Culture Why Aren't More Straight People on PrEP?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Why Aren't More Straight People on PrEP?​

Pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, is the number one form of HIV prevention, but marketing efforts for the medication are historically targeted towards men who have sex with men.

While this community is largely at a higher risk for HIV, this has left an open gap in messaging for the heterosexual community.

In 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that heterosexual people made up 22 percent of the 30,635 new HIV diagnoses that year. The United Kingdom also reported that new HIV cases were higher in heterosexual people than gays and bisexuals for the first time in a decade.

Perceptions that HIV is a “gay disease” play a part in the struggle to broaden the message for HIV care.

“I believe there is stigma attached to PrEP that unfortunately keeps straight/cisgender people from accessing it at the rates this population should,” Dr. Monica Gandhi, MPH, told Healthline. “The CDC estimates that 1.2 million people require pre-exposure prophylaxis in the US, but fewer than 25% are taking it.”

Gandhi noted the troubling CDC statistics “means we have to redouble our efforts to reach heterosexual, cisgender women and men with our PrEP messaging. In fact, two of the biggest PrEP trials that led to the approval of PrEP were in heterosexual couples.”

Younger generations are more likely to remain open-minded to this medication as opposed to older generations. In the battle against HIV stigma, education remains a primary issue. Clinicians especially need more training and knowledge on this topic.

Advancements like tele-PrEP services and the new federal budget to cover PrEP in the underinsured or uninsured help with making the medication more accessible.

With nearly 1 in 7 people living with HIV unaware of their status, getting tested and considering PrEP can help you and those around you stay safe and protected.
 
Typically I'm not having anal sex orgies. Also I'm not gay.
typically.png

If it's only the incidental anal sex orgy, it's not really gay indeed.
 
I believe there is stigma attached to PrEP that unfortunately keeps straight/cisgender people from accessing it
I don't take it because I'm monogamous. You don't need to worry about randomly catching AIDS if you don't fuck strangers.
 
In 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that heterosexual people made up 22 percent of the 30,635 new HIV diagnoses that year. The United Kingdom also reported that new HIV cases were higher in heterosexual people than gays and bisexuals for the first time in a decade.
Okay first lol@CDC.
Second no:
Men and women who reported heterosexual contact continue to be affected by HIV. In 2020, people reporting heterosexual contact accounted for 22% (6,626) of the 30,635 new HIV diagnoses.
The CDC did not report anything. People self-reported. It is beyond ignorant to pretend that closeted men claiming they are straight are not influencing the percentage.

Further the UK reporting that HIV cases are higher in hetero people than fags(while likely being horseshit for the above mentioned reason) has nothing to do with 22% of new infections in the US being in self-reported straight people.

Also: https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/GetUrlReputation is a fucking dynamite link to nothing and no this was not Jambled's fault. It is a fault in the pharma advertisement.
Perceptions that HIV is a “gay disease” play a part in the struggle to broaden the message for HIV care.
If the majority of new cases are among faggots then IT IS a gay fucking disease. Stop fucking random strangers in the ass.
 
It's the same as the monkeypox thing or wondering why blacks are imprisoned at higher rates. They obviously know the answers to these dumb questions but their ideology prevents them from coming to simple conclusions. Why are these retards considered our "experts"?
 
Pharma Company: HOW CAN WE MAKE MORE PEOPLE TAKE OUR SHIT AND GIVE US MONEY?

Fuck off.

Dammit. Forum glitch.

Someone please love me.

Have a Spock meme.

4143657-a99870ada68403e314133381b06274aa.jpg
 
  • Lower frequency of sex
    • Voluntary Celibacy
    • Involuntary Celibacy
    • Even if not celibate, not hypersexual either
    • Sex is not a lifestyle
  • Lower risk of infection
    • Monogamy
    • Trust in monogamous partners
    • Different sexual actions
    • Even if someone cheats, the chances of being within a couple degrees of separation from a pozzer are low
  • It's an opt in action
    • And straights have to pay for their own healthcare
Fun fact. One of the side effects of PREP is uncontrollable diarrhea.

This is not a good thing if the entirely of your life revolves around getting fucked in the ass.
Wouldn't that be a good thing because it keeps the turd walls out of the way? Getting shat on is gross but you can still fuck through it, you can't fuck through constipation. (please do not send me proof that I am wrong).
 
Fun fact. One of the side effects of PREP is uncontrollable diarrhea.

This is not a good thing if the entirely of your life revolves around getting fucked in the ass.

I sorta wonder if the uncontrollable diarrhea might just be from all the ass-fucking?
 
In 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that heterosexual people made up 22 percent of the 30,635 new HIV diagnoses that year. The United Kingdom also reported that new HIV cases were higher in heterosexual people than gays and bisexuals for the first time in a decade.
Am I misunderstanding something? There were 30,635 NEW hiv diagnoses in 2020, and 22% of those were self-proclaimed straights. Which means the rest of the NEW diagnoses, that's 78%, are gays and bisexuals. There are only 21 ways to cut that number to where either gay or bisexuals are lower than straights, but not both, because even at their highest (yet still below straights) makes up only 64%... meaning there would be 36% more of... what? All those gender specials?

Also, it is a gay disease; sure it can be spread via needle sharing and other things, but the majority is gay male sex. Straights don't pay attention to it via the same reason men don't worry about getting pregnant.

Edit: As an aside; many men not having a lot of sex could be the other reason. If men are having less sex (and not sharing needles), there's even less of a risk to getting the HIV. Hi, I'm just some retard on the internet, but can come up with a competent thought process within 5 minutes of being presented a retarded question.
 
It's virtually impossible for a straight male to get the HIV through sex. Maybe if you already have cuts or open lesions on your junk and you stick it inside a pus-spewing pozzed vagina, but otherwise you don't absorb fluids through your dick.
 
One thing I really don't understand is how so many conservatives and moderates have been psy opped into thinking gay men are the good ones and it's just the evil troons that are the problem.

Gays and the debauchery they engage in are fucking revolting.
 
Because straight people, as a whole, dont fuck anything and everything that has a pulse.
 
Back
Top Bottom