White genocide theorists

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The "White" genocide could end any minute if "White" people start having children. Though knowing the originators of " White Genocide" it just means their specific demographic sub-section of "white" is not reproducing . I don't see them trying to imitate or even congratulating the Hasidic/Quiverfull/Mormon/Balkan Wahabist muslim's for keeping the "White" race around, even if those groups are pretty much the only ones reproducing at above replacement levels and are mostly white.
I think they believe that the decision isn't informed because the jews are controlling the media and manipulating whites into doing this (despite jews having the same thing with them)
 
"white genocide" fails to understand that two mixed people can have children that have a lot of white features. Lets say they are right that one day whites will be "bred out" which is a ludicrous scenario in the first place. White people will still pop up from time to time due to genetics, and if anything this would make being white more unique in the long term.
 
Throughout history the rich elite classes had proportionally more children, who were healthier, better fed, etc and thus survived the insane child mortality rates of the times better than others. It's still the same in practically every non-western country. Affluence is not a factor, go to any Gulf country and the richest have absolutely massive families. "Education" I get, but when westerners say people need to be "educated" it's nothing more than a way of saying "accept western mores", which is ironically arrogant and ethnocentric. They're certainly not talking about getting STEM degrees, that's for sure. The myth that wealth and affluence must perforce lead to the exact same social values and politics as those of the modern west is disproven by even a cursory examination of the recent past and present.
juan_carreno_de_miranda_koenig_karl_ii._von_spanien_teaser.jpg
 
There is an actual term for what these dipshits are whinging about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition

As you can see, it's not a genocide and it's not exactly a bad thing. Many of these nutjobs deny the Holocaust, though, so I guess they just don't know the meaning of the word genocide.

I'll just leave this here:

http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/Khraif/Documents/fertility_saudi_arabia_pdf.pdf

"Since income related questions have not been included in the survey, a
composite measure of level of living was constructed and found to be related to
fertility behavior. Women who live in families with high standards of living have
fewer children than women belonging to relatively poor families"

It seems that there's an inverse correlation between living standards and number of children born within countries as well as between them, and that Muslim nations are no exceptions. This seems like a slam-dunk defense of the demographic transition thesis, but if anyone disagrees, I'd be genuinely interested in hearing why we're wrong, preferably with specific examples or statistics, rather than impotent sperging about how anyone who doesn't believe whites (and only whites) are being systematically exterminated must self-evidently be a Communist.
 
Last edited:
"white genocide" fails to understand that two mixed people can have children that have a lot of white features. Lets say they are right that one day whites will be "bred out" which is a ludicrous scenario in the first place. White people will still pop up from time to time due to genetics, and if anything this would make being white more unique in the long term.
That is only part of the issue. Traits cannot be "bred out" but if white people continue to have subreplacement fertility over time there will be selection against such traits. The fact that they are unwilling to go interracial actually likely reduces their ability to have lots of children and thus the prevalence of "White" genes in the population since they are denying themselves the ability to reproduce with more willing people
 
I've ranted about this before, but racism more than holding prejudice and involves treating 'races' differently. So-called 'anti-racists' tend to be referred to, by the confused, as racist... because they simply acknowledge that difference treatment exists and actually pursue (by various means, good and bad) the end of differential treatment.

Anyway, with regards to white genocide pillocks, what they refer to as "racism" and "genocide" are usually just people (with varying different inherited characteristics) fucking, i.e. normal, healthy human interaction. This requires treating people equally and with the same respect across the board.

Unfortunately, people are not treated equally across the board. Progress has happened in American history, yes, but the country is still horribly racist, with a class system that is additionally divided by race ('white', 'black' etc.)

So.... you currently have a resurgence of anti-racist and racial advocacy groups, a black president, and a media super-focused on jihadist terror against western countries (despite the fact that the demographic most killed by Jihadist terror are MUSLIMS)... this is obviously going to ruffle the feathers of white supremacists/separatists who already believe that our not-racist behaviors (like a white and black person fucking, or legally allowing a black person to run for political office), are genocide
 
OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL ADVISER ON THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE (OSAPG) ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Legal definition of genocide Genocide is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part1 ; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Genocide can occur in various ways. In Western countries, in general, people don't physically murder white people for being white, but far too many would if it were legal. The way genocide is being committed against white people is through psychological manipulation and memetic warfare. For example, take a look at our favorite hugbox, Tumblr. Just how many times have we read about whites feeling like they are worse than a child rapist, just for being born white? How many times do you see whites trying to defend blacks or other "underprivileged" groups, who don't even want to be defend, against what amounts to another person using the word "nigger" or saying that people should just listen to police officers?

Frankly, I do not think there is any super-powerful organization or country or group of nonwhites or Jews planning to erase, or mentally enslave, whites, but just because such a group may not exist doesn't mean white genocide is utter piffle. All it takes is one powerless person to have or spread an idea, and if the conditions happen to be right, that idea will infect everyone, changing the world on all scales. The very fact that there are so many people, of all races, who feel guilty of their skin color or ethnicity means they have been infected with a virus intended to change their behavior and thoughts, making them spew more virus particles on anyone they can connect with. While there is no cure for any virus, whether they be an idea or biological, they can be suppressed with beneficial viruses, like the notion that no humans will exist in a few decades because you are all inferior meatbags.

The truth is, to some degree, every group of people is under some form of genocide or another; the only way to keep these genocides from wholly playing out is to ensure that violence is universally condemned and values such as freedom of expression and thought can never be hindered or removed from any any group. In other words, I am saying that as long as everyone can be racist scream slurs over and over again without suffering any consequences, financial or status-wise, eventually we would all be so used to trolling each other that it would no longer occur, people would be less likely to commit acts of violence, and racism and hatred of people for dumb reasons would, paradoxically, plummet.

The REAL reason why the intellectual leaders of the "feelings trump freedoms" groups push their agendas is because they don't want to end racism, war, and genocide; they want turn the world into a violent, racist shithole with endless hated so they can maintain their authority positions by creating a feedback loop of frustration and tension in which they are always proven right. It's sad to see that almost no one can see this truth, and its even more depressing that there are billions of people who are willing to be infected with a virus that limits their freedoms, thoughts, and ability to evolve into better humans. The future of warfare is memetic warfare, and we are clearly losing. However, all hope is not lost; as long as a single person knows this truth, the war of ideas (aka the war of existence) will forever endure.
 
Is white genocide real yet?
 
Back
Top Bottom