Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Did she call someone a "Sand-nigger" and a "dyke" because they worked at the office of the school paper that had a restraining order against John (not yet Brianna) Flynt and wouldn't publish his bimbo self-insert "comics?"

As much as I find that meme amusing it's super hearsay. Someone (and nobody knows who it is) said they heard John say that. Nobody else has ever corroborated it.
 
As much as I find that meme amusing it's super hearsay. Someone (and nobody knows who it is) said they heard John say that. Nobody else has ever corroborated it.

I don't think Dr. Husni has any reason to lie... and John did also have a court-issued restraining order. So John was enough of a disruption that it was worth it for the Daily Miss to file and for a judge to agree to grant the order. I'm inclined to believe it myself (why would they need to lie?), but you're right: the office wasn't wiretapped so it wasn't recorded.
 
Now that your relationship with Wu has potentially changed, it might be interesting to revisit @Dr. Merkwurdichliebe's post from about 20 pages ago and consider asking her about:

(3) Your boss claims to have spent "a career" working in tech. Have you ever asked him to name a single company or gavernment agency that employed him? (Some advice: If you ask, you'll be fired.)

(4) Your boss claims to have worked "for years" as an investigative reporter. Have you ever asked him to name a single news outlet that employed him? (Same advice: If you ask, you'll be fired.)

(5) Your boss claims to have worked "for years" as a professional illustrator. Same advice as before.

(6) Your boss claims to have had a career as a professional illustrator. Same advice.

(7) Have you ever asked your boss about the 10 years he spent in college without earning a degree? (Hint: Don't.)

Additionally, you may want to ask her about Natalie O'Brien, a woman she claimed to employ using her Patreon funds who appears to not exist or for any references from people who were employed by her before the campaign (i.e, people who were paid by her, NOT with donated campaign funds.)

You appear to not care about any of these things and seem to be more interested in having fun and being involved with Brianna's drama, but now that you're involving your "friends" with Brianna, I feel like you owe it to yourself and them to at least do some digging around before you sign them up for working with her. When you interview for a job, if you're actually capable of your abilities, you should also be taking it as an opportunity to interview your potential employer so you can see if they are worthy of your abilities. Why not ask Brianna for some evidence of her claims to see if she's worthy of their time and effort? Most people don't find Sisyphean tasks built on lies as entertaining as you.
 
Last edited:
Warren, are you familiar with what in psychology is called the dark triad?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...201301/shedding-light-psychology-s-dark-triad

It might give you more insight in terms of understanding Brianna

From the article -
Lurking beneath the surface of people who use others to their own advantage is psychology’s “Dark Triad.” Defined as a set of traits that include the tendency to seek admiration and special treatment (otherwise known as narcissism), to be callous and insensitive (psychopathy) and to manipulate others (Machiavellianism), the Dark Triad is rapidly becoming a new focus of personality psychology.

...

Psychologists are just beginning to discover the darkest sides of the Dark Triad, and there will certainly be more that we learn about the problems they create for others (and themselves) in the very near future. In the meantime, Jonason and Webster’s Dirty Dozen scale can give you a quick way to spot the Dark Triad individual in your midst. Rate each item on a 7-point scale as you think it applies to this person. Of course, you can also rate yourself on these qualities to see how you measure up:

  1. I tend to manipulate others to get my way.
  2. I tend to lack remorse.
  3. I tend to want others to admire me.
  4. I tend to be unconcerned with the morality of my actions.
  5. I have used deceit or lied to get my way.
  6. I tend to be callous or insensitive.
  7. I have used flattery to get my way.
  8. I tend to seek prestige or status.
  9. I tend to be cynical.
  10. I tend to exploit others toward my own end.
  11. I tend to expect special favors from others.
  12. I want others to pay attention to me
The total score can range from 12 to 84, but you can also break down the scales into the three traits as follows: Machiavellianism= 1, 5, 7, 10; Psychopathy= 2, 4, 6, 9; Narcissism= 3, 8, 11, 12.
 
Last edited:
I don't think Dr. Husni has any reason to lie…

And we don't even know that Dr. Husni said that. This is literally triple hearsay. Someone else said that Dr. Husni said that John said that.

While I think John probably did say that, this is hardly compelling evidence.

Warren, are you familiar with what in psychology is called the dark triad?
Lurking beneath the surface of people who use others to their own advantage is psychology’s “Dark Triad.” Defined as a set of traits that include the tendency to seek admiration and special treatment (otherwise known as narcissism), to be callous and insensitive (psychopathy) and to manipulate others (Machiavellianism), the Dark Triad is rapidly becoming a new focus of personality psychology.

Trolls often exhibit traits from the dark triad. I'm pretty sure John scores high on these. I'm also pretty sure a lot of us score high on one or more of these traits too.

Just guessing on Warren. He might score somewhat high on the narcissism part, but otherwise seems to be ridiculously nice for a crazy person.
 
And we don't even know that Dr. Husni said that. This is literally triple hearsay. Someone else said that Dr. Husni said that John said that.

While I think John probably did say that, this is hardly compelling evidence.

Given the very homophobic things Brianna has said on her easy to verify internet posts, does it even matter? I believe she said these things because that’s who she is and the claims prwdated her internet infamy by many years. But whether or not we can prove the “dyke” but doesn’t matter at all when you’ve got her on record as calling gay men competition for penis and claiming they aren’t allies to women because they’re all supposedly misogynists.

And we don't even know that Dr. Husni said that. This is literally triple hearsay. Someone else said that Dr. Husni said that John said that.

While I think John probably did say that, this is hardly compelling evidence.



Trolls often exhibit traits from the dark triad. I'm pretty sure John scores high on these. I'm also pretty sure a lot of us score high on one or more of these traits too.

Just guessing on Warren. He might score somewhat high on the narcissism part, but otherwise seems to be ridiculously nice for a crazy person.
I’ll edit to clarify, but I’m pointing Warren toward this because it describes Brianna, not himself
 
Last edited:
Though I shudder to think of it, let's not forget lust.

lust.jpg
 
I’m so curious what happened in this meeting!
Warren, did you ever have to sign a non disclosure agreement? Is that why you hesitant to talk to us about what happened?
 
I’m so curious what happened in this meeting!
Warren, did you ever have to sign a non disclosure agreement? Is that why you hesitant to talk to us about what happened?

I'd wager that Brianna told him that she's watching and has threatened him in some way. I doubt any threat would be valid though as Brianna is very not smart and has a history crying wolf to the FBI / police anyway that she's already seen as a joke to them. She's a public figure though so you're allowed to criticize her and whatnot, as Brianna's life is already a public affair to a degree thanks to the office run. She would never go to court anyway; discovery would be John's ultimate undoing.

I'm :optimistic::optimistic::optimistic: and hoping it's not a matter of Warren @W person cow still being on the fence and not wanting to admit that Brianna is a horrible person. Based on his last statements though, it seems a part of him is still not ready to give up the fantasy she wove for him.

@W person cow -- we're interested here, and you're not "the bad guy" to us -- John/Brianna is. We got your back. :semperfidelis:
 
I wrote a whole description of the meeting and the subsequent meeting, with paraphrasing of my best recollections of what was said. But now I am afraid to post it. I am sorry for all the anticipation without reveal. I am just nervous of what Brianna will do, and I think she will be mad at me.
 
I wrote a whole description of the meeting and the subsequent meeting, with paraphrasing of my best recollections of what was said. But now I am afraid to post it. I am sorry for all the anticipation without reveal. I am just nervous of what Brianna will do, and I think she will be mad at me.

Bah, what a cock tease. Get the kiwi spirit, bro. Reveal all.
 
Bah, what a cock tease. Get the kiwi spirit, bro. Reveal all.
I will probly post when I am calmed down somewhat.
While I am like, trying to chill out...
I think all the transgender stuff in general hurts your case. Even if she is transgender, I think most people would agree that "out"ing a closeted gay or transgender person is pretty bad manners, and upon hearing such things, they will tend to be more sympathetic towards the outed person, rather than less.
 
I wrote a whole description of the meeting and the subsequent meeting, with paraphrasing of my best recollections of what was said. But now I am afraid to post it. I am sorry for all the anticipation without reveal. I am just nervous of what Brianna will do, and I think she will be mad at me.

You realize she's totally going to flip her shit the moment she realizes you were here, right?

Holy fuck, I was so astounded I forgot to misgender John.
 
I wrote a whole description of the meeting and the subsequent meeting, with paraphrasing of my best recollections of what was said. But now I am afraid to post it. I am sorry for all the anticipation without reveal. I am just nervous of what Brianna will do, and I think she will be mad at me.

She might get mad but there's literally nothing she can do to you, that's the biggest issue she has with lying constantly - she can't actually engage with anyone or wield influence on any level apart from on Twitter because the rest of life doesn't have a block button. Anything she says will just reveal to you how much of a liar she is.
 
Back
Top Bottom