Business Why Ben Shapiro’s Media Empire Is Collapsing - The collapse of the Daily Wire can be seen as a dire warning for traditional Republicans.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1.png
Photo: Mark Peterson/Redux

There was a time, not very long ago, when Ben Shapiro could reasonably call himself the king of all conservative media.

In 2020, as Drew Harwell at the Washington Post notes, Shapiro’s media company, the Daily Wire, “ranked as Facebook’s top English-language publisher for three straight months. Its sarcastic news items on then–House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s salon visits gained millions more views than the websites of Fox News, CNN and the New York Times.” Shapiro himself was ubiquitous, a right-wing star who had risen to fame before Donald Trump and seamlessly adapted to the MAGA takeover of the Republican Party. He was a digital battering ram against the Democrats and the progressive left. He seemed guaranteed, like Fox itself, for an indefinite run at the top of the media heap.

That’s all over now. The Daily Wire is instituting significant layoffs. Its website has emerged as one of the great traffic losers in conservative media. Meanwhile, the company has seen its subscriber base on YouTube starting to shrink. There are Daily Wire YouTube videos that now, after a few days online, have less than 10,000 views, a catastrophically small number for a channel with more than 3 million subscribers. The top comments all mock the low view counts.

If a variety of poor business decisions can be blamed, in part, for the Daily Wire’s downfall — ill-fated investments in feature films, an epic fantasy series, and peculiar merchandise — the greater story is the collapse of Shapiro’s constituency, especially among the young media consumers who once fueled the Daily Wire’s runaway growth. There are two realities to Shapiro conservatism in 2026: It retains a significant foothold among Republican elites, and it is fast being rejected by the future grassroots of the party.

Shapiro, who is an Orthodox Jew, is fiercely pro-Israel. His support for Israel and hatred of the Palestinian cause are issues that define him as a public political figure. He is an unequivocal backer of Netanyahu’s Israel and a committed, conventional neoconservative; he has been predictably thrilled by Trump’s war against Iran. Also a fiscal libertarian and social conservative, Shapiro once sat at the happy median of the Republican voter and could claim, at least in the 2010s, that he understood the beating heart of campus conservatism.

No longer. The anti-Israel, antisemitic Groypers, led by Nick Fuentes, are in ascendance. Candace Owens, who once worked with Shapiro at the Daily Wire, now boasts a YouTube channel that’s larger than his, where she’s indulged in anti-Israel conspiracy theories, warred with Charlie Kirk’s widow, and even broken with Trump without suffering any financial consequences. Beyond Owens and Fuentes, Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly have found massive audiences with their own brand of conspiratorial commentary that marries Israel skepticism and isolationist advocacy. Carlson and Kelly have both loudly opposed the war in Iran; Trump now reviles them, but neither ex–Fox talking head has backed down. Carlson seems to be moving on from Trump completely.

As the recent state elections in Indiana show, Republicans who break with Trump can still suffer. He remains godly among the MAGA faithful. It remains to be seen if the Carlson or Owens projects have an electoral future. What is clear, however, is that there’s an online constituency for what they do, whereas Shapiro’s will have an expiration date. Gen-Z conservatives have no great affection for Israel. In the Groyper tent, this can be chalked up to Jew hatred. But the story is far more complicated among the millions of young right-leaning voters who simply don’t understand how Trump could campaign on America First while standing up a foreign policy that is clearly subservient to the whims of the Netanyahu government. In 2025, a pundit who claimed Netanyahu would be dictating the terms of an Iran bombing campaign to Trump might have been accused of trafficking in antisemitic tropes. Instead, we’ve learned that’s essentially what happened.

The reality of two wars — Israel’s bombing of Gaza following the October 7 attacks and the ongoing bombardment of Iran — cannot be waved away by the likes of Shapiro, whose propagandist talking points have grown stale. There are young conservatives willing to call Israel’s actions in Gaza genocidal or question how establishing a violent apartheid state in the West Bank is furthering American interests. This doesn’t mean there’s any groundswell of sympathy for the Palestinians among right-wing Gen Z, but it does preclude the ironclad support for Israel that Shapiro has always insisted is essential for any conservative. The chaos in Iran, meanwhile, has only damaged Shapiro’s standing further. Republican voters overall still back Trump and the war, but support for MAGA is collapsing among the youth — which is to say, Shapiro’s audience. What is America First about incinerating an Iranian school for no real reason?

In the second Trump term, conventional conservatives are undoubtedly the power brokers, and they’ll have another two and a half years to impose their will on the country and the rest of the world. Attempted regime change in Iran and Venezuela were great neoconservative projects. Marco Rubio might be the most important official in the Trump Cabinet, and there are signs he’s displacing J.D. Vance as the front-runner for the 2028 nomination. Who, though, will actually own the future? What will the GOP look like in 10 or 20 years? Will your prototypical Republican be a Shapiro Republican — libertarian on economics, interventionist on foreign policy, and extremely pro-Israel? Or will they look very different, closer to a Carlson or an Owens or even a Fuentes?

The collapse of the Daily Wire can be seen as a dire warning for traditional Republicans. Young conservatives are now looking on as the Iran war rapidly devolves into a quagmire and seeing all the damage it has wrought. They view this as an outgrowth of Israeli foreign policy, and they don’t like it. In a post-Trump future, they’ll have little desire to repeat these interventions. Like the Rockefeller Republican of yore, the Shapiro Republican could go extinct entirely.

This story has been updated to credit reporting from the Washington Post.

Article Link

Archive
 
"traditional Republicans" I.E. Miggers.

Fuck em. Fuck their party. Burn it down, salt the earth, build a new party that doesn't include them. They can go be Democrats.
 
People have ZOG/Jew fatigue. It's really that simple.

Fuck Iran, Fuck Israel. I want my own damned country and it's issues to be dealt with. Leave the primitive sand nigger bullshit to the middle east.
 
Shapiro, who is an Orthodox Jew, is fiercely pro-Israel. His support for Israel and hatred of the Palestinian cause are issues that define him as a public political figure. He is an unequivocal backer of Netanyahu’s Israel and a committed, conventional neoconservative; he has been predictably thrilled by Trump’s war against Iran. Also a fiscal libertarian and social conservative, Shapiro once sat at the happy median of the Republican voter and could claim, at least in the 2010s, that he understood the beating heart of campus conservatism.
The last dying gasp of the rightoid boomers. Billions for Israel because "Muh Holy Land"/"Never Again", endless immigrants because "they scrub my toilets"/"pay taxes"/"depress wages"/"make line go up" and bomb the shit out of various shades of brown because [insert reason here].

I want my money to stay at home in the pockets of people actually born here to people who don't regard this country as an economic strip mine, for the various foreigners to make line go up in their own countries, and for anyone who thinks that despoiling Americans, whether it is to enact globohomo world government plan #37 or in the name of shareholder value (all the major shareholders being banks or holding companies), to end penniless, disgraced, and in a gutter.

What will the GOP look like in 10 or 20 years? Will your prototypical Republican be a Shapiro Republican — libertarian on economics, interventionist on foreign policy, and extremely pro-Israel? Or will they look very different, closer to a Carlson or an Owens or even a Fuentes?
Neocons? Or freaks, frauds, and fags? Not much different from the Republicans now, honestly.

The total eradication of the neocons has been desirous since Reagan allowed them into the party in the 1980s. As to what the party looks like, ideally it will be someone who learned from Year One of Trump's second term. Study the government, identify your enemies, prepare to either neutralize them completely on day one or replace them, and just move with such speed that nobody has time to react.
 
Shapiro imploded for me when he was doing some tour of the UK and had an interview/debate? with a conservative and walked out of the whole thing when faced with mild pushback. He completely flipped his shit then tried to walk it all back, but he had already shown that his feelings do care about the facts.
 
Man can’t something that was ‘popular’ just not be popular anymore? That used to be a natural thing we just accepted happened as times changed and so did the trends the the people who set them. Not everything had to have some deeper meaning.

Because as we saw in the Iowa primary, while there is a noticeable rise in anti-Israel sentiment, the media hype and hot air over it is getting fucking tiring.
 
We've had too many riots that young people just aren't buying the "Democrats are the real racists, we judge a man by the content of his character, Lincoln the schizophrenic dictator was a REPUBLICAN" thing anymore.

A lot of the basic tenants of American life that we used to agree was aspirational... like living in a nice little suburban house, having some kids, saving money for things you like are now completely under attack by outisders we welcomed into the country. These are ultimately white/european values and ways of life.

Defining America by the fact it saved Jews from evil mustache man, or pretending an African or Mexican is a "fellow christian with the same worldview as us" is just an impossible to maintain illusion now.
 
The narrative of the article is that the "reasonable" republicans like Ben Shapiro are being driven out of the party while the true jew-hating nazis like Nick Fuentes are waiting to take over so the death camps can finally re-open. They are taking a real event which is the decline of the Daily Wire and mixing it up with their favorite narratives about the nazi conspiracy to take over America.

Alot of political commentator guys like Ben Shapiro have a limited shelf-life. And he has kind of reached the end of his. His act is stale and he is really boring. Three years of lecturing people over Israel certainly didn't help him. But even if he had shut up about Israel, I think people would still have drifted away from him.

I mean he is 42 years old now. He isn't young anymore and he has been around for 10+ years doing his act. He also really doesn't have broad appeal or IMO special charisma.
His stance on migration hurt him but he is also kinda annoying. He’s like a right wing destiny but slightly less of a lolcow.
 
By Tatsuya Ishida:
2025-03-31.jpg
It's very clear, goy, be on the side of the Jews who want to mutilate children (sex-change operations) or the side of the Jews who want to mutilate children (genocide). Those are the choices.
 
It's multiple things, and the article touches on them a bit but then draws back and tries to build up the groyper menace because that's the Message. I'd say it's not one thing, but a combination.

They invested a whole lot of money into trying to diversify from commentary and break into the movie business. That wouldn't have been bad, but aside from facing a lot of obstacles (like trying to break into an industry controlled by an industry cartel), you actually have to make good movies. What is a Woman was really funny, but it was carried by Matt Walsh's talent for deadpan comedy, and willing to touch an explosive issue. The rest wasn't that. Ladyballers and Mr. Birchum, what I have seen of them, just seemed flat, and had design by committee written all over them. The Pendragon Cycle is not out yet, fingers crossed but no high hopes. It will probably be very mid. They had some kind of cheap Snow White movie that nobody has seen. IDK. All this must have burned up an enormous amount of time and money which would have been hard on any news site.

When it comes to the commentary, that's their core business, and it's no wonder it's drying up, because it is dogshit. The article makes a very good point there but doesn't make much of it. Ben started out speaking to a receptive audience of angry young men who were fed up with wokeness, but pivoted to buttering up the donor class. That must have seemed lucrative while they were investing in his operation, but alienated his listeners and ended up killing his act. We can add his tone deafness about his "ethnostate for me, not for thee" positions, his fanatical support for wars more and more on the right are tired of, and the fact that he is not a particularly smart guy, just a midwit playing one on TV. Catboy Nick and people like him enjoy dunking on him because he is very easy to dunk on. He has a terrible understanding of optics, and keeps walking into revolving doors. He doesn't understand how being likeable matters, which describes a lot of modern Israeli politics. The act is increasingly grotesque, and I suppose not that many are willing to cough up the dough for it. I was a DW subscriber when they yeeted them off of Youtube, mainly for Matt Walsh, but it wasn't really worth it so I didn't renew.

They invested heavily in Candace Owens, and built her up from basically nothing. To which I can only say: LOL. LMAO. "Smart but not wise" comes to mind.

The "not Ben" and "not Matt" contingent on DW is just filler. Does anybody really listen to those guys? I don't even know. They got Jordan Peterson for a while, but it was just empty husk Jordan Peterson, and the few times I watched him on DW just reminded me of JP in his heyday. Sad stuff.

The only good thing on DW is Matt Walsh, and Matt is genuinely good. He has the talent to talk, he has a sense for deadpan comedy, and he is in tune with the audience Ben used to be courting before he fell off. I have a sense Matt has been carrying much of DW on his back, and you can see he has bargaining power because he is willing to go for topics which must be like nails on chalkboard for the site's funders. Now that he has switched into maintenance mode, basically, where he just does a monolog about one topic instead of a full news show, it's probably going to kick out the remaining support beam holding up the studio roof. Matt is strong enough to just go and become his own thing like Tucker, or join the Blaze, or do whatever he wants once his contract runs out. There is little else worth salvaging.
 
I know one way to save your empire, Benny boy; Have your sister whip out those giant milkers and film some OF-style content!
The lore that Abby Shapiro is his sister always cracks me up, especially since there's a bunch of her leaked nudes online, which would make him crazy.
Recently saw a clip of him saying people should never be able to retire unless they have a specific condition (probably being jewish lol). I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume the clip's fake but it does seem like the type of dumb shit he'd say now.
That is a real clip. His argument was that people shouldn't retire because they're a burden on the taxpayer (no mention of foreign aid being a burden of course), and ge used the example of his own father who never retired. He didn't seem to realise that not everyone is a composer, and some jobs are actually hard on your body, or taxing to your brain.
I hope he gets run down by an 83 year old truck driver who took his advice and didn't retire.
 
How hard is it to just run a political commentary show? Why do they always try to find 20 fucking revenue streams for this shit?
Ben doesn't care about white people and he only wants your money.
 
I don't get the Israel sperging both in the article and thread, it's not as if there was peace in the Middle East and Shapiro had been 100% anti illegal immigration there would have been any change in the results.

The idea of replacing legacy media is just impossible, not just the amount of money required to promote yourself, but needing to get normies and boomers to actually change their habits is legitimately impossible.

So that just leaves overly political people that take the grift as legit, and like with woke media, very rarely they'll put their wallet where their mouth is, especially if they don't want to announce their power level.

The sad reality is that content today isn't seen to be enjoyed, it is seen to be talked about afterwards.
 
They had some kind of cheap Snow White movie that nobody has seen. IDK. All this must have burned up an enormous amount of time and money which would have been hard on any news site.
There was no movie, just a trailer that didn't amount to anything as Brett Cooper left TDW a long time ago. It's just like, as far as I know, their "own" brand of razors (announced after Gillette shit the bed) never happened and "their" brand of chocolate (announced after some forgettable DEI bullshit with a candy maker) never appeared. (And, in reality, both of those things would have been them slapping a label on an already existing promotional product. So why couldn't they handle that?)

Reading between the lines, TDW have been quick to announce things with no idea of how to actually follow through on them. It's embarrassing and amateurish.
They got Jordan Peterson for a while, but it was just empty husk Jordan Peterson, and the few times I watched him on DW just reminded me of JP in his heyday. Sad stuff.
I don't agree. I think the only thing that really changed was that Peterson had access to bigger name guests that were, of course, more likely to be more right wing. (Both because TDW is Conservative, Inc. and because the left will not talk to anyone right of center, especially not a designated shitlib Satan like Peterson).

I'm not accusing you of this, but the rewriting of Jordan Peterson in the public eye (because he's suffering with... whatever he's suffering with) has been childish and shameful. He's not pure enough, or he's too right wing, or he's not anti-Israel enough, or he's a flawed human being and so shouldn't be listened to at all, or because he's brought more young men back to the church than any faith leader but isn't a believer in the supernatural himself.. all of these are cowardly attempts to shift the public narrative by people who resented him in the first place. And he's indisposed so he can't refute or answer the claims with his own presence. It's pathetic shit you would expect from catty women.
 
Shapiro imploded for me when he was doing some tour of the UK and had an interview/debate? with a conservative and walked out of the whole thing when faced with mild pushback. He completely flipped his shit then tried to walk it all back, but he had already shown that his feelings do care about the facts.
The BBC interview with Andrew Neil, a conservative who as editor of the Times was a notorious Aids denier/gay blamer.
Relevent clip:
Full interview:
 
The sad reality is that content today isn't seen to be enjoyed, it is seen to be talked about afterwards.
By people you've already captured and thus this "talking" gives you no political advantage.

You convince no one, and mistake the "oh fuck off" you're getting from it as a positive since it's at least interaction.....
 
Back
Top Bottom