Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

[Feline Darkmage]

How do you know that? Maybe cows can be people, or people can be cows!

They can but you're too chill to be a cow at this point.
Just kind of a fun weird guy that types words.

Also welcome back, I wasn't in this thread much when you were here last time before being fired so Hi.

 

[ZKWNordman]

Regarding Frank and the allegations of abuse, I think the main reason it’s been brought up is this: So many people, particularly on the left on social media, insist on soapboxing “I believe her.” This is where the accuser is believed no matter what. Brianna does this all of the time, but hypocritically, she draws the line with her spouse. She didn’t ignore this, but rather used her public platform to attack Frank’s ex.

The abuse allegations came out publicly when Frank followed Brianna’s lead (where she talked about GamerGate victimization). He used his Twitter as a platform to talk about how awful his ex-wife was. This forced his ex to come out publicly with very specific details of abuse and Frank’s sociopathic tendencies.

Her comments were far more specific and came across as genuine. The most damning piece of evidence against Frank was in that he RESPONDED to these allegations by saying, essentially, “maybe the truth was in the middle.”

Sociopathic people are often charmers.

I think you’re being asked about this for a couple of reasons: a) people want to know if you saw the cracks in his personality and b) people want to know if you’re an “I believe her” progressive. If you are, you can’t ethically ignore these allegations, can you?

 

[Very Honest Content]

How did you and Stee meet, Warren? She seems kind of nice from what little I've read/seen of her in the threads where you both make appearances, she's kind of got that cute librarian type of look going for her.

Also, $12 in Dunkin' Donuts gift cards per picture of candidate for house rep Wu is a damn good offer, I was going to suggest you ask for that and settle at $10 a picture as a meeting point but apparently Daily Bugle distribution is up significantly these days? I'm not really sure another estimated grand for your NDA signature would be as much of a wacky adventure as going into business for yourself and shitposting with us here though...

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

But again, you dodged the most important question, the thing that seems to be at the heart of WHY you are pushing the progressive point of view. "Everyone is losing their human rights". Who is losing what rights, specifically?

What I was saying is just kind of a vague feeling of disgust at how little politicians from both parties seem to care about human rights and human beings, instead of about money, which makes me sad. I could do like a whole rant about it, but I'm too busy right now, and not motivated.

Warren... come on man. This "everyone is losing their human rights" is the rallying cry of the progressive movement. It's what everyone is literally shaking over on twitter. Could you please, please explain what people mean by this so I can consider it myself? Because if the impetus behind your politics is so vague you can't even define it, then I'm clearly wasting time trying to understand it. I am capable of having my mind changed. If you tell me something new, I might even come over to your way of thinking. But you have to define what is meant by "Everyone is losing their human rights", because it's beginning to look like you don't even know what you mean by it, and that's pretty sad since I see that sentiment all over the place.

Secondly, you talk about how the old european antifa were violent communists, but that's different from today's american antifa, which are all old ladies(Video evidence seems to disagree with that, but I digress). Doesn't that exact argument work just as well for actual nazis? Those bad nazis were old military germans 80 years ago! You think a bunch of basement dwelling kids are the same thing? Lay off the crack pipe!

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

Tell me more about what leftists should do, since you are such a lifelong leftist.

Voted Dem my entire life, politically active at the local level, have donated more money to various campaigns than you see in a year.
Try again, poser.

If he's really a spousal abuser, that would be very bad. I would guess not given his general temperament and how much he indulges Brianna. But who knows. There are many mysteries in the world of Brianna Wu.

Alright, this is going to get into territory you don't want to hear about, but fuck it, let's explore:
Abusers are often marked by a lack of power in other areas of their lives, and use manipulative behaviors to feel control in their relationships, where the power dynamic may be different.
In Frank's first marriage, his wife younger than him by a frankly inappropriate margin. He was substantially wealthier, older, and accomplished in writing than she was, and as an aspiring writer, this was important to her. Thus, the relationship became abusive when he began to exert power over her in inappropriate ways.

Brianna, however, is not a terrified and naive young girl. She is a transwoman, a good 3 feet taller than him, and carries substantial weight in the weird little circles people like them run in.
Put simply, Frank isn't abusive to Brianna because the power dynamic is significantly different. He can't physically abuse her because she's actually a pretty large, lanky dude who would kick the shit out of him. He can't emotionally abuse her because she's significantly more unstable than he is and far better at those games. He cannot flex his "sci-fi writer" shit over her because she doesn't give a rats ass about much of anything, save how it can benefit her in the short term.

It's not that he's unwilling to be abusive, that much is documented. It's that he's unable to in this case.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

It's that he's unable to in this case.

I would actually push back at you on this because my contention is Frank is still maintaining his pattern of being abusive, it's just that John is too fucking re,tarded to either notice or care. Everyone knows that John would be just another useless ebegging troon if not for Frank, and to me it's clear that Frank jacks off to the fact that he has total control over an absolute moron who would starve to death if not for him. Keep in mind that I am not attempting to paint John as some kind of victim here but to me this is the only plausible explanation as to why Frank bothers to live in a rental house with a crypt fiend.

 

[captn_kettle]

Can someone fill me in on what happened with Warren? I tried to look through the past few pages but everyone said Warren wanted to fuck Brianna and I'm now convinced this is a Reddit hugbox.

Why did Warren become the cronk of Brianna's campaign to a backstreet crack whore?

 

[Dimethyl Ketone]

Can someone fill me in on what happened with Warren? I tried to look through the past few pages but everyone said Warren wanted to fuck Brianna and I'm now convinced this is a Reddit hugbox.

Why did Warren become the cronk of Brianna's campaign to a backstreet crack whore?

It's not really a "win" against Brianna.. he's not a trophy. The reality of it is he got too close to the truth and she fired him before he could come to his senses with any association to the campaign. Just the potential for him to come to any rightful conclusions about John while still "on the campaign" was more risk than value when it came to a Scampaign that John went into knowing he wasn't going to get elected. She dropped him just on the chance that he might wake up, just so she would have the point to discredit him "oh he mad cuz I fired him."

That should have fucked anyone's head straight to have the majority of their time seen as having lower value than some words on the internet. Don't kid yourselves that the campaign was ever "in danger" if Warren woke up, it's in no danger of winning period.

I mean fuck he's still in here defending her after she wiped him off her boot on the curb. I'd like to be glad that "one less person enslaved in the Flu machine" but... that didn't even happen. Dude's still cult whipped bright eyed grade a sucker.

Maybe he's not a bad dude... maybe he is. Is someone that once did the work for an evil being and now apologizes and dismisses their wrongs evil themselves?

Actively stand with < Passively stand width < passively stand against < actively stand against

Is the rule in my book. Warren's taken a positive step (albeit involuntarily, however much he tries now to revise history to make it his decision), but he has not crossed the line to the 'good guys' yet.

 

[AnOminous]

Tell me more about what leftists should do, since you are such a lifelong leftist.

Getting elected would be a nice start. I'm also okay with nuking the leadership by primary-ing them in otherwise safe seats where there is no reason to have a DINO. Wu is not the person to do that, though. Ocasio-Cortez may be.

It's not really a "win" against Brianna.. he's not a trophy. The reality of it is he got too close to the truth and she fired him before he could come to his senses with any association to the campaign.

I don't think Warren gets how we are viewed by most of the people in his political circles. We aren't just bad, we're not just jerks, we're something on the level of Nazis and Daleks combined, and even talking to us at all is equivalent to Neville Chamberlain appeasing Hitler.

That, or he understands that, but just doesn't give a fuck. And I actually approve of the not giving a fuck thing.

One of the most bizarre things about the hysteria surrounding KF has been how so many people are actually weirdly terrified of us, like we're ghastly monsters. Okay, some of us are pretty bad people and we're kind of jerks, but that's really about as bad as it gets. I mean other than the mass shooters. But most of them are dead. I hope.

 

[Richard Stabone]

The reality of it is he got too close to the truth and she fired him before he could come to his senses with any association to the campaign. Just the potential for him to come to any rightful conclusions about John while still "on the campaign" was more risk than value when it came to a Scampaign that John went into knowing he wasn't going to get elected. She dropped him just on the chance that he might wake up, just so she would have the point to discredit him "oh he mad cuz I fired him."

I think it was money. Warren was asking to be paid more than a Vietnamese sweatshop worker and Brianna wanted another Porsche.

 

[W person cow]

Warren's taken a positive step (albeit involuntarily, however much he tries now to revise history to make it his decision), but he has not crossed the line to the 'good guys' yet.

Warren Lynch: considered a good guy by slimy internet trolls who use the n-word ironically and doxx people!

I don't think Warren gets how we are viewed by most of the people in his political circles. We aren't just bad, we're not just jerks, we're something on the level of Nazis and Daleks combined, and even talking to us at all is equivalent to Neville Chamberlain appeasing Hitler.

I always felt bad for the Daleks. Half the time when they say "exterminate exterminate", what they mean is, "I love you."
Nazis not so much, especially the modern ones. The old ones maybe a lot of them didn't know really the extent of what was going on, but that Illinois guy, WTF? He should punch himself before Indiana Jones does it for him.

That, or he understands that, but just doesn't give a fuck. And I actually approve of the not giving a fuck thing.

Or I just have poor impulse control.
I also have a soft spot for the whole "radical free speech" thing, as a lot of fringe ideas do get censored these days. I used to troll just for the sake of trolling, just for free speech. And I still do sometimes.
Also Lauren Pepsi from the show said she reads lolcows, and was talking about the "split in the trollverse between right wing pepe jerks and more left leaning lolcow jerks about whether punching a Nazi is okay", and said the pepe side says punching a nazi makes you "as bad as a Nazi" because somehow punching people is the core of Nazi philosophy or something and anyone who isnt a total pacifist is "the real Nazi". And the other side says "Ew, of course punch a Nazi. What is this, the anti-punching society? What happened to anarchy?"
So I was like "really, there's a left-leaning troll-verse?" Although clearly, the opinion on Nazi-punching isn't as monolithic as Lauren described, lol.

One of the most bizarre things about the hysteria surrounding KF has been how so many people are actually weirdly terrified of us.

Isn't that the point, though? To weirdly terrify and/or mock people?
If I couldn't weirdly terrify my City Councillors, showing up to meetings wouldn't be nearly as fun

 

[AnOminous]

Isn't that the point, though? To weirdly terrify and/or mock people?

I find it strange. I'm not at all sure why people are terrified by the mere fact that we laugh at them. Do you understand that? I don't.

I find it extremely strange that people view us as literal Nazis even though many of us are actually leftists ourselves, just leftists disgusted by SJWs.

 

[W person cow]

Warren... come on man. This "everyone is losing their human rights" is the rallying cry of the progressive movement. It's what everyone is literally shaking over on twitter. Could you please, please explain what people mean by this so I can consider it myself? Because if the impetus behind your politics is so vague you can't even define it, then I'm clearly wasting time trying to understand it. I am capable of having my mind changed. If you tell me something new, I might even come over to your way of thinking. But you have to define what is meant by "Everyone is losing their human rights", because it's beginning to look like you don't even know what you mean by it, and that's pretty sad since I see that sentiment all over the place.

I think that we have some kind of right to privacy, and domestic surveillance is crazy out of control.
I think we have a right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and that went out the window in the 80s and 90s pretty much.
I think we have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and not to be deprived of them without due process. Which has been variously taken away by degrees in various recent bipartisan NDAAs since Bush.
I think we ought to have freedom of the press, and we do not.
I think we ought to have a more restrained, respectful police force in many areas.
I agree with Libertarians about most of what constitutes our liberty and how it is infringed. Although I disagree with the "Koch Brothers wing" of the Libertarians' idea that large corporations deserve the same freedoms, and some aspects of the whole "big government" argument. I'm for more government services, but less government surveillance, brutality, and telling people how to live their lives.

Secondly, you talk about how the old european antifa were violent communists, but that's different from today's american antifa, which are all old ladies(Video evidence seems to disagree with that, but I digress).

No I said they're MOSTLY old ladies. Especially around here.

Doesn't that exact argument work just as well for actual nazis? Those bad nazis were old military germans 80 years ago! You think a bunch of basement dwelling kids are the same thing? Lay off the crack pipe!

Maybe so, but I imagine both would be hilarious to troll. Kinnon can't walk down the street now without being jeered at because everybody knows he's a racial conspiracy theorist. Call him a Nazi or don't, either way he sucks.

 

[Particle Bored]

Nazis not so much, especially the modern ones. The old ones maybe a lot of them didn't know really the extent of what was going on

Lol wtf “some WWII Nazis just didn’t know any better; the 30 people in a gazebo in Boston are the real SS scum.”

“PS, I support radical free speech, btw punch a Nazi.”

 

[W person cow]

I find it strange. I'm not at all sure why people are terrified by the mere fact that we laugh at them. Do you understand that? I don't.

Laughter can be acutely terrifying to most people. The more of a control freak and/or vain someone is, the less they can handle being laughed at. Which is just about the best thing ever, when it comes to local politicians. 3-4 people in the crowd laughing when people lie has done more to change politics in Malden in the past year than probably the previous 10 years of everybody's "polite" activism here.

I find it extremely strange that people view us as literal Nazis even though many of us are actually leftists ourselves, just leftists disgusted by SJWs.

I mean "disgusted by SJWs" has a pretty specific Venn diagram tho. Are the lolcows all "SJWs"?

“Radical free speech means you can talk about anything EXCEPT punching Nazis”

Lolwhut?

 

[Dr. Merkwurdichliebe]

Are the lolcows all "SJWs"?

No. Some of the cows are ultra-right-wing, racist lunatics.

If you don't believe me, read the Iconoclast thread in which Jonathan M. Sweet of Blythville, Ark., shows up to defend his Jigaboo Junction comics series, including the Brokeblack Mountain issue that lists on it's cover a cast including Manny Coons and Lotta Jiggs.

We Farmers don't give a crap about the cow's politics.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

Laughter can be acutely terrifying to most people. The more of a control freak and/or vain someone is, the less they can handle being laughed at.

That's a Kiwi approved point of view. And yet you damn us for calling Brianna a tranny and making fun of her ching chong chinaman and his screeching derpy face.

Warren Lynch: considered a good guy by slimy internet trolls who use the n-word ironically and doxx people!

You dodged my post because you're a coward but again, you keep telling us how to be leftist despite the fact that multiple people here have donated more to left-leaning causes than you ever will.
We had an entire subforum devoted to doxing, attacking, and shaming MRA's and rape apologists and pissing off the communities they inhabit.
Your move.

I mean "disgusted by SJWs" has a pretty specific Venn diagram tho. Are the lolcows all "SJWs"?

No. The majority of them, like the cow you shilled for, aren't even sincere progressives.
But they're all lunatics, and they will all fail when it's said and done.

 

[W person cow]

I am still convinced there is a time warp in the swamps of East Bridgewater.

You dodged my post because you're a coward but again,

People on the internet who call people "cowards" for not noticing them are a really funny segment.

you keep telling us how to be leftist despite the fact that multiple people here have donated more to left-leaning causes than you ever will.

I have strong opinions, but you should do what you want!

 

[GethN7]

I am still convinced there is a time warp in the swamps of East Bridgewater.

Warren, I know you may not believe the sincerity of everyone here, and for that, I will grant you that's fair enough.

I would however, like to say this, and I hope you will take my word of honor I am absolutely serious.

The general consensus here, once you get past all the shit talk and insults, is that Brianna Wu is a manifestly incompetent liar who has failed at everything they ever sought out to do and got nothing in life unless they got it from someone else, used connections to step over more deserving people, or paid lots of money for.

We have gathered and cross-referenced numerous records and we have found nothing to suggest anything otherwise, and if you otherwise take away nothing else, I do hope you come to realize on that point, we are absolutely serious and we believe this incompetent fraud is not fit to have any sort of power as they wouldn't know how to use it and would be extremely corrupt if given half a chance to do any actual damage.

As for what happens here in general, this is a forum for discussing the people of this world who do such bizarre, foolish, or crazy things that their actions warrant public comments because they chose, of their own free will, to make their presence and behaviors public, and thus said activity is under no expectation of privacy and the public has every right to comment on what they are witness to under every law I'm aware of.

We can be harsh, judgmental, and even downright assholes here, I make no excuses for that, but we base all of our observations off of actual proof we have gathered, often the very words and recorded activity of the people we discuss, and from that we engage in speculation and collation of this information, primarily for our entertainment, but in cases where the party has proven dangerous to the public or in any other way a deleterious influence on other people, we strive to collect as much information as we can on them for the sake of the public interest.

If nothing else, I commend you for having the decency to engage us directly and to at least have been willing to hear us out to some degree instead of rejecting everything out of hand simply because of offense at our irreverent and often abrasive tone.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

People on the internet who call people "cowards" for not noticing them are a really funny segment.


I have strong opinions, but you should do what you want!

You're right, good post, prove me wrong:
As a leftist, what is your response to Frank being accused of abuse by his significantly younger ex wife? What is your response to him replying to her accusations by declaring her to be an evil bitch who deserved no mercy?
We've got caps of it, take your time.