What if Dracula were a nonbinary immigrant gardener? - A new play produced by Theater Mu makes the Bram Stoker legend contemporary.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article / Archive

1741207132118.png

When Dracula makes his big move to London from Transylvania in Bram Stoker’s famous novel, he brings with him 50 boxes of earth.

In the rules Stoker sets up, vampires must sleep in coffins filled with earth from their homeland.

New York-based playwright Ankita Raturi uses the image of dirt-filled coffins for her new play, “Fifty Boxes of Earth,” presented by Theater Mu and directed by KT Shorb. The show had its world premiere last weekend at Park Square Theatre in St. Paul. The work draws inspiration from “Dracula,” though it’s not strictly an adaptation of the story. Instead, Raturi uses metaphorical touchstones from the novel to reflect on how our society otherizes people with difference. Rather than a blood-sucking fiend, the story’s vampire experiences marginalization, while hegemony becomes the real villain.

I caught the matinee on Sunday during the show’s opening weekend. There was a pretty significant technical issue that caused the show to take an unplanned break, but besides that glitch, the show brought together some terrific visual design elements and choreography by Ananya Chatterjea. The show’s use of Dracula lore to explore ideas of xenophobia and bigotry was also compelling.

The Dracula character in Raturi’s script is named Q, played with enigmatic sageness by New York-based actor Che’Li. With swept short hair and a grounded bearing, Che’Li’s Q is calm, but intent on pursuing their aims.

An immigrant from an undisclosed place, Q arrives at a community garden with dirt from home. Their intention is preparing a garden plot with the earth they brought to ready for their family members, including their son, who they hope will join them in their new home.

At the community garden, Q is greeted by organizer Jon Harker, bearing a similar name to Jonathan Harker from the novel, who visits Dracula as part of a real estate negotiation, gets trapped there and nearly killed.

In Raturi’s story, Jon Harker is a bit of a bigot. Played by Alex Galick, Jon is personable and polite enough at first, but grows tense as time passes. Jon is disturbed to learn Q brought foreign dirt to the garden, and seems irked by Q’s transness, their unusual customs and their superior gardening skills.

Jon’s dislike of Q grows while his child’s affection for the new neighbor develops, perhaps because of that affection. Jon’s fear and ignorance fuel his actions, ultimately revealing him to be the monstrous one, not Q. Galick takes an understated approach to the character, not revealing his overt nastiness right away. He lets Jon’s actions, rather than attitude, reveal the kind of person he is.

Galick’s portrayal, and Raturi’s text, allows for some nuance. He clearly loves his child and fears for them, and that love and fear act as a spark for his approach to a new person they encounter who is different from them.

Jon’s child indicates a questioning of their own gender identity. They prefer to use their last name, Harker, instead of their feminine first name, for example.

As directed by Shorb, the tension between Jon and Q visibly seethes. In one scene, they stand off face-to-face atop the upper level of the garden — in a set designed by Mina Kinukawa. You can just feel the contempt between the two characters.

While the story Raturi tells veers quite a bit from that of the novel, the playwright does align with Stoker’s vampiric givens. Like Dracula in the novel, Q is deathly allergic to garlic. They also seem to thrive at night but aren’t harmed by sunlight.

Like Dracula, Q is adept at using blood as a life force, but in a way that’s quite a bit different than the novel. For one thing, Q uses their own blood, rather than murdering other people. They also don’t use the blood for their own immortality but rather as a special fertilizer for their garden.

Ultimately, Raturi employs Dracula as a framework to meditate on survival, especially for someone who is far from home and in a place that doesn’t keep them safe. The “Fifty Boxes of Earth” from the title refers to a bold act of connection to home. Rather than creepy, it’s a powerful force of strength.

Mu’s production is supplemented with a chorus of dancers, choreographed by Ananya Chatterjea. The movers at times channel seeds, at other times the life force of plants growing into being. They swirl together, employing Chatterjea’s signature style that mixes classical Indian forms with martial arts and contemporary movement. They also manipulate the plants that grow to gigantic sizes in the garden plots, in puppetry design by Oanh Vu and Andrew Young.

Mu has created a sumptuous visual work with “Fifty Boxes of Earth,” and engages with ideas that are timely and pressing. The challenge here is that by responding to a beloved and very famous story, the play inherently sets up comparisons to the original text. Raturi has inserted elements of horror and magic into her story, but the work mainly hones in on the three characters and their relationship to each other. This piece doesn’t approach the epic scale of “Dracula,” even though it has a fascinating arc to follow in its own right.
 
though it’s not strictly an adaptation of the story. Instead,
dang
ngl I was really impressed with how amazingly on the fucking nose

What if Dracula were a nonbinary immigrant gardener?​

was at being that sort of thing

but yeah more vampire stuff seems like they could get some weird milage out of the Earth thing
 
What if theatre kids tried being normal for once?


Dracula and vampires in general have been "subverted" for so long? It'll be refreshing when someone decides to depict them as the corrupting abominations they are and are supposed to be.
I feel like they always try to make them sympathetic when the whole point is that they are parasitic and ultimately murderous monsters. They hide it in appearances, but they are monsters playing as men.

I always understood it as a parallel to the aging gentry in European country sides that technically owned land that the peasants worked, but the system moved beyond them and they only had power due the system. Them going after virgins was a prima notca
 
In Raturi’s story, Jon Harker is a bit of a bigot. Played by Alex Galick, Jon is personable and polite enough at first, but grows tense as time passes. Jon is disturbed to learn Q brought foreign dirt to the garden, and seems irked by Q’s transness, their unusual customs and their superior gardening skills.
'I AM OFFENDED AT YOUR SUPERIOR GARDENING SKILLS'

Screenshot 2025-03-06 104159.png

"Q", aka Dracula, is the one on the right. Can you tell it's trans?
 
>Make lame, gay, trans, immigrant, Dracula
>Name it Q

I'm starting to understand why Vlad Tepes impaled people. Also the only gay AIDS vampire I will recognize is the Hemogoblin from the New Guardians™.
 
Since the original Dracula is an epistolary novel, told through letters, it would be interesting if someone attempted to make a movie that does the same thing, only set in the present and telling the story through characters using modern social media. Like having Jonathan Harker making some kind of travelogue with his smartphone while he's traveling to Dracula's house, then having him accidentally film Dracula crawling into his window while he's got his camera pointed out of it, etc. It sounds lame, I know, but I'm thinking there might be a cool scene where Van Helsing sets up cameras and instruments around Mina to record Dracula coming in to prey on her, and things get all creepy, sort of like in Paranormal Activity. You could do a lot of creative stuff with this wort of thing, although you'd have to answer the question of whether Dracula's image can actually appear on a camera or not...
 
There really needs to be a billionaire-funded conservative art group
This is a billionaire-funded art group. This is what billionaires like.
inb4 "but it's publicly funded" (probably, the article doesn't say, and I'm on the phone): well where do you think billionaires got money?

Art groups need to be audience-funded, only then can they be conservative.
 
For one thing, Q uses their own blood, rather than murdering other people. They also don’t use the blood for their own immortality but rather as a special fertilizer for their garden.
It's period blood, isn't it...

Anyway this sounds like it's so dramatically deviated from the Dracula story it's hardly worth using it as a framework.

London really does fund some shit projects.
 
Last edited:
So they're making an old monster even more monstrous for "modern audiences"?

I don't think that making a blood sucking monster non-binary is the flex they think it is.
 
The work draws inspiration from “Dracula,” though it’s not strictly an adaptation of the story.
Rather than a blood-sucking fiend, the story’s vampire experiences marginalization, while hegemony becomes the real villain.
The Dracula character in Raturi’s script is named Q
An immigrant from an undisclosed place, Q arrives at a community garden with dirt from home. Their intention is preparing a garden plot
Jon Harker is a bit of a bigot.
Q’s transness
their superior gardening skills
Jon’s child indicates a questioning of their own gender identity. They prefer to use their last name, Harker, instead of their feminine first name, for example.
aren’t harmed by sunlight
Q uses their own blood, rather than murdering other people.
They also don’t use the blood for their own immortality but rather as a special fertilizer for their garden.
Rather than creepy, it’s a powerful force of strength.
They also manipulate the plants that grow to gigantic sizes in the garden plots

So, it sounds to me like their play that's supposedly inspired by Dracula, in fact, actually has very little to do with Dracula whatsoever.
 
As directed by Shorb, the tension between Jon and Q visibly seethes. In one scene, they stand off face-to-face atop the upper level of the garden — in a set designed by Mina Kinukawa. You can just feel the contempt between the two characters.

Can you feel my contempt, both for everyone involved in this muddled mess and the journo praising it to the skies?
 
although you'd have to answer the question of whether Dracula's image can actually appear on a camera or not...
I've seen vampire media where they can't appear through film cameras, but can appear through digital cameras. I guess it varies with all the different lore.
 
Back
Top Bottom