Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

[polonium]

Talking shit about me and not tagging me. Shameful.

Also lol thanks for proving my point @W person cow, you took what I said and tried to use it as reasons to disregard the opinions of other people. You're almost as big a liar as John!

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

It's a little... scary? Sad? I don't know... that Warren seems completely earnest and candid here, and yet inconvenient facts slide off him like water off a duck. I have to imagine this is what a lot of political operatives are like, completely consumed in their drive to affect politics, but totally blind to the shortcomings of the people they align with.

I mean, it's way better than someone who purposely spreads misinformation, but still, that immunity to facts is scary. It's what allows any loudmouth to yell an opinion and be treated as legitimately as someone who has the truth on their side.

I mean, Warren keeps talking about some vague progressive values he's for, but he's stated that he's ok if someone just gives lip service (It's better than no lip service), it's ok if they lie and treat people poorly... like what the hell are you using to pick the people you support? They don't wear fancy shirts? They're internet famous?

Warren, every time you back a "progressive" who doesn't actually follow those values, every time you back someone with seemingly no real understanding of their policies, you're hurting your own ability to affect the change you want. If we could see you as principled and honest, you might be able to convince people to support the people you do. But you retreat to "lol so random" mode instead of addressing this.

The perception is that most "progressives" are hypocrites, who preach that normal people should sacrifice (in the form of taxes, the ability to defend themselves with guns) while at the same time living lavishly, and having armed guards. If your response to that is "it's ok progressives can be rich" you're missing the point. A conservative might say "I'm rich, and I want you to be able to be rich as well". The progressive says "Why do you care about my money, don't you care about the poor people? Give them your money."

Obviously extreme oversimplification, but I'm trying to get you to see why people are getting frustrated with you. I don't think people expect you to change your mind and become a trump supporter or something, but it would be nice if you'd stop praising someone who is a well documented scam artist who also screwed you over.

 

[Human Institute Director]

You may say Brianna treated me bad, but overall I got good things out of it and learned a lot, and had fun.

You got good things but coincidentally. Not because Wu went out of her way to give you the good stuff, only because you managed to stay positive in this entire mess. While it's a good thing to value those experiences, don't conflate them with Wu, it was your own doing. Wu only used you for what she wanted, and it wouldn't be this bad usually, since we all "use" people at some point... except she used you in such degrading conditions (not even a living wage despite buying THREE (3) GODDAMN PORSCHES) before throwing you away like an object that this doesn't fall under regular selfishness: this is a huge cock ripping your asshole, no matter how YOU felt about it.

Everyone has their own opinions. But there are some objective statements nevertheless. The sky is blue, the apple falls from the tree, and Wu acted like a disgusting pile of human trash. You can choose to deny it if it makes you feel better, but that wont change the objective truth.

 

[Very Honest Content]

There is an estimated 0% chance that Warren will imitate Jack Nicholson while he reenacts the A Few Good Men stand ALL CAPS scene regarding John to thread readers.

At least until after the primary, then the chance goes up, ever so slightly.

It's a little... scary? Sad?... that Warren seems completely earnest and candid here, and yet inconvenient facts slide off him like water off a duck. I have to imagine this is what a lot of political operatives are like...but it would be nice if you'd stop praising someone who is a well documented scam artist who also screwed you over.

He is a committed partisan. I would say the posting facet you're discussing is to be expected due to that?

 

[W person cow]

The perception is that most "progressives" are hypocrites, who preach that normal people should sacrifice (in the form of taxes, the ability to defend themselves with guns) while at the same time living lavishly, and having armed guards. If your response to that is "it's ok progressives can be rich" you're missing the point. A conservative might say "I'm rich, and I want you to be able to be rich as well". The progressive says "Why do you care about my money, don't you care about the poor people? Give them your money."

The conservative is conning you with the lie that because he or she is rich, that will somehow help you. The progressive says exactly how they want to help the poor, and doesn't moralize at them about some farcical faerie tale about bootstraps or "trickle down", and gives them their fair share of subsidies from the rich guy's taxes, so everybody can have the same chances the rich guy's parents had 30 years ago.
The fake progressive just says they are going to help you, with no clear actual plans, just like the conservative does.
You can draw your own conclusions about which politicians I think (or don't think) have concrete plans about helping people's lives these days, lol. But I'm not joining in any hate fest of anybody unless I feel like it, and I don't care how many ways y'all feel like moralizing at me that I should. Ask a question instead.

Obviously extreme oversimplification, but I'm trying to get you to see why people are getting frustrated with you. I don't think people expect you to change your mind and become a trump supporter or something, but it would be nice if you'd stop praising someone who is a well documented scam artist who also screwed you over.

I'm not going to stop being a thick skinned entertainment guy who is sometimes "immune to facts". I'm not going to stop being a wild-eyed dreamer who is doubly "immune to facts". I'm not going to turn on a former client and namecall them all day.

Why don't y'all stop ranting about your emotions about Brianna and ask a dang question? There is so much to discover in this world

The rumor that she smokes is hilarious. Why would you even care if somebody did or didn't smoke, UNLESS YOU WERE IN LOVE WITH HER?

Speaking of which, there was a question if Frank is really just a happy go lucky person. I must say that Frank is one of the most positive, enthusiastic, cheerful, friendly people I have met in a long time.

He is a committed partisan.

What gave you that impression? Fuck Chuck Schumer, fuck Nancy Pelosi, fuck Tom DeLeo, fuck Tim Kaine, fuck Tom Perez, fuck Doug Jones, and fuck Hillary Clinton. And, y'know, fuck Stephen Lynch. Facepalm.

You got good things but coincidentally. Not because Wu went out of her way to give you the good stuff, only because you managed to stay positive in this entire mess.

Yet people get all mad at me for being positive. OH NO, WARREN HAD FUN AND MET NICE PEOPLE! WHAT A SINISTER CONSPIRACY!

 

[Dr. Merkwurdichliebe]

Why don't y'all stop ranting about your emotions about Brianna and ask a dang question?

OK.

A female impersonator who is running for Congress has reported that he spends $300 a week of his sugar daddy's money having his hair done as he attempts to conceal his male pattern baldness from the voters.

Do you think it is fair -- or progressive -- that a wealthy drag queen with three Porsches spends more at the hairdresser every month than he paid one of his employees for three months' work?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Would other progressives in the Eighth Massachusetts give the same answer? What about regular blue collar Democrats in the district?

 

[W person cow]

What's Volksaufklaurung?

 

[AnOminous]

A conservative might say "I'm rich, and I want you to be able to be rich as well". The progressive says "Why do you care about my money, don't you care about the poor people? Give them your money."

And a fake progressive might say "I'd love to pay my campaign workers at least minimum wage, but I'd really rather have a third Porsche."

 

[Very Honest Content]

What gave you that impression? Fuck Chuck Schumer, fuck Nancy Pelosi, fuck Tom DeLeo, fuck Tim Kaine, fuck Tom Perez, fuck Doug Jones, and fuck Hillary Clinton. And, y'know, fuck Stephen Lynch. Facepalm.

That's a little unfair to throw man of the people Stevie Lynch in there with the rest of those weak tea equivocators I think Warren. What is the main 'dragged farther to the left' issue that you think Wu will claim to have effected the most change out of MA-8's representative in Congress when the primary is over? Protecting Roe vs. Wade has to be the favorite now with the Justice Kennedy retirement, right?

 

[360NoTrope]

WHAT A SINISTER CONSPIRACY!

Spoiler

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

The conservative is conning you with the lie that because he or she is rich, that will somehow help you. The progressive says exactly how they want to help the poor, and doesn't moralize at them about some farcical faerie tale about bootstraps or "trickle down", and gives them their fair share of subsidies from the rich guy's taxes, so everybody can have the same chances the rich guy's parents had 30 years ago.

See, here's where I think you are misunderstanding a typical conservative position. I don't think a electing a rich politician means he's going to share his money with me. I don't think the government should be giving me money, because to give me money they have to take it away from someone. The progressives do moralize constantly, they tell us we're racists for not wanting to let them take more money from us, so they can give 10% of it to their preferred class of "the poor". And so many of these progressives are the "rich guy's parents". Yet when they were in power, not everyone had the same chances as they did 30 years ago. Why was that?

There's no such thing as a "fair share of subsidies". All I want the government to do is stay out of my way and let me earn a living, and keep other people out of my way so I can earn a living. Obviously they also should keep me out of other people's way as well. The myth that if we just took a tiny percentage away from those evil rich folks all our problems would be solved is the fairy tale.

And here's another thing. I do not trust conservatives. I do not trust liberals. They're politicians. They're liars.

Conservatives say "We should take less power", liberals say "We should have more power". I have nothing to go on except their word and their history, and historically conservatives have been for smaller government with less power over its citizens. This is good, because as I said before, I don't trust them. Historically liberals have been for increasing government size and power. I consider this bad, because like I said, I don't trust them.

 

[W person cow]

See, here's where I think you are misunderstanding a typical conservative position. I don't think a electing a rich politician means he's going to share his money with me. I don't think the government should be giving me money, because to give me money they have to take it away from someone. The progressives do moralize constantly, they tell us we're racists for not wanting to let them take more money from us, so they can give 10% of it to their preferred class of "the poor". And so many of these progressives are the "rich guy's parents". Yet when they were in power, not everyone had the same chances as they did 30 years ago. Why was that?

Nobody thinks a rich politician will share their OWN money with them. They're obviously selfish, in fact some of them brag about it like it's some virtue. Maybe people think that good job opportunities will come from magic chemtrails that conservative politicians carry in their pockets?

There's no such thing as a "fair share of subsidies".

So it was "unfair" for state college to be free until the 1950s, and it's more "fair" now, for rents to be sky-high and college and healthcare costs through the roof? I'll have to agree to disagree on that one.

All I want the government to do is stay out of my way and let me earn a living, and keep other people out of my way so I can earn a living. Obviously they also should keep me out of other people's way as well. The myth that if we just took a tiny percentage away from those evil rich folks all our problems would be solved is the fairy tale.

You mean a straw man lol. Nobody believes that except a character in some yarn Ted Cruz is spinning.

And here's another thing. I do not trust conservatives. I do not trust liberals. They're politicians. They're liars.

Conservatives say "We should take less power", liberals say "We should have more power". I have nothing to go on except their word and their history, and historically conservatives have been for smaller government with less power over its citizens. This is good, because as I said before, I don't trust them. Historically liberals have been for increasing government size and power. I consider this bad, because like I said, I don't trust them.

So in other words, you don't trust conservatives and you know they are all liars, but you vote for them over liberals because at least they give lip service to your values. Hmmmmm...

I mean, we kinda both know that very few so called conservative politicians are actually getting rid of government intrusion into ordinary people's lives. They just SAY they're doing that, while constantly expanding federal surveillance powers, military powers, police powers, and taking away more and more human rights. Just like the liberals. But hey, at least they SAY "we're fighting big government together", right?

Seems like one thing we agree on is that we don't like liberals or conservatives. So at least there's that. I thought Brianna was a liberal who "leans progressive" or could even "become progressive". And I mean, maybe someday. But oy, maybe not today lol.

I could vote for an Eisenhower style conservative who isn't smoking an Ayn Rand crack pipe. But modern conservatives and modern "mainstream" liberals pretty much mostly want the same things in my book. Privatize everything, and screw the little guy.

 

[Bassomatic]

Nobody thinks a rich politician will share their OWN money with them. They're obviously selfish, in fact some of them brag about it like it's some virtue. Maybe people think that good job opportunities will come from magic chemtrails that conservative politicians carry in their pockets?
.

Not trolling are you aware of Bernies history and his wife's thefts?

 

[JULAY]

Political Sperging

"We basically made him into a local version of a lolcow."

Ah,, yes, the Farms are strong with you. Find and seek out lolcows, and bring them here for mockery.

 

[Clockwork Dragon]

Speaking of which, there was a question if Frank is really just a happy go lucky person. I must say that Frank is one of the most positive, enthusiastic, cheerful, friendly people I have met in a long time.

Also, according to his ex wife, allegedly a wife-beater who used his contacts in writing circles to spike her career. I don't recall he ever responded directly to that, so read into it what you will. Many people took it as the truth. I suppose this might tell you something about your ability to correctly read people.

Edit: Correction, she accused him of domestic abuse, and said she had a burn mark on her back, rather than beatings as such.

 

[Richard Stabone]

The progressive says exactly how they want to help the poor, and doesn't moralize at them about some farcical faerie tale about bootstraps or "trickle down", and gives them their fair share of subsidies from the rich guy's taxes, so everybody can have the same chances the rich guy's parents had 30 years ago.

That's the opposite of Brianna. She said she wants to withhold federal funding from poor states that don't agree with her. She says it's "leverage". Essentially, rich people should dangle a carrot (carrot being food stamps, health care, etc) over poor people until they do exactly what she wants. How is that remotely progressive?

https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/817818177933574148
https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/817819493783244800

We don't have to talk about how her campaign is built around the tech industry. A predominately white male industry with loads of money. Or how she wants to give them incentives to come to her district. Presumably to gentrify it and price out her lower-class constituents.

You're not a fake progressive, you're a Facebook progressive. You have progressive beliefs, but you're not really going to stand up for them. You just want to take some photos, post them online, and revel in the likes and comments. If social media didn't exist, you wouldn't be involved in any of this.

Deep down you know Brianna is a fraud. But you can't risk losing that social media capital by saying it. Because in the end, that's what's important to you.

 

[Gorilla Tessellator]

You're not a fake progressive, you're a Facebook progressive. You have progressive beliefs, but you're not really going to stand up for them. You just want to take some photos, post them online, and revel in the likes and comments. If social media didn't exist, you wouldn't be involved in any of this.

Deep down you know Brianna is a fraud. But you can't risk losing that social media capital by saying it. Because in the end, that's what's important to you.

I think it's also very likely that Warren is afraid of retaliation. He suggested it at least one time in this thread. Even his relatively benign disclosures were hesitant, and I'm pretty sure that he still overestimates Bri influence. After all if any it's social media influence.

 

[Kosher Dill]

Vignette from Election Eve : John's self-insert gets hired as an underpaid campaign worker!

But in the end, the Congressman decided to hire her because years of experience had taught him sometimes to go with his gut instinct, which was telling him he’d be a fool to miss this opportunity.

“Wait till you hear how shamefully low the pay is,” he said. “There are sweatshops that are considering outsourcing jobs into my campaign.”

Brea just smiled and asked, “When can I start?”

"Brea" on progressives in primaries:

“It always goes like this,” thought Brea in exasperation. “For the nomination, the process always leans towards the leftmost candidate. You’ve got to factor in who can actually win in November!”

 

[W person cow]

That's the opposite of Brianna. She said she wants to withhold federal funding from poor states that don't agree with her. She says it's "leverage". Essentially, rich people should dangle a carrot (carrot being food stamps, health care, etc) over poor people until they do exactly what she wants. How is that remotely progressive?

https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/817818177933574148
https://twitter.com/Spacekatgal/status/817819493783244800

We don't have to talk about how her campaign is built around the tech industry. A predominately white male industry with loads of money. Or how she wants to give them incentives to come to her district. Presumably to gentrify it and price out her lower-class constituents.

You're not a fake progressive, you're a Facebook progressive. You have progressive beliefs, but you're not really going to stand up for them. You just want to take some photos, post them online, and revel in the likes and comments. If social media didn't exist, you wouldn't be involved in any of this.

Deep down you know Brianna is a fraud. But you can't risk losing that social media capital by saying it. Because in the end, that's what's important to you.

Earth to Kiwi Farms: I stopped working for Brianna nearly a month ago now.
If I cared about "social media capital", I wouldn't be on here at all.
10 messages a day saying "you're a fraud because you're still working for Brianna" are amusing though, I guess?
But maybe asking a question would be less boring?

 

[Human Institute Director]

Yet people get all mad at me for being positive. OH NO, WARREN HAD FUN AND MET NICE PEOPLE! WHAT A SINISTER CONSPIRACY!

Having fun and focusing on the positive aspects of a situation is good and can be useful in general. What's dumb and might make people exasperated is the denial of reality. If thinking Wu did things right makes you feel more at ease you can do so, but this just isn't true and people are going to call this opinion stupid. They don't even need to bring up the shit Wu did in the past (which unquestionably makes Wu a despicable conman for each qualification she falsely claims to have) this political mess is enough.