Containment What will happen when Barb dies?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Chris is exactly what every young parents hope to avoid at all cost. A disabled/retarded potato alright, but there's more : A disabled/retarded AND fucking lazy/insufferable potato, a leech with no future nor decent present. A stain on display for your family tree.
I said this in another thread. Chris is here as a warning to people that don't want to get help for socially and mentally challenged kids as what they could end up as.

That is Chris' purpose.
 
You could probably use Chris as a PSA.
Autism speaks, are you listening?
hhhhhhhhhh.PNG
 
I said this in another thread. Chris is here as a warning to people that don't want to get help for socially and mentally challenged kids as what they could end up as.

That is Chris' purpose.
Honestly you're fucking right. If I ever end up with a special need offspring I'll immediately send it with other slow spergs instead of tryharding to mainstream it. He/She will also be fucking banned from any form of internet for his/her entire childhood, and limited times of Cartoons. This way someday he/she might become a productive potato able to clean up windows or whatever.
 
Honestly you're fucking right. If I ever end up with a special need offspring I'll immediately send it with other slow spergs instead of tryharding to mainstream it. He/She will also be fucking banned from any form of internet for his/her entire childhood, and limited times of Cartoons. This way someday he/she might become a productive potato able to clean up windows or whatever.

Abortion is a far better option
 
Does Barb exist canonically in the Sonichu universe? If so, will the comic incarnation of her return in the dimensional merge if she kicks the bucket first?
Sonichu_-_Classic_Strips,_Page_5.jpg

Don't worry, not even Barb can run away from her destiny as a striped shirted mongoloid in a furry world.
 
Considering there's a place for Barb's ashes next to Bob, isn't there going to be a cremation procedure to pay for?

Perhaps the idea of Barb's body being burnt to ashes later would mean to CWC that no evidence to whatever is done to the corpse would physically remain.

It had been suggested here that CWC would drive her to a hospital or something at the first signs of emergency, but frankly, I still somehow expect at least some dodgy actions done to the body. Of course, chances of anyone documenting that would be next to none, but the fact remains that at least some Laughs Under Lucricities would be expected upon Barb's passing.
 
This is somewhere between a random thought and a "dead Barb" thought.

Going through the list of people who would be able to do a damn thing come her passing, the Weston relatives seem like the best bet. They're geographically close and, if not emotionally close, I assume they have enough propriety to not leave the body of next-of-kin at room temperature for an indefinite period.

But then the thought occurs: Every time Chris has sent out distress calls for relatives to come "help" care for Barb, he's never called on the Weston side. He's always called on Cole, David, and Carol, and the latter two aren't even her children. (Given they were independent adults when Bob remarried, they only technically qualify as stepchildren.) We know Chris knows a little about Barb's family turmoil, but I wonder what else had to be said to make him assume they're not an option, period, the end.

Or if anything had to be said. Cole, David, and Carol, for all intents and purposes, are abstractions, people Chris doesn't know, so they can just as easily fit the slot of caretaker as any other. Chris has, however, been to a few Weston gatherings, so, even if his ability to read the room is limited, there must've been something in the air to let him know that fealty is non-existent.
 
Last edited:
This is somewhere between a random thought and a "dead Barb" thought.

Going through the list of people who would be able to do a damn thing come her passing, the Weston relatives seem like the best bet. They're geographically close and, if not emotionally close, I assume they have enough propriety to not leave the body of next-of-kin at room temperature for an indefinite period.

But then the thought occurs: Every time Chris has sent out distress calls for relatives to come "help" care for Barb, he's never called on the Weston side. He's always called on Cole, David, and Carol, and the latter two aren't even her children. (Given they were independent adults when Bob remarried, they only technically qualify as stepchildren.) We know Chris knows a little about Barb's family turmoil, but I wonder what else had to be said to make him assume they're not an option, period, the end.

Or if anything had to be said. Cole, David, and Carol, for all intents and purposes, are abstractions, people Chris doesn't know, so they can just as easily fit the slot of caretaker as any other. Chris has, however, been to a few Weston gatherings, so, even if his ability to read the room is limited, there must've been something in the air to let him know that fealty is non-existent.
Constant arguments and yelling maybe? Autists can tell somethings wrong when people are yelling and screaming.
Whatever issues Chris has wouldn't manifest during the fetal period. So abortion is moot
It’s the parenting. One of the ways to prevent this is to have a consistent and effective parenting methods.
 
Chris has, however, been to a few Weston gatherings, so, even if his ability to read the room is limited, there must've been something in the air to let him know that fealty is non-existent.
He has literally no ability to read social situations. I think it's likely Barb has shit-talked them to him any time they're mentioned, so he just adopted Barb's attitude.
 
This is somewhere between a random thought and a "dead Barb" thought.

Going through the list of people who would be able to do a damn thing come her passing, the Weston relatives seem like the best bet. They're geographically close and, if not emotionally close, I assume they have enough propriety to not leave the body of next-of-kin at room temperature for an indefinite period.

But then the thought occurs: Every time Chris has sent out distress calls for relatives to come "help" care for Barb, he's never called on the Weston side. He's always called on Cole, David, and Carol, and the latter two aren't even her children. (Given they were independent adults when Bob remarried, they only technically qualify as stepchildren.) We know Chris knows a little about Barb's family turmoil, but I wonder what else had to be said to make him assume they're not an option, period, the end.

Or if anything had to be said. Cole, David, and Carol, for all intents and purposes, are abstractions, people Chris doesn't know, so they can just as easily fit the slot of caretaker as any other. Chris has, however, been to a few Weston gatherings, so, even if his ability to read the room is limited, there must've been something in the air to let him know that fealty is non-existent.
This is interesting. My piping cold take is Chris may believe that the Weston clan are poor inbred hillbillies. For Chris, it's mostly about money for him. Everything in his life revolves around extremely expensive hobbies, so his world revolves around money. My Exhibit A is his comic of Cole tossing money into a fireplace while trashing Toy Story 3. So in Chris' mind, since Bob's kids are very successful he can more easily just leech off them and keep buying vidya he'll never play, toys that'll just collect dust, and conventions he can be banned from. Meanwhile, the Westons have enough money to live on (if that) and Chris would actually have to take care of his mother.
He has literally no ability to read social situations. I think it's likely Barb has shit-talked them to him any time they're mentioned, so he just adopted Barb's attitude.
Or...just this. I might have too much fun playing armchair psychiatrist.
 
It’s the parenting. One of the ways to prevent this is to have a consistent and effective parenting methods.
Research has shown that the age of the parents, especially the mother, is heavily linked to the probably of the child being autistic. Barb was 40 years old when she had Chris wich is probably what caused his autism.
 
Research has shown that the age of the parents, especially the mother, is heavily linked to the probably of the child being autistic. Barb was 40 years old when she had Chris wich is probably what caused his autism.
Bob was even older.
 
Prolly been said before, but like had Chris had some decent support growing up, he would have still been a bit "simple" but likely would have lived a decent life (compared to what it is now). He might have worked a little job, married an autistic woman... y'know.

But like either he was a product of neglect or just the times, and stupidity.
 
Back
Top Bottom