Haaretz represents the kikes plus ultra of Judaism, they are so addicted to undermining everything they even undermine their own people
 
This comes off as pushing horseshoe theory which tells me everything I need to know about the writers level of maturity and nuance.
 
Eh, figured it worked on two levels for Neo-Nazis. 1.) They get to show Israel being Israel and 2.) get to show that jews can't even restrain themselves from stabbing their own back.

I still say Israel is a better nation than Palestine, though. Fuck Hamas.
This comes off as pushing horseshoe theory which tells me everything I need to know about the writers level of maturity and nuance.
1642455165268.png
 
Haaretz was always comprised of turbo leftists who so wanted to be more moral than everyone they'll smear their own country.
 
A neo-Nazi website claims that Orthodox Jews treat women “like filth,” and says that doing so is commanded by Jewish law. The claim is backed up with quotes from an article from the far-left daily, Haaretz, and even includes a direct link to the Israeli newspaper’s site.
Okay, lol, I did the most simple, and quick Google search one could do: "Orthodox Jews how they treat women"

First thing that comes up is Wikipedia, informing me that in Orthodox households, they still hold the belief that a menstruating woman is "unclean". Menstruating women are not allowed to touch their husbands. I would imagine some of these households would still be bold enough to leave their menstruating women in a separate room for the entire week, or even in a separate household, away from the "main home".

I also get this link, which talks about the unique domestic violence situations Orthodox Jewish women face. Ironically, the entire article comes to the conclusion that when designing a D.V. intervention for an Orthodox family, that one must keep the religious dogma first and foremost. "It does this for those women who need to plan an immediate escape but also accounts for a therapeutic dimension that involves both partners, for it assumes that not all women who are being hit may wish to leave their marriage, and that it is not empowering to force them to do so." Yeah, okay, sure.

Also, ironically, guess who also comes up on Google's first page of results? Haaretz of course!! Nothing being said is inherently wrong though. It's all true. Jews do not value their women. Their women are not allowed to be religious leaders in any way. They can't even sing for fear of men hearing and "becoming aroused", unless it's singing for a funeral, or singing for the children. According to the very Haaretz article, "The extremists who spit at women, who call themselves Sikarikim, learned their lesson 101 times and learned it well: A husband would do well not to let his wife go outside, into the street, and should restrict her outings "to once or twice a month, as necessary, since a woman has no beauty except by sitting in the corner of her house.""

Tell me Jews, why should we turn the other way to how you treat your fellow halves? Why should anyone NOT take the words from the site Haaretz seriously? It's Israelis speaking first on the very things they grew up learning and witnessing. It's LIBERAL no less, don't you want more LIBERAL people? Lmfao.
 
How many neo-nazis actually exist in this country? Like 500? They're as rare as fatal spider bites, but I don't see constant news articles about those. Rent fucking free.
 
Haaretz is generally seen as being ridiculous and beyond parody, but i've never seen a neo-nazi praise them.
 
Okay, lol, I did the most simple, and quick Google search one could do: "Orthodox Jews how they treat women"

First thing that comes up is Wikipedia, informing me that in Orthodox households, they still hold the belief that a menstruating woman is "unclean". Menstruating women are not allowed to touch their husbands. I would imagine some of these households would still be bold enough to leave their menstruating women in a separate room for the entire week, or even in a separate household, away from the "main home".

No one goes into a room for a week, the most significant part is that the husband and wife don't touch. The only real change in routine is that the twin beds that orthodox couples sleep in are pushed apart so that the husband and wife don't accidentally touch during sleep. My friends who follow these rules tell me that it's great for their sex life.

I also get this link, which talks about the unique domestic violence situations Orthodox Jewish women face. Ironically, the entire article comes to the conclusion that when designing a D.V. intervention for an Orthodox family, that one must keep the religious dogma first and foremost. "It does this for those women who need to plan an immediate escape but also accounts for a therapeutic dimension that involves both partners, for it assumes that not all women who are being hit may wish to leave their marriage, and that it is not empowering to force them to do so." Yeah, okay, sure.

This link is fucking hilarious, this person hasn't ever been in an orthodox household.

While this law only applies to singing, not speaking, there is an underlying implication that women’s voices have a dangerous quality. Men are warned not to listen to women, for fear that they will be greatly moved or swayed from their course of action. Men are allowed to listen to women speak, but it seems that if women’s voices are to be avoided in one context, they may not be given much respect in another context. The responsibility seems to lie with the women who must not sing around the men, for it will not always be possible for a man to leave the presence of a singing woman. The message to women, then, is that it is their duty to keep quiet in any situation when they might be overheard. Perhaps they will even refrain from singing in situations where they think they are alone, just in case a man was to unexpectedly enter. Orthodox women are thus raised to always be wary of what comes out of their mouth, and who is listening. Silence is safer than making forbidden sounds.

Read this and tell me if you ever heard of a Jewish woman being afraid to speak out about something she doesn't like. It's a stereotype for a reason. The author assumes that just because men cannot listen to women singing due to it being arousing for men, there exists the implication that women shouldn't be listened to at all. That's the exact opposite of what the rabbis advise. It's repeated over and over in the religion that women should be listened to and respected because they are the foundation of the household.
While Jewish law forbids physical contact with the opposite sex outside of the family, sexual relations and physical contact between husband and wife are required; it is the man’s duty to have intercourse with his wife, and she is prohibited from refusing him

Utter bullshit. There is no prohibition for women to refuse sex. It's actually the opposite, the rabbis condemn anyone who rapes his wife in Eruvin 100b.

The Gemara cites another halakha derived from the verse mentioned in the previous discussion. Rami bar Ḥama said that Rav Asi said: It is prohibited for a man to force his wife in the conjugal mitzva, i.e., sexual relations, as it is stated: “And he who hastens with his feet sins” (Proverbs 19:2). The term his feet is understood here as a euphemism for intercourse. And Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: Anyone who forces his wife to perform the conjugal mitzva will have unworthy children as a consequence. Rav Ika bar Ḥinnana said: What is the verse that alludes to this? “Also, that the soul without knowledge is not good” (Proverbs 19:2). If intercourse takes place without the woman’s knowledge, i.e., consent, the soul of the offspring will not be good.

but later on in Eruvin 100b:

Apropos relations between husband and wife, the Gemara cites that Rav Shmuel bar Naḥmani said that Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Any woman who demands of her husband that he fulfill his conjugal mitzva will have sons the likes of whom did not exist even in Moses’ generation. With regard to Moses’ generation, it is written: “Get you, wise men, and understanding, and well-known from each one of your tribes, and I will make them head over you” (Deuteronomy 1:13), and it is later written: “So I took the heads of your tribes, wise men, and well-known, and made them heads over you” (Deuteronomy 1:15). However, men possessing understanding, which is a more lofty quality than wisdom, Moses could not find any of these.
So if the wife doesn't want to have sex, the rabbis declare that she doesn't have to but if the wife wants sex but the husband doesn't, the rabbis strongly urge the husband to have sex with her anyway. Women can also sue for divorce if they aren't sexually satisfied.

This article was written by a WASP who doesn't actually understand what she's talking about. I don't have time to deconstruct it further but she's gotten major things wrong in only the first few paragraphs.
Tell me Jews, why should we turn the other way to how you treat your fellow halves? Why should anyone NOT take the words from the site Haaretz seriously? It's Israelis speaking first on the very things they grew up learning and witnessing. It's LIBERAL no less, don't you want more LIBERAL people? Lmfao.
Because Haaretz is written by people who live in the leftist Tel Aviv bubble. What they think the Orthodox do vs what they actually do is worlds apart. The Orthodox ideal of the perfect woman is written in the song Woman of Valor:

A Woman of Valor, who can find? She is more precious than corals.
Her husband places his trust in her and profits only thereby.
She brings him good, not harm, all the days of her life.
She seeks out wool and flax and cheerfully does the work of her hands.

She is like the trading ships, bringing food from afar.
She gets up while it is still night to provide food for her household, and a fair share for her staff.
She considers a field and purchases it, and plants a vineyard with the fruit of her labors.
She invests herself with strength and makes her arms powerful.

She senses that her trade is profitable; her light does not go out at night.
She stretches out her hands to the distaff and her palms hold the spindle.
She opens her hands to the poor and reaches out her hands to the needy.
She has no fear of the snow for her household, for all her household is dressed in fine clothing.

She makes her own bedspreads; her clothing is of fine linen and luxurious cloth.
Her husband is known at the gates, where he sits with the elders of the land.
She makes and sells linens; she supplies the merchants with sashes.
She is robed in strength and dignity, and she smiles at the future.

She opens her mouth with wisdom and a lesson of kindness is on her tongue.
She looks after the conduct of her household and never tastes the bread of laziness.
Her children rise up and make her happy; her husband praises her:
"Many women have excelled, but you excell them all!"

Grace is elusive and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears God -- she shall be praised.
Give her credit for the fruit of her labors, and let her achievements praise her at the gates.

So a woman who administers the household, runs a business, controls the money of the household, donates to charity, fears God and is in charge of the family life while her husband is off studying with the elders. Doesn't sound like someone who stays inside all day in the corner.

Haaretz: Jews have a right to an ethno-state, and white people are evil.

Gee, I wonder why they'd love a publication that willfully and openly broadcasts the bullshit everyone claims is anti-semitism.

Actually Haaretz hates Israel as an ethnostate. They hire Gideon Levy, one of the biggest self hating Israelis out there who essentially just writes whatever the Palestinians tell him to write because he doesn't bother to fact check any sources.
 
Lots of whining from someone who I can't even quote reply to, lmfao.
 
Okay, lol, I did the most simple, and quick Google search one could do: "Orthodox Jews how they treat women"

First thing that comes up is Wikipedia, informing me that in Orthodox households, they still hold the belief that a menstruating woman is "unclean". Menstruating women are not allowed to touch their husbands. I would imagine some of these households would still be bold enough to leave their menstruating women in a separate room for the entire week, or even in a separate household, away from the "main home".

I also get this link, which talks about the unique domestic violence situations Orthodox Jewish women face. Ironically, the entire article comes to the conclusion that when designing a D.V. intervention for an Orthodox family, that one must keep the religious dogma first and foremost. "It does this for those women who need to plan an immediate escape but also accounts for a therapeutic dimension that involves both partners, for it assumes that not all women who are being hit may wish to leave their marriage, and that it is not empowering to force them to do so." Yeah, okay, sure.

Also, ironically, guess who also comes up on Google's first page of results? Haaretz of course!! Nothing being said is inherently wrong though. It's all true. Jews do not value their women. Their women are not allowed to be religious leaders in any way. They can't even sing for fear of men hearing and "becoming aroused", unless it's singing for a funeral, or singing for the children. According to the very Haaretz article, "The extremists who spit at women, who call themselves Sikarikim, learned their lesson 101 times and learned it well: A husband would do well not to let his wife go outside, into the street, and should restrict her outings "to once or twice a month, as necessary, since a woman has no beauty except by sitting in the corner of her house.""

Tell me Jews, why should we turn the other way to how you treat your fellow halves? Why should anyone NOT take the words from the site Haaretz seriously? It's Israelis speaking first on the very things they grew up learning and witnessing. It's LIBERAL no less, don't you want more LIBERAL people? Lmfao.
Liberal for thee but not for me is the jewish way. They know the issues with liberalism and that's why they like to pack it into their "allies" to weaken them.
 
Jews love Trans Nazi WN retards. The keep the Nazi, Holocost and eternal victim hood alive.

NAZIS-640x468.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom