🐱 Was “Harriet the Spy” a queer hero? - Isn’t she just a child who solves mysteries

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


The modern LGBTQ rights movement had barely begun when author Louise Fitzhugh dreamed up confident, rebellious Harriet the Spy, an animated young girl who spied on her friends and family, wrote nasty things about them in her journal, wore “boys” clothing, and saw no problem at all with her boldness.
Harriet’s sexuality was not discussed in the book, but it was 1964, five years before the Stonewall uprising. At that time, mainstream LGBTQ young adult books (like 2012’s The Miseducation of Cameron Post, for example) were more or less figments of the queer imagination.


Instead, queer kid heroes had to come in different, more concealed packages.
Fitzhugh, herself, was a lesbian, and thus, many have speculated that she wrote Harriet as a queer character — someone who was different from those around her and was constantly asked to apologize for it.
But, in a way that likely inspired many kids, Harriet refused to change.
“As a kid who already felt left out by the mechanisms of femininity that everyone around me seemed to adopt with ease, Harriet was the blue denim baby butch I needed among the endless ballerina narratives,” wrote children’s book author Kat Patrick in a 2019 essay for The Guardian on how Harriet the Spy helped them come to terms with their queerness.

“Back then,” they continued, “I didn’t yet have the words for what I felt fizzing through my insides, and even now, 15 years after coming out, I’m only just learning to feel comfortable with how I present: non-binary, butch.”
A new biography, Sometimes You Have To Lie by Leslie Brody delves into Fitzhugh’s personal life, including her sexuality.
In a review of the book, the New Republic discusses how the title represents one of the most controversial moments in Harriet’s story – when her nanny, Ole Golly, tells her that sometimes it’s okay to lie. This advice comes after Harriet’s notebook is found, and she struggles to apologize to those whose feelings she has hurt, since she isn’t actually sorry.

The biography’s author speculates that his empathy for lying is likely a nod to Fitzhugh’s need to lie about her own sexuality to protect herself.
“Truth and honesty are always things that are coveted in childhood, as long as the truth is palatable,” Patrick wrote in their Guardian essay. “But being butch, binding your chest, using different pronouns, and wearing your dad’s shirts: these are truths that plenty of people still don’t want to hear.”
“Ole Golly’s message to Harriet was practical and tender: do what you have to do to survive, and don’t feel too guilty about it. As a kid, that was a revelation. Louise Fitzhugh taught me how to forgive myself.”

So there you have it. Harriet the Spy was the queer hero you may have never known you had.
 
Whoo-whee, there's a full :lunacy: out tonight!

Surprised such a site allows comments on their gay articles. There's one comment so far and it's got two downvotes. I wonder why???
"Good grief. How much do we have to follow stereotypes and regressive ways to look at the sexes to see Harriet as queer. A female can wear what ever they want and doesn't make them "queer". So regressive. Girls don't have to wear or be interested in pink and dolls. All still girls, cause female sex. How freeing."
 
Further proof that everyone involved in children's entertainment is a degenerate.
 
All fiction must conform to current year politics.

All characters must be queer or submit to the 'female ways of knowing.'

Eat bugs.
Live in pods.
Suck girlcock.
Queerify literature.
Own nothing.
Be happy.
 
What, did they get tired of sucking off Ellen Page? Leave Harriet alone!
 
I don't care about Harriet's sexuality because it has literally no effect on the story whatsoever.

Also, she's a fucking child.
 
Give me all the top hats you want, but i hate the fucking queers. Not gays, lesbians, or bis. They're all fine. Fucking queers have to colonize everything. and like the post above mine says, she's a child. leave her the fuck alone.
 
I've been trying to type some kind of witty response to this but words fail me at how monumentally fucking stupid this is.

In what world is projecting your own sexuality onto a fictional ten year old in a book for fucking elementary schoolers something to be lauded?
 
First, stop sexualizing childhood and children’s interactions with everyone, adults and children alike.

But also:
In a review of the book, the New Republic discusses how the title represents one of the most controversial moments in Harriet’s story – when her nanny, Ole Golly, tells her that sometimes it’s okay to lie. This advice comes after Harriet’s notebook is found, and she struggles to apologize to those whose feelings she has hurt, since she isn’t actually sorry...The biography’s author speculates that his empathy for lying is likely a nod to Fitzhugh’s need to lie about her own sexuality to protect herself.

This could not more clearly be a description of how you tell a kid who is autistic and/or has sociopathic traits (ie less apparent ability than others in their cohort to empathize with and care about (or appear to care about) how other people feel) to fake it till she makes it so people will stop hating her for being an autist/sociopath. All children are natural sociopaths, but some grow out of it later than others. Stop sexualizing this, which is applicable to all kids and is no more likely a perspective of a lesbian than a straight person, unless of course lesbians are more likely to be autists than other women? I mean even the idea that a kid is maintaining this black and white thinking that says you can’t say a thing unless you really mean it - ie can’t say sorry if you don’t think you feel sorry - is how autists think about social rules. You’ve told the kid not to lie. Now you’re giving them a different rule? What are they to do with this?

If a kid alienates other people and it is clear to you why but not to her, and she wonders why people don’t like her or are mad at her, and you say well, you hurt them, you betrayed them. Say you’re sorry. And she says, but I’m not. Ok well...it will improve your social situation and make the hurt people feel better. You have introduced her to a new social rule which is much more important for a girl than a guy, because girls are expected to understand and help manage other people’s feelings even when they haven’t done anything wrong or even if they have nothing to do with the issue at all. So, when a girl doesn’t do this, people take it much much worse than if it was a boy. She needs this new social rule from you, an adult, because she isn’t grasping the nuance because she’s less adept than others at doing so.

And I mean Harriet? Her obsession with spying? Does an autistic Special Interest have to literally be fucking trains or dinosaurs before you recognize it as such? Come on.
 
Last edited:
Let's remember that in 1964 the "Super Spy" genre was very much alive. Harriet wanting to be a spy is like a modern 11 year old who wants to be a superhero.
 
They need to stop applying their gender woo woo to characters from decades ago. Same goes for George/Georgina from Blyton's Famous Five, which was written from the 40s to the 60s. I've seen plenty of articles calling her non-binary/trans or queer, when she just was a tomboy and rejected the gender roles of that time. I bet they would love to rewrite the whole series and give her they/them pronouns.
 
Everywhere I go there some degenerate making fake problems and sexualising children. Every retarded post I see, its always by this troon, CatParty. Please go work at Kotaku or Polygon full time so you don't have to post your shitty threads on KiwiFarms.
 
Back
Top Bottom