Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ZKWNordman said:
Between that first post and Brianna’s crazy rage on Twitter today, it’s pretty obvious that she and Frank are PISSED at Warren. This is hilarious.
Click to expand...
What happened in Monday?
 
KerryDixon9 said:
Not on Monday, but it was the crying and shouting incident with Rep Stephen Lynch.
Click to expand...

I don't think John actually wants attention from Lynch, and Warren publicly freaking out on him in her name didn't help that.

Attention means opposition research and shit being said about him that can't be dismissed by just screeching about alt-right goobergabbers.

It's not really Warren's fault, though. The slightest vetting of him would have shown him to be an obvious raving wacko but they hired him anyway, or even if they're not paying him, gave him permission to represent their scampaign.
 
AnOminous said:
I don't think John actually wants attention from Lynch, and Warren publicly freaking out on him in her name didn't help that.

Attention means opposition research and shit being said about him that can't be dismissed by just screeching about alt-right goobergabbers.

It's not really Warren's fault, though. The slightest vetting of him would have shown him to be an obvious raving wacko but they hired him anyway, or even if they're not paying him, gave him permission to represent their scampaign.
Click to expand...


You’re probably right, but any thoughts on why she Tweeted that she’s blogging about it? My guess is she wants the Lynch campaign to misstep, which they won’t. She also wants to put out that Stephen Lynch is violent. One incident 30 plus years ago isn’t going to cut it. Imply heavily that the congressman is still violent, however, and you create a “history of violent behavior.”

I think Brianna got over excited and showed her hand on Twitter. Now that she has Warren’s insane account of events, she’ll probably talk about the fake story at the caucuses.
 
AnOminous said:
I don't think John actually wants attention from Lynch, and Warren publicly freaking out on him in her name didn't help that.
Click to expand...

There was a few days between the incident and Brianna tweeting about writing the blog post. Brianna also tagged Stephen Lynch in the tweet she made. Other Kiwis have pointed out that Brianna has made some vague bitching tweets about Stephen, but she's never tagged him before. She also had a FB exchange with someone who was warning her to make sure Warren was trustworthy, but Brianna replied that it was Stephen Lynch that was in the wrong.
 
KerryDixon9 said:
There was a few days between the incident and Brianna tweeting about writing the blog post. Brianna also tagged Stephen Lynch in the tweet she made. Other Kiwis have pointed out that Brianna has made some vague bitching tweets about Stephen, but she's never tagged him before. She also had a FB exchange with someone who was warning her to make sure Warren was trustworthy, but Brianna replied that it was Stephen Lynch that was in the wrong.
Click to expand...

John can't admit he ever did anything wrong, though, so if he admits Warren was wrong, it means he was wrong to hire this fruitcake.
 
AnOminous said:
John can't admit he ever did anything wrong, though, so if he admits Warren was wrong, it means he was wrong to hire this fruitcake.
Click to expand...

The incident was old news. The only person who wrote about it was Warren on his FB page, where he had universal backing even though he was clearly in the wrong.

Possibly she had a couple of people questioning her about it and she was using the tweet as a way of framing Stephen in the wrong, but I don't know why she'd tag Stephen in the tweet.

I do think that Stephen Lynch probably won't have given a moments thought to Brianna because her scampaign is so worthless. I think there's every chance the meeting with Warren also didn't register, because politicians will have to shrug off incidents with obsessed lunatics all the time. The really massive warning sign for Stephen that he needs to have someone keeping an eye on Brianna is the tweet she made.

That tweet, along with Brianna's history of being a professional victim with a ridiculously supportive press, would make me think that there's so much crazy on Brianna's side if he ever has to engage, he needs to be burning Brianna's campaign down instantly. He's probably an ambitious man who wants to move higher in politics. The one thing he doesn't need is a shit show with a ridiculous tranny fucking those ambitions up.
 
ZKWNordman said:
You’re probably right, but any thoughts on why she Tweeted that she’s blogging about it? My guess is she wants the Lynch campaign to misstep, which they won’t. She also wants to put out that Stephen Lynch is violent. One incident 30 plus years ago isn’t going to cut it. Imply heavily that the congressman is still violent, however, and you create a “history of violent behavior.”

I think Brianna got over excited and showed her hand on Twitter. Now that she has Warren’s insane account of events, she’ll probably talk about the fake story at the caucuses.
Click to expand...

Because she tweets every half assed thought that comes into her head. It's as simple as that. If she were capable of strategizing, she might have had a real campaign.
 
"The government should take away everyone's guns and then expand its power to control all facets of society"

:thinking::thinking::thinking:

guns.png
 
KerryDixon9 said:
The incident was old news. The only person who wrote about it was Warren on his FB page, where he had universal backing even though he was clearly in the wrong.

Possibly she had a couple of people questioning her about it and she was using the tweet as a way of framing Stephen in the wrong, but I don't know why she'd tag Stephen in the tweet.

I do think that Stephen Lynch probably won't have given a moments thought to Brianna because her scampaign is so worthless. I think there's every chance the meeting with Warren also didn't register, because politicians will have to shrug off incidents with obsessed lunatics all the time. The really massive warning sign for Stephen that he needs to have someone keeping an eye on Brianna is the tweet she made.

That tweet, along with Brianna's history of being a professional victim with a ridiculously supportive press, would make me think that there's so much crazy on Brianna's side if he ever has to engage, he needs to be burning Brianna's campaign down instantly. He's probably an ambitious man who wants to move higher in politics. The one thing he doesn't need is a shit show with a ridiculous tranny fucking those ambitions up.
Click to expand...
So by supporting Wu and creating AstroTurf campaigns, Bri-Bri would get beaten down more thoroughly.
Where are these Russian trolls when you need them?
 
If @RepStephenLynch is your idea of a """"far-right""""" candidate it's no surprise that no one takes you fucking idiots seriously.

right.png



As per @ZKWNordman

Why don't you start some shit you fucking faggot

8489F75B-A4E0-434D-8085-1B8F234CCFFE.jpg
 
I never knew getting signatures on a bit of paper was such a daring, dangerous thing to do. I hope the IRA don't get him, or whatever it is Warren likes to imagine himself courageously rebelling against, Jackie Chan style.

Did someone say that this guy is in his forties? He writes like an incredibly sheltered 19-year-old.

He's claiming to be Irish? Way to confirm a national stereotype, Warren. :heart-empty:
 
ZKWNordman said:
How has this idiot survived to 43?
Click to expand...

:autism::autism::autism: Somehow it manages to survive, but in this lunatic's case, I really have no idea.

How can someone claim to be a progressive activist if you're such a fucking sped you can't even work yourself up to going door to door asking for signatures? Does social media create such a disconnect that by hash tagging and REEEEing on twatter that these idiots think that they're actually doing something? If so, this is why the so called "progressive left" is doomed to eternal failure, because when it comes right down to it, no one who has a real life, or reasonable view of life gives two flying fucks what these dumbasses have to say online.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom