Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

[AprilRains]

I think she pays better than most struggling politicians of her level. But yes, I would enjoy having highly paid, happy, enthusiastic staffers more than I would enjoy driving a fancier car, if I were the one running. There's nothing better than good staff. Not that I'm biased, lol.

She has three Porsches. She's not struggling.

 

[W person cow]

That wasn't me. That was polonium. I've only been nice to you, even if you think the crown of dicks you kept asking for wasn't nice... Consider I spent my free time to create that art for you.

I liked the "chad stride" art a ton. It was polonium who posted the pcp thing but you "agree" reacted.
I was like, really? The person who wants me to say I'm their anonymous "friend" also says I suck and should be shot? I mean, which is it?

 

[Dimethyl Ketone]

I liked the "chad stride" art a ton. It was polonium who posted the pcp thing but you "agree" reacted.
I was like, really? The person who wants me to say I'm their anonymous "friend" also says I suck and should be shot? I mean, which is it?

I agreed to the part where you were "[weaselly]... dodging criticism."

I could be wrong and I can't speak for Polonium, but I believe he was sharing sentiment that he wished you could have went out with a bang that was destructive to John's absolute scampaign, rather than the slow simmer of still defending her after she threw you away when you weren't anymore, in her narcissistic mind, even worth the pennies she was paying you. I also agree with that sentiment.

 

[W person cow]

Do you have any opinion on, if someone happens to be wealthy, which tends to be better class of person: those who worked for their wealth, or those who inherit or, totally hypothetically, marry in to it?

I do not think people are better or worse based on their class. I think people who work hard for their wealth tend to be ruthless, often cold people. Others who inherited their wealth may be spoiled or sheltered. Others who are poor and have no wealth may have short fuses and be freaks, like me. I try to get along with all classes of people if i can, despite their flaws and different perspectives based on their class.
But it's easiest to get along with other people in similar situations to me of course, just from familiarity.

rather than the slow simmer of still defending her.

I'm not defending her, I'm defending me. I'm not going to join anybody's "shit on Brianna club" and I try not to be a backstabber.
Y'all don't like her and that's fine. I'm still gonna be me, and follow my own quaint, possibly delusional idealistic path

 

[Dimethyl Ketone]

I'm not defending her, I'm defending me. I'm not going to join anybody's "shit on Brianna club" and I try not to be a backstabber.

The shitting and the backstabbing only flow one way. I know this. Rome wasn't built in a day. Most True Believers never wake up. I said I was proud that you've at least stopped adamantly defending her and going on about how glad you are to be covered in shit.

It is not shameful to start in a pile of shit,
It is, however, to continue to roll around in it when you're made aware of its composition.

You've not climbed out, but you've stopped smearing yourself at least.

It seems like we're no longer "right wing trolls in some secret hate club that tell only lies", and while maybe we haven't moved into the realms where you would consider to call me "friend" or acknowledge the bullshit John poured on you, at least you're moving in the right direction. Only time will tell if you're able to go all the way.

You may not like me, and that's totally fine. I'm just some ketone on the internet. But I am infinitely more on your side than "Brianna" ever was.

 

[W person cow]

Most True Believers never wake up.

Maybe I'll "wake up" when what I'm doing stops WORKING
I think most people who take pride in cynicism are just scared and making excuses.
My enthusiasm and idealism may not get Brianna elected, but it sure helped get a lot of Malden progressives elected last year!
And look at Ocasio-Cortez! Idealism is in.

 

[Yellow Yam Scam]

I liked the "chad stride" art a ton. It was polonium who posted the pcp thing but you "agree" reacted.
I was like, really? The person who wants me to say I'm their anonymous "friend" also says I suck and should be shot? I mean, which is it?

Ratings on this site exist purely for the purpose of ironic meta-trolling, ignore them.

 

[AnOminous]

And look at Ocasio-Cortez! Idealism is in.

Citing someone who does exactly the opposite as what Wu does isn't very convincing.

Wu is a lying sack of shit, a complete phony, a fraud who routinely claims nonexistent qualifications, a flip-flopping weasel who changes positions more often than that shitty black dress, which somehow always has the same stains on it in every media appearance, and otherwise pretty much the antithesis of Ocasio-Cortez.

Wu couldn't even be bothered to show up to official events, and even got caught begging off about an appearance, claiming some imaginary injury when actually using exercise equipment that uploads data to the public.

Wu is a joke who doesn't even pretend the scampaign is an actual attempt to get elected.

Ocasio-Cortez won, and is pretty likely to win the general, too.

I'd ordinarily be upset with someone who primaried out an incumbent, but this doesn't appear to endanger the seat, and even if it does, it's time for more than a shot across the bow against the corrupt, incompetent DNC leadership. One can only hope Nancy Pelosi is next.

 

[Fagatron 69]

Hey @W person cow, what does Brianna smell like? I've heard rumors she smells like rotting watermelon, is that true?

 

[Particle Bored]

I hate not being able to edit. I meant 105, not 1 in 5. The ratio of primary wins was more like 40%. Which is odd because usually incumbents win 80 to 90% of races


I never agreed with her on the Porsche stuff, or any kind of conspicuous consumption. I do think it's possible to be a rich gaudy progressive, but it makes it harder, I think. For example Sam Hammar in my district I respect a lot more than her opponent, because she's a struggling mom who wears t-shirts and jeans, whereas her opponent wears fancy suits and went to Harvard Business School.


I try not to be galled by things. Although folks try to bait me.
I drive a second hand Jeep with an "I support veterans" sticker, and that's just me. I don't think it makes somebody better to be poor, but I think that most voters are poor, and it's easier to reach people over things you have in common with them. Cars aren't really my big thing but maybe, I don't know, movies, comic books, politics, wacky adventures? Most people like talking about their wacky adventures, I think?

I think she pays better than most struggling politicians of her level. But yes, I would enjoy having highly paid, happy, enthusiastic staffers more than I would enjoy driving a fancier car, if I were the one running. There's nothing better than good staff. Not that I'm biased, lol.

I don’t get this obtuseness. It’s pretty disingenuous. It’s not about being a “rich” progressive (the Wus aren’t rich, even though Frank pulls an upper-class income). It’s not so much about “enjoying” fast cars over well paid employees, though that’s a bit closer to the mark, sort of.

Let me reframe this away from your pay: Brianna has made numerous tweets complaining about “omg isn’t it just so messed up how even though my husband is highly paid in biotech and I’m an engineer, we still can’t afford a house!” Implying that it’s a problem with the housing market or the economy that prevents this, when it’s the fact that they constantly piss away money on selfish frivolities. She wants to blame other people for problems blatantly of her own creation, grandstand on the proposition, and try to find ways to get other people to take on the burden to some degree or another. And the fact that she only really talks about buying the Porsches on an obscure Porsche forum under an unrelated pseudonym means she knows she would be called out on it in an instant by lots of people that currently purport to support her “campaign.” (not to mention billing airfare to pick up a Porsche to the campaign)

This deflection about not wanting to “backstab” may feel noble, but backstabbing implies that there was some level of genuine trust or loyalty on Brianna’s part that was betrayed, which really isn’t the case. You’re the one that’s already been backstabbed, and admitting that the sky is in fact blue is not the same as running some kind of underhanded smear campaign. I can see how not running here on a shit-talking spree after the firing could be seen as honorable, but this “yeah maybe possibly she may have done this thing and I would do it differently but hey, progressive optimism!” is pathetic and a bit sleazy imo. Don’t make me rework Chad Warren, bub.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

Maybe I'll "wake up" when what I'm doing stops WORKING
I think most people who take pride in cynicism are just scared and making excuses.
My enthusiasm and idealism may not get Brianna elected, but it sure helped get a lot of Malden progressives elected last year!
And look at Ocasio-Cortez! Idealism is in.

Is it?
Because Trump controls the White House, Repubs control the Congress, and Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy has just given Trump yet another seat to fill by announcing his retirement today.
You've seen some small-time, local level battles between different flavors of democrats with middling success. But "working"? Hardly.

What we're trying to tell you is that your actions (or lack of) will do nothing to get Brianna elected or unelected. She will lose because she is a pathological liar with no experience, no qualifications, no voter base, and a complete lack of knowledge about what the job actually entails. Whether she's a real progressive or a fake one, she's just some crossdresser who married into money and decided she gets to be important.
She's gonna lose, man. And that'll be a good thing, because dear fuck, can you imagine an idiot like that having any measure of actual power?

 

[W person cow]

This deflection about not wanting to “backstab” may feel noble, but backstabbing implies that there was some level of genuine trust or loyalty on Brianna’s part that was betrayed, which really isn’t the case.

I don't care if it's noble or not noble. I'm not a backstabber in that way. Call it my idealistic stubbornness or stupidity or whatever.
You may say Brianna treated me bad, but overall I got good things out of it and learned a lot, and had fun.
I will be honest about what happened but I'm not going to join somebody's opinion just because they think they're right. Everybody has different opinions.

Is it?
Because Trump controls the White House, Repubs control the Congress, and Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy has just given Trump yet another seat to fill by announcing his retirement today.
You've seen some small-time, local level battles between different flavors of democrats with middling success. But "working"? Hardly.

Um, I'm not working for supreme court justices, I'm working to get local progressives elected to address local issues. I talk about some national issues like we all do. But my main focus is local. You can call that "small time" if you want, and you can disagree with my goals. But saying the fact that I'm not accomplishing YOUR goals means I'm not accomplishing MINE makes no sense

By the way, here is the new version of Waste Wars. Free to download. Obviously a game under heavy construction. But Statler and Waldorf away!
https://www.patreon.com/posts/19721513

 

[Particle Bored]

I don't care if it's noble or not noble. I'm not a backstabber in that way. Call it my idealistic stubbornness or stupidity or whatever.
You may say Brianna treated me bad, but overall I got good things out of it and learned a lot, and had fun.
I will be honest about what happened but I'm not going to join somebody's opinion just because they think they're right. Everybody has different opinions.

Again, redefining “backstabbing” doesn’t make your case, it just looks like self-justification.

And it’s not about disagreeing with “just an opinion, man,” it’s about ignoring verifiable facts, and that the reason for doing so doesn’t appear to extend beyond a proverbial circling of the “progressive” wagons. Turning a blind eye to confirmed, objective LIES and CORRUPTION due to the hypothetical “progressiveness” of the individual perpetrating them (and being that Bri doesn’t DO anything but talk a big game does make it purely hypothetical) is just another element of the political scumfuckery that has put this country in the position in which it finds itself.

 

[W person cow]

And it’s not about disagreeing with “just an opinion, man,” it’s about ignoring verifiable facts

It is your opinion that, after seeing these "verifiable facts", I still have my own opinion about vague opinion-related things like who is a "bad person", and that means I ignored and didn't read all the "verifiable facts"? I mean, there were *some* that I just skimmed, but there's more to the story than that.
But you're welcome to that opinion!

 

[Kosher Dill]

@W person cow - Did you ever see Brianna smoking? Everyone says she's a smoker but I personally am not convinced.

 

[Dr. Merkwurdichliebe]

I don't care if it's noble or not noble. I'm not a backstabber in that way. Call it my idealistic stubbornness or stupidity or whatever.
You may say Brianna treated me bad, but overall I got good things out of it and learned a lot, and had fun.
I will be honest about what happened but I'm not going to join somebody's opinion just because they think they're right. Everybody has different opinions.

Your inability to distinguish between facts and opinions is symptomatic of mental illness. Your boss has the same problem.

Also like your boss, you seem overly fond of semiliterate raving. For example, how the hell do you "join" someone's opinion?

I blame your parents; they should have sent you to parochial school. A coven of mesomorphic Irish nuns armed with metal yardsticks could have cured most of your problems.

 

[W person cow]

@W person cow - Did you ever see Brianna smoking? Everyone says she's a smoker but I personally am not convinced.

Neither Brianna nor Frank is a smoker. Nobody on the campaign except me smokes cigarettes, and it seems that very few of the active Democrats I run into smokes cigarettes. They are bad for you. I did run into one Democrat lady in Malden who smokes though.

Your inability to distinguish between facts and opinions is symptomatic of mental illness.

That's just your opinion, lol.

Also, you seem overly fond of semiliterate raving. For example, how the hell do you "join" someone's opinion?

Haha, that one's fair. Join them in agreement?

I blame your parents; they should have sent you to parochial school. A coven of mesomorphic Irish nuns armed with metal yardsticks could have cured most of your problems.

So you're saying I should be a nun? You could be right!

I think you should change my description from "Brianna Wu's person cow" to "just some random person cow".

What if I were a robot ninja nun who is not religious and eats potato chips?

 

[Dr. Merkwurdichliebe]

So you're saying I should be a nun? You could be right!

No, I don't even imply that you should be a nun. We'll add abysmal reading comprehension to your list of shortcomings.

 

[360NoTrope]

Brianna: "Because it's gross, and it's not professional! You're talking about people pooping, and I don't like how that reflects on my campaign!"

What's with you and poop, bro?

 

[AnOminous]

Neither Brianna nor Frank is a smoker. Nobody on the campaign except me smokes cigarettes, and it seems that very few of the active Democrats I run into smokes cigarettes. They are bad for you. I did run into one Democrat lady in Malden who smokes though.

So far as I can tell, the Wu is a smoker thing is a meme that comes from some post back in October 2015 in the original thread about something that supposedly looked like a pack of cigarettes in some selfie. Haven't been able to find the alleged photo, though. Or any pictures of Wu smoking.

Never mind, found it. Pretty sure that isn't a pack of cigarettes, although it looks vaguely like a pack of Marlboro Lights would look if it weren't shaped like an actual pack of cigarettes.