🐱 We need more queer representation in children’s media

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


Make Elsa a lesbian

We’ve all heard the debate before surrounding this so-called ‘controversial’ question: should Disney make Elsa a lesbian?

People often don’t pay this debate any mind, dismissing it as an insignificant issue as it’s ‘only about a kids’ movie. However, people don’t realize the adverse effects that a lack of queer representation may have on queer children growing up, and how this debate is more complex than it appears.

One of the most common arguments made by those opposed to having queer characters in children’s movies is that having queer representation on TV pushes non-heteronormative sexualities onto children. This opinion is highly problematic for an abundance of reasons, especially since it pushes the age-old idea that sexuality is a choice. The fact of the matter is that people are born to be whatever sexuality they are and nothing changes that — not even the media they consume at a young age. This logic is also extremely contradictive, as every queer person today grew up consuming media featuring heterosexual relationships.

Having queer representation in movies for children is so essential in helping queer kids feel seen and — quite frankly — feel ‘normal.’ I know that, in my case, I grew up feeling lost and confused because of the lack of queer characters on my TV screen. I understood from a very young age that I was not straight. Still, due to the lack of queer representation in media, I thought there was something wrong with me and that I was ‘broken.’ It’s because of these occurrences that I, as a 19-year-old queer man, still face internalized confusion today as to whether or not I’m ‘just like everybody else.’

It is vital that queer kids have role models that they can look up to in order to feel seen and represented. By doing so, queer children will grow up with less internalized homophobia and, therefore, will have a greater chance of coming to terms with their sexuality earlier and quicker.

To be fair, there have been queer characters in Disney movies before. However, this is not always explicit. If you assess many of the villains featured in Disney movies, you’ll come to find that they are heavily queer-coded. In essence, this means that many Disney villains possess characteristics, whether in their personalities or physical appearances, that have historically been associated with queer people.

For example, Ursula, the antagonist in The Little Mermaid, is based on a famous drag queen named Divine, which is evident through their uncanny appearance and personality type. Other villains often seen as being queer-coded include Cruella DeVil, Maleficent, Scar, Jafar, and the list goes on. Having these villains possess stereotypes associated with queer people is highly damaging, as it villainizes those characteristics and generates homophobia among both queer and straight children.

It’s about time that queer people were adequately represented in children’s movies. Queer characters should take on more crucial protagonist roles instead of either being blatantly forgotten or cast as villains.

So next time you think to yourself, why people care so much whether Elsa is a lesbian or not, understand the significance of having a prominent and influential character representing the queer population. Elsa being established as queer will not only help straight children accept queer people, but it will also help queer children accept themselves.
 
80 Years ago people writing this drivel would literally be strung up in public by a mob (at least in parts of the US) but remember the slippery slope isn't real.

I will be Emailing Ansarallah to petition them to change their slogan to “Death to America, Death to Canada, Death to Israel, Curses upon the Jews, Victory to Islam“ because too much Canadian garbage has piled up on the internet.
 
If little billy doesnt know what filching is by the age of 2 than all gays everywhere are harmed.

Thats nice, up against the wall, please.
 
I remember back when I was little, watching Mr Rodgers, my biggest concern was which of the puppets were bumping uglies. That's what kids like.
 
This may be a result of my somewhat sheltered upbringing, but why does there need to be any sexuality in children's media? I have family members that are gay and it took until almost my teens to wonder why two same-sex family members were like roommates or something. Other than feeling a little foolish after the fact, I can't think of a single negative in being allowed to have that ignorance. I'm not saying to lie or make extensive efforts to hide it, but why is it so damn important to ensure they are exposed to it thoroughly?
 
This may be a result of my somewhat sheltered upbringing, but why does there need to be any sexuality in children's media? I have family members that are gay and it took until almost my teens to wonder why two same-sex family members were like roommates or something. Other than feeling a little foolish after the fact, I can't think of a single negative in being allowed to have that ignorance. I'm not saying to lie or make extensive efforts to hide it, but why is it so damn important to ensure they are exposed to it thoroughly?
Shit i didn't discover my sexuality until i was 17
 
You know, if they had said "we could include some gay people in children's shows to promote tolerance", whether yoy agree with it or not, it's a reasonable suggestion that I'd be open to debate.

But they mention "queer", which is an absolute red flag as "queer" means nothing at all and it's an umbrella term for degeneracy and a chance to groom children.

So, no. Fuck off.
 
I came out when I was 12 and it had literally nothing to do with cartoons
Shit i didn't discover my sexuality until i was 17
Adding onto that yeah it had nothing to do with cartoons or videogames or whatever.

I just want to live my life as a guy who likes men and women and for people to not make a big deal out of it is that too hard to ask
 
Shouldn't characters in kiddie media be a-sexual so that way kids can figure out what they like when they're old enough? Isn't that how it's supposed to work? No?
 
For example, Ursula, the antagonist in The Little Mermaid, is based on a famous drag queen named Divine, which is evident through their uncanny appearance and personality type.

Ursula is not a "they".

Other villains often seen as being queer-coded include Cruella DeVil, Maleficent, Scar, Jafar, and the list goes on.

I never saw Cruella as a drag queen or a lesbo. She's just a crazy lady who didn't realise she could have gotten a cheap dog fur coat from China for less effort than chasing after a bunch of puppies. Also, the explanation for her dalmation hate boner was pants on head retarded.

Isn't Maleficent married? Doesn't Scar have a mate too?

You can have Jafar. He's a fucking froot loop if I ever saw one.

What's next, the ugly step-sisters were just having internalized homophobia because they both secretly wanted Cinderella and not the prince? Quasimodo is trans? The snowman from Frozen is in a poly relationship with three icicles and a mountaintop?

Kids don't need this stuff in their cartoons. Adult perverts obsessed with shows for children need to have their hard drives seized.
 
as a white hetro cisgender female, I don't understand why it is so important to reminded of who other people like to fuck all time. I'm hearing 'We want acceptance, equality etc, but then on the other hand it's "we're special snowflakes and want to fag-ify everything.

The only people would would care enough about this would be extreme faggots and white middle class people who want to appear to be woke.

I never saw Cruella as a drag queen or a lesbo. She's just a crazy lady who didn't realise she could have gotten a cheap dog fur coat from China for less effort than chasing after a bunch of puppies. Also, the explanation for her dalmation hate boner was pants on head retarded
A drag queen, tranny or lezzy as a antagonist is homo/transphobic ;)
 
Once again, I'll tap the sign:

cartoons.png


This grooming shit is getting old.

Besides, it was already revealed why Jafar was a villain:

 
Societal rot is the only goal I can see when monopolies court a group of people which cannot breed and thus cannot create future CONSOOMERS for them.
But they mention "queer", which is an absolute red flag as "queer" means nothing at all and it's an umbrella term for degeneracy and a chance to groom children.
Queer literally means strange, and fucking damn weird at best. HP Lovecraft used it for every other word in his stories, "the queer and abyssal lake" etc.
 
You know, if they had said "we could include some gay people in children's shows to promote tolerance", whether yoy agree with it or not, it's a reasonable suggestion that I'd be open to debate.

But they mention "queer", which is an absolute red flag as "queer" means nothing at all and it's an umbrella term for degeneracy and a chance to groom children.

So, no. Fuck off.
Honestly, the point of debate and reason is LONG GONE. At this point, ... I don't even know what to think.
 
Back
Top Bottom